Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael J. Schnieders is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael J. Schnieders.


Journal of Physical Chemistry B | 2010

Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field

Jay W. Ponder; Chuanjie Wu; Pengyu Ren; Vijay S. Pande; John D. Chodera; Michael J. Schnieders; Imran S. Haque; David L. Mobley; Daniel S. Lambrecht; Robert A. DiStasio; Martin Head-Gordon; Gary N. I. Clark; Margaret E. Johnson; Teresa Head-Gordon

Molecular force fields have been approaching a generational transition over the past several years, moving away from well-established and well-tuned, but intrinsically limited, fixed point charge models toward more intricate and expensive polarizable models that should allow more accurate description of molecular properties. The recently introduced AMOEBA force field is a leading publicly available example of this next generation of theoretical model, but to date, it has only received relatively limited validation, which we address here. We show that the AMOEBA force field is in fact a significant improvement over fixed charge models for small molecule structural and thermodynamic observables in particular, although further fine-tuning is necessary to describe solvation free energies of drug-like small molecules, dynamical properties away from ambient conditions, and possible improvements in aromatic interactions. State of the art electronic structure calculations reveal generally very good agreement with AMOEBA for demanding problems such as relative conformational energies of the alanine tetrapeptide and isomers of water sulfate complexes. AMOEBA is shown to be especially successful on protein-ligand binding and computational X-ray crystallography where polarization and accurate electrostatics are critical.


Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation | 2018

Tinker 8: Software Tools for Molecular Design

Joshua A. Rackers; Zhi Wang; Chao Lu; Marie L. Laury; Louis Lagardère; Michael J. Schnieders; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Pengyu Ren; Jay W. Ponder

The Tinker software, currently released as version 8, is a modular molecular mechanics and dynamics package written primarily in a standard, easily portable dialect of Fortran 95 with OpenMP extensions. It supports a wide variety of force fields, including polarizable models such as the Atomic Multipole Optimized Energetics for Biomolecular Applications (AMOEBA) force field. The package runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows systems. In addition to canonical Tinker, there are branches, Tinker-HP and Tinker-OpenMM, designed for use on message passing interface (MPI) parallel distributed memory supercomputers and state-of-the-art graphical processing units (GPUs), respectively. The Tinker suite also includes a tightly integrated Java-based graphical user interface called Force Field Explorer (FFE), which provides molecular visualization capabilities as well as the ability to launch and control Tinker calculations.


Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics | 2012

Biomolecular electrostatics and solvation: a computational perspective

Pengyu Ren; Jaehun Chun; Dennis G. Thomas; Michael J. Schnieders; Marcelo Marucho; Jiajing Zhang; Nathan A. Baker

An understanding of molecular interactions is essential for insight into biological systems at the molecular scale. Among the various components of molecular interactions, electrostatics are of special importance because of their long-range nature and their influence on polar or charged molecules, including water, aqueous ions, proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and membrane lipids. In particular, robust models of electrostatic interactions are essential for understanding the solvation properties of biomolecules and the effects of solvation upon biomolecular folding, binding, enzyme catalysis, and dynamics. Electrostatics, therefore, are of central importance to understanding biomolecular structure and modeling interactions within and among biological molecules. This review discusses the solvation of biomolecules with a computational biophysics view toward describing the phenomenon. While our main focus lies on the computational aspect of the models, we provide an overview of the basic elements of biomolecular solvation (e.g. solvent structure, polarization, ion binding, and non-polar behavior) in order to provide a background to understand the different types of solvation models.


Journal of Computational Chemistry | 2009

Trypsin-ligand binding free energies from explicit and implicit solvent simulations with polarizable potential.

Dian Jiao; Jiajing Zhang; Robert E. Duke; Guohui Li; Michael J. Schnieders; Pengyu Ren

We have calculated the binding free energies of a series of benzamidine‐like inhibitors to trypsin with a polarizable force field using both explicit and implicit solvent approaches. Free energy perturbation has been performed for the ligands in bulk water and in protein complex with molecular dynamics simulations. The binding free energies calculated from explicit solvent simulations are well within the accuracy of experimental measurement and the direction of change is predicted correctly in all cases. We analyzed the molecular dipole moments of the ligands in gas, water and protein environments. Neither binding affinity nor ligand solvation free energy in bulk water shows much dependence on the molecular dipole moments of the ligands. Substitution of the aromatic or the charged group in the ligand results in considerable change in the solvation energy in bulk water and protein whereas the binding affinity varies insignificantly due to cancellation. The effect of chemical modification on ligand charge distribution is mostly local. Replacing benzene with diazine has minimal impact on the atomic multipoles at the amidinium group. We have also utilized an implicit solvent based end‐state approach to evaluate the binding free energies of these inhibitors. In this approach, the polarizable multipole model combined with Poisson‐Boltzmann/surface area (PMPB/SA) provides the electrostatic interaction energy and the polar solvation free energy. Overall the relative binding free energies obtained from the MM‐PMPB/SA model are in good agreement with the experimental data.


Proteins | 2011

Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Justin L. MacCallum; Alberto Perez; Michael J. Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P. Jacobson; Ken A. Dill

We assess performance in the structure refinement category in CASP9. Two years after CASP8, the performance of the best groups has not improved. There are few groups that improve any of our assessment scores with statistical significance. Some predictors, however, are able to consistently improve the physicality of the models. Although we cannot identify any clear bottleneck in improving refinement, several points arise: (1) The refinement portion of CASP has too few targets to make many statistically meaningful conclusions. (2) Predictors are usually very conservative, limiting the possibility of large improvements in models. (3) No group is actually able to correctly rank their five submissions—indicating that potentially better models may be discarded. (4) Different sampling strategies work better for different refinement problems; there is no single strategy that works on all targets. In general, conservative strategies do better, while the greatest improvements come from more adventurous sampling—at the cost of consistency. Comparison with experimental data reveals aspects not captured by comparison to a single structure. In particular, we show that improvement in backbone geometry does not always mean better agreement with experimental data. Finally, we demonstrate that even given the current challenges facing refinement, the refined models are useful for solving the crystallographic phase problem through molecular replacement. Proteins 2011;.


Journal of Chemical Physics | 2007

Polarizable Atomic Multipole Solutes in a Poisson-Boltzmann Continuum

Michael J. Schnieders; Nathan A. Baker; Pengyu Ren; Jay W. Ponder

Modeling the change in the electrostatics of organic molecules upon moving from vacuum into solvent, due to polarization, has long been an interesting problem. In vacuum, experimental values for the dipole moments and polarizabilities of small, rigid molecules are known to high accuracy; however, it has generally been difficult to determine these quantities for a polar molecule in water. A theoretical approach introduced by Onsager [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486 (1936)] used vacuum properties of small molecules, including polarizability, dipole moment, and size, to predict experimentally known permittivities of neat liquids via the Poisson equation. Since this important advance in understanding the condensed phase, a large number of computational methods have been developed to study solutes embedded in a continuum via numerical solutions to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. Only recently have the classical force fields used for studying biomolecules begun to include explicit polarization in their functional forms. Here the authors describe the theory underlying a newly developed polarizable multipole Poisson-Boltzmann (PMPB) continuum electrostatics model, which builds on the atomic multipole optimized energetics for biomolecular applications (AMOEBA) force field. As an application of the PMPB methodology, results are presented for several small folded proteins studied by molecular dynamics in explicit water as well as embedded in the PMPB continuum. The dipole moment of each protein increased on average by a factor of 1.27 in explicit AMOEBA water and 1.26 in continuum solvent. The essentially identical electrostatic response in both models suggests that PMPB electrostatics offers an efficient alternative to sampling explicit solvent molecules for a variety of interesting applications, including binding energies, conformational analysis, and pK(a) prediction. Introduction of 150 mM salt lowered the electrostatic solvation energy between 2 and 13 kcalmole, depending on the formal charge of the protein, but had only a small influence on dipole moments.


Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation | 2007

Polarizable Atomic Multipole Solutes in a Generalized Kirkwood Continuum.

Michael J. Schnieders; Jay W. Ponder

The generalized Born (GB) model of continuum electrostatics is an analytic approximation to the Poisson equation useful for predicting the electrostatic component of the solvation free energy for solutes ranging in size from small organic molecules to large macromolecular complexes. This work presents a new continuum electrostatics model based on Kirkwoods analytic result for the electrostatic component of the solvation free energy for a solute with arbitrary charge distribution. Unlike GB, which is limited to monopoles, our generalized Kirkwood (GK) model can treat solute electrostatics represented by any combination of permanent and induced atomic multipole moments of arbitrary degree. Here we apply the GK model to the newly developed Atomic Multipole Optimized Energetics for Biomolecular Applications (AMOEBA) force field, which includes permanent atomic multipoles through the quadrupole and treats polarization via induced dipoles. A derivation of the GK gradient is presented, which enables energy minimization or molecular dynamics of an AMOEBA solute within a GK continuum. For a series of 55 proteins, GK electrostatic solvation free energies are compared to the Polarizable Multipole Poisson-Boltzmann (PMPB) model and yield a mean unsigned relative difference of 0.9%. Additionally, the reaction field of GK compares well to that of the PMPB model, as shown by a mean unsigned relative difference of 2.7% in predicting the total solvated dipole moment for each protein in this test set. The CPU time needed for GK relative to vacuum AMOEBA calculations is approximately a factor of 3, making it suitable for applications that require significant sampling of configuration space.


Proteins | 2009

Assessment of the protein-structure refinement category in CASP8

Justin L. MacCallum; Lan Hua; Michael J. Schnieders; Vijay S. Pande; Matthew P. Jacobson; Ken A. Dill

Here, we summarize the assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP8. Twenty‐four groups refined a total of 12 target proteins. Averaging over all groups and all proteins, there was no net improvement over the original starting models. However, there are now some individual research groups who consistently do improve protein structures relative to a starting starting model. We compare various measures of quality assessment, including (i) standard backbone‐based methods, (ii) new methods from the Richardson group, and (iii) ensemble‐based methods for comparing experimental structures, such as NMR NOE violations and the suitability of the predicted models to serve as templates for molecular replacement. On the whole, there is a general correlation among various measures. However, there are interesting differences. Sometimes a structure that is in better agreement with the experimental data is judged to be slightly worse by GDT‐TS. This suggests that for comparing protein structures that are already quite close to the native, it may be preferable to use ensemble‐based experimentally derived measures of quality, in addition to single‐structure‐based methods such as GDT‐TS. Proteins 2009.


Acta Crystallographica Section D-biological Crystallography | 2009

Polarizable atomic multipole X-ray refinement: application to peptide crystals

Michael J. Schnieders; Timothy D. Fenn; Vijay S. Pande; Axel T. Brunger

A method to accelerate the computation of structure factors from an electron density described by anisotropic and aspherical atomic form factors via fast Fourier transformation is described for the first time.


Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2016

High-Throughput Genetic Testing for Thrombotic Microangiopathies and C3 Glomerulopathies

Fengxiao Bu; Nicolò Borsa; Michael Jones; Erika Takanami; Carla Nishimura; Jill Hauer; Hela Azaiez; Elizabeth A. Black-Ziegelbein; Nicole C. Meyer; Diana L. Kolbe; Yingyue Li; Kathy L. Frees; Michael J. Schnieders; Christie P. Thomas; Carla M. Nester; Richard J.H. Smith

The thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) and C3 glomerulopathies (C3Gs) include a spectrum of rare diseases such as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, C3GN, and dense deposit disease, which share phenotypic similarities and underlying genetic commonalities. Variants in several genes contribute to the pathogenesis of these diseases, and identification of these variants may inform the diagnosis and treatment of affected patients. We have developed and validated a comprehensive genetic panel that screens all exons of all genes implicated in TMA and C3G. The closely integrated pipeline implemented includes targeted genomic enrichment, massively parallel sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, and a multidisciplinary conference to analyze identified variants in the context of each patients specific phenotype. Herein, we present our 1-year experience with this panel, during which time we studied 193 patients. We identified 17 novel and 74 rare variants, which we classified as pathogenic (11), likely pathogenic (12), and of uncertain significance (68). Compared with controls, patients with C3G had a higher frequency of rare and novel variants in C3 convertase (C3 and CFB) and complement regulator (CFH, CFI, CFHR5, and CD46) genes (P<0.05). In contrast, patients with TMA had an increase in rare and novel variants only in complement regulator genes (P<0.01), a distinction consistent with differing sites of complement dysregulation in these two diseases. In summary, we were able to provide a positive genetic diagnosis in 43% and 41% of patients carrying the clinical diagnosis of C3G and TMA, respectively.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael J. Schnieders's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pengyu Ren

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jay W. Ponder

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yue Shi

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge