Michael D. Schneider
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Michael D. Schneider.
Physical Review D | 2013
Scott Dodelson; Michael D. Schneider
Extracting parameter constraints from cosmological observations requires accurate determination of the covariance matrix for use in the likelihood function. We show here that uncertainties in the elements of the covariance matrix propagate directly to increased uncertainties in cosmological parameters. When the covariance matrix is determined by simulations, the resulting variance of the each parameter increases by a factor of order
The Astrophysical Journal | 2006
Michael D. Schneider; Lloyd Knox; Hu Zhan; A. Connolly
1+N_b/N_s
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2015
Jiaxin Han; Vincent R. Eke; Carlos S. Frenk; Rachel Mandelbaum; Peder Norberg; Michael D. Schneider; J. A. Peacock; Yipeng Jing; Ivan K. Baldry; J. Bland-Hawthorn; Sarah Brough; Michael J. I. Brown; J. Liske; J. Loveday; Aaron S G Robotham
where
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
M. James Jee; J. Anthony Tyson; Stefan Hilbert; Michael D. Schneider; Samuel J. Schmidt; David Michael Wittman
N_b
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
Michael D. Schneider; Shaun Cole; Carlos S. Frenk; István Szapudi
is the number of bands in the measurement and
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013
Michael D. Schneider; Shaun Cole; Carlos S. Frenk; Lee S. Kelvin; Rachel Mandelbaum; Peder Norberg; Joss Bland-Hawthorn; Sarah Brough; Simon P. Driver; Andrew M. Hopkins; J. Liske; Jon Loveday; Aaron S. G. Robotham
N_s
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Michael D. Schneider; David W. Hogg; Philip J. Marshall; William A. Dawson; J. Meyers; Deborah Bard; Dustin Lang
is the number of simulations.
Physical Review D | 2008
Michael D. Schneider; Lloyd Knox; Salman Habib; Katrin Heitmann; David Higdon; Charles Nakhleh
We investigate how well the redshift distributions of galaxies sorted into photometric redshift bins can be determined from the galaxy angular two-point correlation functions. We find that the uncertainty in the reconstructed redshift distributions depends critically on the number of parameters used in each redshift bin and the range of angular scales used, but not on the number of photometric redshift bins. Using six parameters for each photometric redshift bin, and restricting ourselves to angular scales over which the galaxy number counts are normally distributed, we find that errors in the reconstructed redshift distributions are large; i.e., they would be the dominant source of uncertainty in cosmological parameters estimated from otherwise ideal weak lensing or baryon acoustic oscillation data. However, either by reducing the number of free parameters in each redshift bin or by (unjustifiably) applying our Gaussian analysis into the non-Gaussian regime, we find that the correlation functions can be used to reconstruct the redshift distributions with moderate precision; e.g., with mean redshifts determined to ~0.01. We also find that dividing the galaxies into two spectral types, thereby doubling the number of redshift distribution parameters, can result in a reduction in the errors in the combined redshift distributions.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Michael D. Schneider; Karen Y. Ng; William A. Dawson; Philip J. Marshall; Joshua Meyers; Deborah Bard
We present a maximum-likelihood weak-lensing analysis of the mass distribution in optically selected spectroscopic Galaxy Groups (G3Cv5) in the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey, using background Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) photometric galaxies. The scaling of halo mass, Mh, with various group observables is investigated. Our main results are as follows. (1) The measured relations of halo mass with group luminosity, virial volume and central galaxy stellar mass, M*, agree very well with predictions from mock group catalogues constructed from a GALFORM semi-analytical galaxy formation model implemented in the Millennium ΛCDM N-body simulation. (2) The measured relations of halo mass with velocity dispersion and projected half-abundance radius show weak tension with mock predictions, hinting at problems in the mock galaxy dynamics and their small-scale distribution. (3) The median Mh|M* measured from weak lensing depends more sensitively on the lognormal dispersion in M* at fixed Mh than it does on the median M*|Mh. Our measurements suggest an intrinsic dispersion of σlog(M*)∼ 0.15. (4) Comparing our mass estimates with those in the catalogue, we find that the G3Cv5 mass can give biased results when used to select subsets of the group sample. Of the various new halo-mass estimators that we calibrate using our weak-lensing measurements, group luminosity is the best single-proxy estimator of group mass.
Optics Express | 2018
Brian J. Bauman; Michael D. Schneider
We present a tomographic cosmic shear study from the Deep Lens Survey (DLS), which, providing a limiting magnitude r_{lim}~27 (5 sigma), is designed as a pre-cursor Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) survey with an emphasis on depth. Using five tomographic redshift bins, we study their auto- and cross-correlations to constrain cosmological parameters. We use a luminosity-dependent nonlinear model to account for the astrophysical systematics originating from intrinsic alignments of galaxy shapes. We find that the cosmological leverage of the DLS is among the highest among existing >10 sq. deg cosmic shear surveys. Combining the DLS tomography with the 9-year results of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP9) gives Omega_m=0.293_{-0.014}^{+0.012}, sigma_8=0.833_{-0.018}^{+0.011}, H_0=68.6_{-1.2}^{+1.4} km/s/Mpc, and Omega_b=0.0475+-0.0012 for LCDM, reducing the uncertainties of the WMAP9-only constraints by ~50%. When we do not assume flatness for LCDM, we obtain the curvature constraint Omega_k=-0.010_{-0.015}^{+0.013} from the DLS+WMAP9 combination, which however is not well constrained when WMAP9 is used alone. The dark energy equation of state parameter w is tightly constrained when Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data are added, yielding w=-1.02_{-0.09}^{+0.10} with the DLS+WMAP9+BAO joint probe. The addition of supernova constraints further tightens the parameter to w=-1.03+-0.03. Our joint constraints are fully consistent with the final Planck results and also the predictions of a LCDM universe.