Michael Lampel

Comparison of carbon monoxide measurements by TES and MOPITT: Influence of a priori data and instrument characteristics on nadir atmospheric species retrievals

[1] Comparisons of tropospheric carbon monoxide (CO) volume mixing ratio profiles and total columns are presented from nadir-viewing measurements made by the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) on the NASA Aura satellite and by the Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument on the NASA Terra satellite. In this paper, we first explore the factors that relate the retrieved and the true species profiles. We demonstrate that at a given location and time the retrieved species profiles reported by different satellite instrument teams can be very different from each other. We demonstrate the influence of the a priori data and instrument characteristics on the CO products from TES and MOPITT and on their comparisons. Direct comparison of TES and MOPITT retrieved CO profiles and columns show significant differences in the lower and upper troposphere. To perform a more proper and rigorous comparison between the two instrument observations we allow for different a priori profiles and averaging kernels. We compare (1) TES retrieved CO profiles adjusted to the MOPITT a priori with the MOPITT retrievals and (2) the above adjusted TES CO profiles with the MOPITT profiles vertically smoothed by the TES averaging kernels. These two steps greatly improve the agreement between the CO profiles and the columns from the two instruments. No systematic differences are found as a function of latitude in the final comparisons. These results show that knowledge of the a priori profiles, the averaging kernels, and the error covariance matrices in the standard data products provided by the instrument teams and understanding their roles in the retrieval products are essential in quantitatively interpreting both retrieved profiles and the derived total or partial columns for scientific applications.

Ozone-CO correlations determined by the TES satellite instrument in continental outflow regions

0.4– 1.0 mol mol � 1 and consistent with ICARTT data. The GEOS-Chem model reproduces the O3-CO enhancement ratios observed in continental outflow, but model correlations are stronger and more extensive. We show that the discrepancy can be explained by spectral measurement errors in the TES data. These errors will decrease in future data releases, which should enable TES to provide better information on O3-CO correlations. Citation: Zhang, L., et al. (2006), Ozone-CO correlations determined by the TES satellite instrument in continental outflow regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L18804, doi:10.1029/2006GL026399.

Forward model and Jacobians for Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer retrievals

The Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) is a high-resolution spaceborne sensor that is capable of observing tropospheric species. In order to exploit fully TESs potential for tropospheric constituent retrievals, an accurate and fast operational forward model was developed for TES. The forward model is an important component of the TES retrieval model, the Earth Limb and Nadir Operational Retrieval (ELANOR), as it governs the accuracy and speed of the calculations for the retrievals. In order to achieve the necessary accuracy and computational efficiency, TES adopted the strategy of utilizing precalculated absorption coefficients generated by the line-by-line calculations provided by line-by-line radiation transfer modeling. The decision to perform the radiative transfer with the highest monochromatic accuracy attainable, rather than with an accelerated scheme that has the potential to add algorithmic forward model error, has proven to be very successful for TES retrievals. A detailed description of the TES forward model and Jacobians is described. A preliminary TES observation is provided as an example to demonstrate that the TES forward model calculations represent TES observations. Also presented is a validation example, which is part of the extensive forward model validation effort.

TES ground data system software

Software development in support of the tropospheric emission spectrometer instrument ground data system has undergone many challenges due to the uniqueness of the instrument, complexity of the science, data volume, and performance requirements. In this paper, we describe the software, its development, and the way in which many of these challenges were met.