Michael Ghadimi

Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with infusional fluorouracil, total mesorectal excision surgery, and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil was established by the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial as a standard combined modality treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Here we compare the previously established regimen with an investigational regimen in which oxaliplatin was added to both preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study we randomly assigned patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, clinically staged as cT3-4 or any node-positive disease, to two groups: a control group receiving standard fluorouracil-based combined modality treatment, consisting of preoperative radiotherapy of 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions plus infusional fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29-33), followed by surgery and four cycles of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29); or to an investigational group receiving preoperative radiotherapy of 50·4 Gy in 28 fractions plus infusional fluorouracil (250 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 and 22-35) and oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29), followed by surgery and eight cycles of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15), leucovorin (400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15), and infusional fluorouracil (2400 mg/m(2) on days 1-2 and 15-16). Randomisation was done with computer-generated block-randomisation codes stratified by centre, clinical T category (cT1-3 vs cT4), and clinical N category (cN0 vs cN1-2) without masking. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, defined as the time between randomisation and non-radical surgery of the primary tumour (R2 resection), locoregional recurrence after R0/1 resection, metastatic disease or progression, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Survival and cumulative incidence of recurrence analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle; toxicity analyses included all patients treated. Enrolment of patients in this trial is completed and follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00349076. FINDINGS Of the 1265 patients initially enrolled, 1236 were assessable (613 in the investigational group and 623 in the control group). With a median follow-up of 50 months (IQR 38-61), disease-free survival at 3 years was 75·9% (95% CI 72·4-79·5) in the investigational group and 71·2% (95% CI 67·6-74·9) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·79, 95% CI 0·64-0·98; p=0·03). Preoperative grade 3-4 toxic effects occurred in 144 (24%) of 607 patients who actually received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin during chemoradiotherapy and in 128 (20%) of 625 patients who actually received fluorouracil chemoradiotherapy. Of 445 patients who actually received adjuvant fluorouracil and leucovorin and oxaliplatin, 158 (36%) had grade 3-4 toxic effects, as did 170 (36%) of 470 patients who actually received adjuvant fluorouracil. Late grade 3-4 adverse events in patients who received protocol-specified preoperative and postoperative treatment occurred in 112 (25%) of 445 patients in the investigational group, and in 100 (21%) of 470 patients in the control group. INTERPRETATION Adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (at the doses and intensities used in this trial) significantly improved disease-free survival of patients with clinically staged cT3-4 or cN1-2 rectal cancer compared with our former fluorouracil-based combined modality regimen (based on CAO/ARO/AIO-94). The regimen established by CAO/ARO/AIO-04 can be deemed a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. FUNDING German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe).

Tumor Regression Grading After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Carcinoma Revisited: Updated Results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 Trial

PURPOSE We previously described the prognostic impact of tumor regression grading (TRG) on the outcome of patients with rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial. Here we report long-term results after a median follow-up of 132 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS TRG after preoperative CRT was determined in 386 surgical specimens by the amount of viable tumor cells versus fibrosis, ranging from TRG 4 (no viable tumor cells) to TRG 0 (no signs of regression). Clinicopathologic parameters and TRG were correlated to the cumulative incidence of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Ten-year cumulative incidence of distant metastasis and DFS were 10.5% and 89.5% for patients with TRG 4 (complete regression), 29.3% and 73.6% for TRG 2 and 3 (intermediate regression), and 39.6% and 63% for TRG 0 and 1 (poor regression), respectively (P = .005 and P = .008, respectively). On multivariable analysis, residual lymph node metastasis (ypN+) and TRG were the only independent prognostic factors for cumulative incidence of distant metastasis (P < .001 and P = .035, respectively) and DFS (P < .001 and P = .039, respectively), whereas local recurrence was significantly affected by ypN status (P < .001) and lymphatic invasion (P = .026). CONCLUSION Complete and intermediate tumor regressions were associated with improved long-term outcome in patients with rectal carcinoma after preoperative CRT independent of clinicopathologic parameters. This classification system needs to be prospectively tested in multiple data sets to validate its reproducibility in a wider setting.

Pylorus Preservation Has No Impact on Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatic Head Resection

Objectives Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) has been specifically attributed to pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). As PPPD has been shown to be comparable with the classic Kausch-Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy (KWPD) in terms of oncological radicality, DGE has advanced to be the leading argument for hemigastrectomy in PD. Methods A prospective, nonrandomized comparison of patients undergoing PPPD (n = 113), KWPD (n = 19), and duodenum-preserving, pancreatic head resection (DPPHR, n = 18) for various diseases was performed. First, groups were analyzed with regard to structural similarity; then, they were compared with special emphasis on DGE and other postoperative complications. Finally, further prognostic factors were sought that had an impact on DGE. Results The PPPD group was comparable with the KWPD group, but not to the DPPHR population. The in-clinic course after DPPHR compared favorably with PPPD as well as KWPD, and, here, no DGE occurred. The overall morbidity rates of PPPD and KWPD were comparable; 1 patient died in hospital (mortality rate, 0.7%). The gastric tube after PPPD and KWPD could be withdrawn at a median of 2 and 3 days, respectively, a liquid diet was started after 4 and 5 days, respectively, and a full diet was tolerated after 10 days each (n.s.). DGE was distributed evenly among PPPD (12%) and KWPD patients (21%, n.s.), and it was noted almost exclusively when other postoperative complications were present (P < 0.0001). No further prognostic factors influencing DGE could be identified. Conclusion Pylorus preservation does not increase the frequency of DGE. DGE almost exclusively occurs as a consequence of other postoperative complications. Therefore, DGE should not be used as an argument to advocate hemigastrectomy in PPPD.

Prevalence of familial pancreatic cancer in Germany

Based on several case‐control studies, it has been estimated that familial aggregation and genetic susceptibility play a role in up to 10% of patients with pancreatic cancer, although conclusive epidemiologic data are still lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the prevalence of familial pancreatic cancer and differences to its sporadic form in a prospective multicenter trial. A total of 479 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were prospectively evaluated regarding medical and family history, treatment and pathology of the tumour. A family history for pancreatic cancer was confirmed whenever possible by reviewing the tumour specimens and medical reports. Statistical analysis was performed by calculating odds ratios, regression analysis with a logit‐model and the Kaplan‐Meier method. Twenty‐three of 479 (prevalence 4.8%, 95% CI 3.1–7.1) patients reported at least 1 first‐degree relative with pancreatic cancer. The familial aggregation could be confirmed by histology in 5 of 23 patients (1.1%, 95% CI 0.3–2.4), by medical records in 9 of 23 patients (1.9%, 95% CI 0.9–3.5) and by standardized interviews of first‐degree relatives in 17 of 23 patients (3.5%, 95% CI 2.1–5.6), respectively. There were no statistical significant differences between familial and sporadic pancreatic cancer cases regarding sex ratio, age of onset, presence of diabetes mellitus and pancreatitis, tumour histology and stage, prognosis after palliative or curative treatment as well as associated tumours in index patients and families, respectively. The prevalence of familial pancreatic cancer in Germany is at most 3.5% (range 1.1–3.5%) depending on the mode of confirmation of the pancreatic carcinoma in relatives. This prevalence is lower than so far postulated in the literature. There were no significant clinical differences between the familial and sporadic form of pancreatic cancer.

KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE KRAS and BRAF are mutated in 35% and 10% of colorectal cancers, respectively. However, data specifically for locally advanced rectal cancers are scarce, and the frequency of KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 remains to be established. MATERIALS AND METHODS DNA was isolated from pre-therapeutic biopsies of 94 patients who were treated within two phase-III clinical trials receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Mutation status of KRAS exons 1-3 and BRAF exon 15 was established using the ABI PRISM Big Dye Sequencing Kit and subsequently correlated with clinical parameters. RESULTS Overall, KRAS was mutated in 45 patients (48%). Twenty-nine mutations (64%) were located in codon 12, 10 mutations (22%) in codon 13, and 3 mutations (7%) in codons 61 and 146. No V600E BRAF mutation was detected. The presence of KRAS mutations was correlated neither with tumor response or lymph node status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy nor with overall survival or disease-free survival. When KRAS exon 1 mutations were separated based on the amino-acid exchange, we again failed to detect significant correlations (p=0.052). However, G12V mutations appeared to be associated with higher rates of tumor regression than G13D mutations (p=0.012). CONCLUSION We are the first to report the mutation status of KRAS and BRAF in pre-therapeutic biopsies from locally advanced rectal cancers. The high number of KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 emphasizes the importance to expand current mutation analyses, whereas BRAF mutations are not relevant for rectal carcinogenesis. Although the KRAS mutation status was not correlated with response, the subtle difference between G12V and G13D mutations warrants analysis of a larger patient population.

Irradiation with protons for the individualized treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: A planning study with clinical implications

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Ongoing clinical trials aim to improve local control and overall survival rates by intensification of therapy regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. It is well known that whenever treatment is intensified, risk of therapy-related toxicity rises. An irradiation with protons could possibly present an approach to solve this dilemma by lowering the exposure to the organs-at-risk (OAR) without compromising tumor response. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty five consecutive patients were treated from 04/2009 to 5/2010. For all patients, four different treatment plans including protons, RapidArc, IMRT and 3D-conformal-technique were retrospectively calculated and analyzed according to dosimetric aspects. RESULTS Detailed DVH-analyses revealed that protons clearly reduced the dose to the OAR and entire normal tissue when compared to other techniques. Furthermore, the conformity index was significantly better and target volumes were covered consistent with the ICRU guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Planning results suggest that treatment with protons can improve the therapeutic tolerance for the irradiation of rectal cancer, particularly for patients scheduled for an irradiation with an intensified chemotherapy regimen and identified to be at high risk for acute therapy-related toxicity. However, clinical experiences and long-term observation are needed to assess tumor response and related toxicity rates.

CpG island methylator phenotype infers a poor disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND Locally advanced rectal cancers are treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT). However, subsets of patients have no benefit from preoperative treatment. Since epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, may influence response to neoadjuvant treatment we studied the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in patients who received a 5-fluouracil based RCT. METHODS One hundred fifty patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, treated within a phase III clinical trial (CAO/ARO/AIO-94 and -04), were included in this analysis. CIMP was assessed by methylation specific PCR (MSP) using RUNX3, SOCS1, NEUROG1, IGF2, and CACNA1G as a marker panel. Loss of mismatch repair gene (MMR) expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry for a subset of patients. KRAS and BRAF mutation status were assessed using Sanger sequencing. RESULTS The CIMP status could be established in all 150 patients. Fifteen (10%) revealed CIMP positivity (≥3 methylated promoters), whereas 135 patients (90%) where classified as CIMP negative. Analysis for MMR status did not reveal any microsatellite instability (MSI). A single mutation of the BRAF gene (D594G) was detected. The KRAS gene (exon 1, 2, and 3) was mutated in 65 tumors (43%) but was not correlated to a specific CIMP status. Three- and 5-year disease-free survival was notably worse in CIMP positive patients (56% and 0% vs 80% and 75%; P < .01) suggesting an increased likelihood of poor clinical outcome (HR 5.5; 95%CI: [2.1, 13.9]). CONCLUSION CIMP positivity, defined by methylation of at least 3 specific gene promoters, is an infrequent event in locally advanced rectal cancer. However, it increases the likelihood of distant metastases. Therefore, the CIMP status may be included as a molecular marker for the identification of high-risk patients and might contribute to individual treatment stratification.

Identification of a microRNA expression signature for chemoradiosensitivity of colorectal cancer cells, involving miRNAs-320a, -224, -132 and let7g

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) represents the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Tumor response and progression vary considerably. MicroRNAs represent master regulators of gene expression, and may therefore contribute to this diversity. MATERIAL AND METHODS Genome-wide microRNA (miRNA) profiling was performed for 12 colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines and an individual in vitro signature of chemoradiosensitivity was established. Functional relevance of selected miRNAs was established by transfecting miRNA-mimics into SW480 and SW837 cells. The prognostic value of selected miRNAs was assessed in 128 pretherapeutic patient biopsies. RESULTS Thirty-six miRNAs were identified to significantly correlate with sensitivity to CRT (Q < 0.05) including miR-320a and other miRNAs involved in the MAPK-, TGF- and Wnt-pathway. Transfection of selected miRNAs (let-7g, miR-132, miR-224, miR-320a) each induced a shift of sensitivity. High expression of let-7 g was associated with a good prognosis in rectal cancer patients (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of a miRNA expression signature for in vitro chemoradiosensitivity of CRC cell lines. Many of the identified miRNAs have not been linked to the response to CRT and may represent potential molecular targets to sensitize resistant cancers. If further validated, let7g expression may serve as predictive biomarker.

MicroRNA-101 Suppresses Tumor Cell Proliferation by Acting as an Endogenous Proteasome Inhibitor via Targeting the Proteasome Assembly Factor POMP

Proteasome inhibition represents a promising strategy of cancer pharmacotherapy, but resistant tumor cells often emerge. Here we show that the microRNA-101 (miR-101) targets the proteasome maturation protein POMP, leading to impaired proteasome assembly and activity, and resulting in accumulation of p53 and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. miR-101-resistant POMP restores proper turnover of proteasome substrates and re-enables tumor cell growth. In ERα-positive breast cancers, miR-101 and POMP levels are inversely correlated, and high miR-101 expression or low POMP expression associates with prolonged survival. Mechanistically, miR-101 expression or POMP knockdown attenuated estrogen-driven transcription. Finally, suppressing POMP is sufficient to overcome tumor cell resistance to the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Taken together, proteasome activity can not only be manipulated through drugs, but is also subject to endogenous regulation through miR-101, which targets proteasome biogenesis to control overall protein turnover and tumor cell proliferation.

Induction chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer : is it time for a randomized phase III trial?

Background:In the era of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME), the development of distant metastases is the predominant mode of failure in rectal cancer patients today. Integrating more effective systemic therapy into combined modality programs is the challenge. The question that needs to be addressed is how and when to apply systemic treatment with adequate dose and intensity.Material and Methods:This review article focuses on phase II–III trials designed to improve 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based combined modality treatment for rectal cancer patients through the inclusion of concurrent, adjuvant or, most recently, induction combination chemotherapy. Computerized bibliographic searches of PubMed were supplemented with hand searches of reference lists and abstracts of ASCO/ASTRO/ESTRO meetings.Results:After preoperative CRT and surgical resection, approximately one third of patients do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly due to surgical complications, patients’ refusal, or investigator’s discretion. In order to be able to apply chemotherapy with sufficient dose and intensity, an innovative approach is to deliver systemic therapy prior to preoperative CRT rather than adjuvant chemotherapy. Emerging evidence from several phase II trials and, recently, randomized phase II trials indicate that induction chemotherapy is feasible, does not compromise CRT or surgical resection, and enables the delivery of chemotherapy in adequate dose and intensity. Although this approach did not increase local efficacy in recent trials (e.g., pathological complete response rates, tumor regression, R0 resection rates, local control), it may help to improve control of distant disease.Conclusion:Whether this improvement in applicability and dose density of chemotherapy will ultimately translate into improved disease-free survival will have to be tested in a larger phase III trial.Hintergrund:Nach Einführung der präoperativen Radiochemotherapie (RCT) und der totalen mesoerektalen Excision manifestieren sich Rezidive beim Rektumkarzinom am häufigsten als Fernmetastasen. Daher ist die Integration einer systemisch effektiveren Therapie in das multimodale Behandlungskonzept derzeit die entscheidende Herausforderung. Die Frage ist, wann und wie diese Systemtherapie mit adäquater Dosis und Intensität verabreicht werden kann.Material und Methoden:Der Übersichtsartikel beschreibt Phase II–III Studien, deren Ziel es war, die allein 5-FU-basierte multimodale Behandlung durch Hinzunahme einer Kombinations-Chemotherapie, simultan zur Radiotherapie, adjuvant oder als Induktionstherapie, zu verbessern. Dazu diente eine Suchabfrage in Pubmed, in Referenzlisten publizierter Arbeiten sowie Abstrakts von ASCO/ASTRO/ESTRO-Konferenzen.Ergebnisse:Nach präoperativer RCT und Operation erhalten etwa ein Drittel aller Patienten wegen postoperativer Komplikationen, patientenseitiger Ablehnung oder Entscheidung des betreuenden Arztes keine adjuvante Chemotherapie. Ein innovativer Ansatz ist die Induktionschemotherapie vor präoperativer RCT und Operation, um die systemische Therapie in ausreichender Dosierung und Intensität durchführen zu können. Eine Vielzahl an Phase II-Studien, und zuletzt auch randomisierter Phase- II-Studien, zeigte, dass dieses Konzept durchführbar ist, die anschließende RCT und Operation nicht kompromittiert sowie die systemische Komponente in adäquater Dosis und Intensität applizierbar macht. Wenngleich dadurch die lokale Wirksamkeit (histopathologisch bestätigte Komplettremission, Tumorregression, R0-Resektionsrate, lokale Kontrolle) nicht verbessert wurde, könnte sich dieses Vorgehen positiv auf die systemische Tumorkontrolle auswirken.Schlussfolgerung:Eine Phase-III-Studie muss klären, ob die verbesserte Durchführbarkeit und Dosisdichte einer Induktionschemotherapie das krankheitsfreie Überleben verbessern kann.