Michael R. Lieber

The Mechanism of Double-Strand DNA Break Repair by the Nonhomologous DNA End Joining Pathway

Double-strand DNA breaks are common events in eukaryotic cells, and there are two major pathways for repairing them: homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ). The various causes of double-strand breaks (DSBs) result in a diverse chemistry of DNA ends that must be repaired. Across NHEJ evolution, the enzymes of the NHEJ pathway exhibit a remarkable degree of structural tolerance in the range of DNA end substrate configurations upon which they can act. In vertebrate cells, the nuclease, DNA polymerases, and ligase of NHEJ are the most mechanistically flexible and multifunctional enzymes in each of their classes. Unlike repair pathways for more defined lesions, NHEJ repair enzymes act iteratively, act in any order, and can function independently of one another at each of the two DNA ends being joined. NHEJ is critical not only for the repair of pathologic DSBs as in chromosomal translocations, but also for the repair of physiologic DSBs created during variable (diversity) joining [V(D)J] recombination and class switch recombination (CSR). Therefore, patients lacking normal NHEJ are not only sensitive to ionizing radiation (IR), but also severely immunodeficient.

Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining

Non-homologous DNA end-joining (NHEJ) — the main pathway for repairing double-stranded DNA breaks — functions throughout the cell cycle to repair such lesions. Defects in NHEJ result in marked sensitivity to ionizing radiation and ablation of lymphocytes, which rely on NHEJ to complete the rearrangement of antigen-receptor genes. NHEJ is typically imprecise, a characteristic that is useful for immune diversification in lymphocytes, but which might also contribute to some of the genetic changes that underlie cancer and ageing.

Activity of DNA ligase IV stimulated by complex formation with XRCC4 protein in mammalian cells

Mutation of the XRCC4 gene in mammalian cells prevents the formation of the signal and coding joints in the V(D)J recombination reaction, which is necessary for production of a functional immunoglobulin gene, and renders the cells highly sensitive to ionizing radiation. However, XRCC4 shares no sequence homology with other proteins, nor does it have a biochemical activity to indicate what its function might be. Here we show that DNA ligase IV (ref. 5) co-immunoprecipitates with XRCC4 and that these two proteins specifically interact with one another in a yeast two-hybrid system. Ligation of DNA double-strand breaks in a cell-free system by DNA ligase IV is increased fivefold by purified XRCC4 and seven- to eightfold when XRCC4 is co-expressed with DNA ligase IV. We conclude that the biological consequences of mutating XRCC4 are primarily due to the loss of its stimulatory effect on DNA ligase IV: the function of the XRCC4–DNA ligase IV complex may be to carry out the final steps of V(D)J recombination and joining of DNA ends.

The Mechanism of Human Nonhomologous DNA End Joining

Double-strand breaks are common in all living cells, and there are two major pathways for their repair. In eukaryotes, homologous recombination is restricted to late S or G2, whereas nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) can occur throughout the cell cycle and is the major pathway for the repair of double-strand breaks in multicellular eukaryotes. NHEJ is distinctive for the flexibility of the nuclease, polymerase, and ligase activities that are used. This flexibility permits NHEJ to function on the wide range of possible substrate configurations that can arise when double-strand breaks occur, particularly at sites of oxidative damage or ionizing radiation. NHEJ does not return the local DNA to its original sequence, thus accounting for the wide range of end results. Part of this heterogeneity arises from the diversity of the DNA ends, but much of it arises from the many alternative ways in which the nuclease, polymerases, and ligase can act during NHEJ. Physiologic double-strand break processes make use of the imprecision of NHEJ in generating antigen receptor diversity. Pathologically, the imprecision of NHEJ contributes to genome mutations that arise over time.

R-loops at immunoglobulin class switch regions in the chromosomes of stimulated B cells

The mechanism responsible for immunoglobulin class switch recombination is unknown. Previous work has shown that class switch sequences have the unusual property of forming RNA-DNA hybrids when transcribed in vitro. Here we show that the RNA-DNA hybrid structure that forms in vitro is an R-loop with a displaced guanine (G)-rich strand that is single-stranded. This R-loop structure exists in vivo in B cells that have been stimulated to transcribe the γ3 or the γ2b switch region. The length of the R-loops can exceed 1 kilobase. We propose that this distinctive DNA structure is important in the class switch recombination mechanism

RAG Mutations in Human B Cell-Negative SCID

Patients with human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) can be divided into those with B lymphocytes (B+ SCID) and those without (B− SCID). Although several genetic causes are known for B+ SCID, the etiology of B− SCID has not been defined. Six of 14 B− SCID patients tested were found to carry a mutation of the recombinase activating gene 1 (RAG-1), RAG-2, or both. This mutation resulted in a functional inability to form antigen receptors through genetic recombination and links a defect in one of the site-specific recombination systems to a human disease.

The defect in murine severe combined immune deficiency: Joining of signal sequences but not coding segments in V(D)J recombination

Pre-B and pre-T cell lines from mutant mice with severe combined immune deficiency (scid mice) were transfected with plasmids that contained recombination signal sequences of antigen receptor gene elements (V, D, and J). Recovered plasmids were tested for possible recombination of signal sequences and/or the adjacent (coding) sequences. Signal ends were joined, but recombination was abnormal in that half of the recombinants had lost nucleotides from one or both signals. Coding ends were not joined at all in either deletional or inversional V(D)J recombination reactions. However, coding ends were able to participate in alternative reactions. The failure of coding joint formation in scid pre-B and pre-T cells appears sufficient to explain the absence of immunoglobulin or T cell receptor production in scid mice.

Yeast DNA ligase IV mediates non-homologous DNA end joining

The discovery of homologues from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae of the human Ku DNA-end-binding proteins (HDF1 and KU80) has established that this organism is capable of non-homologous double-strand end joining (NHEJ), a form of DNA double-strand break repair (DSBR) active in mammalian V(D)J recombination. Identification of the DNA ligase that mediates NHEJ in yeast will help elucidate the function of the four mammalian DNA ligases in DSBR, V(D)J recombination and other reactions. Here we show that S. cerevisiae has two typical DNA ligases, the known DNA ligase I homologue CDC9 (refs 11,12, 13, 14) and the previously unknown DNA ligase IV homologue DNL4. dnl4 mutants are deficient in precise and end-processed NHEJ. DNL4 and HDF1 are epistatic in this regard, with the mutation of each having equivalent effects. dn14 mutants are complemented by overexpression of Dnl4 but not of Cdc9, and deficiency of Dnl4 alone does not impair either cell growth or the Cdc9-mediated responses to ionizing and ultraviolet radiation. Thus, S.cerevisiae has two distinct and separate ligation pathways.

The characterization of a mammalian DNA structure-specific endonuclease

The repair of some types of DNA double‐strand breaks is thought to proceed through DNA flap structure intermediates. A DNA flap is a bifurcated structure composed of double‐stranded DNA and a displaced single‐strand. To identify DNA flap cleaving activities in mammalian nuclear extracts, we created an assay utilizing a synthetic DNA flap substrate. This assay has allowed the first purification of a mammalian DNA structure‐specific nuclease. The enzyme described here, flap endonuclease‐1 (FEN‐1), cleaves DNA flap strands that terminate with a 5′ single‐stranded end. As expected for an enzyme which functions in double‐strand break repair flap resolution, FEN‐1 cleavage is flap strand‐specific and independent of flap strand length. Furthermore, efficient flap cleavage requires the presence of the entire flap structure. Substrates missing one strand are not cleaved by FEN‐1. Other branch structures, including Holliday junctions, are also not cleaved by FEN‐1. In addition to endonuclease activity, FEN‐1 has a 5′‐3′ exonuclease activity which is specific for double‐stranded DNA. The endo‐ and exonuclease activities of FEN‐1 are discussed in the context of DNA replication, recombination and repair.

The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L stimulates de novo methylation by Dnmt3a

Dnmt3L is required for the establishment of maternal methylation imprints at imprinting centers (ICs). Dnmt3L, however, lacks the conserved catalytic domain common to DNA methyltransferases. In an attempt to define its function, we coexpressed DNMT3L with each of the two known de novo methyltransferases, Dnmt3a and DNMT3B, in human cells and monitored de novo methylation by using replicating minichromosomes carrying various ICs as targets. Coexpression of DNMT3L with DNMT3B led to little or no change in target methylation. However, coexpression of DNMT3L with Dnmt3a resulted in a striking stimulation of de novo methylation by Dnmt3a. Stimulation was observed at maternally methylated ICs such as small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N (SNRPN), Snrpn, and Igf2r/Air, as well as at various nonimprinted sequences present on the episomes. Stimulation of Dnmt3a by DNMT3L was also observed at endogenous sequences in the genome. Therefore, DNMT3L acts as a general stimulatory factor for de novo methylation by Dnmt3a. The implications of these findings for the function of DNMT3L and Dnmt3a in DNA methylation and genomic imprinting are discussed.