Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Paul Okunieff is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Paul Okunieff.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1995

Ten-Year Results of a Comparison of Conservation with Mastectomy in the Treatment of Stage I and II Breast Cancer

Joan Jacobson; David N. Danforth; Kenneth H. Cowan; Teresa D'Angelo; Seth M. Steinberg; Lori J. Pierce; Marc E. Lippman; Allen S. Lichter; Eli Glatstein; Paul Okunieff

BACKGROUND Breast-conservation therapy for early-stage breast cancer is now an accepted treatment, but there is still controversy about its comparability with mastectomy. Between 1979 and 1987, the National Cancer Institute conducted a randomized, single-institution trial comparing lumpectomy, axillary dissection, and radiation with mastectomy and axillary dissection for stage I and II breast cancer. We update the results of that trial after a median potential follow-up of 10.1 years. METHODS Two hundred forty-seven patients with clinical stage I and II breast cancer were randomly assigned to undergo either modified radical mastectomy or lumpectomy, axillary dissection, and radiation therapy. The 237 patients who actually underwent randomization have been followed for a median of 10.1 years. The primary end points were overall survival and disease-free survival. RESULTS At 10 years overall survival was 75 percent for the patients assigned to mastectomy and 77 percent for those assigned to lumpectomy plus radiation (P = 0.89). Disease-free survival at 10 years was 69 percent for the patients assigned to mastectomy and 72 percent for those assigned to lumpectomy plus radiation (P = 0.93). The rate of local regional recurrence at 10 years was 10 percent after mastectomy and 5 percent after lumpectomy plus radiation (P = 0.17) after recurrences successfully treated by mastectomy were censored from the analysis. CONCLUSIONS In the management of stage I and II breast cancer, breast conservation with lumpectomy and radiation offers results at 10 years that are equivalent to those with mastectomy.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Oligometastases Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Long-Term Follow-Up of Prospective Study

Michael T. Milano; Alan W. Katz; Hong Zhang; Paul Okunieff

PURPOSE To analyze the long-term survival and tumor control outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastases limited in number and extent. METHODS AND MATERIALS We prospectively analyzed the long-term overall survival (OS) and cancer control outcomes of 121 patients with five or fewer clinically detectable metastases, from any primary site, metastatic to one to three organ sites, and treated with SBRT. Freedom from widespread distant metastasis (FFDM) was defined as metastatic disease not amenable to local therapy (i.e., resection or SBRT). Prognostic variables were assessed using log-rank and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS For breast cancer patients, the median follow-up was 4.5 years (7.1 years for 16 of 39 patients alive at the last follow-up visit). The 2-year OS, FFDM, and local control (LC) rate was 74%, 52%, and 87%, respectively. The 6-year OS, FFDM, and LC rate was 47%, 36%, and 87%, respectively. From the multivariate analyses, the variables of bone metastases (p = .057) and one vs. more than one metastasis (p = .055) were associated with a fourfold and threefold reduced hazard of death, respectively. None of the 17 bone lesions from breast cancer recurred after SBRT vs. 10 of 68 lesions from other organs that recurred (p = .095). For patients with nonbreast cancers, the median follow-up was 1.7 years (7.3 years for 7 of 82 patients alive at the last follow-up visit). The 2-year OS, FFDM, and LC rate was 39%, 28%, and 74%, respectively. The 6-year OS, FFDM, and LC rate was 9%, 13%, and 65%, respectively. For nonbreast cancers, a greater SBRT target volume was significantly adverse for OS (p = .012) and lesion LC (p < .0001). Patients whose metastatic lesions, before SBRT, demonstrated radiographic progression after systemic therapy experienced significantly worse OS compared with patients with stable or regressing disease. CONCLUSIONS Select patients with limited metastases treated with SBRT are long-term survivors. Future research should address the therapeutic benefit of SBRT for these patients.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1995

Radiation dose-response of human tumors

Paul Okunieff; David Morgan; Andrzej Niemierko; Herman D. Suit

PURPOSE The dose of radiation that locally controls human tumors treated electively or for gross disease is rarely well defined. These doses can be useful in understanding the dose requirements of novel therapies featuring inhomogeneous dosimetry and in an adjuvant setting. The goal of this study was to compute the dose of radiation that locally controls 50% (TCD50) of tumors in human subjects. METHODS AND MATERIALS Logit regression was used with data collected from single institutions or from combinations of local control data accumulated from several institutions treating the same disease. RESULTS 90 dose response curves were calculated; 62 of macroscopic tumor therapy, 28 of elective therapy with surgery for primary control. The mean and median TCD50 for gross disease were 50.0 and 51.9 Gy, respectively. The mean and median TCD50 for microscopic disease control were 39.3 and 37.9 Gy, respectively. At the TCD50, an additional dose of 1 Gy controlled an additional 2.5% (median) additional patients with macroscopic disease and 4.2% (median) additional patients with microscopic disease. For both macro- and microscopic disease, an increase of 1% of dose at the TCD50 increased control rates approximately 1% (median) or 2-3% (mean). A predominance of dose response curves had shallow slopes accounting for the discrepancy between mean and median values. CONCLUSION Doses to control microscopic disease are approximately 12 Gy less than that required to control macroscopic disease, and are about 79% of the dose required to control macroscopic disease. The percentage increase in cures expected for a 1% increase in dose is similar for macroscopic microscopic disease, with a median value of approximately 1%/% and a mean of approximately 2.7%/%.


Radiation Research | 2010

Animal Models for Medical Countermeasures to Radiation Exposure

Jacqueline P. Williams; Stephen L. Brown; George E. Georges; Martin Hauer-Jensen; Richard P. Hill; Amy K. Huser; David G. Kirsch; Thomas J. MacVittie; Kathryn A. Mason; Meetha Medhora; John E. Moulder; Paul Okunieff; Mary F. Otterson; Michael E. Robbins; James B. Smathers; William H. McBride

Abstract Since September 11, 2001, there has been the recognition of a plausible threat from acts of terrorism, including radiological or nuclear attacks. A network of Centers for Medical Countermeasures against Radiation (CMCRs) has been established across the U.S.; one of the missions of this network is to identify and develop mitigating agents that can be used to treat the civilian population after a radiological event. The development of such agents requires comparison of data from many sources and accumulation of information consistent with the “Animal Rule” from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Given the necessity for a consensus on appropriate animal model use across the network to allow for comparative studies to be performed across institutions, and to identify pivotal studies and facilitate FDA approval, in early 2008, investigators from each of the CMCRs organized and met for an Animal Models Workshop. Working groups deliberated and discussed the wide range of animal models available for assessing agent efficacy in a number of relevant tissues and organs, including the immune and hematopoietic systems, gastrointestinal tract, lung, kidney and skin. Discussions covered the most appropriate species and strains available as well as other factors that may affect differential findings between groups and institutions. This report provides the workshop findings.


Cancer | 2008

A Prospective Pilot Study of Curative-intent Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With 5 or Fewer Oligometastatic Lesions

Michael T. Milano; Alan W. Katz; A. Muhs; Abraham Philip; Daniel J. Buchholz; Michael C. Schell; Paul Okunieff

It is hypothesized that oligometastatic disease represents a state of potentially curable, limited metastases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an option for patients who are not amenable to or do not want resection.


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2010

Testicular Cancer Survivorship: Research Strategies and Recommendations

Lois B. Travis; Clair J. Beard; James M. Allan; Alv A. Dahl; Darren R. Feldman; Jan Oldenburg; Gedske Daugaard; Jennifer L. Kelly; M. Eileen Dolan; Robyn Hannigan; Louis S. Constine; Kevin C. Oeffinger; Paul Okunieff; G. T. Armstrong; David Wiljer; Robert C. Miller; Jourik A. Gietema; Flora E. van Leeuwen; Jacqueline P. Williams; Craig R. Nichols; Lawrence H. Einhorn; Sophie D. Fosså

Testicular cancer represents the most curable solid tumor, with a 10-year survival rate of more than 95%. Given the young average age at diagnosis, it is estimated that effective treatment approaches, in particular, platinum-based chemotherapy, have resulted in an average gain of several decades of life. This success, however, is offset by the emergence of considerable long-term morbidity, including second malignant neoplasms, cardiovascular disease, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, hypogonadism, decreased fertility, and psychosocial problems. Data on underlying genetic or molecular factors that might identify those patients at highest risk for late sequelae are sparse. Genome-wide association studies and other translational molecular approaches now provide opportunities to identify testicular cancer survivors at greatest risk for therapy-related complications to develop evidence-based long-term follow-up guidelines and interventional strategies. We review research priorities identified during an international workshop devoted to testicular cancer survivors. Recommendations include 1) institution of lifelong follow-up of testicular cancer survivors within a large cohort setting to ascertain risks of emerging toxicities and the evolution of known late sequelae, 2) development of comprehensive risk prediction models that include treatment factors and genetic modifiers of late sequelae, 3) elucidation of the effect(s) of decades-long exposure to low serum levels of platinum, 4) assessment of the overall burden of medical and psychosocial morbidity, and 5) the eventual formulation of evidence-based long-term follow-up guidelines and interventions. Just as testicular cancer once served as the paradigm of a curable malignancy, comprehensive follow-up studies of testicular cancer survivors can pioneer new methodologies in survivorship research for all adult-onset cancer.


Acta Oncologica | 2006

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for lung metastases.

Paul Okunieff; Anncatrine L. Petersen; Abraham Philip; Michael T. Milano; Alan W. Katz; Laszlo Boros; Michael C. Schell

The curative treatment of oligometastases with radiotherapy remains an area of active investigation. We hypothesise that treating oligometastases with SBRT can prolong life and potentially cure patients, while in patients with multiple lung metastases SBRT can improve quality of life. Fifty patients with lung metastases were treated on this study. Individuals with five or fewer total lesions were treated with curative intent. Individuals with > five metastases were treated palliatively. Most patients (62%) received 5 Gy/fraction for a total of 50 Gy. The number of targets treated per patient ranged from one to five (mean 2.6). Tumor sizes ranged from 0.3–7.7 cm in maximal diameter (median 2.1 cm). Mean follow-up was 18.7 months. Local control of treated lesions was obtained in 42 of 49 evaluable patients (83%). Of the 125 total lesions treated, eight progressed after treatment (94% crude local control). The median overall survival time from time of treatment completion of the curatively treated patients was 23.4 months. The progression-free survival of the same group of patients was 25% and 16% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Grade 1 toxicity occurred in 35% of all the patients, 6.1% had grade 2 toxicity, and 2% had grade 3 toxicity. Excellent local tumor control rates with low toxicity are seen with SBRT. Median survival time and progression-free survival both appear better than that achieved with standard care alone. Long-term progression-free survival can be seen in a subset of patients when all tumors are targeted


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011

CONSIDERATION OF DOSE LIMITS FOR ORGANS AT RISK OF THORACIC RADIOTHERAPY: ATLAS FOR LUNG, PROXIMAL BRONCHIAL TREE, ESOPHAGUS, SPINAL CORD, RIBS, AND BRACHIAL PLEXUS

Feng Ming Kong; Timothy Ritter; Douglas J. Quint; Suresh Senan; Laurie E. Gaspar; R. Komaki; Coen W. Hurkmans; Robert D. Timmerman; Andrea Bezjak; Jeffrey D. Bradley; Benjamin Movsas; Lon H. Marsh; Paul Okunieff; Hak Choy; Walter J. Curran

PURPOSE To review the dose limits and standardize the three-dimenional (3D) radiographic definition for the organs at risk (OARs) for thoracic radiotherapy (RT), including the lung, proximal bronchial tree, esophagus, spinal cord, ribs, and brachial plexus. METHODS AND MATERIALS The present study was performed by representatives from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, and Soutwestern Oncology Group lung cancer committees. The dosimetric constraints of major multicenter trials of 3D-conformal RT and stereotactic body RT were reviewed and the challenges of 3D delineation of these OARs described. Using knowledge of the human anatomy and 3D radiographic correlation, draft atlases were generated by a radiation oncologist, medical physicist, dosimetrist, and radiologist from the United States and reviewed by a radiation oncologist and medical physicist from Europe. The atlases were then critically reviewed, discussed, and edited by another 10 radiation oncologists. RESULTS Three-dimensional descriptions of the lung, proximal bronchial tree, esophagus, spinal cord, ribs, and brachial plexus are presented. Two computed tomography atlases were developed: one for the middle and lower thoracic OARs (except for the heart) and one focusing on the brachial plexus for a patient positioned supine with their arms up for thoracic RT. The dosimetric limits of the key OARs are discussed. CONCLUSIONS We believe these atlases will allow us to define OARs with less variation and generate dosimetric data in a more consistent manner. This could help us study the effect of radiation on these OARs and guide high-quality clinical trials and individualized practice in 3D-conformal RT and stereotactic body RT.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1993

Oxygen tension distributions are sufficient to explain the local response of human breast tumors treated with radiation alone

Paul Okunieff; Michael Hoeckel; Eamonn P. Dunphy; Karlheinz Schlenger; Claudia Knoop; Peter Vaupel

PURPOSE Several factors are known to influence the probability of tumor control after radiation. These include tumor oxygen tension distribution, glutathione content, intrinsic radiation sensitivity, rate of repopulation, tumor size, physician skill, etc. The relative impact of oxygen on human tumor response is unknown. The purpose of this analysis is to determine to what extent the observed shape of the radiation response curve for human tumors can be predicted by the tumor oxygenation status. METHODS AND MATERIALS The radiation dose response curve for patients treated with radiation alone for breast cancer was calculated based on pooled data. Tumor control rates as a function of radiation dose were fitted to a probit curve. Twenty-two women with breast cancer in Mainz (Germany) and at Stanford University had pO2 measurements made of their tumors. An average of 87 +/- 58 (range 21 to 300) measurements were made from each patient. Hypoxia was assumed to be a purely dose modifying factor with a maximum oxygen enhancement ratio of 2.5. Assuming patients are treated with daily radiation doses of 2 Gy, the breast cancer alpha/beta ratio is 10 Gy, tumors have a mean of 10(8) stem cells, and using the linear quadratic formula for modelling surviving fraction, it was possible to estimate tumor control probability. RESULTS Tumor oxygenation was an extremely important modifier of the shape of the dose response curve and alone was sufficient to account for the slope of the observed dose response curve for human breast carcinoma. Tumor size distribution had a smaller effect on the shape and the slope of the dose response curve. Two models of radiation induced reoxygenation were tested, one that allowed full reoxygenation to the baseline state between the daily radiation fractions and another with no reoxygenation between fractions. The clinical data fell between these two models in accordance with the expected incomplete reoxygenation between treatments. CONCLUSION The results support the conclusion that in human breast carcinoma, oxygen tension distribution is a critical modifier of radiation treatment response.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Radiotherapy for Liver Metastases: A Review of Evidence

Morten Høyer; Anand Swaminath; Sean Bydder; Michael Lock; Alejandra Méndez Romero; Brian D. Kavanagh; Karyn A. Goodman; Paul Okunieff; Laura A. Dawson

Over the past decade, there has been an increasing use of radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of liver metastases. Most often, ablative doses are delivered to focal liver metastases with the goal of local control and ultimately improving survival. In contrast, low-dose whole-liver RT may be used for the palliation of symptomatic diffuse metastases. This review examines the available clinical data for both approaches. The review found that RT is effective both for local ablation of focal liver metastases and for palliation of patients with symptomatic liver metastases. However, there is a lack of a high level of evidence from randomized clinical trials.

Collaboration


Dive into the Paul Okunieff's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lurong Zhang

Fujian Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ivan Ding

University of Rochester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mei Zhang

University of Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Liangjie Yin

University of Rochester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lurong Zhang

Fujian Medical University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge