Michael S. McCracken

Validation of strain gauges as a method of measuring precision of fit of implant bars.

Multiple articles in the literature have used strain gauges to estimate the precision of fit of implant bars. However, the accuracy of these measurements has not been fully documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of strain gauges to known amounts of misfit in an implant bar. This is an important step in validation of this device. Materials:A steel block was manufactured with five 4.0-mm externally hexed implant platforms machined into the block 7-mm apart. A 1.4-cm long gold alloy bar was cast to fit 2 of the platforms. Brass shims of varying thickness (150, 300, and 500 &mgr;m) were placed under one side of the bar to create misfit. A strain gage was used to record strain readings on top of the bar, one reading at first contact of the bar and one at maximum screw torque. Microgaps between the bar and the steel platforms were measured using a high-precision optical measuring device at 4 points around the platform. The experiment was repeated 3 times. Two-way analysis of variance and linear regression were used for statistical analyses. Results:Shim thickness had a significant effect on strain (P < 0.0001). There was a significant positive correlation between shim thickness and strain (R2 = 0.93) for strain at maximum torque, and for strain measurements at first contact (R2 = 0.91). Microgap measurements showed no correlation with increasing misfit. Conclusions:Strain in the bar increased significantly with increasing levels of misfit. Strain measurements induced at maximum torque are not necessarily indicative of the maximum strains experienced by the bar. The presence or absence of a microgap between the bar and the platform is not necessarily indicative of passivity. These data suggest that microgap may not be clinically reliable as a measure of precision of fit.

Variability of Mechanical Torque-Limiting Devices in Clinical Service at a US Dental School

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to measure the variability of torque produced by a population of mechanical torque-limiting devices in clinical service in a US dental school. The torque-limiting devices were divided into two categories according to their mode of action: toggle-type and beam wrenches. Proper action of these devices is essential for calibrated delivery of preload to implant prosthetic screws. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventeen torque-limiting devices (35 Ncm) were obtained from graduate prosthodontic, predoctoral, and faculty practice clinics. Nine of these were toggle-type devices, and eight were beam-type wrenches. Torque from each wrench was measured using an MGT electronic torque meter. Wrenches were tested in two modes, slow (over 4 seconds) and fast (over 1 second). RESULTS Toggle-type torque wrenches produced a mean (+/- SD) torque of 38.1 +/- 16.0 Ncm; beam-type wrenches produced 32.8 +/- 1.1 Ncm. These results were not significantly different. When tested in fast mode (1 second), toggle-type wrenches produced 28.0 +/- 9.6 Ncm; in the slow mode (4 seconds) they produced significantly more force, 36.6 +/- 14.0 Ncm (p < 0.001). Beam-type wrenches produced 33.2 +/- 1.1 Ncm and 32.8 +/- 1.1 Ncm in fast and slow modes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Both types of wrenches tested were capable of producing accurate torque values; however, variability was higher in the toggle-type group. Some toggle-type torque wrenches in clinical service delivered unacceptably high torque values. It is recommended that clinicians calibrate toggle-type wrenches frequently. Torque wrenches should be activated slowly, over 4 seconds, when using a correctly calibrated toggle-type wrench.

A randomized clinical trial to compare diagnostic casts made using plastic and metal trays

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Virtually every prosthodontic rehabilitation involves making diagnostic casts for analysis and prosthesis fabrication. Frequently, these casts are produced using irreversible hydrocolloid (IH) impression materials in stock metal or plastic trays. However, it is unclear whether one technique produces a more accurate cast. PURPOSE The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the linear accuracy of diagnostic casts produced using IH with 1 of 3 different tray types: (1) perforated metal trays, (2) stock plastic trays, and (3) directed-flow stock plastic trays. All groups were compared to casts produced with custom trays and vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials, which were considered the control. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seven subjects participated in this trial. IH impressions were made in a random order using 1 of 3 tray types: stock plastic, perforated metal, or plastic directed flow. These were compared to VPS impressions using custom trays (control group). Each impression technique was repeated 3 times per subject, for a total of 84 observations. Impressions were disinfected and poured in a type IV stone. Linear accuracy of casts was measured using computer software analysis of scanned images of the casts at x30 magnification. Three linear measurements were made on each cast: second molar to second molar, right second molar to left first premolar, and left second molar to right first premolar. Measurements were compared among techniques using mixed-model analysis of variance to account for correlation among the multiple measurements made on each subject. Dunnetts adjustment for multiple comparisons with control was used (α=.05). RESULTS For molar-to-molar and right second molar to the left first premolar measurements, there were no significant differences in linear dimensions between casts made from different trays. However, linear measurements from the left second molar to the right first premolar demonstrated significant differences for casts made with stock metal, directed-flow, and stock plastic trays compared to custom trays. In this group, casts produced by stock metal, directed-flow, and stock plastic trays differed from controls by 102, 68, and 71 um, respectively. Generally, casts made with plastic trays (stock plastic and directed flow) had values closer to those of custom trays than did casts made with metal trays. CONCLUSIONS Impressions made with irreversible hydrocolloid produced casts that were significantly different in linear dimension than casts produced by custom trays and VPS impressions. These differences were not uniform, but varied by location on the cast.

A residual granuloma in association with a dental implant

At times, dental implants are placed into sites with a history of periapical pathology. Sometimes the infection is active, and other times the tooth may have been extracted years before implant placement. In either case, the possibility exists for long-term residual cysts or infections that can negatively impact the prognosis of the implant. In this case report, an implant is placed into a healed mandibular ridge several months after extraction of the tooth. A radiolucency was noted on routine radiographic examination 2 years later. Surgical inspection and histology revealed a periapical granuloma with acute and chronic inflammatory cells. After surgical curettage of the site, the patient healed without complication. Implants may develop apical pathology as a result of a preexisting long-term residual infection.

Comparison of the Passivity between Cast Alloy and Laser-Welded Titanium Overdenture Bars

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the fit of cast alloy overdenture and laser-welded titanium-alloy bars by measuring induced strain upon tightening of the bars on a master cast as well as a function of screw tightening sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four implant analogs were secured into Type IV dental stone to simulate a mandibular edentulous patient cast, and two groups of four overdenture bars were fabricated. Group I was four cast alloy bars and Group II was four laser-welded titanium bars. The cast alloy bars included Au-Ag-Pd, Pd-Ag-Au, Au-Ag-Cu-Pd, and Ag-Pd-Cu-Au, while the laser-welded bars were all Ti-Al-V alloy. Bars were made from the same master cast, were torqued into place, and the total strain in the bars was measured through five strain gauges bonded to the bar between the implants. Each bar was placed and torqued 27 times to 30 Ncm per screw using three tightening sequences. Data were processed through a strain amplifier and analyzed by computer using StrainSmart software. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukeys post hoc test. RESULTS Significant differences were found between alloy types. Laser-welded titanium bars tended to have lower strains than corresponding cast bars, although the Au-Ag-Pd bar was not significantly different. The magnitudes of total strain were the least when first tightening the ends of the bar. CONCLUSIONS The passivity of implant overdenture bars was evaluated using total strain of the bar when tightening. Selecting a high modulus of elasticity cast alloy or use of laser-welded bar design resulted in the lowest average strain magnitudes. While the effect of screw tightening sequence was minimal, tightening the distal ends first demonstrated the lowest strain, and hence the best passivity.

Strength comparison of four techniques to secure implant attachment housings to complete dentures

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Implant overdentures become thinner and weaker after direct transfer of implant attachment housings. While much has been published on denture repair, these data do not directly apply to implant overdentures because the introduction of a metal housing changes the character of the repair. It is desirable to make a strong repair to avoid prosthesis fracture. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the flexural strengths of 4 different methods for chairside direct transfer of implant attachment housings. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty 11.5 × 9.1 × 39 mm heat-polymerized acrylic resin blocks were processed, assessed for porosities, and polished. An 8.5 mm diameter hole was drilled to a depth of 5 mm in the center of each block. Attachment housings were set into the bases with 4 different repair materials: autopolymerized acrylic resin (APAR), light-polymerized acrylic resin (LPAR), autopolymerized acrylic resin with silanated attachment housings (APSAH), and light-polymerized acrylic resin with silanated attachment housings (LPSAH). Blocks were immersed in water for 30 days in an incubator. A 3-point bend test was done in a universal testing machine, and load to fracture was recorded (MPa). Results were compared with 2-way ANOVA (α=.05). RESULTS APSAH had the highest mean flexural strength at fracture (863.1 ±87 MPa) as compared to APAR (678.4 ±72.4 MPa), LPAR (550.9 ±119.3 MPa), and LPSAH (543.2 ±100.8 MPa). A comparison among the 4 groups showed that there were significant differences in maximum flexural strength (P<.001). The mean maximum strength of autopolymerized acrylic resin groups was significantly higher than light-polymerized acrylic resin groups. Silanation increased strength significantly compared to nonsilanated groups. CONCLUSIONS The flexural strength of autopolymerized acrylic resin with silanated attachment housings was significantly higher than autopolymerized acrylic resin alone, light-polymerized acrylic resin alone, or light-polymerized acrylic resin with silanated attachment housings. Autopolymerized acrylic resin produced stronger constructs than light-polymerized materials.

Impression Techniques Used for Single-Unit Crowns: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

PURPOSE To: (1) determine which impression and gingival displacement techniques practitioners use for single-unit crowns on natural teeth; and (2) test whether certain dentist and practice characteristics are significantly associated with the use of these techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dentists participating in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network were eligible for this survey study. The study used a questionnaire developed by clinicians, statisticians, laboratory technicians, and survey experts. The questionnaire was pretested via cognitive interviewing with a regionally diverse group of practitioners. The survey included questions regarding gingival displacement and impression techniques. Survey responses were compared by dentist and practice characteristics using ANOVA. RESULTS The response rate was 1777 of 2132 eligible dentists (83%). Regarding gingival displacement, most clinicians reported using either a single cord (35%) or dual cord (35%) technique. About 16% of respondents preferred an injectable retraction technique. For making impressions, the most frequently used techniques and materials are: poly(vinyl siloxane), 77%; polyether, 12%; optical/digital, 9%. A dental auxiliary or assistant made the final impression 2% of the time. Regarding dual-arch impression trays, 23% of practitioners report they typically use a metal frame tray, 60% use a plastic frame, and 16% do not use a dual-arch tray. Clinicians using optical impression techniques were more likely to be private practice owners or associates. CONCLUSIONS This study documents current techniques for gingival displacement and making impressions for crowns. Certain dentist and practice characteristics are significantly associated with these techniques.

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of implants in rat tibiae.

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated for its ability to measure changes in bone mineral density in isolated rat tibiae. This technique is available for in vivo use to potentially augment or replace some aspects of conventional histomorphometric techniques used for the evaluation of metallic implant-to-bone interfaces. Known quantities of hydroxyapatite powder, representing various bone densities, were measured using DXA in a series of 3 experiments: (1) the hydroxyapatite powder was placed within a plastic tube, (2) the hydroxyapatite was placed within an excised rat tibia, and (3) hydroxyapatite powder was placed within a rat tibia with soft tissue overlying it. Statistical analysis (analysis of variance) showed significant differences in bone mineral density among groups that varied by only 5% hydroxyapatite density within the plastic tubes. The system detected hydroxyapatite changes of 20% within the tibiae with and without overlying soft tissue (P < 0.05). These data were consistent and linear (R2 > 0.90). Although DXA analysis has been widely used in clinical and research applications for detection of osteoporosis, its use for documenting bone growth around implants has not been widely reported. The use of such a technique could have substantial benefits for both the clinical and research arenas. These data show that DXA analysis to identify bone density changes adjacent to implants has significant applications in small animal research models.

Impression evaluation and laboratory use for single-unit crowns. Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

BACKGROUND Objectives were to determine the likelihood that a clinician accepts an impression for a single-unit crown and document crown remake rates. METHODS The authors developed a questionnaire that asked dentists about techniques used to fabricate single-unit crowns. The authors showed dentists photographs of 4 impressions and asked them to accept or reject each impression. The authors correlated answers with dentist and practice characteristics. Other questions pertained to laboratory use and crown remake rates. RESULTS The response rate was 83% (1,777 of 2,132 eligible dentists). Of the 4 impressions evaluated, 3 received consistent responses, with 85% agreement. One impression was more equivocal; 52% accepted the impression. The likelihood of accepting an impression was associated significantly with the clinicians sex, race, ethnicity, and practice busyness. Clinicians produced 18 crowns per month on average, and 9% used in-office milling. Most dentists (59%) reported a remake rate of less than 2%, whereas 17% reported a remake rate greater than 4%. Lower remake rates were associated significantly with more experienced clinicians, optical impressions, and not using dual-arch trays. CONCLUSIONS Although dentists were largely consistent in their evaluation of impressions (> 85%), nonclinical factors were associated with whether an impression was accepted or rejected. Lower crown remake rates were associated with more experienced clinicians, optical impressions, and not using dual-arch trays. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS These results provide a snapshot of clinical care considerations among a diverse group of dentists. Clinicians can compare their own remake rates and impression evaluation techniques with those in this sample when developing best practice protocols.

Tooth structure loss apical to preparations for fixed partial dentures when using self-limiting burs

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Burs with guide pins may be used to limit the depth of tooth preparation for fixed partial dentures. The effects of guide pins on tooth structure apical to the finish line after tooth preparation for fixed partial dentures has not been recorded. PURPOSE This in vitro study recorded loss of tooth structure within 1.0 mm apical to the finish line of teeth prepared with straight cylinder and tapered cylinder self-limiting burs and one conventional bur. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-five extracted human teeth were randomly divided into three groups. The facial surface of each tooth was prepared with two types of diamond burs with guide pins and a conventional diamond for the control. The surface was profiled before and after tooth preparation. Profiled surfaces were analyzed and the groups were compared using analysis of variance and the Tukey-Kramer HSD test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS No significant difference was recorded between the control group and the group prepared with a round-ended tapered cylinder self-limiting pin. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the control and cylindrical pin groups, and between the two groups prepared with self-limiting diamonds. CONCLUSION This study revealed abrasion apical to the finish line of the preparation in all groups. The cylindrical guide pin group exhibited the greatest loss of tooth surface.