Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mehmet Z. Unlu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mehmet Z. Unlu.


Physica Medica | 2006

MRI/PET nonrigid breast-image registration using skin fiducial markers.

Andrezej Krol; Mehmet Z. Unlu; Karl G. Baum; James A. Mandel; Wei Lee; Ioana L. Coman; Edward D. Lipson; David H. Feiglin

We propose a finite-element method (FEM) deformable breast model that does not require elastic breast data for nonrigid PET/MRI breast image registration. The model is applicable only if the stress conditions in the imaged breast are virtually the same in PET and MRI. Under these conditions, the observed intermodality displacements are solely due the imaging/reconstruction process. Similar stress conditions are assured by use of an MRI breast-antenna replica for breast support during PET, and use of the same positioning. The tetrahedral volume and triangular surface elements are used to construct the FEM mesh from the MRI image. Our model requires a number of fiducial skin markers (FSM) visible in PET and MRI. The displacement vectors of FSMs are measured followed by the dense displacement field estimation by first distributing the displacement, vectors linearly over the breast surface and then distributing them throughout the volume. Finally, the floating MRI image is warped to a fixed PET image, by using an appropriate shape function in the interpolation from mesh nodes to voxels. We tested our model on an elastic breast phantom with simulated internal lesions and on a small number of patients imaged, with FMS using PET and MRI. Using simulated lesions (in phantom) and real lesions (in patients) visible in both PET and MRI, we established that the target registration error (TRE) is below two pet voxels.


Computers in Biology and Medicine | 2010

Computerized method for nonrigid MR-to-PET breast-image registration.

Mehmet Z. Unlu; Andrzej Krol; Alphonso Magri; James A. Mandel; Wei Lee; Edward D. Lipson; Ioana L. Coman; David H. Feiglin

We have developed and tested a new simple computerized finite element method (FEM) approach to MR-to-PET nonrigid breast-image registration. The method requires five-nine fiducial skin markers (FSMs) visible in MRI and PET that need to be located in the same spots on the breast and two on the flanks during both scans. Patients need to be similarly positioned prone during MRI and PET scans. This is accomplished by means of a low gamma-ray attenuation breast coil replica used as the breast support during the PET scan. We demonstrate that, under such conditions, the observed FSM displacement vectors between MR and PET images, distributed piecewise linearly over the breast volume, produce a deformed FEM mesh that reasonably approximates nonrigid deformation of the breast tissue between the MRI and PET scans. This method, which does not require a biomechanical breast tissue model, is robust and fast. Contrary to other approaches utilizing voxel intensity-based similarity measures or surface matching, our method works for matching MR with pure molecular images (i.e. PET or SPECT only). Our method does not require a good initialization and would not be trapped by local minima during registration process. All processing including FSMs detection and matching, and mesh generation can be fully automated. We tested our method on MR and PET breast images acquired for 15 subjects. The procedure yielded good quality images with an average target registration error below 4mm (i.e. well below PET spatial resolution of 6-7 mm). Based on the results obtained for 15 subjects studied to date, we conclude that this is a very fast and a well-performing method for MR-to-PET breast-image nonrigid registration. Therefore, it is a promising approach in clinical practice. This method can be easily applied to nonrigid registration of MRI or CT of any type of soft-tissue images to their molecular counterparts such as obtained using PET and SPECT.


international conference on image processing | 2006

Techniques for Fusion of Multimodal Images: Application to Breast Imaging

María Helguera; Joseph P. Hornak; John P. Kerekes; Ethan D. Montag; Mehmet Z. Unlu; David H. Feiglin; Andrzej Krol

In many situations it is desirable and advantageous to acquire medical images in more than one modality. For example positron emission tomography can be used to acquire functional data while magnetic resonance imaging can be used to acquire morphological data. In some situations a side by side comparison of the images provides enough information, but in other situations it may be considered a necessity to have the exact spatial relationship between the modalities presented to the observer. In order to accomplish this, the images need to first be registered and then combined (fused) to create a single image. In this paper we discuss the options for performing such fusion in the context of multimodal breast imaging.


international conference on image processing | 2012

An automatic level set based liver segmentation from MRI data sets

Evgin Goceri; Mehmet Z. Unlu; Cüneyt Güzeliş; Oguz Dicle

A fast and accurate liver segmentation method is a challenging work in medical image analysis area. Liver segmentation is an important process for computer-assisted diagnosis, pre-evaluation of liver transplantation and therapy planning of liver tumors. There are several advantages of magnetic resonance imaging such as free form ionizing radiation and good contrast visualization of soft tissue. Also, innovations in recent technology and image acquisition techniques have made magnetic resonance imaging a major tool in modern medicine. However, the use of magnetic resonance images for liver segmentation has been slow when we compare applications with the central nervous systems and musculoskeletal. The reasons are irregular shape, size and position of the liver, contrast agent effects and similarities of the gray values of neighbor organs. Therefore, in this study, we present a fully automatic liver segmentation method by using an approximation of the level set based contour evolution from T2 weighted magnetic resonance data sets. The method avoids solving partial differential equations and applies only integer operations with a two-cycle segmentation algorithm. The efficiency of the proposed approach is achieved by applying the algorithm to all slices with a constant number of iteration and performing the contour evolution without any user defined initial contour. The obtained results are evaluated with four different similarity measures and they show that the automatic segmentation approach gives successful results.


Proceedings Medical Imaging 2005: Image Processing | 2005

Deformable model for 3D intramodal nonrigid breast image registration with fiducial skin markers

Mehmet Z. Unlu; Andrzej Krol; Ioana L. Coman; James A. Mandel; Wei Lee; Edward Lipson; David H. Feiglin

We implemented a new approach to intramodal non-rigid 3D breast image registration. Our method uses fiducial skin markers (FSM) placed on the breast surface. After determining the displacements of FSM, finite element method (FEM) is used to distribute the markers’ displacements linearly over the entire breast volume using the analogy between the orthogonal components of the displacement field and a steady state heat transfer (SSHT). It is valid because the displacement field in x, y and z direction and a SSHT problem can both be modeled using LaPlace’s equation and the displacements are analogous to temperature differences in SSHT. It can be solved via standard heat conduction FEM software with arbitrary conductivity of surface elements significantly higher than that of volume elements. After determining the displacements of the mesh nodes over the entire breast volume, moving breast volume is registered to target breast volume using an image warping algorithm. Very good quality of the registration was obtained. Following similarity measurements were estimated: Normalized Mutual Information (NMI), Normalized Correlation Coefficient (NCC) and Sum of Absolute Valued Differences (SAVD). We also compared our method with rigid registration technique.


Medical Imaging 2006: Image Processing | 2006

Iterative deformable FEM model for nonrigid PET/MRI breast image coregistration

Mehmet Z. Unlu; Andrzej Krol; Alphonso Magri; David H. Feiglin; James A. Mandel; Edward D. Lipson; Ioana L. Coman; Wei Lee; Gwen Tillapaugh-Fay

We implemented an iterative nonrigid registration algorithm to accurately combine functional (PET) and anatomical (MRI) images in 3D. Our method relies on a Finite Element Method (FEM) and a set of fiducial skin markers (FSM) placed on breast surface. The method is applicable if the stress conditions in the imaged breast are virtually the same in PET and MRI. In the first phase, the displacement vectors of the corresponding FSM observed in MRI and PET are determined, then FEM is used to distribute FSM displacements linearly over the entire breast volume. Our FEM model relies on the analogy between each of the orthogonal components of displacement field, and the temperature distribution field in a steady state heat transfer (SSHT) in solids. The problem can thus be solved via standard heat-conduction FEM software, with arbitrary conductivity of surface elements set much higher than that of volume elements. After determining the displacements at all mesh nodes, moving (MRI) breast volume is registered to target (PET) breast volume using an image-warping algorithm. In the second iteration, to correct for any residual surface and volume misregistration, a refinement process is applied to the moving image, which was already grossly aligned with the target image in 3D using FSM. To perform this process we determine a number of corresponding points on each moving and target image surfaces using a nearest-point approach. Then, after estimating the displacement vectors between the corresponding points on the surfaces we apply our SSHT model again. We tested our model on twelve patients with suspicious breast lesions. By using lesions visible in both PET and MRI, we established that the target registration error is below two PET voxels. The surface registration error is comparable to the spatial resolution of PET.


Journal of Instrumentation | 2014

Modeling and simulation of Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) based on double-sided CdTe strip detectors

Ilker Ozsahin; Mehmet Z. Unlu

Breast cancer is the most common leading cause of cancer death among women. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Mammography, also known as Positron Emission Mammography (PEM), is a method for imaging primary breast cancer. Over the past few years, PEMs based on scintillation crystals dramatically increased their importance in diagnosis and treatment of early stage breast cancer. However, these detectors have significant limitations like poor energy resolution resulting with false-negative result (missed cancer), and false-positive result which leads to suspecting cancer and suggests an unnecessary biopsy. In this work, a PEM scanner based on CdTe strip detectors is simulated via the Monte Carlo method and evaluated in terms of its spatial resolution, sensitivity, and image quality. The spatial resolution is found to be ~ 1 mm in all three directions. The results also show that CdTe strip detectors based PEM scanner can produce high resolution images for early diagnosis of breast cancer.


international symposium on biomedical imaging | 2004

Intermodality nonrigid breast-image registration

Ioana L. Coman; Andrzej Krol; David H. Feiglin; Edward D. Lipson; James A. Mandel; Karl G. Baum; Mehmet Z. Unlu; Wei Li


Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences | 2015

A comparative performance evaluation of various approaches for liver segmentation from SPIR images

Evgin Goceri; Mehmet Z. Unlu; Oğuz Dicle


Progress in biomedical optics and imaging | 2007

Nonrigid registration of dynamic-breast F-18-FDG PET/CT images using deformable FEM model and CT image warping

Alphonso Magri; Andrzej Krol; Mehmet Z. Unlu; Edward Lipson; James A. Mandel; Wendy McGraw; Wei Lee; Ioana L. Coman; David Feiglin

Collaboration


Dive into the Mehmet Z. Unlu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrzej Krol

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David H. Feiglin

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ioana L. Coman

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wei Lee

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward Lipson

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gwen Tillapaugh-Fay

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge