Michael Cummings
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Michael Cummings.
Archives of Environmental Health | 1990
Michael Cummings; Samuel J. Markello; Martin C. Mahoney; Arvind Bhargava; Peter D. McElroy; James R. Marshall
Reports of recent exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and urinary cotinine levels were obtained on 663 never- and ex-smokers who attended a cancer screening clinic in Buffalo, New York, in 1986. Study objectives included determining the prevalence of exposure to ETS using urinary cotinine and identifying questionnaire exposure measures predictive of cotinine. Findings demonstrate that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke is extremely prevalent, even among those not living with a smoker. A total of 76% of subjects reported exposure to ETS in the 4 d preceding the interview. The most frequently mentioned sources of exposure were at work (28%) and at home (27%). Cotinine was found in the urine of 91% of subjects. Cotinine values increased significantly with the number of exposures reported. Among the different questionnaire measures of exposure that were evaluated, the single best predictor of cotinine was the number of friends and family members seen regularly by the subject who smoke.
Thorax | 2007
Gregory M. Loewen; Nachimuthu Natarajan; Dongfeng Tan; Enriqueta Nava; Donald L. Klippenstein; Martin C. Mahoney; Michael Cummings; Mary E. Reid
Background: This is a preliminary report of an ongoing prospective bimodality lung cancer surveillance trial for high-risk patients. Bimodality surveillance incorporates autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) and spiral CT (SCT) scanning in high-risk patients as a primary lung cancer surveillance strategy, based entirely on risk factors. AFB was used for surveillance and findings were compared with conventional sputum cytology for the detection of malignancy and pre-malignant central airway lesions. Methods: 402 patients registering at Roswell Park Cancer Institute were evaluated with spirometric testing, chest radiography, history and physical examination, of which 207 were deemed eligible for the study. For eligibility, patients were required to have at least two of the following risk factors: (1) ⩾20 pack year history of tobacco use, (2) asbestos-related lung disease on the chest radiograph, (3) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <70% of predicted, and (4) prior aerodigestive cancer treated with curative intent, with no evidence of disease for >2 years. All eligible patients underwent AFB, a low-dose SCT scan of the chest without contrast, and a sputum sample was collected for cytological examination. Bronchoscopic biopsy findings were correlated with sputum cytology results, SCT-detected pulmonary nodules and surveillance-detected cancers. To date, 186 have been enrolled with 169 completing the surveillance procedures. Results: Thirteen lung cancers (7%) were detected in the 169 subjects who have completed all three surveillance studies to date. Pre-malignant changes were common and 66% of patients had squamous metaplasia or worse. Conventional sputum cytology missed 100% of the dysplasias and 68% of the metaplasias detected by AFB, and failed to detect any cases of carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ in this patient cohort. Sputum cytology exhibited 33% sensitivity and 64% specificity for the presence of metaplasia. Seven of 13 lung cancers (58%) were stage Ia or less, including three patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules identified by SCT scanning of the chest were 3.16 times more likely to exhibit pre-malignant changes on AFB (p<0.001). Conclusion: Bimodality surveillance will detect central lung cancer and pre-malignancy in patients with multiple lung cancer risk factors, even when conventional sputum cytology is negative. AFB should be considered in high-risk patients, regardless of sputum cytology findings.
Journal of Cell Biology | 2012
Megan Gervasi; Anna Bianchi-Smiraglia; Michael Cummings; Qiao Zheng; Dan Wang; Song Liu; Andrei V. Bakin
JunB helps set in motion the transcriptional program necessary for the epithelial–mesenchymal transition and tissue fibrosis in response to TGF-β.
Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly | 2003
Andrew Hyland; Vanaja Puli; Michael Cummings; Russ Sciandra
Abstract Contrary to claims that smoke-free regulations cause decreases in hospitality-industry sales, this study determined that neither sales nor employment is hurt when smoke-free regulations are put in place. That conclusion is based on an examination of changes in restaurants and hotels business levels in five populous New York State jurisdictions that have implemented smoke-free regulations (namely, Erie, Monroe, Suffolk, and Westchester counties, and five boroughs of New York City). Using states sales data and employment data for eating and drinking establishment and for hotels, the study compared those statistics for the year before the regulation was implemented with the same statistics for the first year following implementation. The regulations in the counties being studied require a 100-percent smoke-free dining area unless such an area is separately enclosed and separately ventilated. The study examined trends in per-capita levels of sales and employment, as well as the fraction of restaurant sales to total sales. Additionally, a combined model considered data from all counties in the state to compare sales and employment outcomes. Instead of damaging hospitality sales and employment, the onset of smoke-free regulations was associated with increases in per-capita taxable sales for eating and drinking establishments and hotels (controlling for other economic factors). Employment rose in hotels, while no measurable change was observed for employment in restaurants operating under smoke-free regulations. The study concludes that smoke-free regulations have not been bad for business in New York State restaurants or hotels.
Annals of Hematology | 2010
Ramya Varadarajan; Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland; Eunice S. Wang; Meir Wetzler
Previous studies have demonstrated a modest association between smoking and leukemia particularly for myeloid disorders. Our objective was to examine whether changing trends in cigarette smoking prevalence nationally and within selected states parallel similar trends in mortality from leukemia. Trends in national smoking rates were correlated with trends in leukemia mortality rates obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry, respectively. State-specific correlations were assessed from 1984 to 2004 using smoking prevalence data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and leukemia mortality data from National Vital Statistics System. Correlations were computed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Leukemia mortality decreased overall in the United States in parallel with decreased smoking. Analyzed on a state-specific basis, leukemia mortality decreased in states where smoking rates declined markedly but remained unchanged where smoking prevalences were relatively stable. The findings suggest that declining rates of leukemia mortality are associated with changing patterns of smoking behavior.
Addiction | 2011
Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Ron Borland; Michael Cummings; Richard J. O'Connor; Geoffrey T. Fong
American Journal of Epidemiology | 1989
Martin C. Mahoney; Arthur M. Michalek; Michael Cummings; Philip C. Nasca; Lawrence J. Emrich
Cancer | 1994
Michael Cummings
Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly | 2016
Andrew Hyland; Vanaja Puli; Michael Cummings; Russ Sciandra
The FASEB Journal | 2014
Megan Gervasi; Anna Bianchi-Smiraglia; Michael Cummings; Andrei V. Bakin