Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Michael Q. Potter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Michael Q. Potter.


Journal of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons | 2013

Early weight bearing after lower extremity fractures in adults.

Erik N. Kubiak; Michael J. Beebe; Kylee North; Robert W. Hitchcock; Michael Q. Potter

Abstract Weight‐bearing protocols should optimize fracture healing while avoiding fracture displacement or implant failure. Biomechanical and animal studies indicate that early loading is beneficial, but high‐quality clinical studies comparing weight‐bearing protocols after lower extremity fractures are not universally available. For certain fracture patterns, well‐designed trials suggest that patients with normal protective sensation can safely bear weight sooner than most protocols permit. Several randomized, controlled trials of surgically treated ankle fractures have shown no difference in outcomes between immediate and delayed (≥6 weeks) weight bearing. Retrospective series have reported low complication rates with immediate weight bearing following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures and following surgical management of femoral neck and intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients. For other fracture patterns, particularly periarticular fractures, the evidence in favor of early weight bearing is less compelling. Most surgeons recommend a period of protected weight bearing for patients with calcaneal, tibial plafond, tibial plateau, and acetabular fractures. Further studies are warranted to better define optimal postoperative weight‐bearing protocols.


Arthroscopy | 2014

Psychological Distress in Hip Arthroscopy Patients Affects Postoperative Pain Control

Michael Q. Potter; Grant S. Sun; Jennifer A. Fraser; James T. Beckmann; Jeffrey D. Swenson; Travis G. Maak; Stephen K. Aoki

PURPOSE To determine whether patients with higher levels of preoperative psychological distress more frequently use a postoperative fascia iliaca nerve block for pain control after hip arthroscopy, and to determine whether a fascia iliaca nerve block is an effective adjunct to multimodal oral and intravenous analgesia after hip arthroscopy. METHODS One hundred seven patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were prospectively enrolled. Before surgery, patients were administered the Distress Risk Assessment Method questionnaire to quantify their level of preoperative psychological distress. Postoperatively, patients with pain inadequately controlled by multimodal oral and intravenous analgesics could request and receive a fascia iliaca nerve block. Pain scores, opioid consumption, time in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and postoperative complications were recorded for all patients. RESULTS Patients with normal Distress Risk Assessment Method scores requested fascia iliaca nerve blocks approximately half as frequently (18 of 50 [36%]) as patients in the at-risk category (28 of 47 [60%]) or distressed category (7 of 10 [70%]) (P = .02). Patients with high levels of distress also received 40% more intraoperative opioid than patients with normal scores (P = .04). In the study population as a whole, patients who received a fascia iliaca nerve block (n = 53) had a higher initial visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in the PACU (7.2 ± 0.3 v 5.5 ± 0.4, P = .001) and showed greater improvement in the VAS pain score by PACU discharge (-4.3 ± 0.2 v -2.1 ± 0.3, P ≤ .0001) compared with patients who did not receive a block (n = 54). CONCLUSIONS Patients with higher levels of preoperative psychological distress more frequently requested a postoperative nerve block to achieve adequate pain control after hip arthroscopy. Patients receiving a block had greater improvement in VAS pain scores compared with patients managed with oral and intravenous analgesics alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, case series.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2015

Effect of Naproxen Prophylaxis on Heterotopic Ossification Following Hip Arthroscopy A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

James T. Beckmann; James D. Wylie; Michael Q. Potter; Travis G. Maak; Thomas H. Greene; Stephen K. Aoki

BACKGROUND Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known complication of hip arthroscopy. Our objective was to determine the effect of postoperative naproxen therapy on the development of HO following arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. METHODS Between August 2011 and April 2013, 108 eligible patients were enrolled and randomized to take naproxen or a placebo for three weeks postoperatively. Radiographs were made at routine follow-up visits for one year following surgery. The primary outcome measure was the development of HO, as classified with the Brooker criteria and two-dimensional measurements on radiographs made at least seventy-five days postoperatively (average, 322 days). The primary analysis, performed with a Fisher exact test, compared the proportion of subjects with HO between the treatment and control groups. A single a priori interim analysis was planned at the midpoint of the study. RESULTS Our data safety and monitoring board stopped this study when the interim analysis showed that the stopping criterion had been met for demonstration of efficacy of the naproxen intervention. The prevalence of HO was 46% (twenty-two of the forty-eight in the final analysis) in the placebo group versus 4% (two of forty-eight) in the naproxen group (p < 0.001). Medication compliance was 69% overall, but it did not differ between the naproxen and placebo groups. Minor adverse reactions to the study medications were reported in 42% of the patients taking naproxen versus 35% of those taking the placebo (p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS In this trial, prophylaxis with naproxen was effective in reducing the prevalence of HO without medication-related morbidity.


Orthopedic Clinics of North America | 2013

Weight Bearing After a Periarticular Fracture: What is the Evidence?

Justin M. Haller; Michael Q. Potter; Erik N. Kubiak

Orthopedic surgeons frequently provide weight-bearing recommendations to guide patient recovery following lower extremity fractures. This article discusses the available literature regarding the effects of early weight bearing on fracture healing, patient compliance with weight bearing restrictions, and the effect of different weight bearing protocols following acetabular, tibial plateau, tibial plafond, ankle, and calcaneus fractures.


Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | 2015

One-year Patient-reported Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Do Not Correlate With Mild to Moderate Psychological Distress

Michael Q. Potter; James D. Wylie; Erin K. Granger; Patrick E. Greis; Robert T. Burks; Robert Z. Tashjian

BackgroundPatients with shoulder and rotator cuff pathology who exhibit greater levels of psychological distress report inferior preoperative self-assessments of pain and function. In several other areas of orthopaedics, higher levels of distress correlate with a higher likelihood of persistent pain and disability after recovery from surgery. To our knowledge, the relationship between psychological distress and outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has not been similarly investigated.Questions/purposes(1) Are higher levels of preoperative psychological distress associated with differences in outcome scores (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? (2) Are higher levels of preoperative psychological distress associated with less improvement in outcome scores (VAS for pain, Simple Shoulder Test, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? (3) Does the prevalence of psychological distress in a population with full-thickness rotator cuff tears change when assessed preoperatively and 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?MethodsEighty-five patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were prospectively enrolled; 70 patients (82%) were assessed at 1-year followup. During the study period, the three participating surgeons performed 269 rotator cuff repairs; in large part, the low overall rate of enrollment was related to two surgeons enrolling only two patients total in the initial 14 months of the study. Psychological distress was quantified using the Distress Risk Assessment Method questionnaire, and patients completed self-assessments including the VAS for pain, the Simple Shoulder Test, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score preoperatively and 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Fifty of 85 patients (59%) had normal levels of distress, 26 of 85 (31%) had moderate levels of distress, and nine of 85 (11%) had severe levels of distress. Statistical models were used to assess the effect of psychological distress on patient self-assessment of shoulder pain and function at 1 year after surgery.ResultsWith the numbers available, distressed patients were not different from nondistressed patients in terms of postoperative VAS for pain (1.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.0–2.8] versus 1.0 [95% CI, 0.5–1.4], p = 0.10), Simple Shoulder Test (9 [95% CI, 8.1–10.4] versus 11 [95% CI, 10.0–11.0], p = 0.06), or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (80 [95% CI, 72–88] versus 88 [95% CI, 84–92], p = 0.08) 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. With the numbers available, distressed patients also were not different from nondistressed patients in terms of the amount of improvement in scores between preoperative assessment and 1-year followup on the VAS for pain (3 [95% CI, 2.2–4.1] versus 2 [95% CI, 1.4–2.9], p = 0.10), Simple Shoulder Test (5.2 [95% CI, 3.7–6.6] versus 5.0 [95% CI, 4.2–5.8], p = 0.86), or American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scale (38 [95% CI, 29–47] versus 30 [95% CI, 25–36], p = 0.16). The prevalence of psychological distress in our patient population was lower at 1 year after surgery 14 of 70 (20%) versus 35 of 85 (41%) preoperatively (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.74; p = 0.005).ConclusionsMild to moderate levels of distress did not diminish patient-reported outcomes to a clinically important degree in this small series of patients with rotator cuff tears. This contrasts with reports from other areas of orthopaedic surgery and may be related to a more self-limited course of symptoms in patients with rotator cuff disease or possibly to a beneficial effect of rotator cuff repair on sleep quality or other unrecognized determinants of psychosocial status.Level of EvidenceLevel I, prognostic study.


Gait & Posture | 2012

The effect of partial weight bearing in a walking boot on plantar pressure distribution and center of pressure.

Kylee North; Michael Q. Potter; Erik N. Kubiak; Stacy J. Morris Bamberg; Robert W. Hitchcock

Physicians routinely prescribe partial weight bearing in a walking boot following fractures of the lower limbs in order to produce the needed mechanical environment to facilitate healing. Plantar pressure measurements can provide key information regarding the mechanical environment experienced by lower limb bones. The effect of walking boots on plantar pressure distribution has been well reported, however, the combined effects of partial weight bearing and walking boots on plantar pressure distribution and center of pressure is unknown. Thirteen healthy volunteers with no known gait pathologies were fitted with a multi-pressure sensor insole that recorded their plantar pressure distribution during four walking trials: (i) normal walking, (ii) full weight bearing in a walking boot, (iii) 27 kg partial weight bearing in a walking boot and (iv) 9 kg partial weight bearing in a walking boot. Results demonstrated that changing from trial (i) to (iv) resulted in a posterior shift in weight distribution; the percentage of total weight experienced at the heel increased while the percentage of total weight experienced at the forefoot (both medial and lateral) and the hallux decreased. Center of pressure trajectories also shifted more posteriorly. Additionally, while in a walking boot the gait during full and partial weight bearing resulted in more even foot loading.


Journal of wrist surgery | 2014

Intraneural Ganglion in Superficial Radial Nerve Mimics de Quervain Tenosynovitis

Justin M. Haller; Michael Q. Potter; Micah K. Sinclair; Douglas T. Hutchinson

UNLABELLED Background Intraneural ganglions in peripheral nerves of the upper extremity are extremely rare and poorly understood. Case Description We report a patient with symptoms consistent with de Quervain tenosynovitis who was found to have an intraneural ganglion in the superficial radial nerve. The ganglion did not communicate with the wrist joint. We removed the intraneural ganglion, and the patients symptoms resolved. At her 6-month postoperative follow-up, she remained asymptomatic. LITERATURE REVIEW  There is only one case report of intraneural ganglion in the superficial radial nerve. In that case, the patient had symptoms consistent with nerve irritation, including radiating pain and paresthesias. In contrast to that previous report, the patient in the current case had only localized pain, no paresthesias, and a physical exam consistent with de Quervain tenosynovitis. Clinical Relevance This case demonstrates that an intraneural ganglion cyst can mimic the symptoms of de Quervain tenosynovitis without the more usual presentation of painful paresthesias.


Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) | 2012

Simultaneous Dislocation of the Radiocapitellar and Distal Radioulnar Joints Without Fracture: Case Report

Michael Q. Potter; Angela Wang

Simultaneous dislocation of the distal radioulnar joint and the radial head without fracture is an uncommon injury. Prior reports have described closed treatment of this injury. We report a case of paired dislocation without fracture that required open reduction of both articulations in the acute setting. Potential mechanisms responsible for this pattern and recommendations for management of similar patients are described.


Journal of wrist surgery | 2014

Ligamentous Radiocarpal Fracture-Dislocation Treated with Wrist-Spanning Plate and Volar Ligament Repair

Michael Q. Potter; Justin M. Haller; Andrew R. Tyser

Background Radiocarpal fracture-dislocations are challenging injuries that are often associated with postoperative pain, stiffness, instability, or early arthrosis. Case Description We report a 1-year follow-up of a ligamentous radiocarpal dislocation (Dumontier group I) treated with a dorsal wrist-spanning plate and volar capsular repair with good results. Literature Review Historically, Dumontier group I injuries treated with a variety of techniques (closed reduction and casting, percutaneous pinning, and open fixation) have been associated with stiffness and loss of reduction. Clinical Relevance Distraction plating is a safe and effective technique for treating select distal radius fractures, and we suggest it has the potential to produce good outcomes when used to treat radiocarpal fracture-dislocations.


Evidence-based Spine-care Journal | 2013

Periaortic pedicle screw removal with endovascular control of the aorta and intraoperative aortography: a case report and review of the literature.

Michael Q. Potter; Brandon D. Lawrence; Daniel V. Kinikini; Darrel S. Brodke

Study Design  Case report and review of the literature. Objective The objective of the article is to report the case of a 20-year-old patient with a threatened aortic injury from pedicle screw instrumentation successfully managed without aortic grafting. Methods The patients clinical course is retrospectively reviewed. The offending hardware was removed after gaining endovascular control of the aorta. Results Intraoperative aortography was normal and no graft was placed. The patient remains asymptomatic at 2 years after surgery. Conclusions Hardware impinging on the aorta can safely be removed by gaining endovascular control of the aorta. In the setting of normal intraoperative aortography in a young patient, we recommend against further intervention to avoid the known morbidity of aortic grafting.

Collaboration


Dive into the Michael Q. Potter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge