Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael K. Rosner is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael K. Rosner.


Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques | 2006

Single-stage Treatment of Pyogenic Spinal Infection With Titanium Mesh Cages

Timothy R. Kuklo; Benjamin K. Potter; Randy S. Bell; Ross R. Moquin; Michael K. Rosner

Study Design Single institution retrospective review. Objectives To report a series of pyogenic spinal infections treated with single-stage debridement and reconstruction with titanium mesh cages. Summary of Background Data Various studies have reported surgical results of pyogenic spinal osteomyelitis with anterior debridement, strut grafting and fusion, including delayed posterior spinal instrumentation. Additionally, various authors have recommended against the use of instrumentation because of the concern about glycocalyx formation on the metal and chronic infection. At our institution, we routinely treat chronic vertebral osteomyelitis with single-stage debridement, reconstruction with a titanium mesh cage filled with allograft chips and demineralized bone matrix, and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. To our knowledge, this is the largest single series reporting single-stage debridement and instrumentation of pyogenic spinal infection with titanium mesh cages and posterior instrumentation. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the patient records and radiographs of 21 consecutive patients (average age 49.3 years, range 23 to 80 years) with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis, all treated with titanium mesh cages. Average follow-up was 44 months (range, 25 to 70 months). Spinal levels included 6 thoracic, 4 thoracolumbar, 9 lumbar, and 2 lumbosacral (L5-S1) lesions. All patients had preoperative serum evaluation, which usually included blood cultures, complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP), in addition to plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. A positive needle biopsy was available in only 2/7 patients (29%), and overall, preoperative pathogen identification was available in only 7/21 patients (33%). All patients were treated postoperatively with a minimum of 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, with a specific antibiotic regimen directed toward the postoperative pathogen when identified (17/21 cases). Extensive radiographic evaluation was also performed. Results ESR and CRP were routinely elevated (18/20 and 11/17 cases respectively), whereas the white blood count was elevated in only 8 out of 21 cases (38%). The average duration of symptoms to diagnosis was approximately 13.6 weeks (range 3 weeks to 10 months). The indications for surgery included neurologic compromise, significant vertebral body destruction with loss of sagittal alignment, failure of medical treatment, and/or epidural abscess. All patients had resolution of infection, as noted by normalization of the ESR and CRP. Further, 16 out of 21 patients also had a significant reduction of pain. There were no deaths or new postoperative neurologic compromise. The most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. Two patients required a second surgery (posterior irrigation and debridement) during the same admission for persistent wound drainage. Radiographically, the average segmental kyphosis (or loss of lordosis) was 11.5 degrees (range, 0 to 24 degrees) preoperatively, and +0.8 degrees (range, –3 to +5 degrees) at latest postoperative follow-up. There was an average of 2.2 mm cage settling (range, 0 to 5 mm) on latest follow-up. There were no instrumentation failures, signs of chronic infection, or rejection. Conclusions Titanium mesh cages present a viable option for single-stage anterior surgical debridement and reconstruction of vertebral osteomyelitis, without evidence of chronic infection or rejection. When used in conjunction with pedicle screw instrumentation, there is minimal cage settling without loss of sagittal alignment.


Neurosurgical Focus | 2010

Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy

Frederick L. Stephens; Correy M. Mossop; Randy S. Bell; Teodoro Tigno; Michael K. Rosner; Anand R. Kumar; Leon E. Moores; Rocco A. Armonda

OBJECT In support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom-Afghanistan (OEF-A), military neurosurgeons in the combat theater are faced with the daunting task of stabilizing patients in such a way as to prevent irreversible neurological injury from cerebral edema while simultaneously allowing for prolonged transport stateside (5000-7000 miles). It is in this setting that decompressive craniectomy has become a mainstay of far-forward neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). As such, institutional experience with cranioplasty at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) and the National Naval Medical Center (NNMC) has expanded concomitantly. Battlefield blast explosions create cavitary injury zones that often extend beyond the border of the exposed surface wound, and this situation has created unique reconstruction challenges not often seen in civilian TBI. The loss of both soft-tissue and skull base support along with the need for cranial vault reconstruction requires a multidisciplinary approach involving neurosurgery, plastics, oral-maxillofacial surgery, and ophthalmology. With this situation in mind, the authors of this paper endeavored to review the cranial reconstruction complications encountered in these combat-related injuries. METHODS A retrospective database review was conducted for all soldiers injured in OIF and OEF-A who had undergone decompressive craniectomy with subsequent cranioplasty between April 2002 and October 2008 at the WRAMC and NNMC. During this time, both facilities received a total of 408 OIF/OEF-A patients with severe head injuries; 188 of these patients underwent decompressive craniectomies in the theater before transfer to the US. Criteria for inclusion in this study consisted of either a closed or a penetrating head injury sustained in combat operations, resulting in the performance of a decompressive craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty at either the WRAMC or NNMC. Excluded from the study were patients for whom primary demographic data could not be verified. Demographic data, indications for craniectomy, as well as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters following cranioplasty, were recorded. Perioperative and postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS One hundred eight patients (male/female ratio 107:1) met the inclusion criteria for this study, 93 with a penetrating head injury and 15 with a closed head injury. Explosive blast injury was the predominant mechanism of injury, occurring in 72 patients (67%). The average time that elapsed between injury and cranioplasty was 190 days (range 7-546 days). An overall complication rate of 24% was identified. The prevalence of perioperative infection (12%), seizure (7.4%), and extraaxial hematoma formation (7.4%) was noted. Twelve patients (11%) required prosthetic removal because of either extraaxial hematoma formation or infection. Eight of the 13 cases of infection involved cranioplasties performed between 90 and 270 days from the date of injury (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS This study represents the largest to date in which cranioplasty and its complications have been evaluated in a trauma population that underwent decompressive craniectomy. The overall complication rate of 24% is consistent with rates reported in the literature (16-34%); however, the perioperative infection rate of 12% is higher than the rates reported in other studies. This difference is likely related to aspects of the initial injury pattern-such as skull base injury, orbitofacial fractures, sinus injuries, persistent fluid collection, and CSF leakage-which can predispose these patients to infection.


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2012

Incidence and severity of acute complications after spinal cord injury

Robert G. Grossman; Ralph F. Frankowski; Keith D. Burau; Elizabeth G. Toups; John W. Crommett; Michele M. Johnson; Michael G. Fehlings; Charles H. Tator; Christopher I. Shaffrey; Susan J. Harkema; Jonathan Hodes; Bizhan Aarabi; Michael K. Rosner; James D. Guest; James S. Harrop

OBJECT The aim of this multicenter, prospective study was to determine the spectrum, incidence, and severity of complications during the initial hospitalization of patients with spinal cord injury. METHODS The study was conducted at 9 university-affiliated hospitals that comprise the clinical centers of the North American Clinical Trials Network (NACTN) for Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury. The study population comprised 315 patients admitted to NACTN clinical centers between June 25, 2005, and November 2, 2010, who had American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grades of A-D and were 18 years of age or older. Patients were managed according to a standardized protocol. RESULTS The study population was 79% male with a median age of 44 years. The leading causes of injury were falls (37%) and motor vehicle accidents (28%). The distribution of initial ASIA grades were A (40%), B (16%), C (15%), and D (29%). Fifty-eight percent of patients sustained 1 or more severe, moderate, or mild complications. Complications were associated with more severe ASIA grade: 84% of patients with Grade A and 25% of patients with Grade D had at least 1 complication. Seventy-eight percent of complications occurred within 14 days of injury. The most frequent types of severe and moderate complications were respiratory failure, pneumonia, pleural effusion, anemia, cardiac dysrhythmia, and severe bradycardia. The mortality rate was 3.5% and was associated with increased age and preexisting morbidity. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge of the type, frequency, time of occurrence, and severity of specific complications that occur after spinal cord injury can aid in their early detection, treatment, and prevention. The data are of importance in evaluating and selecting therapy for clinical trials.


The Spine Journal | 2008

Adjacent vertebral body osteolysis with bone morphogenetic protein use in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Melvin D. Helgeson; Ronald A. Lehman; Jeanne C. Patzkowski; Anton E. Dmitriev; Michael K. Rosner; Andrew W. Mack

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Recent studies have demonstrated cases of adjacent vertebral body osteolysis when assessing the effect of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) on fusion rates. However, no study to date has evaluated the course of osteolysis at different periods. PURPOSE To determine the incidence and resolution of osteolysis associated with BMP used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE All TLIF cases using BMP performed at one institution with routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans at defined intervals. OUTCOME MEASURES Area of osteolysis and fusion as determined by CT scan. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients at our facility who underwent TLIF with BMP. Included were all patients who had obtained a CT scan within 48 hours of surgery, 3 to 6 months postoperatively, and 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Areas of osteolysis were defined as lucency within the vertebral body communicating with the interbody spacer that was not present on the immediately postoperative CT scan. Areas of osteolysis were measured in all three planes and the volume used for comparison of the 3 to 6 months CT scans with the greater than 1 year CT scan. RESULTS Twenty-three patients who underwent TLIF with BMP had obtained CT scans at all time periods required for evaluation. Seventy-eight vertebral bodies/end plates were assessed for osteolysis (39 levels). The incidence of osteolysis 3 to 6 months postoperatively in the adjacent vertebral bodies was 54% compared with 41% at 1 to 2 years. The mean volume of osteolysis was at 0.216 cm(3) at 1 to 2 years compared with 0.306 cm(3) at 3 to 6 months (p=.082). The area/rate of osteolysis did not appear to significantly affect the rate of fusion or final outcome with an overall union rate of 83%. CONCLUSIONS The rate of osteolysis decreased at 1 year compared with 3 to 6 months, but only 24% of the vertebral bodies with evidence of osteolysis at 3 to 6 months completely resolved by 1 year.


Spine | 2008

Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment.

Mario J. Cardoso; Anton E. Dmitriev; Melvin D. Helgeson; Ronald A. Lehman; Timothy R. Kuklo; Michael K. Rosner

Study Design. This is an in vitro biomechanical study. Objective. The current investigation was performed to evaluate adjacent level kinematic change following unilateral and bilateral facet violation and laminectomy following 1-, 2-, and 3-level reconstruction. Summary of Background Data. The incidence of superior-segment facet violation with lumbar transpedicular fixation has been reported as high as 35%; however, its contribution to biomechanical instability at the supradjacent level is unknown. In addition, superior-segment laminectomy has been implicated as a risk factor for the development of adjacent level disease. The authors assess the acute biomechanical effects of proximal facet violation and subsequent laminectomy in an instrumented posterior fusion model in 10 cadaveric specimens. Methods. Biomechanical testing was performed on 10 human cadaveric spines under axial rotation (AR), flexion-extension (FE), and lateral bending (LB) loading. After intact analysis, pedicle screws were inserted from L5-S1 and testing repeated with: (1) preserved L4–L5 facets, (2) unilateral facet breach, (3) bilateral breach, and (4) L5 laminectomy. Following biomechanical analysis, instrumentation was extended to L4, then L3 and biomechanical testing repeated. Full range of motion (ROM) at the proximal adjacent levels were recorded and normalized to intact (100%). Results. Supradjacent level ROM was increased for all groups under all loading methods relative to intact (P < 0.05). However, AR testing revealed progressive instability at the adjacent level in groups 3 and 4, relative to group 1, following 1-, 2- and 3-level fixation (P < 0.05). During FE, supradjacent level ROM was significantly increased for group 4 specimens compared with group 1 after L5-S1 fixation (P < 0.05), and was greater than all other groups for L3-S1 constructs (P < 0.05). Interestingly, under lateral bending, facet joint destabilization did not change adjacent segment ROM. Conclusion. There were significant changes in proximal level ROM immediately after posterior stabilization. However, an additional increase in supradjacent segment ROM was recorded during AR after bilateral facet breach. Subsequent complete laminectomy at the uppermostfixation level further destabilized the supradjacent segment in FE and AR. Therefore, meticulous preservation of the cephalad–most segment facet joints–is paramount to ensure stability.


Spine | 2007

Fluoroscopic video to identify aberrant lumbar motion.

Deydre S. Teyhen; Timothy W. Flynn; John D. Childs; Timothy R. Kuklo; Michael K. Rosner; David W. Polly; Lawrence D. Abraham

Study Design. A prospective, case-control design. Objectives. To develop a kinematic model that characterizes frequently observed movement patterns in patients with low back pain (LBP). Summary of Background Data. Understanding arthrokinematics of lumbar motion in those with LBP may provide further understanding of this condition. Methods. Digital fluoroscopic video (DFV) was used to quantify the magnitude and rate of attainment of sagittal plane intersegmental angular and linear displacement from 20 individuals with LBP and 20 healthy control subjects during lumbar flexion and extension. Three fellowship-trained spine surgeons subsequently qualitatively analyzed the DFVs to determine normality of movement. Final classification was based on agreement between their symptom and motion status (11 with LBP and aberrant motion and 14 healthy controls without aberrant motion). Independent t tests, receiver operator characteristic curves, and accuracy statistics were calculated to determine the most parsimonious set of kinematic variables able to distinguish patients with LBP. Results. Eight kinematic variables had a positive likelihood ratio ≥2.5 and entered the model. Six of the variables described a disruption in the rate of attainment of angular or linear displacement during midrange postures. When 4 or more of these variables were present, the positive likelihood ratio was 14.0 (confidence interval 3.2–78.5), resulting in accurately identifying 96% of participants. Conclusions. DFV was useful for discriminating between individuals with and without LBP based on kinematic parameters. Disruptions in how the motion occurred during midrange motions were more diagnostic for LBP than range of motion variables. Cross validation of the model is required.


Neurosurgical Focus | 2010

Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement

Mario J. Cardoso; Michael K. Rosner

OBJECT In this study, the authors review the technique for inserting the Prestige ST in a contiguous multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty in patients with radiculopathy and myelopathy. They describe the preoperative planning, surgical technique, and their experience with 10 patients receiving a contiguous Prestige ST implant. They present contiguous multilevel cervical arthroplasty as an alternative to multilevel arthrodesis. METHODS After institutional board review approval was obtained, the authors performed a retrospective review of all contiguous multilevel cervical disc arthroplasties with the Prestige ST artificial disc between August 2007 and November 2009 at a single institution by a single surgeon. Clinical criteria included patients who had undergone a multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty performed for radiculopathy and myelopathy without the presence of a previous cervical fusion. Between August 2007 and November 2009, 119 patients underwent cervical arthroplasty. Of the 119 patients, 31 received a Hybrid construct (total disc resection [TDR]-anterior cervical decompression and fusion [ACDF] or TDR-ACDF-TDR) and 24 received a multilevel cervical arthroplasty. The multilevel cervical arthroplasty group consisted of 14 noncontiguous and 10 contiguous implants. This paper examines patients who received contiguous Prestige ST implants. RESULTS Ten men with an average age of 45 years (range 25-61 years) were treated. Five patients presented with myelopathy, 3 presented with radiculopathy, and 2 presented with myeloradiculopathy. Twenty-two 6 x 16-mm Prestige ST TDRs were implanted. Six patients received 2-level Prestige ST implants. Five patients received TDRs at C5-6 and C6-7, and 1 patient received TDRs at C3-4 and C4-5. One patient received a TDR at C3-4, C5-6, and C6-7 where C4-5 was a congenital block vertebra. Three patients (2 with 3-level disease and 1 with 4-level disease) received contiguous Prestige ST implants as well as a Prevail ACDF as part of their constructs. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 12 months. There has been no case of screw backout, implant dislodgment, progressive kyphosis, formation of heterotopic bone, evidence of pseudarthrosis at the Prevail levels, or development of symptomatic adjacent level disease. CONCLUSIONS Multilevel cervical arthroplasty with the Prestige ST is a safe and effective alternative to fusion for the management of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy.


The Spine Journal | 2008

Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment

Anton E. Dmitriev; Norman W. Gill; Timothy R. Kuklo; Michael K. Rosner

BACKGROUND CONTEXT With lumbar arthroplasty gaining popularity, limited data are available highlighting changes in adjacent-level mechanics after multilevel procedures. PURPOSE Compare operative- and adjacent-segment range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressures (IDPs) after two-level arthroplasty versus circumferential arthrodesis. STUDY DESIGN Cadaveric biomechanical study. METHODS Ten human cadaveric lumbar spines were used in this investigation. Biomechanical testing was performed according to a hybrid testing protocol using an unconstrained spine simulator under axial rotation (AR), flexion extension (FE), and lateral-bending (LB) loading. Specimens were tested in the following order: 1) Intact, 2) L3-L5 total disc replacement (TDR), 3) L3-L5 anterior interbody cages+pedicle screws. IDP was recorded at proximal and distal adjacent levels and normalized to controls (%intact). Full ROM was monitored at the operative and adjacent levels and reported in degrees. RESULTS Kinematics assessment revealed L3-L5 ROM reduction after both reconstructions versus intact controls (p < .05). However, global quality of segmental motion distributed over L2-S1 was preserved in the arthroplasty group but was significantly altered after circumferential fixation. Furthermore, adjacent-level ROM was increased for the arthrodesis group under LB at both segments and during AR at L2-L3 relative to controls (p < .05). FE did not reveal any intergroup statistical differences. Nonetheless, after arthrodesis IDPs were increased proximally under all three loading modalities, whereas distally a significant IDP rise was noted during AR and LB (p < .05). No statistical differences in either biomechanical parameter were recorded at the adjacent levels between intact control and TDR groups. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate no significant adjacent-level biomechanical changes between arthroplasty and control groups. In contrast, significant alterations in ROM and IDP were recorded both proximally (ROM=LB & AR; IDP=AR, FE, LB) and distally (ROM=LB; IDP=AR & LB) after circumferential arthrodesis. Therefore, two-level lumbar arthroplasty maintains a more favorable biomechanical environment at the adjacent segments compared with the conventional transpedicular fixation technique. This, in turn, may have a positive effect on the rate of the transition syndrome postoperatively.


Spine | 2005

Reliability of end, neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Benjamin K. Potter; Michael K. Rosner; Ronald A. Lehman; David W. Polly; Teresa M. Schroeder; Timothy R. Kuklo

Study Design. Analysis of radiographic interpretation and vertebral level identification. Objectives. To assess the intra- and interobserver reliability by observer training level used for selecting the end vertebra (EV), neutral vertebra (NV), and stable vertebra (SV) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Summary of Background Data. Various radiographic and clinical factors are important in surgical planning. For adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, an analysis of the end, neutral, and stable vertebrae are of paramount importance for understanding spinal deformity management and determining the distal fusion level. Additionally, the development and comparison of optimal surgical techniques requires reliable, reproducible radiographic parameters. Methods. One hundred consecutive radiographs of operative cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were evaluated on three separate occasions by three surgeons (2700 data points) at various levels of training (fellowship-trained spine surgeon, fellow in-training, orthopedic surgery resident). For each iteration, the observers attempted to identify the distal structural Cobb curve EV, NV, and SV. The radiographs included preselected Lenke type 1, 3, and 5 curves in random order. The average main thoracic curve was 53° (range, 30–82°) with a T8–T9 average apex, whereas the average thoracolumbar curve was 33° (range, 18–65°). Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed by means of Cohen’s Kappa correlation coefficient, and raw percentages of agreement were recorded. Results. Intraobserver reliability was good to excellent for determining the EV (&kgr;a = 0.69–0.88), good for determining the NV (&kgr;a = 0.65–0.73), and good to excellent fordetermining the SV (&kgr;a = 0.74–0.91) with 83.5, 72.2, and 85.6% intraobserver agreement, respectively. A trendwas noted towards greater intraobserver reliability with increasing levels of observer experience. Interobserver reliability was poor (&kgr;a = 0.26–0.39) for each vertebral level, with interobserver agreement for only 48.7% of EV, 41.7% of NV, and 51.0% of SV. However, interobserver agreement increased significantly when concurrence within one vertebral level was assessed, with 91, 73, and 76% agreement for identifying the EV, NV, and SV, respectively. Conclusions. Radiographic determination of the EV, NV, and SV demonstrated good to excellent intraobserver, but poor interobserver, reliability. Interobserver agreement was fair to good when concurrence within one adjacent level was assessed. Observer experience level may be a factor. The difficulties in identifying these vertebral levels represent a potential obstacle to reproducible patient-specific fusion level determination and to the optimization and uniformity of patient care.


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2011

Cervical hybrid arthroplasty with 2 unique fusion techniques

Mario J. Cardoso; Audra Mendelsohn; Michael K. Rosner

OBJECTIVE Multilevel cervical arthroplasty achieved using the Prestige ST disc can be challenging and often unworkable. An alternative to this system is a hybrid technique composed of alternating total disc replacements (TDRs) and fusions. In the present study, the authors review the safety and radiological outcomes of cervical hybrid arthroplasty in which the Prestige ST disc is used in conjunction with 2 unique fusion techniques. METHODS After obtaining institutional review board approval, the authors completed a retrospective review of all hybrid cervical constructs in which the Prestige ST disc was used between August 2007 and November 2009 at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. A Prestige ST total disc replacement was performed in 119 patients. Thirty-one patients received a hybrid construct defined as a TDR and fusion (TDR-anterior cervical decompression and fusion [ACDF]) or as 2 TDRs separated by a fusion (TDR-ACDF-TDR). A resorbable plate and graft system (Mystique) or stand-alone interbody spacer (Prevail) was implanted at the fusion levels. Plain radiographs were compared and evaluated for cervical lordosis, range of motion, implant complications, development of adjacent-level disease, and pseudarthrosis. In addition, charts were reviewed for clinical complications related to the index surgery. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (18 men and 13 women; mean age 50 years, range 32-74 years) received a hybrid construct. All patients were diagnosed with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Twenty-four patients received a 2-level and 7 a 3-level hybrid construct. In 2 patients in whom a 2-level hybrid construct was implanted, a noncontiguous TDR was also performed. The mean clinical and radiological follow-up duration was 18 months. There was no significant difference in preoperative (19.3° ± 13.3°) and postoperative (19.7° ± 10.5°) cervical lordosis (p = 0.48), but there was a significant decrease in range in motion (from 50.0° ± 11.8° to 38.9° ± 12.7°) (p = 0.003). There were no instances of screw backout, implant dislodgement, progressive kyphosis, formation of heterotopic bone, pseudarthrosis, or symptomatic adjacent-level disease. Seven patients had dysphasia and 1 patient had vocal cord paralysis at 6 weeks. By 3 months, both the dysphasia and the vocal cord paralysis were resolved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS Hybrid cervical arthroplasty involving the placement of a Prestige ST disc and either the Mystique resorbable plate or Prevail stand-alone interbody device is a safe and effective alternative to multilevel fusion for the management of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael K. Rosner's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy R. Kuklo

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ronald A. Lehman

Columbia University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anton E. Dmitriev

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melvin D. Helgeson

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mario J. Cardoso

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris J. Neal

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patrick Cooper

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Norman W. Gill

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ross R. Moquin

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge