Menachem Ben-Shachar
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Menachem Ben-Shachar.
Cancer | 1988
Ora Israel; Dov Front; Menachem Lam; Simona Ben-Haim; Uriel Kleinhaus; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Eliezer Robinson; Gerald M. Kolodny
The value of gallium 67 (Ga) imaging in monitoring lymphoma response to treatment was assessed in 25 patients with Ga‐avid tumors and compared to body computed tomography (CT), chest radiographs, and palpation of tumor infiltrated peripheral lymph nodes. Ga imaging was negative in 95% (20/21) of the patients who were clinically considered to be in remission and in whom treatment was stopped. The disease did not recur during a follow‐up of 12 to 26 months in 15 patients. Six patients developed recurrence of the disease 3 to 12 months after treatment was stopped. In all six patients Ga imaging became positive again at the time of the appearance of active disease. In the group of patients in remission, CT was negative in 57% (11/19), chest x‐rays in 55% (6/11) and peripheral lymph nodes were palpated in none of the patients (13/13). In four patients that did not achieve remission after treatment, Ga scans were positive. Ga imaging appears useful in monitoring lymphoma response to treatment. This is probably because Ga imaging monitors tumor cell viability, whereas body CT and chest radiographs show the tumor mass, which may consist of fibrotic or necrotic tissue.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1996
Simona Ben-Haim; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Ora Israel; Nissim Haim; Ron Epelbaum; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Diana Gaitini; Gerald M. Kolodny; Dov Front
PURPOSE Low-grade non-Hodgkins lymphoma (LGNHL) has traditionally been considered non-gallium-avid. The sensitivity of gallium 67 (67Ga) scintigraphy when using modern equipment and techniques in patients with LGNHL was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-seven consecutive patients with LGNHL underwent 67Ga scintigraphy at initial presentation (n = 40), when tumor progression occurred during treatment (n = 3), and at suspected disease recurrence after continuous clinical remission (CCR) (n = 14). Planar and tomographic images were obtained with either a very large field-of-view or a dual-head digital camera. Of 45 patients with Ga-avid LGNHL, 30 underwent 93 follow-up scans (one to six studies per patient). Scan findings were correlated with clinical and computed tomographic (CT) findings and with patient outcomes. RESULTS 67Ga scintigraphy was positive in 45 of 57 patients (sensitivity, 79%) and in 113 of 164 disease sites (sensitivity, 69%). The sensitivity was higher in the more common types of LGNHL: follicular, predominantly small cleaved cell (FSC), and follicular, mixed small cleaved and large cell (FM) (84% and 91% in patients and 72% and 71% in disease sites, respectively). Sensitivity was lower in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALT) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SL). Among 28 patients with disease recurrence after CCR (14 with and 14 without baseline studies), 67Ga scan was positive in 25, for a sensitivity of 89% for detection of disease recurrence. CONCLUSION When modern technology is used, 67Ga scintigraphy has good sensitivity in patients with LGNHL. It therefore can be used to monitor response to therapy and to provide early detection of disease recurrence in these patients.
Haematologica | 2010
Eldad J. Dann; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Ada Tamir; Ron Epelbaum; Irit Avivi; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Diana Gaitini; Jacob M. Rowe
Background The findings of interim fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT) predict progression-free survival of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Historically, the assessment was based on a static all-or-none scoring system. However, the clinical significance of any positivity in interim FDG-PET/CT has not been defined. Design and Methods Ninety-six patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma who underwent interim FDG-PET/CT were evaluated using dynamic and visual scores, employing mediastinal or liver blood pool uptake as a comparator. FDG-PET/CT was prospectively defined as positive if any abnormal F18FDG uptake was present. In a retrospective analysis dynamic score 0 indicated resolution of all disease sites; score 1 defined a single residual focus; score 2 denoted a reduction in the number of foci; score 3 defined a reduction in intensity with no reduction in number; and score 4 indicated no change in the number and intensity of foci or appearance of new foci. Results The dynamic visual score review reduced the number of positive interim studies from 24 to 6 if a score of 2 or less was considered negative, with significantly better specificity (96%) as compared to static visual scores (78%–86%). The 5-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates in patients who had a negative dynamic score were 92% and 97%, respectively; the corresponding figures for patients with positive results were 50% and 67%. Conclusions A dynamic visual score may be a better indicator for tailoring therapy than static visual scoring.
Tumori | 1995
Moshe Stein; Nissim Haim; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Dorith Goldsher; Zvi Bernstein; Yehudith Ben-Arieh; Abraham Kuten
A patient who developed primary brain lymphoma 6 years following whole brain irradiation due to a low-grade glioma is described. The patient had no evidence of congenital or acquired immunodeficiency state and achieved a good and prompt response to aggressive chemotherapy, including high-dose methotrexate. The previous radiation therapy is implicated in the etiology of the lymphoma because of the geometric coincidence, the relatively long latency period and the different histology. A brief review of current literature is reported.
Blood | 2006
Eldad J. Dann; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Ada Tamir; Nissim Haim; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Irit Avivi; Tzila Zuckerman; Mark Kirschbaum; Odelia Goor; Diana Libster; Jacob M. Rowe; Ron Epelbaum
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine | 1995
Rachel Bar-Shalom; Ora Israel; Ron Epelbaum; Nissim Haim; Myriam Ben-Arush; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Michelle Leviov; Diana Gaitini; Simona Ben-Haim; Einat Even-Sapir; Gerald M. Kolodny; Dov Front
Chest | 1989
Ami-Hai E. Rubin; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Ehud Malberger
Blood | 2009
Eldad J. Dann; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Ada Tamir; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Irit Avivi; Tsila Zuckerman; Nuhad Haddad; Hanna Rosenbaum; Riva Fineman; Odelia Goor; Diana Libster; Zeev Blumenfeld; Jacob M. Rowe; Ron Epelbaum
Blood | 2008
Eldad J. Dann; Ada Tamir; Ron Epelbaum; Irit Avivi; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Diana Gaitini; Jacob M. Rowe; Rachel Bar-Shalom
Blood | 2011
Eldad J. Dann; Zeev Blumenfeld; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Irit Avivi; Menachem Ben-Shachar; Odelia Goor; Diana Libster; Diana Gaitini; Jacob M. Rowe; Ron Epelbaum