Michael Frass

Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit

Objective: To assess survival in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with respect to the nature of malignancy, cause of ICU admittance, and course during ICU stay as well as to evaluate the prognostic value of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: ICU at a university cancer referral center. Patients: A total of 414 cancer patients admitted to the ICU during a period of 66 months. Interventions: None. Measurements: Charts of the patients were analyzed with respect to underlying disease, cause of admission, APACHE III score, need and duration of mechanical ventilation, neutropenia and development of septic shock, as well as ICU survival and survival after discharge. Mortality data were compared with two control groups: 1362 patients admitted to our ICU suffering from diseases other than cancer and 2,776 cancer patients not admitted to the ICU. Main Results: ICU survival was 53%, and 1‐yr survival was 23%. The 1‐yr mortality rate was significantly lower in both control groups. Patients admitted after bone marrow transplantation had the highest mortality. In a multivariate analysis, prognosis was negatively influenced by respiratory insufficiency, the need of mechanical ventilation, and development of septic shock during the ICU stay. Admission after cardiopulmonary resuscitation yielded high ICU mortality but a relatively good long‐term prognosis. Admission after surgery and as a result of acute hemorrhage was associated with a good prognosis. Age, neutropenia, and underlying disease did not influence outcome significantly. Admission APACHE III scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors but failed to predict individual outcome satisfactorily. All patients with APACHE III scores of >80 died at the ICU. Conclusion: A combination of factors must be taken into account to estimate a critically ill cancer patients prognosis in the ICU. The APACHE III scoring system alone should not be used to make decisions about therapy prolongation. Admission to the ICU worsens the prognosis of a cancer patient substantially; however, as ICU mortality is 47%, comparable with severely ill noncancer patients, general reluctance to admit cancer patients to an ICU does not seem to be justified.

Comparison of Conventional Surgical versus Seldinger Technique Emergency Cricothyrotomy Performed by Inexperienced Clinicians

Background: Cricothyrotomy is the ultimate option for a patient with a life-threatening airway problem. Methods: The authors compared the first-time performance of surgical (group 1) versus Seldinger technique (group 2) cricothyrotomy in cadavers. Intensive care unit physicians (n = 20) performed each procedure on two adult human cadavers. Methods were compared with regard to ease of use and anatomy of the neck of the cadaver. Times to location of the cricothyroid membrane, to tracheal puncture, and to the first ventilation were recorded. Each participant was allowed only one attempt per procedure. A pathologist dissected the neck of each patient and assessed correctness of position of the tube and any injury inflicted. Subjective assessment of technique and cadaver on a visual analog scale from 1 (easiest) to 5 (worst) was conducted by the performer. Results: Age, height, and weight of the cadavers were not different. Subjective assessment of both methods (2.2 in group 1 vs. 2.4 in group 2) and anatomy of the cadavers (2.2 in group 1 vs. 2.4 in group 2) showed no statistically significant difference between both groups. Tracheal placement of the tube was achieved in 70% (n = 14) in group 1 versus 60% (n = 12) in group 2 (P value not significant). Five attempts in group 2 had to be aborted because of kinking of the guide wire. Time intervals (mean ± SD) were from start to location of the cricothyroid membrane 7 ± 9 s (group 1) versus 8 ± 7 s (group 2), to tracheal puncture 46 ± 37 s (group 1) versus 30 ± 28 s (group 2), and to first ventilation 102 ± 42 s (group 1) versus 100 ± 46 s (group 2) (P value not significant). Conclusions: The two methods showed equally poor performance.

The esophageal tracheal combitube: Preliminary results with a new airway for CPR

We developed the esophageal tracheal combitube (ETC), a plastic twin-lumen tube, one lumen resembling an esophageal obturator airway (EOA), the other resembling an endotracheal airway (ETA). Ventilation is possible after either esophageal or tracheal placement of the ETC. A specially designed pharyngeal balloon replaces the mask of the EOA and provides sufficient seal, preventing the escape of air through the mouth and nose. The effectiveness of ventilation with the ETC in esophageal position was tested in a crossover study comparing ETC and ETA during routine operations in 31 patients. Blood gas measurements showed a significantly higher (P less than .001) mean arterial oxygen tension during ventilation with the ETC. The reason for this is not yet clear. Preliminary investigations during CPR in 21 arrest patients indicate that the ETC is as effective as the ETA.

Evaluation of esophageal tracheal combitube in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Prompt establishment of an airway is a primary goal in CPR of nonbreathing and unconscious patients. The esophageal tracheal combitube (ETC) is a new airway, designed for emergency intubation providing sufficient ventilation whether the airway is placed into the trachea or into the esophagus. We evaluated the effectiveness of the ETC in 31 patients during CPR. Blood gas analyses obtained during esophageal placement of the ETC showed results comparable to those of ventilation with a conventional endotracheal airway (ETA). The ETC appeared to oxygenate and ventilate patients adequately without complications. The efficacy, safety, and ease of insertion ensure rapid airway control. It is concluded that the ETC provides a sufficient alternative to the ETA whenever ideal conditions or trained staff for endotracheal intubation are not immediately available.

Comparison of a conventional tracheal airway with the Combitube in an urban emergency medical services system run by physicians

This prospective randomised study was performed to compare the use of the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube(R) (ETC; Tyco Healthcare, Mansfield, MA; http://www.combitube.org) with a conventional tracheal airway (ETA) for airway management by experienced physicians of the Emergency Medical Services System of the City of Vienna in the prehospital setting. Access to the patients head, time of arrival of the ambulance, ease of insertion, time of insertion, potential substitution by the alternate airway, efficacy of adrenaline (epinephrine) administered via the airway, survival to the intensive care unit (ICU) ward and survival to discharge from the hospital were evaluated. One hundred and seventy-two non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients (131 males, 41 females) were enrolled in this study during a 12 months period. In 83 patients (48.3%), the conventional ETA (group 1) was used for the initial intubation attempt which was successful in 78 patients (94%). The remaining five patients of group 1 could not be intubated with an ETA, but were successfully managed with the ETC. Eighty-nine patients (51.7%) were intubated with the ETC (group 2) as first choice (79 in oesophageal position (89%); eight in tracheal position: (9%)), which was successful in 87 (98%) patients. The remaining two patients in group 2 (2%) were successfully managed with the ETA. Success of intubation and ventilation with ETC was comparable to the ETA. Recorded time of insertion was shorter with the ETC versus ETA (P<0.05). The Combitube worked well in cases of difficult access to the patients head and in bleeding and vomiting patients. Both devices served as successful substitutes for each other. Adrenaline (epinephrine) applied via ETC with a 10-fold dosage was as effective as via the conventional ETA. To our knowledge this is the first study using physicians comparing ETC and ETA in the prehospital setting.

Emergency intubation with the combitube®: Comparison with the endotracheal airway

STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Combitude as used by ICU nurses under medical supervision compared with endotracheal airway established by ICU physicians during CPR. DESIGN Prospective study of ICU patients over a seven-month period. SETTING Medical ICU. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-seven patients suffering from cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS Emergency intubation with either the Combitube by nurses or the endotracheal airway by physicians and subsequent mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Evaluation of blood gases after 20 minutes of mechanical ventilation. Intubation time was shorter for the Combitube (P < .001). Blood gases for each device showed comparable results; PaO2 was slightly higher during ventilation with the Combitube (P < .001). CONCLUSION The Combitube as used by ICU nurses was as effective as establishment of the endotracheal airway by intensivists during CPR. The Combitube may be used whenever endotracheal intubation cannot be performed immediately.

Evaluation of Seldinger technique Emergency cricothyroidotomy versus standard surgical cricothyroidotomy in 200 cadavers

Background: Percutaneous cricothyroidotomy is a lifesaving procedure for airway obstruction in trauma victims who need airway establishment and cannot be intubated or in whom intubation has failed. Methods: The purpose of this study was to examine whether there is a training effect using Seldinger technique emergency cricothyroidotomy (group 1; Arndt Emergency Cricothyroidotomy Catheter Set; Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, IN) versus standard surgical cricothyroidotomy (group 2). Twenty emergency physicians performed five cricothyroidotomies with each method in a total of 200 human cadavers, comparing efficacy and safety (speed, success rate, and injuries). Results: Seven attempts in group 1 and six in group 2 had to be aborted. Time intervals from the start of the procedure to location of the cricothyroid membrane were not significantly different between the groups. However, time to tracheal puncture (P < 0.01) and time to first ventilation (P < 0.001) were significantly longer in group 2. No time effect could be observed in both groups. The airway was accurately placed into the trachea through the cricothyroid membrane in 88.2% (82 of 93) of the cadavers in group 1 and in 84.0% (79 of 94) in group 2 (not significant). No injuries were observed in group 1, whereas there were six punctures of the thyroid vessels in group 2 (P < 0.05). Conclusions: With respect to time needed for the procedure, the participants performed Seldinger technique emergency cricothyroidotomy significantly faster as compared with standard surgical cricothyroidotomy. Even if no training effect had been observed, the authors believe that it is important to train residents in different methods of cricothyroidotomy in cadavers in addition to training in mannequins to achieve a higher level of efficacy in real-life situations. The shorter time to first ventilation and the fact that no injuries could be observed favor the Seldinger technique.

Relationship between neopterin and granulocyte elastase plasma levels and the severity of multiple organ failure

In a series of 56 patients (24 uncomplicated postoperative and 32 septic patients), neopterin and elastase alpha 1 protease inhibitor complex (E-alpha 1 PI) plasma levels were measured daily. The clinical course of each patient was evaluated with the Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) score according to Goris. Neopterin could differentiate between septic and nonseptic patients (p less than .001), and E-alpha 1 PI between septic nonsurvivors and nonseptic patients only (p less than .01). In septic patients, acute pulmonary insufficiency was indicated by elevated E-alpha 1 PI values (greater than or equal to 400 micrograms/L) 1 day before mechanical ventilation was performed with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 82%. Defining a patient with MOF whose score was greater than or equal to 5 as a high-risk septic patient, a comparison neopterin greater than or equal to 40 nmol/L and E-alpha 1 PI greater than or equal to 400 micrograms/L, measured 1 day before the evaluation of an MOF score of greater than or equal to 5 yielded a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 99% when patients fulfilled both criteria. We conclude that neopterin and E-alpha 1 PI might be useful parameters for the diagnosis of septicemia and monitoring of the clinical course in septic patients. Moreover, they might indicate the possible central role of macrophage and PMN activation in the development of MOF.

Influence of age on outcome of mechanically ventilated patients in an intensive care unit

ObjectiveTo assess the influence of age on the outcome of patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. DesignRetrospective study. SettingIntensive care unit. PatientsA total of 1,141 patients in our ICU during a 32-month period. A total of 536 patients required mechanical ventilation. After exclusion of 171 patients ventilated for <24 hrs after surgery, 365 patients were investigated. Measurements and Main ResultsTwo hundred sixty-six (73%) patients were aged <70 yrs; 99 (27%) patients were ≥70 yrs. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the younger and the older age groups. There was no significant influence of other important factors, such as severity of illness, duration of mechanical ventilation, or length of ICU stay. The only factor showing a significant influence on patient outcome was the reason for mechanical ventilation. There were more survivors in the group being ventilated because of ventilatory insufficiency than in the group with oxygenation impairment (57.8% vs. 23.9%, p <.001). ConclusionAn influence of age on the outcome of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU could not be ascertained in this study.

Ultrasound contact medium dispenser

The coupling agent dispenser serves to guide and, at the same, possibly to warm up the coupling agent, which is required for many medical examinations, directly during the examination from a reservoir to a diagnostic probe.