Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael B. Berkenpas is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael B. Berkenpas.


Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 1997

Integrated Environmental Control Modeling of Coal-Fired Power Systems

Edward S. Rubin; Jayant R. Kalagnanam; H. Christopher Frey; Michael B. Berkenpas

Abstract The capability to estimate the performance and costs of advanced environmental control systems for coal-fired power plants is critical to a variety of planning and analysis requirements faced by utilities, regulators, researchers, and analysts in the public and private sectors. This paper describes a computer model developed for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to provide an up-to-date capability for analyzing a variety of pre-combustion, combustion, and post-combustion options in an integrated framework. A unique feature of the model allows performance and costs of integrated environmental control concepts to be modeled probabilistically as a means of characterizing uncertainties and risks. Examples are presented of model applications, comparing conventional and advanced emission control designs. The magnitude of technological risks associated with advanced technologies now under development are seen to vary markedly across applications. In general, however, integrated environmental control c...


Other Information: PBD: 1 Mar 2004 | 2004

AN INTEGRATED MODELING FRAMEWORK FOR CARBON MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES

Anand B. Rao; Edward S. Rubin; Michael B. Berkenpas

CO{sub 2} capture and storage (CCS) is gaining widespread interest as a potential method to control greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel sources, especially electric power plants. Commercial applications of CO{sub 2} separation and capture technologies are found in a number of industrial process operations worldwide. Many of these capture technologies also are applicable to fossil fuel power plants, although applications to large-scale power generation remain to be demonstrated. This report describes the development of a generalized modeling framework to assess alternative CO{sub 2} capture and storage options in the context of multi-pollutant control requirements for fossil fuel power plants. The focus of the report is on post-combustion CO{sub 2} capture using amine-based absorption systems at pulverized coal-fired plants, which are the most prevalent technology used for power generation today. The modeling framework builds on the previously developed Integrated Environmental Control Model (IECM). The expanded version with carbon sequestration is designated as IECM-cs. The expanded modeling capability also includes natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plants and integrated coal gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems as well as pulverized coal (PC) plants. This report presents details of the performance and cost models developed for an amine-based CO{sub 2} capture system, representing the baseline of current commercial technology. The key uncertainties and variability in process design, performance and cost parameters which influence the overall cost of carbon mitigation also are characterized. The new performance and cost models for CO{sub 2} capture systems have been integrated into the IECM-cs, along with models to estimate CO{sub 2} transport and storage costs. The CO{sub 2} control system also interacts with other emission control technologies such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems for SO{sub 2} control. The integrated model is applied to study the feasibility and cost of carbon capture and sequestration at both new and existing PC plants as well as new NGCC plants. The cost of CO{sub 2} avoidance using amine-based CO{sub 2} capture technology is found to be sensitive to assumptions about the reference plant design and operation, as well as assumptions about the CO{sub 2} capture system design. The case studies also reveal multi-pollutant interactions and potential tradeoffs in the capture of CO{sub 2}, SO{sub 2}, NO{sub 2} and NH{sub 3}. The potential for targeted R&D to reduce the cost of CO{sub 2} capture also is explored using the IECM-cs in conjunction with expert elicitations regarding potential improvements in key performance and cost parameters of amine-based systems. The results indicate that the performance of amine-based CO{sub 2} capture systems can be improved significantly, and the cost of CO{sub 2} capture reduced substantially over the next decade or two, via innovations such as new or improved sorbents with lower regeneration heat requirements, and improvements in power plant heat integration to reduce the (currently large) energy penalty of CO{sub 2} capture. Future work will explore in more detail a broader set of advanced technology options to lower the costs of CO{sub 2} capture and storage. Volume 2 of this report presents a detailed Users Manual for the IECM-cs computer model as a companion to the technical documentation in Volume 1.


Archive | 2007

Development and Application of Optimal Design Capability for Coal Gasification Systems

Edward S. Rubin; Anand B. Rao; Michael B. Berkenpas

The basic objective of this research is to develop a model to simulate the performance and cost of oxyfuel combustion systems to capture CO{sub 2} at fossil-fuel based power plants. The research also aims at identifying the key parameters that define the performance and costs of these systems, and to characterize the uncertainties and variability associated with key parameters. The final objective is to integrate the oxyfuel model into the existing IECM-CS modeling framework so as to have an analytical tool to compare various carbon management options on a consistent basis.


Archive | 2007

User Manual: Integrated Environmental Control Model

Edward S. Rubin; Michael B. Berkenpas; Constance J. Zaremsky


Archive | 2006

Estimating Future Costs of CO2 Capture Systems Using Historical Experience Curves

Edward S. Rubin; Sonia Yeh; Matt Antes; Michael B. Berkenpas; John Davison; Stoke Orchard


Archive | 2001

A Multi-Pollutant Framework for Evaluating CO2 Control Options for Fossil Fuel Power Plants

Edward S. Rubin; Anand B. Rao; Michael B. Berkenpas


Institute of Transportation Studies | 2007

Use of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture

Edward S. Rubin; Sonia Yeh; Matt Antes; Michael B. Berkenpas; John Davison


Archive | 1995

New models for FGD performance, cost and hazardous air pollutant removal

Edward S. Rubin; Jayant R. Kalagnanam; Michael B. Berkenpas


Archive | 1988

Modeling of integrated environmental control systems for coal-fired power plants

Edward S. Rubin; J. S. Salmento; H. C. Frey; A. Abu-Baker; Michael B. Berkenpas


Archive | 2001

Multi-Polluntant Emission Control of Electric Power Plants

Edward S. Rubin; Michael B. Berkenpas; Alex Farrell; Gerst A. Gibbon; Dennis M. Smith

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael B. Berkenpas's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward S. Rubin

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anand B. Rao

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. Christopher Frey

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chao Chen

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sean T. McCoy

Carnegie Mellon University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sonia Yeh

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Davison

International Energy Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge