Michael S. Ingber

NOTES Transvaginal Nephrectomy: First Human Experience

OBJECTIVES To present the operative outcomes of the first natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvaginal nephrectomy. METHODS A 57-year-old woman with hypertension, right-sided flank pain, and radiographic evidence of an atrophic right kidney consented for NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved with a Veress needle inserted deep in the umbilicus. Under direct vision, a colpotomy was made and a transvaginal port positioned. Using standard and articulating operating instruments inserted transvaginally, the kidney was mobilized and the renal hilum was controlled with an endovascular stapler. The kidney was placed in a laparoscopic retrieval bag and extracted through the vaginal incision. Salient demographic and operative data were obtained. RESULTS NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy was successfully completed, with all the operative steps performed transvaginally. Dense pelvic adhesions from a prior hysterectomy necessitated the use of a 5-mm umbilical port during vaginal port placement and for retraction of the ascending colon during division of the renal hilum. No intraoperative complications occurred. Operative time was 307 minutes, with 124 minutes dedicated to vaginal port placement and 183 minutes dedicated to adhesiolysis and nephrectomy. The duration of hospitalization was 23 hours. The visual analog pain scale score was 1 of 10 on postoperative day 2. CONCLUSIONS Our experience shows that NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy is technically feasible. Access to the peritoneal cavity should be performed under visual guidance and after insufflation through the umbilicus. Additional experience is needed to better define patient selection criteria and indications for NOTES transvaginal urologic surgery.

Purely Transvaginal/Perineal Management of Complications From Commercial Prolapse Kits Using a New Prostheses/Grafts Complication Classification System

PURPOSE Commercial prolapse mesh kits are increasingly used in the management of pelvic organ prolapse. We present our experience with the transvaginal/perineal management of synthetic mesh related complications from prolapse kits. In addition, we used the new ICS/IUGA (International Continence Society/International Urogynecological Association) prostheses/grafts complication classification system to report on our contemporary series. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgical removal of transvaginal mesh for mesh related complications after prolapse kit use from November 2006 to April 2010 at 1 institution was performed. We report our contemporary series of mesh complications using the new ICS/IUGA prostheses/grafts complication classification system. Postoperative pain, degree of improvement and presence of continued symptoms were reported by patients at last followup. RESULTS A total of 23 patients underwent transvaginal removal of mesh during the study period. Mean patient age was 61 years. Median period of latency to mesh related complication was 10 months (range 1 to 27). Indications for mesh removal included vaginal/pelvic pain (39%), dyspareunia (39%), vaginal mesh extrusion/exposure (26%), urinary incontinence (35%), recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (22%), bladder mesh perforation with recurrent urinary tract infection (22%), rectal mesh perforation (4%), ureteral perforation injury (4%), retained foreign body (surgical sponge) in the bladder (4%) and vesicovaginal fistula (9%), with most patients citing more than 1 reason. CONCLUSIONS Although technically difficult in some cases, purely transvaginal mesh excision appears to be safe with resolution of almost all presenting symptoms. Although slightly cumbersome, the new ICS/IUGA prostheses/graft complication classification system can be used to report and more accurately characterize mesh complications.

Single-port Transvesical Excision of Foreign Body in the Bladder

OBJECTIVES To present a novel technique to remove intravesical polypropylene mesh through a single laparoscopic port placed directly into the bladder. METHODS A Triport single-site access system was placed transvesically and carbon dioxide was used for insufflation of the bladder. A combination of straight and articulating laparoscopic instruments was used to dissect the mesh away from the bladder mucosa and transect each end for complete removal of foreign bodies. Mucosal reapproximation was performed on the latter case. RESULTS Two patients were managed adequately in the outpatient setting. No suprapubic catheters were necessary, and patients were discharged within 23 hours. CONCLUSIONS Removal of foreign bodies of the bladder through a single transvesical laparoscopic port is technically feasible. This procedure offers excellent visualization of mesh material, especially near the bladder neck where these foreign bodies often reside. This approach offers patients a minimally invasive approach through a single small incision.

Surgically Corrected Urethral Diverticula: Long-term Voiding Dysfunction and Reoperation Rates

OBJECTIVES To present the largest reported cohort of women with urethral diverticula and to evaluate the surgical outcomes and long-term voiding symptoms after urethral diverticulectomy. Studies evaluating the outcomes after urethral diverticulectomy have been limited by small patient numbers and short-term follow-up. METHODS Women who had undergone diverticulectomy at our institution from 1996 to 2008 were mailed surveys. Urinary bother was assessed using the Urogenital Distress Inventory 6-item questionnaire, and patients were asked to report subsequent urethral or vaginal surgery and the number of urinary tract infections within the previous year. To determine the rate of surgical recurrence, the charts of women not responding to the survey were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 122 women were identified as having undergone urethral diverticulectomy during the study period. Of these, 13 (10.7%) had an eventual recurrence that required repeat surgical excision. Patients with a proximal diverticulum, multiple diverticula, or previous pelvic or vaginal surgery (excluding previous diverticulectomy) were more likely to develop recurrence (P = .01, P = .03, and P < .001, respectively). For the 61 women (50%) responding to our survey, the mean follow-up was 50.4 months. Of these 61 women, 24 (39.3%) had had a urinary tract infection within the previous year, with 14 (23%) women having had ≥3 within the previous year. Also, 16 (26.2%) had persistent pain or discomfort with urination. The mean ± SD total Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 score was 31.1 ± 25.5 for the survey responders. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, our study represents the largest study with the longest follow-up after urethral diverticulectomy. Patients with proximal or multiple diverticula and those with previous pelvic surgery should be counseled appropriately regarding the risks of recurrence and persistent voiding dysfunction.

Incidence of perioperative urinary tract infection after single-dose antibiotic therapy for midurethal slings.

OBJECTIVES A recent Best Practice Statement published by the American Urological Association (AUA) recommends that antibiotic therapy in patients undergoing midurethral synthetic slings (MUS) should be 24 hours or less. Subjects at our institution are routinely administered a single dose of intravenous antibiotics before MUS surgery. We prospectively evaluated urinary tract infection (UTI) rates and risk factors for UTI in subjects undergoing MUS who receive single-dose antibiotic therapy. METHODS Adult female patients who were undergoing MUS for stress or mixed urinary incontinence were prospectively included and received a single-dose of an intravenous antibiotic in accordance with the AUA Best Practice Statement. Subjects requiring additional procedures for prolapse were excluded. Baseline characteristics and preoperative and postoperative postvoid residual (PVR) were documented. Subjects were contacted within 1 week of surgery, and seen in the office at 1 month, when a urinalysis was performed, and urine culture sent if subjects were symptomatic. RESULTS A total of 101 subjects underwent solitary MUS and received a single dose of intravenous antibiotics. Overall, 6 (5.9%) subjects developed a UTI within 1 month of surgery. Patients who developed a UTI were more likely to have elevated PVRs at the preoperative office visit (62.2 vs 26.8 mL, P = .004). CONCLUSIONS Our study has demonstrated that the rate of perioperative UTI after MUS with one perioperative dose of intravenous antibiotics is low. Patients with an elevated preoperative PVR may be at an increased risk of developing a UTI. Single-dose antibiotic administration is safe and effective at preventing perioperative UTI in subjects undergoing solitary MUS.

Increasing Patient Preparedness for Sacral Neuromodulation Improves Patient Reported Outcomes Despite Leaving Objective Measures of Success Unchanged

PURPOSE We assessed how a group shared appointment influenced patient preparedness for sacral nerve stimulation for refractory overactive bladder and/or urge urinary incontinence. We also evaluated subjective and objective outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients considering sacral nerve stimulation were prospectively enrolled and invited to attend a group shared appointment. This 75-minute presentation included a question and answer period with an implanting surgeon and an implanted patient. Control patients received standard office counseling. A patient preparedness questionnaire was completed after the group shared appointment or office counseling. Response to treatment was determined using the postoperative satisfaction questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and voiding diaries. RESULTS In our study 36 women with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 15 years underwent sacral nerve stimulation. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the 19 women who attended the group shared appointment and the 17 controls. Overall preparedness was greater in the shared appointment group (p = 0.043) with better understanding of the purpose of (p = 0.003) and alternatives to (p = 0.043) sacral nerve stimulation. Significantly more women in the shared appointment group than controls felt completely prepared (78.9% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003) and completely satisfied (78.9% vs 35.3%, p = 0.003) with sacral nerve stimulation as well as very much better (68.4% vs 17.6%, p = 0.002) according to the PGI-I. There was no difference between the groups in the number of women with a 50% or greater symptom reduction on voiding diary. CONCLUSIONS Participating in a group shared appointment before sacral nerve stimulation improved patient preparedness and perceived outcomes of treatment, although there was no difference in objective outcomes based on voiding diary.

Force of Stream After Sling Therapy: Safety and Efficacy of Rapid Discharge Care Pathway Based on Subjective Patient Report

PURPOSE We evaluated the safety of a mid urethral sling postoperative care pathway using patient subjective reporting of force of stream to minimize length of stay and catheter placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women undergoing solitary mid urethral sling surgery were prospectively enrolled in our study. Force of stream after the sling therapy protocol consisted of retrograde bladder filling with 300 ml fluid within 1 hour after surgery. Patients rated force of stream compared to baseline on a visual analog scale. Those with a force of stream of 50% or greater were immediately discharged home regardless of post-void residual urine volume. Only those unable to void and those rating force of stream less than 50% with post-void residual urine volume greater than 500 ml were discharged home with a catheter. Patients were telephoned within 1 week of surgery and seen 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was unexpected visits to the emergency room or office for voiding dysfunction or urinary retention. RESULTS A total of 114 women were prospectively enrolled in our study, of whom 105 (92.1%) passed the protocol and were discharged home without a catheter. Of the patients 14 were discharged home with increased post-void residual urine volume (range 152 to 427 ml) but no catheter, representing those who would have been discharged with a catheter by many traditional voiding protocols. According to protocol 9 patients were discharged with a catheter. No patient presented to the emergency room or office in urinary retention or with voiding dysfunction before the scheduled visit. CONCLUSIONS Patients who report a force of stream of 50% or greater can be safely and rapidly discharged home after an uncomplicated mid urethral sling procedure regardless of post-void residual urine volume. Scanned post-void residual urine volume does not add much value in those who can void. By following the force of stream after sling therapy protocol patients can be discharged home less than 3 hours after mid urethral sling surgery.

Mid-urethral slings in female incontinence: Current status.

The advent of the mid-urethral sling (MUS) 15 years ago has drastically changed the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Both retropubic and transobturator MUS can be placed in the ambulatory setting with excellent results. The tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) sling has the most robust and long-term data, but more recent literature suggests that the transobturator tape sling may offer comparable efficacy in appropriately selected patients. Single incision sling (SIS) is the newest addition to the MUS group and was developed in an attempt to minimize morbidity and create an anti-incontinence procedure that could be performed in the office. The efficacy of SIS remains unknown as the current literature regarding SIS lacks long-term results and comparative trials. The suprapubic arc sling appears to have equally effective outcomes in at least the short-term when compared with TVT. Although evolution of the SIS has led to a less invasive procedure with decreased post-op pain and reduced recovery time, durability of efficacy could be the endpoint we are sacrificing. Until longer-term data and more quality comparison trials are available, tailoring ones choice of MUS to the individual patient and her unique clinical parameters remains the best option.

SINGLE-PORT TRANSVESICAL EXCISION OF FOREIGN BODY

Hypothesis / aims of study Managing foreign bodies of the bladder can be technically challenging. Often times, these foreign bodies are a result of trocar passage through the bladder during midurethral sling and prolapse procedures. Attempts at cystoscopic removal of mesh from midurethral slings may leave residual mesh within the detrusor, which may cause future stone formation, infections or irritable voiding symptoms. Traditionally, removal involves opening the bladder, removing the mesh under direct vision, and placement of a suprapubic tube.