Michela Del Prete

Sorafenib in advanced iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: efficacy, safety and exploratory analysis of role of serum thyroglobulin and FDG-PET

Radioactive iodine is a crucial tool for treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). In 5% of cases, DTCs lose I‐131 avidity and assume an aggressive behaviour. Treatment options for iodine‐refractory DTC are limited. We report the experience of off‐label use of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib for treatment of advanced iodine‐refractory DTC.

Transarterial embolization (TAE) is equally effective and slightly safer than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to manage liver metastases in neuroendocrine tumors

AbstractLiver metastases from neuroendocrine tumor (NET) can be treated by transarterial embolization (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).nThe goal of TAE and TACE is to reduce blood flow to the tumor resulting in tumor ischemia and necrosis. In this retrospective study, the effectiveness and safety of TAE–TACE in the treatment of liver metastases in patients with NET was compared. Thirty patients with a histologically confirmed gastro-entero-pancreatic NET with liver metastases were retrospectively investigated. Seventeen patients underwent TAE, while 13 patients underwent TACE. Tumor response, degree of devascularization in treated lesions, and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated in the whole population and then separately in TAE and TACE subgroups. In all patients treated with TAE and TACE, there was a significant size reduction of lesions as compared to baseline. Per lesion reduction was 2.2xa0±xa01.4 versus 3.3xa0±xa01.5xa0cm for TAE (pxa0<xa00.001) and 2.2xa0±xa01.5 versus 3.4xa0±xa01.7xa0cm for TACE (pxa0<xa00.001). In the whole population, the median PFS for all patients was 36xa0months (16.2–55.7 CI), without significant difference between TAE and TACE. In no patient did adverse events grade 3 and 4 as well as TAE/TACE-related death occurred, while the post-embolization syndrome occurred in 41xa0% of patients treated with TAE and 61xa0% of those treated with TACE. TAE and TACE are both effective in NET patients with liver metastases. TAE should be preferred to TACE in light of its similar anti-tumor effects and slightly better toxicity profile.

Limitations of Chromogranin A in clinical practice

Context: Usefulness of circulating Chromogranin A (CgA) for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors (NEN) is controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the actual role of this marker as diagnostic tool. Methods: Serum blood samples were obtained from 42 subjects affected with NEN, 120 subjects affected with non-endocrine neoplasias (non-NEN) and 100 non-neoplastic subjects affected with benign nodular goitre (NNG). Determination of CgA was performed by means of immunoradiometric assay. Results: The CgA levels among NEN-patients were not significantly different from NNG and non-NEN subjects. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis failed to identify a feasible cut-off value for the differential diagnosis between NEN and the other conditions. Conclusion: Serum CgA is not helpful for the first-line diagnosis of NEN.

Hepatic arterial embolization in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Liver metastases occur in 46-93% of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Presence and extension of liver metastases are considered important prognostic factors, as they may significantly impair the patient’s quality of life, because of either tumor bulk or hormonal hypersecretion. Therapies for NEN liver metastases include surgical resection, liver transplantation, chemotherapy and biotherapy. Surgery is the gold standard for curative therapy, but in most of NEN patients with liver metastases, when surgery can not be applied, minimally invasive therapeutic approaches are adopted. They include trans-arterial embolization (TAE), trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency thermal ablation and new emerging techniques.TAE is based on selective infusion of particles in the branch of the hepatic artery supplying the tumor lesions. The goal of TAE is to occlude tumor blood vessels resulting in ischemia and necrosis. Many reports have shown that TAE can reduce tumor size and hormone output, resulting in palliation of symptoms without the use of cytotoxic drugs, resulting in better tolerability. This review will focus on TAE performance and safety in NEN patients with liver metastases.

Insulin resistance and acne: a new risk factor for men?

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between acne and insulin resistance as well as other metabolic impairment in young males. Acne is a skin disease that can be influenced by endocrine abnormalities. In females, it is associated with polycystic ovary syndrome, with peripheral insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, whereas few data are available in males. For investigating this, 22 young males with acne have been compared to 22 controls of comparable age and gender. Acne was scored using the global acne grading system score. Clinical as well as biochemical parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism, circulating levels of androgens, and IGF-1 were evaluated. Oral glucose tolerance test was performed and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance was calculated. The results thus obtained are as follows, patients had higher BMI (pxa0=xa00.003), WC (pxa0=xa00.002), WHR (pxa0=xa00.02), SBP (pxa0=xa00.0001), DBP (pxa0=xa00.001), basal (pxa0=xa00.01) and 120xa0min. oGTT serum insulin concentrations (pxa0=xa00.002), basal glucose concentrations (pxa0=xa00.03), HOMA-IR (pxa0=xa00.016), and lower HDL-cholesterol than controls (pxa0=xa00.001). Among the subgroup of subjects with BMI <24.9, HDL-cholesterol (pxa0=xa00.05) and 120xa0min. oGTT serum insulin concentrations (pxa0=xa00.009) resulted to be independent predictors of acne at multivariate analysis. In conclusion, these findings highlight a metabolic imbalance in young males affected with acne. Insulin resistance seems to play the main role for the development of acne in these subjects. Insulin resistance could represent an effective target for therapy in male acne.

Cinacalcet in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism: post marketing experience of an Italian multicentre group.

To report the Italian experience on cinacalcet use following its approval by the European Medical Agency (EMA) to control hypercalcaemia in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT).

Targeted therapy with kinase inhibitors in aggressive endocrine tumors

Introduction: Kinase inhibitors (KIs) are a class of anticancer drugs that inhibit activity of the enzymes protein kinases, which regulate crucial cellular processes and have a demonstrated role in human oncogenesis. Treatment of advanced forms of endocrine cancer which are not responsive to cytotoxic chemotherapies is challenging and use of KIs is gaining a growing role in this field. Areas covered: The authors summarize the main genetic alterations known to be linked to endocrine tumors, indicating the rationale for utilizing KIs. Furthermore, they present an updated analysis of clinical trials available on PubMed Central, which were pertinent to the activities of KIs in aggressive endocrine cancer. The authors also discuss the adverse effects of KIs and summarize likely involved underlying mechanisms. Expert opinion: KIs are effective in obtaining a radiological disease control and an improvement of progression-free survival in several forms of endocrine cancer but will never deliver a knockout blow of the disease, due to mechanisms of adaptation to circumvent the specific molecular blockade. The new frontier of KIs treatment is to identify agents that could synergize activity of KIs. The true goal will be to perform an overall genotyping of each tumor, thus predicting the impact of combined targeted therapies in the context of a particular constellation of mutant genes.

Prognostic role of the CDNK1B V109G polymorphism in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

CDKN1B encodes the cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor p27/Kip1. CDKN1B mutations and polymorphisms are involved in tumorigenesis; specifically, the V109G single nucleotide polymorphism has been linked to different tumours with controversial results. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome, characterized by the development of different types of neuroendocrine tumours and increased incidence of other malignancies. A clear genotype–phenotype correlation in MEN1 has not been established yet. In this study, we assessed whether the CDKN1B V109G polymorphism was associated with the development of aggressive tumours in 55 consecutive patients affected by MEN1. The polymorphism was investigated by PCR amplification of germline DNA followed by direct sequencing. Baseline and follow‐up data of tumour types and their severity were collected and associated with the genetic data. MEN1‐related aggressive and other malignant tumours of any origin were detected in 16.1% of wild‐type and 33.3% of polymorphism allele‐bearing patients (P = NS). The time interval between birth and the first aggressive tumour was significantly shorter in patients with the CDKN1B V109G polymorphism (median 46 years) than in those without (median not reached; P = 0.03). Similarly, shorter was the time interval between MEN1 diagnosis and age of the first aggressive tumour (P = 0.02). Overall survival could not be estimated as 96% patients were still alive at the time of the study. In conclusion, CDKN1B V109G polymorphism seems to play a role in the development of aggressive tumours in MEN1.

Personalized 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours: a simulation study

PurposePeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-octreotate is commonly administered at empiric, fixed amounts of injected radioactivity (IA). This results in highly variable absorbed doses to critical organs and suboptimal treatment of most patients. The primary aims of this study were to design a personalized PRRT (P-PRRT) protocol based on dosimetry, and to perform a simulation of this protocol in a retrospective cohort of patients with neuroendocrine tumours, in order to assess the potential of P-PRRT to safely increase the absorbed dose to the tumour during a four-cycle induction course.MethodsThirty-six patients underwent 122 fixed-IA 177Lu-octreotate PRRT cycles with quantitative SPECT/CT-based dosimetry. Twenty-two patients completed a four-cycle induction course (29.6u2009±u20092.4xa0GBq cumulative IA), with kidney, bone marrow and maximum tumour absorbed doses of 16.2u2009±u20095.5, 1.3u2009±u20090.8, and 114u2009±u200966xa0Gy, respectively. We simulated a P-PRRT regime in which the renal absorbed dose per IA was predicted by the body surface area and glomerular filtration rate for the first cycle, and by renal dosimetry of the previous cycle(s) for the following cycles. Personalized IA was adjusted at each cycle in order to reach the prescribed renal absorbed dose of 23xa0Gy over four cycles (with a 25-50% reduction when renal or bone marrow function was impaired). Simulated IA and absorbed doses were based on actual patient characteristics, laboratory values and absorbed doses per IA delivered at each cycle.ResultsIn the P-PRRT regime, cumulative IA could have been increased to 43.7u2009±u200916.5xa0GBq over four induction cycles (10.9u2009±u20095.0xa0GBq per cycle), yielding cumulative kidney, bone marrow and maximum tumour absorbed doses of 21.5u2009±u20092.5, 1.63u2009±u20090.61, and 163.4u2009±u200985.9xa0Gy, respectively. This resulted in an average 1.48-fold increase in cumulative maximum tumour absorbed dose over empiric PRRT (range, 0.68–2.64-fold; Pu2009=u20090.0013).ConclusionBy standardizing the renal absorbed dose delivered during the induction course, P-PRRT has the potential to significantly increase tumour absorbed dose, thus to augment the therapeutic benefit while limiting toxicity.

Second-line sunitinib as a feasible approach for iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer after the failure of first-line sorafenib

About 5 % of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) show RAI-refractory disease, thus having a poor prognosis [1, 2]. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has represented a revolution in the management of iodinerefractory DTC [3]. Sorafenib has been the most studied TKI in this field, showing encouraging results in several retrospective and phase II studies [4–8]. Effectiveness of sorafenib in RAI-refractory DTC has been definitely demonstrated in the phase III trial DECISION, where a significant improvement of median progression-free survival (PFS) in the treatment group, as compared with placebo, was reported (10.8 vs 5.8 months; HR 0.58, 95 % CI 0.45–0.75, p 0.0001) [9]. Following this finding, sorafenib has became the first TKI approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of RAIrefractory DTC. Given that the study cohort of the DECISION trial included only TKIs-naive patients, sorafenib can be fully considered the first-line systemic therapy for this clinical setting. Nevertheless, sorafenib has some crucial limits. As reported for all TKIs, it is never curative and has a temporally limited effect. Furthermore, sorafenib induced the development of adverse events leading to drug withdrawal in about 20 % of patients [9]. To date, clear indications about management of RAI-refractory DTC patients after the failure of first-line sorafenib are lacking. Sunitinib is a TKI with a pharmacodynamic profile similar to sorafenib, but broader, targeting RET, c-Kit, VEGFR1, -2, PDGFR-a and -b [10]. Despite few studies have been performed so far, sunitinib seems to be effective for the treatment of RAI-refractory DTC [11–14]. Furthermore, several trials of renal cancer have showed that sunitinib was effective in achieving clinical benefit in the majority of patients who experienced the failure of first-line sorafenib [15], even inducing a longer median PFS. Hence, sunitinib may represent a feasible option as salvage treatment after sorafenib failure also in iodine-refractory DTC. Here we report clinical histories of 3 patients (followed at Federico II University, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Section of Endocrinology, Naples) with iodinerefractory DTC who were treated with sunitinib after the failure of first-line sorafenib.