Michael Schweigert

Temporal Trends in Long-Term Survival and Cure Rates in Esophageal Cancer: A SEER Database Analysis

Purpose: To assess long-term temporal trends in population-based survival and cure rates in patients with esophageal cancer and compare them over the last 3 decades in the United States. Methods: We identified 62,523 patients with cancer of the esophagus and the gastric cardia diagnosed between 1973 and 2007 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Long-term cancer-related survival and cure rates were calculated. Stage-by-stage disease-related survival curves of patients diagnosed in different decades were compared. Influence of available variables on survival and cure was analyzed with logistic regression. Results: Ten-year survival was 14% in all patients. Disease-related survival of esophageal cancer improved significantly since 1973. Median survival in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results stages in local, regional, and metastatic cancers improved from 11, 10, and 4 months in the 1970s to 35, 15, and 6 months after 2000. Early stage, age 45 to 65 years at diagnosis and undergoing surgical therapy were independent predictors of 10-year survival. Cure rate improved in all stages during the study period and were 73%, 37%, 12%, and 2% in stages 0, 1, 2, and 4, respectively, after the year 2000. Percentage of patients undergoing surgery improved from 55% in the 1970s to 64% between 2000 and 2007. Proportion of patients diagnosed with in situ and local cancer remains below 30%. Conclusion: Long-term survival with esophageal cancer is poor but survival of local esophageal cancer improved dramatically over the decades. Complete cure of nonmetastatic esophageal cancer seems possible in a growing number of patients. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial.

Oesophageal cancer—an overview

Oesophageal carcinoma is one of the most virulent malignant diseases and a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Diagnosis and accuracy of pretreatment staging have substantially improved throughout the past three decades. Therapy is challenging and the optimal approach is still debated. Oesophagectomy is considered to be the procedure of choice in patients with operable oesophageal cancer. Endoscopic measures and limited surgical procedures provide an alternative in patients with early carcinomas confined to the oesophageal mucosa. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy are also frequently applied, either as definitive treatment or as neoadjuvant therapy within multimodal approaches. The question of whether multimodal treatment offers improved results has been the focus of many studies since the 1990s. Although results are discordant and even some meta-analyses remain inconclusive, it is now widely accepted that multimodal therapy leads to a modest survival benefit. The role of minimally invasive oesophagectomy is not yet defined. Endoscopic stent insertion, radiotherapy and other palliative measures provide relief of tumour-related symptoms in advanced, unresectable tumour stages.

Endoscopic stent insertion for anastomotic leakage following oesophagectomy

Introduction Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following oesophagectomy is a crushing condition. Until recently, surgical re-exploration was the preferred way of dealing with this life threatening complication. However, mortality remained significant. We therefore adopted endoscopic stent implantation as the primary treatment option. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and results of endoscopic stent implantation as well as potential hazards and pitfalls. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2011, 292 consecutive patients who underwent an oesophagectomy at a single high volume centre dedicated to oesophageal surgery were included in this retrospective study. Overall, 38 cases with anastomotic leakage were identified and analysed. Results A total of 22 patients received endoscopic stent implantation as primary treatment whereas a rethoracotomy was mandatory in 15 cases. There were no significant differences in age, frequency of neoadjuvant therapy or ASA grade between cases with and without a leak. However, patients with a leak were five times more likely to have a fatal outcome (odds ratio: 5.10, 95% confidence interval: 2.06–12.33, p<0.001). Stent migration occurred but endoscopic reintervention was feasible. In 17 patients (77%) definite closure and healing of the leak was achieved, and the stent was removed subsequently. Two patients died owing to severe sepsis despite sufficient stent placement. Moreover, stent related aortic erosion with consecutive fatal haemorrhage occurred in three cases. Conclusions Stent implantation for intrathoracic oesophageal anastomotic leaks is feasible and compares favourably with surgical re-exploration. It is an easily available, minimally invasive procedure that may reduce leak related mortality. However, it puts the already well-known risk of stent-related vascular erosion on the spot. Awareness of this life threatening complication is therefore mandatory.

Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Surgically Resected T1 Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND The application of endoscopic therapies for early cancers of the esophagus is limited by the possible presence of regional lymph node metastases. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and predictors of lymph node metastases in patients with pT1 carcinoma of the esophagus and the gastric cardia. METHODS The National Cancer Institutes Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database (2004 to 2010) was used to identify all patients with pT1 carcinomas who underwent primary surgical resection for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (EAC) of the esophagus and of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Prevalence of lymph node metastases was assessed, and survival in all types of cancer was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors predicting positive lymph node status. RESULTS There were 1,225 patients (84% male), with a mean age of 64 ± 10 years, and 90% were white. Intramucosal disease was present in 44% of patients, and submucosal invasion (T1b) was present in 692 (56%). Prevalence of lymph node metastases in EAC, SCC, and AEG was 6.4%, 6.9%, and 9.5% for pT1a tumors and 19.6%, 20%, and 22.9% for pT1b tumors, respectively. In patients with more than 23 lymph nodes removed during resection, prevalence of lymph node metastases in EAC, SCC, and AEG was 8.1%, 25%, and 7.4% for pT1a tumors and 27.8%, 33.3%, and 22% for pT1b tumors, respectively. Positive lymph node status was associated with worse overall 5-year survival in EAC (N0 vs N+: 78% vs 52%) and AEG (N0 vs N+: 83% vs 44%) but did not have a significant effect on the long-term survival of patients with SCC. Infiltration of the submucosa, tumor size exceeding 10 mm, and poor tumor differentiation were independently associated with the risk of nodal disease. Prevalence of lymph node metastasis negative for these three risk factors was only 4.8%. CONCLUSIONS Prevalence of lymph node metastasis in early esophageal cancer is high in patients with T1 cancer. Inadequate lymphadenectomy underestimates lymph node status. Endoscopic treatment can be considered only in a select group of patients with early esophageal cancer.

Risk of Stent-Related Aortic Erosion After Endoscopic Stent Insertion for Intrathoracic Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Because of disappointing results after surgical reexploration endoscopic stent implantation was introduced as primary treatment option with improved outcome. Aortoesophageal fistula is a very rare complication and has thus far only anecdotally been reported after esophagectomy. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate if endoscopic stent implantation increases the incidence of postoperative aortoesophageal fistula by reason of stent-related erosion of the thoracic aorta. METHODS Between January 2004 and October 2010, 213 patients underwent esophageal resection mainly for esophageal cancer. An intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leak was endoscopically verified in 25 patients. Seventeen patients received endoscopic implantation of a self-expanding stent as primary treatment. In 8 patients a rethoracotomy was mandatory. RESULTS After successfully accomplished endoscopic stent placement, complete closure of the anastomotic leak was radiologically proven in all 17 patients. In 13 cases, definitive closure and healing of the leak was achieved and the stent could subsequently be removed. In 1 patient, because of early recurrence of very malignant small cell cancer, the stent remained in situ. Three patients developed an erosion of the thoracic aorta with subsequent massive hemorrhage. The mean time between stent insertion and occurrence of aortoesophageal fistula was 26 days. All 3 patients died of exsanguination with severe hypovolemic shock. Postmortem examination confirmed an aortoesophageal fistula in each case. CONCLUSIONS While endoscopic stent implantation seems to be effective in the control of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage, nevertheless the incidence of aortoesophageal fistula caused by stent-related aortic erosion exceeds the thus far reported numbers. Awareness of this life-threatening complication after stent insertion is therefore mandatory.

Closure of persisting air leaks in patients with severe pleural empyema — use of endoscopic one-way endobronchial valve

Parapneumonic pleural empyema is a critical illness with mortality up to 20%. Patients often have severe comorbidity and are not always suitable for major thoracic surgery. Peripheral bronchopleural fistula adds further difficulty. This may result in a situation where recovery is impossible. Therefore, we developed a combination of minimally invasive surgical debridement and closure of the air leak with a bronchoscopic one-way endobronchial valve. Thus far, two patients received the combined treatment. Both patients suffered from a pleural empyema and because of severe comorbidity were not fit for major thoracic surgery. First, minimally invasive surgical debridement of the pleural cavity was performed. In both patients, a persisting peripheral bronchopleural fistula occurred. Via bronchoscopy the leak could be localized in both cases in the lower lobe segment 8. In each case, we implanted an endobronchial one-way valve designed for the treatment of lung emphysema. After the bronchoscopic valve implantation, the leakage ceased in both cases and healing of the pleural empyema was achieved. The valves were subsequently removed via bronchoscopy. Successful closure of peripheral air leaks in patients with pleural empyema using an endoscopic one-way valve is feasible. It is a treatment option in patients who are not fit for major thoracic surgery.

Management of anastomotic leakage-induced tracheobronchial fistula following oesophagectomy: the role of endoscopic stent insertion

OBJECTIVES Tracheobronchial fistulas are rare but life-threatening complications after oesophagectomy. Leakage of the oesophagointestinal anastomosis with inflammatory involvement of the tracheobronchial tree is the predominant reason for postoperative fistulization between the airways and the oesophagus or the gastric tube. Successful management is challenging and still controversially discussed. After promising results in the treatment of intrathoracic anastomotic leaks, we adopted endoscopic stent implantation as the primary treatment option in patients with anastomotic leak-induced tracheobronchial fistula. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, the limits and the results of this procedure. METHODS Between January 2004 and December 2010, 222 consecutive patients underwent oesophageal resection mainly for oesophageal cancer. An anastomotic leak-induced tracheobronchial fistula was bronchoscopically verified in seven patients. Four patients received endoscopic implantation of either a self-expanding tracheal or oesophageal stent or both as primary treatment. Surgical re-exploration was mandatory in 2 patients because of necrosis of the pulled-up gastric tube or gangrene of the airways. One patient was conservatively managed. RESULTS Endoscopic stent placement was successfully accomplished in all 4 patients. Two patients received an oesophageal stent, one patient a tracheal stent and one patient both an oesophageal and a tracheal stent. Closure of the fistula was achieved in all cases and 3 patients finally recovered while one died by reason of respiratory failure. In both surgical re-explored patients resection of the gastric tube was performed, and in one patient, because of subtotal gangrene of the right bronchial tree, emergency pneumectomy was also mandatory. Both patients died due to severe sepsis and respiratory failure. The one conservatively treated patient died from severe pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of anastomotic leak-induced tracheobronchial fistulas by means of oesophageal and tracheal stent implantation is feasible. If stent insertion is limited by gastric tube necrosis or bronchial gangrene, the prognosis is likely to be fatal.

Treatment of intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks by means of endoscopic stent implantation

Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage in patients with esophagectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Until recently surgical reexploration was the preferred way of dealing with this life-threatening complication. But mortality remained significant. After the first successful reports we adopted endoscopic stent implantation as a primary treatment option. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and the results of endoscopic stent implantation. Between January 2004 and December 2009, 167 patients underwent an esophageal resection. Surgery was mainly the result of esophageal cancer. An intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leak was endoscopically verified in 17 patients. Twelve patients received an implantation of a self-expanding stent as a primary treatment. An endoscopic stent placement was accomplished in all 12 patients. In nine patients a definitive closure of the leak was achieved and the stent could subsequently be removed. Two patients died due to severe sepsis in spite of sufficient stent placement. Because of early recurrence of very malign small cell cancer the stent remained in situ in one patient. In conclusion, stent implantation for intrathoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks is feasible and compares favorable with the results of surgical reexploration. It is an easily available minimally-invasive procedure which may reduce leak-related mortality and morbidity.

Spotlight on esophageal perforation: A multinational study using the Pittsburgh esophageal perforation severity scoring system

OBJECTIVE The Pittsburgh group has suggested a perforation severity score (PSS) for better decision making in the management of esophageal perforation. Our study aim was to determine whether the PSS can be used to stratify patients with esophageal perforation into distinct subgroups with differential outcomes in an independent study population. METHODS In a retrospective study cases of esophageal perforation were collected (study-period, 1990-2014). The PSS was analyzed using logistic regression as a continuous variable and stratified into low, intermediate, and high score groups. RESULTS Data for 288 patients (mean age, 59.9 years) presenting with esophageal perforation (during the period 1990-2014) were abstracted. Etiology was spontaneous (Boerhaave; n = 119), iatrogenic (instrumentation; n = 85), and traumatic perforation (n = 84). Forty-three patients had coexisting esophageal cancer. The mean PSS was 5.82, and was significantly higher in patients with fatal outcome (n = 57; 19.8%; mean PSS, 9.79 vs 4.84; P < .001). Mean PSS was also significantly higher in patients receiving operative management (n = 200; 69%; mean PSS, 6.44 vs 4.40; P < .001). Using the Pittsburgh strata, patients were assigned to low PSS (≤2; n = 63), intermediate PSS (3-5; n = 86), and high PSS (>5; n = 120) groups. Perforation-related morbidity, length of stay, frequency of operative treatment, and mortality increased with increasing PSS strata. Patients with high PSS were 3.37 times more likely to have operative management compared with low PSS. CONCLUSIONS The Pittsburgh PSS reliably reflects the seriousness of esophageal perforation and stratifies patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with differential morbidity and mortality outcomes.

Endovascular stent--graft repair of a symptomatic superior mesenteric artery aneurysm.

BACKGROUND Aneurysms of the visceral branches of the abdominal aorta are uncommon and potential life-threatening entities. Although hepatic and splenic artery aneurysms have the highest prevalence among splanchnic aneurysms, superior mesenteric artery aneurysms are even more uncommon. For ruptured visceral arteries aneurysms, a mortality rate of between 20% and 100% has been reported. Besides rupture, the aneurysms can also erode into adjacent visceral organs, which results in severe hemorrhage. Emergency surgery of visceral artery aneurysms is related with significant mortality. In recent years, endovascular therapies have been successfully established in the elective setting. Therefore, we adopted the endovascular stent-graft insertion technique for dealing with an acute symptomatic aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery. METHOD We report the case of a 79-year-old male patient with a symptomatic aneurysm of the proximal superior mesenteric artery. Using an endovascular approach, the aneurysm was excluded with an endoluminal stent--graft. RESULT The endoluminal stent--graft repair resulted in total exclusion of the aneurysm. Patency of the superior mesenteric artery continued and no ischemic complications occurred. Pain and other symptoms disappeared and the patient recovered entirely. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular management of symptomatic superior mesenteric artery aneurysm is feasible and may display excellent results in selected cases. Therefore, endoluminal stent--graft repair should be considered as an alternative to traditional surgical treatment. However, in each patient, the individual anatomy of the mesenteric circulation and the location of the aneurysm play a major role in determining whether endovascular management is possible or surgical repair should be preferred.