Michael Yong Park

Preliminary experience using high intensity focused ultrasound for treating liver metastasis from colon and stomach cancer

Purpose: To determine the efficacy and safety from our preliminary results of using high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) to treat liver metastasis from colon and stomach cancer. Materials and methods: Ten patients with liver metastasis from colon cancer and three from stomach cancer underwent HIFU under general anesthesia. HIFU was performed using an extracorporeal, ultrasound-guided focused system. Complications during the study, extent of coagulative necrosis at two-week follow up, and evidence of tumor on further follow up were analyzed. Patients were divided into four categories: (I) complete ablation with no evidence of recurrence on follow up; (II) apparent complete ablation of target mass with new foci of disease in the target organ or distant malignancy and no local tumor progression; (III) local tumor progression after apparent complete ablation; (IV) partial ablation. Results: Mean follow-up period was 22 weeks in the colon cancer group and 58 weeks in the stomach cancer group. The sum of total lesion size was between 1.8 cm and 21.4 cm (mean: 8.4 cm ± 6.7 cm) for the colon cancer group and between 1.7 and 16.3 cm (mean: 8.8 cm ± 7.3 cm) for the stomach cancer group. In the colon cancer group, one patient was categorized as category I, one as category II, three as category III, and the remaining five as category IV. The stomach cancer group showed two patients as category I, and one as category II. Conclusion: For treating liver metastasis from colon and stomach cancer HIFU seems safe but its efficacy is questionable. Further research is warranted.

Effect of Beam-Flow Angle on Velocity Measurements in Modern Doppler Ultrasound Systems

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to examine the effect of different beam-flow angles on the accuracy of Doppler ultrasound velocity measurements in modern ultrasound systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS A flow phantom was used to create a steady flow of water in a 4.3-mm-diameter tube. Using three different modern university-grade ultrasound systems, flow was measured at 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 88° beam-flow angles twice by two radiologists in consensus using a convex and linear probe. Measured flow ratio, defined as measured velocity divided by estimated actual velocity, was calculated. Intraprobe, interprobe, and intermachine mean variation of measured flow ratio were calculated. RESULTS Measured flow ratio increased as beam-flow angles increased. Measured flow ratios for the angles 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 88° were 0.90, 0.97, 1.10, 1.22, 1.62, 2.34, and 10.29, respectively. Intraprobe, interprobe, and intermachine variation did not show marked differences. For angles grouped as 30-40°, 50-60°, 70°, and 80-88°, intraprobe variation was 12%, 15%, 15%, and 26%; interprobe variation was 20%, 16%, 13%, and 26%; and intermachine variation was 16%, 16%, 17%, and 54%, respectively. As beam-flow angle increased, an increase in spectral broadening was also noted. CONCLUSION There is no simple cutoff beam-flow value, such as the well-quoted less than 60°, at which velocity measurements can be considered accurate. For follow-up imaging, beam-flow angle differences should be considered, and the same beam-flow angles should be used when possible. Follow-up imaging by different sonography machines is feasible.

Correlation of Portal Venous Velocity and Portal Venous Flow With Short-Term Graft Regeneration in Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplants

BACKGROUND To evaluate the correlation of postoperative portal venous velocity (PVV) and portal venous flow (PVF) with the degree of short-term graft regeneration in recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between August 2005 and April 2006, we performed 44 adult-to-adult LDLTs with right-lobe grafts, of whom 31 recipients were included in this study. Doppler ultrasonography was used to measure PVV (cm/s) and PVF (mL/min) on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 5 or 6. Portal venous velocity index (PVI) was defined as the ratio of PVV to graft weight (GW), and portal flow volume index (PFI) as the ratio of PVF to GW. Graft regeneration rate (GRR), defined as the ratio of the volume of regenerated graft to GW, was estimated by dividing computed tomography volumetry at POD 7 by GW measured after retrieval of the graft. We analyzed the relationship between GRR and PVV, PVF, PVI, and PFI. RESULTS GW ranged between 528 g and 1040 g (mean = 735 g) and GRR ranged between 118% and 278% (mean = 172%). Although neither PVV nor PVF correlated with GRR, PVI and PFI at POD 1 (P = .009) and PFI at POD 5 or 6 (P = .012) significantly correlated with GRR at POD 7. CONCLUSION PVI and PFI at POD 1 are useful indicators to predict short-term graft regeneration in recipients of LDLT.

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer

AIM To assess the role of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and establish imaging criteria of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. METHODS One hundred and sixty patients with early colorectal cancer were evaluated for tumor location, clinical history of polypectomy, depth of tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Two radiologists assessed preoperative CT and/or MRI for the primary tumor site detectability, the presence or absence of regional lymph node, and the size of the largest lymph node. Demographic, imaging, and pathologic findings were compared between the two groups of patients based on pathologic lymph node metastasis and optimal size criterion was obtained. RESULTS The locations of tumor were ascending, transverse, descending, sigmoid colon, and rectum. One hundred and sixty early colorectal cancers were classified into 3 groups based on the pathological depth of tumor invasion; mucosa, submucosa, and depth unavailable. A total of 20 (12.5%) cancers with submucosal invasion showed lymph node metastasis. Lymph nodes were detected on CT or MRI in 53 patients. The detection rate and size of lymph nodes were significantly higher (P = 0.000, P = 0.044, respectively) in patients with pathologic nodal metastasis than in patients without nodal metastasis. Receiver operating curve analysis showed that a cut-off value of 4.1 mm is optimal with a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 75%. CONCLUSION The short diameter size criterion of ≥ 4.1 mm for metastatic lymph nodes was optimal for nodal staging in early colorectal cancer.

Diffusion-weighted MRI of epithelial ovarian cancers: Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient values with histologic grade and surgical stage ☆

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to correlate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of epithelial ovarian cancers with histologic grade and surgical stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS We enrolled 43 patients with pathologically proven epithelial ovarian cancers for this retrospective study. All patients underwent preoperative pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted images with b value of 0 and 1000 s/mm2 at 3.0-T unit. The mean ADC values of the solid portion of the tumor were measured and compared among different histologic grades and surgical stages. RESULTS The mean ADC values of epithelial ovarian cancers differed significantly between grade 1 (well-differentiated) and grade 2 (moderately-differentiated) (P=0.013) as well as between grade 1 and grade 3 (poorly-differentiated) (P=0.01); however, no statistically significant difference existed between grade 2 and grade 3 (P=0.737). The receiver-operating characteristic analysis indicated that a cutoff ADC value of less than or equal to 1.09×10(-3)mm2/s was associated with 94.4% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity in distinguishing grade 1 and grade 2/3 cancer. The difference in mean ADC values was statistically significant for early stage (FIGO stage I) and advanced stage (FIGO stage II-IV) cancer (P=0.011). The interobserver agreement for the mean ADC values of epithelial ovarian cancers was excellent. CONCLUSION The mean ADC values of the solid portion of epithelial ovarian cancers negatively correlated to histologic grade and surgical stage. The mean ADC values may be useful imaging biomarkers for assessment of tumor grade of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Intra- and interobserver reliability of gray scale/dynamic range evaluation of ultrasonography using a standardized phantom.

Purpose: To evaluate intra- and interobserver reliability of the gray scale/dynamic range of the phantom image evaluation of ultrasonography using a standardized phantom, and to assess the effect of interactive education on the reliability. Methods: Three radiologists (a resident, and two board-certified radiologists with 2 and 7 years of experience in evaluating ultrasound phantom images) performed the gray scale/dynamic range test for an ultrasound machine using a standardized phantom. They scored the number of visible cylindrical structures of varying degrees of brightness and made a ‘pass or fail’ decision. First, they scored 49 phantom images twice from a 2010 survey with limited knowledge of phantom images. After this, the radiologists underwent two hours of interactive education for the phantom images and scored another 91 phantom images from a 2011 survey twice. Intra- and interobserver reliability before and after the interactive education session were analyzed using K analyses. Results: Before education, the K-value for intraobserver reliability for the radiologist with 7 years of experience, 2 years of experience, and the resident was 0.386, 0.469, and 0.465, respectively. After education, the K-values were improved (0.823, 0.611, and 0.711, respectively). For interobserver reliability, the K-value was also better after the education for the 3 participants (0.067, 0.002, and 0.547 before education; 0.635, 0.667, and 0.616 after education, respectively). Conclusion: The intra- and interobserver reliability of the gray scale/dynamic range was fair to substantial. Interactive education can improve reliability. For more reliable results, double- checking of phantom images by multiple reviewers is recommended.

MRI of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Typical Features Are Less Frequent Below a Size Cutoff of 1.5 cm

OBJECTIVE The purposes of this study were to analyze MRI features of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on the basis of size and to evaluate the difference in frequency of typical radiologic hallmarks of HCC (arterial enhancement and washout) according to the tumor size. MATERIALS AND METHODS Enrolled were 86 patients with 110 HCCs 3 cm or smaller who underwent surgical resection or transplantation. Two radiologists reviewed gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI features for signal intensity of T2-weighted and T1-weighted imaging, diffusion restriction, presence of arterial enhancement, washout on portal and transitional phases, and signal intensity on the hepatobiliary phase. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal HCC cutoff size for radiologic hallmarks of HCC. Tumors were divided into two groups by cutoff size, and the frequencies of MRI features were assessed. RESULTS On ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff for radiologic hallmarks of HCC was 1.5 cm in independent and consensus reviews by two radiologists. HCCs smaller than 1.5 cm showed typical finding of HCC less frequently than HCCs 1.5 cm or larger in diameter. In subgroup analyses, HCCs with diameters between 1 and 1.5 cm showed similar MRI findings to HCCs with diameters 1 cm or less but significantly different findings compared with HCCs with diameters from 1.5 to 2 cm and 2-3 cm. CONCLUSION HCCs smaller than 1.5 cm in size less frequently showed MRI findings seen typically in larger HCCs. Therefore, small HCCs are harder to detect with certainty not only because of small size but also because of the lower frequency of typical MRI findings.

Patient Dose Management: Focus on Practical Actions.

Medical radiation is a very important part of modern medicine, and should be only used when needed and optimized. Justification and optimization of radiation examinations must be performed. The first step of reduction of medical exposure is to know the radiation dose in currently performed examinations. This review covers radiation units, how various imaging modalities report dose, and the current status of radiation dose reports and legislation. Also, practical tips that can be applied to clinical practice are introduced. Afterwards, the importance of radiology exposure related education is emphasized and the current status of education for medical personal and the public is explained, and appropriate education strategies are suggested. Commonly asked radiation dose related example questions and answers are provided in detail to allow medical personnel to answer patients. Lastly, we talk about computerized programs that can be used in medical facilities for managing patient dose. While patient dose monitoring and management should be used to decrease and optimize overall radiation dose, it should not be used to assess individual cancer risk. One must always remember that medically justified examinations should always be performed, and unneeded examinations should be avoided in the first place.

Radiation Doses of Various CT Protocols: a Multicenter Longitudinal Observation Study

Emerging concerns regarding the hazard from medical radiation including CT examinations has been suggested. The purpose of this study was to observe the longitudinal changes of CT radiation doses of various CT protocols and to estimate the long-term efforts of supervising radiologists to reduce medical radiation. Radiation dose data from 11 representative CT protocols were collected from 12 hospitals. Attending radiologists had collected CT radiation dose data in two time points, 2007 and 2010. They collected the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) of each phase, number of phases, dose length product (DLP) of each phase, and types of scanned CT machines. From the collected data, total DLP and effective dose (ED) were calculated. CTDIvol, total DLP, and ED of 2007 and 2010 were compared according to CT protocols, CT machine type, and hospital. During the three years, CTDIvol had significantly decreased, except for dynamic CT of the liver. Total DLP and ED were significantly decreased in all 11 protocols. The decrement was more evident in newer CT scanners. However, there was substantial variability of changes of ED during the three years according to hospitals. Although there was variability according to protocols, machines, and hospital, CT radiation doses were decreased during the 3 years. This study showed the effects of decreased CT radiation dose by efforts of radiologists and medical society.

Fraudulent retouching of digital radiographic images – a potential risk

AIM To determine whether radiologists can recognize images retouched to include sham lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten representative key images were selected of aortic dissection, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, colon cancer, liver metastasis, hepatic cyst, gallbladder stones, splenic artery aneurysm, adrenal adenoma, and stomach cancer from abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging performed in 2008. Five of the key images were replaced with retouched images using image-editing software. The time to complete retouching was recorded for each image. Radiologists were requested to make a diagnosis for the 10 images, and were then asked to identify possible retouched images. The time taken to reach a decision in each case was recorded. Thirty radiologists (13 residents and 17 attending radiologists) participated as reviewers. RESULTS The time to complete retouching was 15.2±3.15 min. None of the reviewers recognized that some images were retouched during diagnosis. The rate of correct diagnosis was 90% (range 71.7-100%). After reviewers were informed of possible image retouching, the detection rate of retouched images was 50% (40-58.3%). This rate was statistically the same as random choice (p=0.876). There was no significant difference between residents and attending radiologists in the detection rate of retouched images (p=0.786). The time to diagnosis and the time to detection of the retouched images were 15 (14-17) and 6 (5-7) min, respectively. CONCLUSION Digital images can be easily retouched, and radiologists have difficulty in identifying retouched images. Radiologists should be aware of the potential fraudulent use of retouched images.