Michael Wilhelmsen

Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study

BACKGROUND Application of the principles of total mesorectal excision to colon cancer by undertaking complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been proposed to improve oncological outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether implementation of CME improved disease-free survival compared with conventional colon resection. METHODS Data for all patients who underwent elective resection for Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage I-III colon adenocarcinomas in the Capital Region of Denmark between June 1, 2008, and Dec 31, 2011, were retrieved for this population-based study. The CME group consisted of patients who underwent CME surgery in a centre validated to perform such surgery; the control group consisted of patients undergoing conventional colon resection in three other hospitals. Data were collected from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) database and medical charts. Patients were excluded if they had stage IV disease, metachronous colorectal cancer, rectal cancer (≤ 15 cm from anal verge) in the absence of synchronous colon adenocarcinoma, tumour of the appendix, or R2 resections. Survival data were collected on Nov 13, 2014, from the DCCG database, which is continuously updated by the National Central Office of Civil Registration. FINDINGS The CME group consisted of 364 patients and the non-CME group consisted of 1031 patients. For all patients, 4-year disease-free survival was 85.8% (95% CI 81.4-90.1) after CME and 75.9% (72.2-79.7) after non-CME surgery (log-rank p=0.0010). 4-year disease-free survival for patients with UICC stage I disease in the CME group was 100% compared with 89.8% (83.1-96.6) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0.046). For patients with UICC stage II disease, 4-year disease-free survival was 91.9% (95% CI 87.2-96.6) in the CME group compared with 77.9% (71.6-84.1) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0.0033), and for patients with UICC stage III disease, it was 73.5% (63.6-83.5) in the CME group compared with 67.5% (61.8-73.2) in the non-CME group (log-rank p=0.13). Multivariable Cox regression showed that CME surgery was a significant, independent predictive factor for higher disease-free survival for all patients (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.83), and also for patients with UICC stage II (0.44, 0.23-0.86) and stage III disease (0.64, 0.42-1.00). After propensity score matching, disease-free survival was significantly higher after CME, irrespective of UICC stage, with 4-year disease-free survival of 85.8% (95% CI 81.4-90.1) after CME and 73.4% (66.2-80.6) after non-CME (log-rank p=0·0014). INTERPRETATION Our data indicate that CME surgery is associated with better disease-free survival than is conventional colon cancer resection for patients with stage I-III colon adenocarcinoma. Implementation of CME surgery might improve outcomes for patients with colon cancer. FUNDING Tvergaards Fund and Edgar and Hustru Gilberte Schnohrs Fund.

Analgesic effects of melatonin: a review of current evidence from experimental and clinical studies

Abstract:  Melatonin is an endogenous indoleamine, produced mainly by the pineal gland. Melatonin has been proven to have chronobiotic, antioxidant, antihypertensive, anxiolytic and sedative properties. There are also experimental and clinical data supporting an analgesic role of melatonin. In experimental studies, melatonin shows potent analgesic effects in a dose‐dependent manner. In clinical studies, melatonin has been shown to have analgesic benefits in patients with chronic pain (fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, migraine). The physiologic mechanism underlying the analgesic actions of melatonin has not been clarified. The effects may be linked to Gi‐coupled melatonin receptors, to Gi‐coupled opioid μ‐receptors or GABA‐B receptors with unknown downstream changes with a consequential reduction in anxiety and pain. Also, the repeated administration of melatonin improves sleep and thereby may reduce anxiety, which leads to lower levels of pain. In this paper, we review the current evidence regarding the analgesic properties of melatonin in animals and humans with chronic pain.

Short-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision compared with 'conventional' colonic cancer surgery.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) seems to be associated with improved oncological outcomes compared with ‘conventional’ surgery, but there is a potential for higher morbidity.

No effect of melatonin to modify surgical-stress response after major vascular surgery: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND A possible mechanism underlying cardiovascular morbidity after major vascular surgery may be the perioperative ischaemia-reperfusion with excessive oxygen-derived free-radical production and increased levels of circulating inflammatory mediators. We examined the effect of melatonin infusion during surgery and oral melatonin treatment for 3 days after surgery on biochemical markers of oxidative and inflammatory stress. METHODS Patients received an intra-operative intravenous infusion of 50 mg melatonin or placebo. In addition, all patients received 10 mg melatonin or placebo orally the first 3 nights after surgery. Blood samples for analysis of malondialdehyde (MDA), ascorbic acid (AA), dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were collected preoperatively, and at 5 min, 6 h and 24 h after clamp removal (recirculation of the first leg). RESULTS Twenty-six patients received melatonin and 24 patients received placebo. No significant differences were observed in any of the oxidative and inflammatory stress parameters. There were significantly more side effects in the melatonin group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Melatonin treatment in the perioperative period did not reduce the oxidative and inflammatory parameters measured in this study.

Detection of colorectal neoplasia: Combination of eight blood-based, cancer-associated protein biomarkers.

Serological biomarkers may be an option for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study assessed eight cancer‐associated protein biomarkers in plasma from subjects undergoing first time ever colonoscopy due to symptoms attributable to colorectal neoplasia. Plasma AFP, CA19‐9, CEA, hs‐CRP, CyFra21‐1, Ferritin, Galectin‐3 and TIMP‐1 were determined in EDTA‐plasma using the Abbott ARCHITECT® automated immunoassay platform. Primary endpoints were detection of (i) CRC and high‐risk adenoma and (ii) CRC. Logistic regression was performed. Final reduced models were constructed selecting the four biomarkers with the highest likelihood scores. Subjects (N = 4,698) were consecutively included during 2010–2012. Colonoscopy detected 512 CRC patients, 319 colonic cancer and 193 rectal cancer. Extra colonic malignancies were detected in 177 patients, 689 had adenomas of which 399 were high‐risk, 1,342 had nonneoplastic bowell disease and 1,978 subjects had ‘clean’ colorectum. Univariable analysis demonstrated that all biomarkers were statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the blood‐based biomarkers in combination significantly predicted the endpoints. The reduced model resulted in the selection of CEA, hs‐CRP, CyFra21‐1 and Ferritin for the two endpoints; AUCs were 0.76 and 0.84, respectively. The postive predictive value at 90% sensitivity was 25% for endpoint 1 and the negative predictive value was 93%. For endpoint 2, the postive predictive value was 18% and the negative predictive value was 97%. Combinations of serological protein biomarkers provided a significant identification of subjects with high risk of the presence of colorectal neoplasia. The present set of biomarkers could become important adjunct in early detection of CRC.

Pre-analytical variables of circulating cell-free nucleosomes containing 5-methylcytosine DNA or histone modification H3K9Me3

Abstract Aim: To evaluate pre-analytical variables of circulating cell-free nucleosomes containing 5-methylcytosine DNA (5mC) or histone modification H3K9Me3 (H3K9Me3). Materials and methods: Six studies were designed to assess the possible influence of pre-analytical variables. Study 1: influence of stasis and contamination with white-cells and platelets. Study 2: influence of within-day variations. Study 3: influence of day-to-day variation. Study 4: influence of temperature during handling and storage, and of neoplastic disease. Study 5: influence of colonoscopy. Study 6: influence of the surgical trauma. 5mC and H3K9Me3 measurements were performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: Stasis, white-cell and platelet contamination, within-day variations, varying storage time before centrifugation, colonoscopy, and surgical trauma had no significant influence on levels of 5mC or H3K9Me3. Day-to-day variations of 12.7% and 11.5% (intra-individual) and 98.1% and 60.8% (inter-individual) were shown for 5mC and H3K9Me3, respectively. Levels of 5mC or H3K9Me3 were significantly higher in samples stored at room temperature until centrifugation compared to samples stored on ice. Patients with cancer had significantly lower levels of 5mC or H3K9Me3 compared to levels in healthy individuals. Conclusion: Levels of 5mC or H3K9Me3 appear stable in most pre-analytical settings if blood samples are stored at room temperature until centrifugation.

Protocol Outlines for Parts 1 and 2 of the Prospective Endoscopy III Study for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: Validation of a Concept Based on Blood Biomarkers

Background Programs for population screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) have been implemented in several countries with fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) as the preferred platform. However, the major obstacle for a feces-based testing method is the limited compliance that reduces the clinical sensitivity for detection of participants with non-symptomatic CRC. Therefore, research approaches have been initiated to develop screening concepts based on biomarkers in blood. Preliminary results show that protein, genetic, epigenetic, and metabolomic components may be valuable in blood-based screening concepts, particularly when combinations of the various components appear to lead to significant improvements. Objectives The protocol described in this paper focuses on the validation of concepts based on biomarkers in blood in a major population screened by FIT. Methods In Part 1, participants will be identified and included through the Danish CRC Screening Program comprising initial FIT and subsequent colonoscopy to those with a positive result. Blood samples will be collected from 8000 FIT-positive participants, who are offered subsequent colonoscopy. Findings and interventions at colonoscopy together with personal data including co-morbidity will be recorded. Blood samples and data will also be collected from 6000 arbitrarily chosen participants with negative FIT. In Part 2, blood samples and data will be collected from 30,000 FIT-negative participants three times within 4 years. The blood samples will be analyzed using various in-house and commercially available manual and automated analysis platforms. Results We anticipate Part 1 to terminate late August 2016 and Part 2 to terminate late September 2022. The results from Parts 1 and 2 will be presented within 12 to 18 months from termination. Conclusions The purpose of this study is to improve the efficacy of identifying participants with neoplastic bowel lesions, to identify false negative participants, to identify participants at risk of interval neoplastic lesions, to improve the compliance in screening sessions, and to establish guidelines for out-patient follow-up of at-risk participants based on combinations of blood-based biomarkers.