Michael Weinstein

A targeted disruption of the murine Brca1 gene causes γ-irradiation hypersensitivity and genetic instability

Germline mutations of the Brca1 gene are responsible for most cases of familial breast and ovarian cancers, but somatic mutations are rarely detected in sporadic events. Moreover, mouse embryos deficient for Brca1 have been shown to die during early embryogenesis due to a proliferation defect. These findings seem incompatible with the tumor suppress function assigned to this gene and raise questions about the mechanism by which Brca1 mutations cause tumorigenesis. We now directly demonstrate that BRCA1 is responsible for the integrity of the genome. Murine embryos carrying a Brca1 null mutation are developmentally retarded and hypersensitive to γ-irradiation, suggesting a failure in DNA damage repair. This notion is supported by spectral karyotyping (SKY) of metaphase chromosomes, which display numerical and structural aberrations. However, massive chromosomal abnormalities are only observed when a p53−/− background is introduced. Thus, a p53 dependent cell cycle checkpoint arrests the mutant embryos and prevents the accumulation of damaged DNA. Brca1−/− fibroblasts are not viable, nor are Brca1−/− : p53−/− fibroblasts. However, proliferative foci arise from Brca1−/− : p53−/− cells, probably due to additional mutations that are a consequence of the accumulating DNA damage. We believe that the increased incidence of such additional mutations accounts for the mechanism of tumorigenesis associated with Brca1 mutations in humans.

Haploid loss of the tumor suppressor Smad4/Dpc4 initiates gastric polyposis and cancer in mice.

The tumor suppressor SMAD4, also known as DPC4, deleted in pancreatic cancer, is a central mediator of TGF-β signaling. It was previously shown that mice homozygous for a null mutation of Smad4 (Smad4−/−) died prior to gastrulation displaying impaired extraembryonic membrane formation and endoderm differentiation. Here we show that Smad4+/− mice began to develop polyposis in the fundus and antrum when they were over 6–12 months old, and in the duodenum and cecum in older animals at a lower frequency. With increasing age, polyps in the antrum show sequential changes from hyperplasia, to dysplasia, in-situ carcinoma, and finally invasion. These alterations are initiated by a dramatic expansion of the gastric epithelium where Smad4 is expressed. However, loss of the remaining Smad4 wild-type allele was detected only in later stages of tumor progression, suggesting that haploinsufficiency of Smad4 is sufficient for tumor initiation. Our data also showed that overexpression of TGF-β1 and Cyclin D1 was associated with increased proliferation of gastric polyps and tumors. These studies demonstrate that Smad4 functions as a tumor suppressor in the gastrointestinal tract and also provide a valuable model for screening factors that promote or prevent gastric tumorigenesis.

Functions of mammalian Smad genes as revealed by targeted gene disruption in mice.

The Smad genes are the intracellular mediators of TGF-beta signals. Targeted mutagenesis in mice has yielded valuable new insights into the functions of this important gene family. These experiments have shown that Smad2 and Smad4 are needed for gastrulation, Smad5 for angiogenesis, and Smad3 for establishment of the mucosal immune response and proper development of the skeleton. In addition, these experiments have shown us the importance of gene dosage in this family, as several of its members yielded haploinsufficiency phenotypes. These include gastrulation and craniofacial defects for Smad2, accelerated wound healing for Smad3, and the incidence of gastric cancer for Smad4. Combinatorial genetics has also revealed functions of Smads in left/right isomerism and liver development.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) and their roles in limb development.

Abstract Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors constitute a family of four membrane-spanning tyrosine kinases (FGFR1–4) which serve as high-affinity receptors for 17 growth factors (FGF1–17). To study functions of FGF/ FGFR signals in development, mice that carry mutations in each receptor have been created by gene targeting. Analysis of these mutant mice revealed essential functions of FGF receptors in multiple biological processes, including mesoderm induction and patterning, cell growth and migration, organ formation and bone growth. In this review we discuss recent work with FGF receptors to illustrate mechanisms, through which the FGF/FGFR signals specify vertebrate limb initiation, outgrowth and patterning.

Smad Proteins and Hepatocyte Growth Factor Control Parallel Regulatory Pathways That Converge on β1-Integrin To Promote Normal Liver Development

ABSTRACT Smads serve as intracellular mediators of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signaling. After phosphorylation by activated type I TGF-β receptors, Smad proteins translocate to the nucleus, where they serve as transcription factors and increase or decrease expression of TGF-β target genes. Mice lacking one copy each ofSmad2 and Smad3 suffered midgestation lethality due to liver hypoplasia and anemia, suggesting essential dosage requirements of TGF-β signal components. This is likely due to abnormal adhesive properties of the mutant hepatocytes, which may result from a decrease in the level of the β1-integrin and abnormal processing and localization of E-cadherin. Culture of mutant livers in vitro revealed the existence of a parallel developmental pathway mediated by hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), which could rescue the mutant phenotype independent of Smad activation. These pathways merge at the β1-integrin, the level of which was increased by HGF in the cultured mutant livers. HGF treatment reversed the defects in cell proliferation and hepatic architecture in theSmad2 +/− ; Smad3 +/− livers.

Gsh-4 encodes a LIM-type homeodomain, is expressed in the developing central nervous system and is required for early postnatal survival.

We present an initial characterization of the murine Gsh‐4 gene which is shown to encode a LIM‐type homeodomain. Genes in this category are known to control late developmental cell‐type specification events in simpler organisms. Whole mount and serial section in situ hybridizations show transient Gsh‐4 expression in ventrolateral regions of the developing neural tube and hindbrain. Mice homozygous for a targeted mutation in Gsh‐4 suffer early postnatal death resulting from immature lungs which do not inflate. Prenatal administration of progesterone and glucocorticoid, to extend gestational term and accelerate maturation, resulted in lung inflation at birth. Nevertheless, the hormonally treated mutants generally failed to survive beyond an hour after birth, due to ineffective breathing efforts. It is concluded that Gsh‐4 plays a critical role in the development of respiratory control mechanisms and in the normal growth and maturation of the lung.

TGIF Inhibits Retinoid Signaling

ABSTRACT TGIF (TG-interacting factor) represses transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)-activated gene expression and can repress transcription via a specific retinoid response element. Mutations in human TGIF are associated with holoprosencephaly, a severe defect of craniofacial development with both genetic and environmental causes. Both TGF-β and retinoic acid signaling are implicated in craniofacial development. Here, we analyze the role of TGIF in regulating retinoid responsive gene expression. We demonstrate that TGIF interacts with the ligand binding domain of the RXRα retinoid receptor and represses transcription from retinoid response elements. TGIF recruits the general corepressor, CtBP, to RXRα, and this recruitment is required for full repression by TGIF. Interaction between TGIF and RXRα is reduced by the addition of retinoic acid, consistent with a role for TGIF as an RXRα transcriptional corepressor. We created a Tgif null mutation in mice and tested the sensitivity of mutant mice to increased levels of retinoic acid. Tgif mutant embryos are more sensitive to retinoic acid-induced teratogenesis, and retinoid target genes are expressed at a higher level in tissues from Tgif null mice. These results demonstrate an important role for TGIF as a transcriptional corepressor, which regulates developmental signaling by retinoic acid, and raises the possibility that TGIF may repress other RXR-dependent transcriptional responses.

Decreased expression of the pro-apoptotic protein Par-4 in renal cell carcinoma

Par-4 is a widely expressed leucine zipper protein that confers sensitization to apoptosis induced by exogenous insults. Because the expression of genes that promote apoptosis may be down-regulated during tumorigenesis, we sought to examine the expression of Par-4 in human tumors. We present here evidence that Par-4 protein levels were severely decreased in human renal cell carcinoma specimens relative to normal tubular cells. Replenishment of Par-4 protein levels in renal cell carcinoma cell lines conferred sensitivity to apoptosis. Because apoptosis may serve as a defense mechanism against malignant transformation or progression, decreased expression of Par-4 may contribute to the pathophysiology of renal cell carcinoma.

Mutually exclusive expression patterns of Bcl-2 and Par-4 in human prostate tumors consistent with down-regulation of Bcl-2 by Par-4

Par-4 is a widely expressed protein that sensitizes both prostatic and non-prostatic cells to apoptosis. Constitutive- or regulated- overexpression of Par-4 caused a reduction in the levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. Replenishment of Bcl-2 levels abrogated susceptibility to Par-4-dependent apoptosis, suggesting that Par-4-mediated apoptosis requires downmodulation of Bcl-2 levels. The inverse correlation between Par-4 and Bcl-2 expression was recapitulated in human prostate tumors. Par-4 but not Bcl-2 was detected in the secretory epithelium of benign prostatic tumors and in primary and metastatic prostate cancers that are apt to undergo apoptosis. Moreover, xenografts of human, androgen-dependent CWR22 tumors showed Par-4 but not Bcl-2 expression. By contrast, androgen-independent CWR22R tumors derived from the CWR22 xenografts showed mutually exclusive expression patterns of Par-4 and Bcl-2. These findings suggest a mechanism by which Par-4 may sensitize prostate tumor cells to apoptosis.

Oscillatory lunatic fringe activity is crucial for segmentation of the anterior but not posterior skeleton

The Notch pathway plays multiple roles during vertebrate somitogenesis, functioning in the segmentation clock and during rostral/caudal (R/C) somite patterning. Lunatic fringe (Lfng) encodes a glycosyltransferase that modulates Notch signaling, and its expression patterns suggest roles in both of these processes. To dissect the roles played by Lfng during somitogenesis, a novel allele was established that lacks cyclic Lfng expression within the segmentation clock, but that maintains expression during R/C somite patterning (LfngΔFCE1). In the absence of oscillatory Lfng expression, Notch activation is ubiquitous in the PSM of LfngΔFCE1 embryos. LfngΔFCE1 mice exhibit severe segmentation phenotypes in the thoracic and lumbar skeleton. However, the sacral and tail vertebrae are only minimally affected in LfngΔFCE1 mice, suggesting that oscillatory Lfng expression and cyclic Notch activation are important in the segmentation of the thoracic and lumbar axial skeleton (primary body formation), but are largely dispensable for the development of sacral and tail vertebrae (secondary body formation). Furthermore, we find that the loss of cyclic Lfng has distinct effects on the expression of other clock genes during these two stages of development. Finally, we find that LfngΔFCE1 embryos undergo relatively normal R/C somite patterning, confirming that Lfng roles in the segmentation clock are distinct from its functions in somite patterning. These results suggest that the segmentation clock may employ varied regulatory mechanisms during distinct stages of anterior/posterior axis development, and uncover previously unappreciated connections between the segmentation clock, and the processes of primary and secondary body formation.