Michael S. Nussbaum
University of Cincinnati
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Michael S. Nussbaum.
Annals of Surgery | 1999
Timothy A. Pritts; Michael S. Nussbaum; Lv Flesch; Elliot J. Fegelman; Alexander A. Parikh; Josef E. Fischer
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of a clinical pathway for small and large bowel resection on cost and length of hospital stay. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Clinical pathways are designed to streamline patient care delivery and maximize efficiency while minimizing cost. Theoretically, they should be most effective in commonly performed procedures, in which volume and familiarity are high. METHODS A clinical pathway to assist in the management of patients undergoing bowel resection was developed by a multidisciplinary team and implemented. Data about length of stay and cost was collected for all patients undergoing bowel resection 1 year before and 1 year after pathway implementation. Three groups were compared: patients undergoing bowel resection in the year prior to pathway implementation (prepathway), patients in the year after pathway implementation but not included on the pathway (nonpathway), and patients included in the pathway (pathway). RESULTS The mean cost per hospital stay was
Surgery | 1997
Stephen B. Archer; Robert J. Burnett; Lv Flesch; Scott C. Hobler; Robert Bower; Michael S. Nussbaum; Josef E. Fischer
19,997.35 +/- 1244.61 for patients in the prepathway group,
Surgery | 1996
C. Daniel Smith; Tory A. Meyer; Michael J. Goretsky; David M. Hyams; Fred A. Luchette; Elliott J. Fegelman; Michael S. Nussbaum
20,835.28 +/- 2286.26 for those in the nonpathway group, and
Journal of Surgical Research | 1990
Shujun Li; Michael S. Nussbaum; David W. McFadden; Fu-Sheng Zhang; Richard LaFrance; Rameshwar Dayal; Josef E. Fischer
13,908.53 +/- 1113.01 for those in the pathway group (p < 0.05 vs. other groups). Mean postoperative length of stay was 9.98 +/- 0.62 days (prepathway), 9.68 +/- 0.88 days for (nonpathway), and 7.71 +/- 0.37 days (pathway) (p < 0.05 vs. other groups). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of the pathway produced significant decreases in length of stay and cost in the pathway group as compared to the prepathway group. These results support the further development of clinical pathways for general surgical procedures.
Journal of Surgical Research | 1988
Shujun Li; Michael S. Nussbaum; Dimitri Teague; Cynthia L. Gapen; Rameshwar Dayal; Josef E. Fischer
BACKGROUND Clinical pathways are increasingly being used by hospitals to improve efficiency in the care of certain patient populations; however, little prospective data are available to support their use. This study examined whether using a clinical pathway for patients undergoing ileal pouch/anal anastomosis, a complex procedure in which we had extensive practical experience, affected hospital charges or length of stay (LOS). METHODS A clinical pathway was developed to serve patients undergoing elective total colectomy and ileal pouch/anal anastomosis. All operations were performed by two attending physicians (J.E.F., M.S.N.). Before implementation, 10 pilot patients were prospectively monitored to ensure that hospital charges were accurately generated. In addition, charge audits were performed by an outside agency to verify the accuracy of the hospital bills. The pathway was then implemented, and 14 patients were prospectively analyzed. RESULTS In all patients the principal diagnosis was ulcerative colitis, with the exception of three patients with familial polyposis. Mean external audit charges were within 2% of the hospital bills; therefore the hospital bills were used in all calculations. The mean LOS decreased from 10.3 days to 7.5 days (p = 0.046) for patients on the pathway versus pilot patients. Mean hospital charges also decreased significantly, from
Journal of Surgical Research | 1989
David W. McFadden; Marek Rudnicki; Michael S. Nussbaum; Ambikaipakan Balasubramaniam; Josef E. Fischer
21,650 to
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2001
Jeffrey M. Marks; Michael S. Nussbaum; Timothy A. Pritts; David E. Scheeres
17,958 per patient (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a clinical pathway, even for an operation in which the surgeon has much experience, is an effective method for reducing LOS and charges for patients. This is likely the result of interdisciplinary cooperation, elimination of unnecessary interventions, and streamlined involvement of ancillary services. These results support the development of clinical pathways for procedures that involve routine preoperative and postoperative care. In addition, the benefits of clinical pathways should increase proportionally with increasing case volume for a particular procedure.
American Journal of Surgery | 1985
Michael S. Nussbaum; Mark A. Schusterman
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and expense of laparoscopic splenectomy by the lateral approach with open splenectomy for the treatment of hematologic diseases. METHODS Medical records of 20 matched patients undergoing open splenectomy and lateral approach laparoscopic splenectomy were retrospectively reviewed detailing perioperative course, clinical outcome, and hospital charges. RESULTS Patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy (n = 10) experienced longer anesthesia (324 versus 176 minutes; p < 0.05) and operative times (261 versus 131 minutes; p < 0.05) than those undergoing open splenectomy (n = 10). No difference was noted in both intraoperative and postoperative packed red blood cells transfused. Laparoscopic splenectomy resulted in a shorter duration of nasogastric decompression (1.2 versus 2.6 days), more rapid resumption of normal oral intake (1.9 versus 4.4 days), and earlier hospital dismissal (3.0 versus 5.8 days). Although hospital charges were not significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | 1992
Michael S. Nussbaum; Shujun Li; Robert H. Bower; David W. McFadden; Rameshwar Dayal; Josef E. Fischer
17,071.00 versus
Neuropeptides | 1989
Ambipaikan Balasubramaniam; David W. McFadden; Marek Rudnicki; Michael S. Nussbaum; Rameshwar Dayal; L.S. Srivastava; Josef E. Fischer
13,196.00; p > 0.05), operative charges were always significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS When compared with open splenectomy, lateral approach laparoscopic splenectomy allows a more rapid return of normal gastrointestinal function and shorter hospital stay. The operative expense of laparoscopic splenectomy is significantly higher; however, the overall hospital expense is not. If costs can be decreased, the lateral approach laparoscopic splenectomy will be the preferred operative approach.