Michael T. Milano

Oligometastases Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Long-Term Follow-Up of Prospective Study

PURPOSE To analyze the long-term survival and tumor control outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastases limited in number and extent. METHODS AND MATERIALS We prospectively analyzed the long-term overall survival (OS) and cancer control outcomes of 121 patients with five or fewer clinically detectable metastases, from any primary site, metastatic to one to three organ sites, and treated with SBRT. Freedom from widespread distant metastasis (FFDM) was defined as metastatic disease not amenable to local therapy (i.e., resection or SBRT). Prognostic variables were assessed using log-rank and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS For breast cancer patients, the median follow-up was 4.5 years (7.1 years for 16 of 39 patients alive at the last follow-up visit). The 2-year OS, FFDM, and local control (LC) rate was 74%, 52%, and 87%, respectively. The 6-year OS, FFDM, and LC rate was 47%, 36%, and 87%, respectively. From the multivariate analyses, the variables of bone metastases (p = .057) and one vs. more than one metastasis (p = .055) were associated with a fourfold and threefold reduced hazard of death, respectively. None of the 17 bone lesions from breast cancer recurred after SBRT vs. 10 of 68 lesions from other organs that recurred (p = .095). For patients with nonbreast cancers, the median follow-up was 1.7 years (7.3 years for 7 of 82 patients alive at the last follow-up visit). The 2-year OS, FFDM, and LC rate was 39%, 28%, and 74%, respectively. The 6-year OS, FFDM, and LC rate was 9%, 13%, and 65%, respectively. For nonbreast cancers, a greater SBRT target volume was significantly adverse for OS (p = .012) and lesion LC (p < .0001). Patients whose metastatic lesions, before SBRT, demonstrated radiographic progression after systemic therapy experienced significantly worse OS compared with patients with stable or regressing disease. CONCLUSIONS Select patients with limited metastases treated with SBRT are long-term survivors. Future research should address the therapeutic benefit of SBRT for these patients.

A Prospective Pilot Study of Curative-intent Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With 5 or Fewer Oligometastatic Lesions

It is hypothesized that oligometastatic disease represents a state of potentially curable, limited metastases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an option for patients who are not amenable to or do not want resection.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for lung metastases.

The curative treatment of oligometastases with radiotherapy remains an area of active investigation. We hypothesise that treating oligometastases with SBRT can prolong life and potentially cure patients, while in patients with multiple lung metastases SBRT can improve quality of life. Fifty patients with lung metastases were treated on this study. Individuals with five or fewer total lesions were treated with curative intent. Individuals with > five metastases were treated palliatively. Most patients (62%) received 5 Gy/fraction for a total of 50 Gy. The number of targets treated per patient ranged from one to five (mean 2.6). Tumor sizes ranged from 0.3–7.7 cm in maximal diameter (median 2.1 cm). Mean follow-up was 18.7 months. Local control of treated lesions was obtained in 42 of 49 evaluable patients (83%). Of the 125 total lesions treated, eight progressed after treatment (94% crude local control). The median overall survival time from time of treatment completion of the curatively treated patients was 23.4 months. The progression-free survival of the same group of patients was 25% and 16% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Grade 1 toxicity occurred in 35% of all the patients, 6.1% had grade 2 toxicity, and 2% had grade 3 toxicity. Excellent local tumor control rates with low toxicity are seen with SBRT. Median survival time and progression-free survival both appear better than that achieved with standard care alone. Long-term progression-free survival can be seen in a subset of patients when all tumors are targeted

Changes in Relative Cerebral Blood Volume 1 Month after Radiation-Temozolomide Therapy Can Help Predict Overall Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma

PURPOSE To evaluate perfusion parameter changes in patients with glioblastoma multiforme by comparing the perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging measurements obtained before combined radiation and temozolomide therapy (RT-TMZ) with the follow-up MR imaging measurements obtained 1 month after completion of this treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained, and HIPAA guidelines were followed. The data of 36 patients (24 male [median age, 63 years]; 12 female [median age, 59 years]) with glioblastoma multiforme who were treated with RT-TMZ were retrospectively reviewed. The hypothesis was that a change in relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) 1 month after RT-TMZ is predictive of overall survival. Linear regression analysis was performed to correlate changes in tumor size and perfusion parameters with overall survival. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were evaluated for 1-year survival. Overall survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meir survival curves and log-rank testing. RESULTS Percentage change in rCBV at 1 month after RT-TMZ correlated with overall survival. Increased rCBV after treatment was a strong predictor of poor survival (median survival, 235 days versus 529 days with decreased rCBV) (P < .008, log-rank test). The ROC curves for 1-year survival showed a greater area under the curve (0.806; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.698, 0.970) (P = .005) with rCBV than with tumor size (0.556; 95% CI: 0.342, 0.729) (P = .382). The overall survival for patients with increased tumor size, based on Macdonald criteria, was shorter than that for patients who showed no progression (stable or partial response), but the difference was not significant (median survival, 442 days versus 598 days) (P = .761, log-rank test). CONCLUSION Change in rCBV after RT-TMZ appears to correlate with overall survival.

An Individual Patient Data Metaanalysis of Outcomes and Prognostic Factors After Treatment of Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND An individual patient data metaanalysis was performed to determine clinical outcomes, and to propose a risk stratification system, related to the comprehensive treatment of patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS After a systematic review of the literature, data were obtained on 757 NSCLC patients with 1 to 5 synchronous or metachronous metastases treated with surgical metastectomy, stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery, or radical external-beam radiotherapy, and curative treatment of the primary lung cancer, from hospitals worldwide. Factors predictive of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were evaluated using Cox regression. Risk groups were defined using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Analyses were conducted on training and validating sets (two-thirds and one-third of patients, respectively). RESULTS Median OS was 26 months, 1-year OS 70.2%, and 5-year OS 29.4%. Surgery was the most commonly used treatment for the primary tumor (635 patients [83.9%]) and metastases (339 patients [62.3%]). Factors predictive of OS were: synchronous versus metachronous metastases (P < .001), N-stage (P = .002), and adenocarcinoma histology (P = .036); the model remained predictive in the validation set (c-statistic = 0.682). In RPA, 3 risk groups were identified: low-risk, metachronous metastases (5-year OS, 47.8%); intermediate risk, synchronous metastases and N0 disease (5-year OS, 36.2%); and high risk, synchronous metastases and N1/N2 disease (5-year OS, 13.8%). CONCLUSION Significant OS differences were observed in oligometastatic patients stratified according to type of metastatic presentation, and N status. Long-term survival is common in selected patients with metachronous oligometastases. We propose this risk classification scheme be used in guiding selection of patients for clinical trials of ablative treatment.

Normal tissue toxicity after small field hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation

Stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) is an emerging tool in radiation oncology in which the targeting accuracy is improved via the detection and processing of a three-dimensional coordinate system that is aligned to the target. With improved targeting accuracy, SBRT allows for the minimization of normal tissue volume exposed to high radiation dose as well as the escalation of fractional dose delivery. The goal of SBRT is to minimize toxicity while maximizing tumor control. This review will discuss the basic principles of SBRT, the radiobiology of hypofractionated radiation and the outcome from published clinical trials of SBRT, with a focus on late toxicity after SBRT. While clinical data has shown SBRT to be safe in most circumstances, more data is needed to refine the ideal dose-volume metrics.

Descriptive Analysis of Oligometastatic Lesions Treated With Curative-Intent Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

PURPOSE To characterize oligometastases in patients enrolled on two prospective pilot studies, treating oligometastases with hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery to cranial lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS We describe the characteristics and local control (LC) of 293 lesions in 121 patients with five or fewer metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation and/or cranial stereotactic radiosurgery. For each lesion, the primary cancer site, tumor histology, site of metastasis, gross tumor volume, and prescribed dose were ascertained. The prescribed dose is expressed by the biologically effective dose in 2-Gy fractions (BED2), calculated using the linear quadratic model, assuming an alpha/beta ratio of 10. RESULTS Lung lesions were significantly smaller than other lesions in our cohort, whereas liver lesions were significantly larger, possibly reflecting a detection and/or referral bias. The 2-year and 4-year tumor LC rates were 77% and 73% respectively. A larger gross tumor volume was significantly (p < 0.0001) correlated with worse lesion LC. Lesions originating from primary pancreatic, biliary or liver cancer exhibited significantly poorer LC, as did lesions from colorectal cancer. Lesions from breast cancer were better controlled. A higher BED2 did not correlate with improved tumor control. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic body radiation to aggressively treat oligometastatic lesions results in good local tumor control. Bulkier lesions are more difficult to control and may benefit from dose escalation.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Treatment of Adrenal Metastases

PURPOSE To investigate the dosimetry and outcomes of patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastases to the adrenal glands. METHODS AND MATERIALS At the University of Rochester, patients have been undergoing SBRT for limited metastases since 2001. We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who had undergone SBRT for adrenal metastases from various primary sites, including lung (n = 20), liver (n = 3), breast (n = 3), melanoma (n = 1), pancreas (n = 1), head and neck (n = 1), and unknown primary (n = 1). RESULTS Of the 30 patients, 14 with five or fewer metastatic lesions (including adrenal) underwent SBRT, with the intent of controlling all known sites of metastatic disease, and 16 underwent SBRT for palliation or prophylactic palliation of bulky adrenal metastases. The prescribed dose ranged from 16 Gy in 4 fractions to 50 Gy in 10 fractions. The median dose was 40 Gy. Of the 30 patients, 24 had >3 months of follow-up with serial computed tomography. Of these 24 patients, 1 achieved a complete response, 15 achieved a partial response, 4 had stable disease, and 4 developed progressive disease. No patient developed symptomatic progression of their adrenal metastases. The 1-year survival, local control, and distant control rate was 44%, 55%, and 13%, respectively. No patient developed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 2 or greater toxicity. CONCLUSION SBRT for adrenal metastases is well tolerated. Most patients developed widespread metastases shortly after treatment. Local control was poor, although this was a patient population selected for adverse risk factors, such as bulky disease. Additional studies are needed to determine the efficacy of SBRT for oligometastatic adrenal metastases, given the propensity of these patients to develop further disease progression.

PATTERNS AND TIMING OF RECURRENCE AFTER TEMOZOLOMIDE-BASED CHEMORADIATION FOR GLIOBLASTOMA

PURPOSE To determine recurrence patterns of glioblastoma treated with temozolomide-based chemoradiation. METHODS Pretreatment and serial posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging scans of 54 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Central recurrence (i.e., local progression) and the development of new (i.e., interval appearance of discrete enhancing lesion) in-field, marginal, and distant recurrences were assessed, with the pattern of recurrence of individual lesions defined relative to the 95% isodose line (D(95)). Distant recurrences were defined as lesions completely outside D(95), marginal recurrences crossed D(95), and in-field recurrences were completely inside D(95). RESULTS At a median follow-up of 17 months, 39 of 54 (72%) patients developed recurrent glioblastoma. Among these 39 patients, central recurrence occurred in 80% (at a median of 7 months from diagnosis); new in-field recurrence developed in 33% (at a median of 14 months); marginal recurrences developed in 15% (at a median of 18 months); and distant recurrences developed in 20% (at a median of 11 months). The actuarial rates of central, new in-field, marginal, distant, and any new recurrences at 1-year were 46%, 15%, 3%, 14%, and 25% respectively, whereas at 2 years, the rates were 68%, 60%, 32%, 28%, and 66%, reflecting an increasing probability of new lesions developing at later time points. Ten patients developed subependymal recurrences, of whom 7 developed multiple subependymal lesions. CONCLUSIONS Whereas central recurrence of glioblastoma treated with radiation and temozolomide predominates and persists over time, new in-field, marginal, and distant recurrences commonly develop, particularly at later time points in patients with longer survival.

Reirradiation of recurrent and second primary head and neck malignancies: a comprehensive review

The management of locoregionally recurrent or second primary tumors in a previously irradiated head and neck volume presents a challenging clinical problem. Only a small subset of patients are candidates for potentially curative surgery. Chemotherapy alone provides only limited palliation with no long term survivors. Reirradiation, particularly with aggressive concomitant chemotherapy, results in prolonged median survival and long term survival for some patients. The toxicity of reirradiation, while greater than chemotherapy alone or primary irradiation, is lower than expected for the high cumulative radiation doses. The results of reirradiation in recurrent head and neck cancer and the prognostic factors predicting outcome in this patient population are reviewed.