Mhairi Day

Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus

Purpose:  Microfluctuations of accommodation are known to increase in magnitude with increasing accommodation stimulus. Reduced sensitivity to blur in myopic subjects could also lead to increases in the magnitude of the microfluctuations. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of variations in accommodation stimulus upon the microfluctuations in different refractive groups.

The effect of modulating ocular depth of focus upon accommodation microfluctuations in myopic and emmetropic subjects

The magnitude of accommodation microfluctuations increases in emmetropic subjects viewing low luminance targets or viewing a target through small artificial pupils. Larger microfluctuations reported in myopia may result from an abnormally large depth of focus (DoF). The effect of modulating the size of the DoF has not been investigated in myopic subjects and may help to explain the cause of the increased DoF. Accommodation microfluctuations were recorded under two experimental conditions. Firstly, 12 emmetropes (EMMs), and 24 myopes (MYOs) viewed a Maltese Cross target with luminance levels of 0.002, 0.2, 6 and 600cd/m(2) and in darkness, and second, 14 EMMs and 16 MYOs viewed a Maltese Cross target through pupil diameters of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5mm presented in Maxwellian view. The magnitude of the accommodation microfluctuations increased significantly with a target luminance of 0.002cd/m(2) (p<.03) and pinhole diameters of <2mm (p<.05). For all other luminance levels and pupil diameters the magnitude was constant. For both conditions, MYOs had significantly larger microfluctuations than EMMs (p<.01). Considerable inter-subject variability was observed in the degree to which the magnitude of the microfluctuations increased, for both the 0.002cd/m(2) luminance and 0.5mm pupils, however, this was not correlated with refractive error. The increase in the magnitude of the microfluctuations while viewing a low luminance target (0.002cd/m(2)) may be due to a shallower contrast gradient in the cortical image, with a consequent increase in DoF. The microfluctuations also increase when viewing through small pupils (<2mm), which increases the DoF without altering the contrast gradient. The larger microfluctuations found in the MYOs consolidates the theory that MYOs have a larger DoF than EMMs and therefore have a higher threshold for retinal image blur.

The relationship between object spatial profile and accommodation microfluctuations in emmetropes and myopes.

The accommodation microfluctuations are thought to be used by the accommodation controller to obtain information about the direction and magnitude of the required response by monitoring changes in the contrast gradient of this image. The contrast gradient can be altered by presenting different spatial frequency (SF) targets to the eye. Twelve myopes (MYOs) and 12 emmetropes (EMMs) viewed sine and square wave targets of SF 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 cpd in a Badal optical system. Accommodation responses were recorded continuously using the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor. There is no change in magnitude of the accommodation microfluctuations as the SF of square waves is altered. While viewing sine wave targets, the microfluctuations are smallest for mid (2, 4 cpd) SFs and increase for low (0.5 cpd) and high (16 cpd) SFs. MYOs show a significantly larger increase in the microfluctuations for the 16 cpd target compared to the EMMs. MYOs have significantly larger microfluctuations than the EMMs throughout. The microfluctuations seem to be monitoring the contrast gradient of the cortical image, which is likely to be used by the accommodation control system during error detection. The results indicate that MYO subjects may have a shallower contrast gradient and the potential reasons and implications of this are discussed.

Accommodation steps, target spatial frequency and refractive error

Citation information: Strang NC, Day M, Gray LS & Seidel D. Accommodation steps, target spatial frequency and refractive error. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011, 31, 444–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1475‐1313.2011.00855.x

Is Pupil Diameter Influenced by Refractive Error

PurposeTo investigate the relationship between pupil diameter and refractive error and how refractive correction, target luminance, and accommodation modulate this relationship. MethodsSixty emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic subjects (age range, 18 to 35 years) viewed an illuminated target (luminance: 10, 100, 200, 400, 1000, 2000, and 4100 cd/m2) within a Badal optical system, at 0 diopters (D) and −3 D vergence, with and without refractive correction. Refractive error was corrected using daily disposable contact lenses. Pupil diameter and accommodation were recorded continuously using a commercially available photorefractor. ResultsNo significant difference in pupil diameter was found between the refractive groups at 0 D or −3 D target vergence, in the corrected or uncorrected conditions. As expected, pupil diameter decreased with increasing luminance. Target vergence had no significant influence on pupil diameter. In the corrected condition, at 0 D target vergence, the accommodation response was similar in all refractive groups. At −3 D target vergence, the emmetropic and myopic groups accommodated significantly more than the hyperopic group at all luminance levels. There was no correlation between accommodation response and pupil diameter or refractive error in any refractive group. In the uncorrected condition, the accommodation response was significantly greater in the hyperopic group than in the myopic group at all luminance levels, particularly for near viewing. In the hyperopic group, the accommodation response was significantly correlated with refractive error but not pupil diameter. In the myopic group, accommodation response level was not correlated with refractive error or pupil diameter. ConclusionsRefractive error has no influence on pupil diameter, irrespective of refractive correction or accommodative demand. This suggests that the pupil is controlled by the pupillary light reflex and is not driven by retinal blur.

Quantifying interactions between accommodation and vergence in a binocularly normal population.

Stimulation of the accommodation system results in a response in the vergence system via accommodative vergence cross-link interactions, and stimulation of the vergence system results in an accommodation response via vergence accommodation cross-link interactions. Cross-link interactions are necessary in order to ensure simultaneous responses in the accommodation and vergence systems. The crosslink interactions are represented most comprehensively by the response AC/A (accommodative vergence) and CA/C (vergence accommodation) ratios, although the stimulus AC/A ratio is measured clinically, and the stimulus CA/C ratio is seldom measured in clinical practice. The present study aims to quantify both stimulus and response AC/A and CA/C ratios in a binocularly normal population, and determine the relationship between them. 25 Subjects (mean ± SD age 21.0 ± 1.9 years) were recruited from the university population. A significant linear relationship was found between the stimulus and response ratios, for both AC/A (r² = 0.96, p < 0.001) and CA/C ratios (r² = 0.40, p < 0.05). Good agreement was found between the stimulus and response AC/A ratios (95% CI -0.06 to 0.24 MA/D). Stimulus and response CA/C ratios are linearly related. Stimulus CA/C ratios were higher than response ratios at low values, and lower than response ratios at high values (95% CI -0.46 to 0.42 D/MA). Agreement between stimulus and response CA/C ratios is poorer than that found for AC/A ratios due to increased variability in vergence responses when viewing the Gaussian blurred target. This study has shown that more work is needed to refine the methodology of CA/C ratio measurement.

The role of orientation and position in shape perception.

This study investigates the contributions of position versus orientation information in shape perception by putting the two in conflict. Sampling the orientation of, e.g., a rounded pentagon and positioning the samples on a circle creates a stimulus in which element positions are consistent with a circle but element orientations with a pentagon. Whether orientation or position dominates the percept depends on a number of factors. First, perceived shape shows a band-pass relationship with respect to number of samples. Element orientation captures element position unless elements are widely separated or very closely spaced. This effect is scale invariant. Second, increasing element envelope size or decreasing carrier wavelength strengthens the influence of element orientation, while other parameters such as the phase and polarity of the carrier or the scale of the Gabor are irrelevant. Third, the overall shape of the contour modulates the effect. The strength of the positional signal rises as the orientation difference between adjacent elements increases. Consequently, the computation underlying contour shape relies on a weighted combination of element orientation and position with weights, not fixed, but dependent on stimulus details. When orientation is dominant, its signal is strong enough to alter positional information, giving rise to the illusion of, e.g., a pentagon despite elements being on a circle.

Effect of artificial tears on tear stress test.

Purpose. To determine the effect of two artificial tears of different viscosities in the relief of environmental dry eye induced with a novel tear stress test (TST). Methods. A novel TST was developed and validated. The following four test conditions were evaluated in 12 healthy normal subjects in a cross-over and subject masked study; unprotected (no test solution used), relief (test solution instilled just after application of TST), immediate protection (test solution instilled just before application of TST), and chronic protection (1 week prophylactic use of the solution). The test solutions were Cellumed, with high viscosity, and Refresh Contacts, with low viscosity. Low contrast visual acuity, symptoms with analogue scales (symptom scoring), non-invasive tear break-up time, and tear evaporation were measured before (prestress) and 2 min after (poststress) application of TST. Two weeks of washout period was allowed after first test solution. Results. In unprotected test condition, there was no significant difference between pre- and poststress visual acuity (p = 0.102), tear evaporation (p = 0.530), and non-invasive tear break-up time (p = 0.878), however, poststress total symptom score was significantly higher than prestress (p = 0.002). No significant differences were seen between pre- and post-total symptom score at relief (p = 0.241 for Cellumed and 0.114 for Refresh Contacts) and immediate protection (p = 0.890 for Cellumed and 0.136 for Refresh Contacts) for both test solutions, whereas postsymptoms total score was significantly higher than prestress at chronic protection (p = 0.003 for both). No significant differences were seen in the effect of the two solutions in all test conditions. Conclusions. There is an increase in dry eye symptomatology after ocular stress. The use of artificial tears just before or after ocular stress is helpful in relieving resultant symptoms in normals.

Technical Note: Effect of contact lenses on measurement of the accommodation microfluctuations

Aim:  Dynamic measurement of accommodation in subjects with myopia usually involves recording through soft contact lenses (CLs) to correct the refractive error. Conversely, dynamic accommodation measurement in emmetropic control subjects is generally undertaken without any corrective lenses. The aim of this experiment was to determine whether CL correction affects the measurement of accommodation microfluctuations using infrared refractometry, and whether this needs to be considered in studies which attempt to compare accommodation responses between the two groups.