Michelle G. Goveia

Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of a Pentavalent Human-Bovine (WC3) Reassortant Rotavirus Vaccine at the End of Shelf Life

BACKGROUND. Rotavirus is the leading cause of dehydrating acute gastroenteritis in infants worldwide. Previous studies of a live pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine have shown it to be efficacious across a range of potencies. OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine at the end of shelf life in healthy infants. PATIENTS AND METHODS. During 2002–2004, 1312 healthy infants ∼6 to 12 weeks old from the United States (47%) and Finland (53%) were randomly assigned to receive 3 oral doses of vaccine (vaccine at ∼1.1 × 107 infectious U per dose) or placebo ∼4 to 10 weeks apart. Infants were to be followed for acute gastroenteritis through 1 rotavirus season after vaccination and for adverse events postvaccination. RESULTS. Three doses of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine at the end of shelf life demonstrated efficacy against rotavirus gastroenteritis caused by human G-serotypes included in the vaccine (G1–G4). Efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 100%, and efficacy against any rotavirus gastroenteritis regardless of severity was 72.5%. A threefold rise in G1 serum neutralizing was observed in 57% and in anti-rotavirus immunoglobulin A in 96% of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients. No statistically significant increase in vomiting, diarrhea, or irritability was observed among pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients compared with placebo recipients within the 7-day period from each dose. A statistically significant increase in fevers (≥100.5°F, rectal equivalent) was observed among pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients compared with placebo recipients after dose 1. CONCLUSIONS. This pentavalent human-bovine rotavirus vaccine was generally well tolerated, efficacious, and immunogenic at the end of shelf life.

Development of a Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine against Prevalent Serotypes of Rotavirus Gastroenteritis

The strategy of decreasing the morbidity and mortality associated with rotavirus gastroenteritis through vaccination is supported by studies demonstrating that wild-type rotavirus infection protects against subsequent rotavirus disease. Primary infection with wild-type rotavirus typically induces homotypic immunity. Vaccination of infants with a multivalent vaccine directed against prevalent rotavirus serotypes is the strategy most likely to provide the broadest degree of protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis. The pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (HBRV) is directed against each of the most prevalent rotavirus serotypes, including G1, G2, G3, G4, and P1. The safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of different reassortant compositions and formulations of the HBRV have been evaluated in clinical trials. An HBRV dose of > or =8 x 10(6) plaque-forming units has demonstrated 68.8%-76.6% efficacy against any rotavirus gastroenteritis, regardless of severity, and approximatel 100% efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis for the first rotavirus infection season after vaccination. The HBRV has been generally well tolerated, with no increase in the incidence of fever, vomiting, diarrhea, or behavioral changes among vaccine recipients, compared with placebo recipients, during the 14- and 42-day periods after administration of any dose. Shedding of vaccine strains in feces is uncommon. A large-scale trial is under way to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the manufacturing-scale formulation of pentavalent HBRV.

Safety and efficacy of the pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine in healthy premature infants.

Background: Premature infants seem to be at greater risk of hospitalization from rotavirus gastroenteritis than term infants. Safety and efficacy of the pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine were assessed in premature infants enrolled in the large-scale, blinded, placebo-controlled rotavirus efficacy and safety trial (REST). Methods: Healthy infants 6–12 weeks of chronologic age at study entry were randomized to receive 3 oral doses of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals. Infants born at ≤36 weeks of gestational age were eligible if thriving at the time of enrollment. Safety and efficacy were retrospectively assessed in these premature infants comparing vaccine with placebo recipients. Cases of rotavirus gastroenteritis were defined as forceful vomiting and/or ≥3 watery or looser-than-normal stools within a 24-hour period, accompanied by detection of rotavirus antigen in the stool. Results: A total of 2070 infants between 25 and 36 gestational weeks received at least 1 dose of vaccine or placebo; 1005 vaccine recipients and 1061 placebo recipients were evaluable for safety. Serious adverse events occurred in 55 vaccine recipients (5.5%) and 62 placebo recipients (5.8%). In a nested substudy of 308 premature infants evaluable for detailed safety (154 in each group), the frequencies of fever, diarrhea, vomiting, and irritability were comparable between vaccine and placebo recipients. Overall, 3 doses of the pentavalent vaccine reduced the rate of hospitalizations and emergency department visits in premature infants due to rotavirus gastroenteritis by 100% (95% CI: 82.2–100) compared with placebo. The vaccine also prevented 73.0% (95% CI: −2.2–95.2) of rotavirus gastroenteritis cases of any severity. Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis of healthy premature infants, the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine was generally well-tolerated and substantially reduced rotavirus-attributable hospitalizations and emergency department visits compared with placebo. Overall, vaccine safety and efficacy seemed to be generally comparable to the results in the REST study population as a whole. These results support vaccinating healthy premature infants on the same schedule as term infants.

RotaTeq, a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine: efficacy and safety among infants in Europe

A pentavalent human-bovine reassortant oral rotavirus vaccine, RotaTeq, was evaluated among nearly 70,000 infants in the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial (REST), of which 30,523 were from Europe. All infants were followed for serious adverse events as well as hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. All adverse events, health care utilization, and RVGE regardless of severity were evaluated in the clinical efficacy cohort (N=2686) in Finland. RotaTeq was 98.3% (95% CI, 90.2-100%) and 68.0% (95% CI 60.3-74.4%) efficacious against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) and all RVGE due to any serotype for two rotavirus seasons post-vaccination. The combined rate of hospitalizations and ED visits due to RVGE of any serotype was reduced by 94.5% (95% CI, 91.3-96.8%) for up to 2 years after vaccination. There were no statistically significant differences between RotaTeq and placebo for any of the safety outcomes. In Europe, RotaTeq was highly efficacious and well tolerated.

Impact of Acute Rotavirus Gastroenteritis on Pediatric Outpatient Practices in the United States

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to determine the presenting symptoms, healthcare utilization, and lost time from work and day care associated with acute rotavirus gastroenteritis. Methods: During the winter to spring seasons of 2002–2003 or 2003–2004, children <36 months of age presenting with acute gastroenteritis to urban and suburban pediatric outpatient practices affiliated with 5 academic centers across the United States were enrolled in similarly designed studies. The case definition required ≥3 watery or looser-than-normal stools and/or forceful vomiting within a 24-hour period beginning ≤72 hours before presentation. Stool samples were tested for rotavirus antigen by standard commercial assays. Symptom frequencies for laboratory-confirmed rotavirus and nonrotavirus gastroenteritis were compared by Fishers exact test; the number of healthcare contacts and lost days from work or day care were compared with the median 2-sample test. Results: Stool specimens were obtained from 284 of 303 (94%) participants; 115 (40%) of tested specimens were positive for rotavirus (range, 31–50% across the 5 centers). Compared with participants with nonrotavirus gastroenteritis, children with rotavirus gastroenteritis were more likely to have 1) vomiting (83% versus 66%; P = 0.003), 2) combined diarrhea and vomiting (75% versus 50%; P < 0.001), and 3) fever (60% versus 43%; P = 0.010). More time from work was lost by parents/guardians of children with rotavirus than nonrotavirus gastroenteritis (median 2 versus 0 day; P = 0.007). More day care was missed by children with rotavirus than nonrotavirus gastroenteritis (median 3 versus 1 day; P = 0.002). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, rotavirus consistently caused a sizable proportion of cases of acute gastroenteritis seen in pediatric outpatient practices in the United States during the winter and spring. Rotavirus gastroenteritis was more frequently associated with vomiting, combined diarrhea and vomiting, fever and lost time from work and day care than nonrotavirus gastroenteritis.

The integrated Phase III safety profile of the pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine

BACKGROUND Rotavirus gastroenteritis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE To perform an integrated safety analysis of data from the Phase III studies of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV). METHODS Healthy 6- to 12-week-old infants received 3 doses of PRV or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals in 3 Phase III, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Active surveillance for serious adverse events (AE), including intussusception, was performed at 7, 14, and 42 days after each dose. Other AEs occurring within 42 days after each dose were documented on Vaccination Report Cards. Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains was evaluated by plaque assay and electropherotyping. RESULTS Intussusception and other serious AEs were evaluated among 71,799 vaccinated subjects. Within 42 days after any dose, intussusception occurred among 6 PRV and 5 placebo recipients. All AEs were evaluated among 11 722 vaccinated subjects. Within the week following the first dose, the incidences of fever and irritability were similar among PRV and placebo recipients, although diarrhea and vomiting occurred more frequently among PRV recipients versus placebo recipients (10.4% vs. 9.1% and 6.7% vs. 5.4%, respectively). Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains occurred in 8.9% of 360 PRV recipients after the first dose. CONCLUSIONS Across the 3 Phase III clinical trials, PRV was well tolerated, with no increased clinical risk of intussusception. Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains occurred infrequently and in low amounts, suggesting the risk of transmission is unlikely.

EFFICACY OF PENTAVALENT HUMAN-BOVINE (WC3) REASSORTANT ROTAVIRUS VACCINE BASED ON BREASTFEEDING FREQUENCY

The efficacy of a live, oral, pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against G1-4 rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) was retrospectively assessed based on breastfeeding frequency among 5098 infants in a placebo-controlled trial. The efficacy against any RVGE severity for infants never breastfed, sometimes breastfed, or exclusively breastfed was 68.3%, 82.2%, and 68.0%, respectively. The efficacy against severe RVGE was 100%, 95.4%, and 100%, respectively. Breastfeeding did not seem to adversely impact the efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine.

Concomitant use of an oral live pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine with licensed parenteral pediatric vaccines in the United States

Background: A live pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV) containing 5 human-bovine (WC3) reassortants expressing human serotypes G1, G2, G3, G4 and P1A[8] was evaluated in a blinded, placebo-controlled study. Possible interactions between PRV and concomitantly administered licensed pediatric vaccines were investigated in a United States-based nested substudy (Concomitant Use Study) of the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial. Methods: From 2002 to 2003, healthy infants approximately 6 to 12 weeks of age at entry were randomized to receive either 3 oral doses of PRV or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals. Subjects were also to receive combined Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B vaccine (2 doses), diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (3 doses), inactivated poliovirus vaccine (2 doses) and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (3 doses) on the same day; oral poliovirus vaccine was not administered. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring antibody responses to PRV and antigens contained in the licensed vaccines. Cases of rotavirus gastroenteritis were defined by forceful vomiting and/or ≥3 watery or looser-than-normal stools within a 24-hour period, and detection of rotavirus antigen in the stool. Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse events using diary cards. Results: The Concomitant Use Study enrolled 662 subjects in the PRV group and 696 subjects in the placebo group. For the 17 antigens in the concomitantly administered vaccines, antibody responses were similar in PRV and placebo recipients, except for moderately diminished antibody responses to the pertactin component of pertussis vaccine. Efficacy of PRV against rotavirus gastroenteritis of any severity was 89.5% (95% CI = 26.5–99.8%). PRV was generally well tolerated when given concomitantly with the prespecified vaccines. Conclusions: In this study, antibody responses to the concomitantly administered vaccines were generally similar in PRV and placebo recipients. PRV was efficacious and well tolerated when given concomitantly with pediatric vaccines licensed in the United States.

Efficacy of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine, RotaTeq® (RV5), between doses of a 3-dose series and with less than 3 doses (incomplete regimen)

Post-hoc analyses of the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial (REST) were conducted to determine whether the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) confers early protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) before completion of the 3-dose regimen. To evaluate the efficacy of RV5 between doses in reducing the rates of RVGE-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in infants who ultimately received all 3 doses of RV5/placebo, events occurring from 2 weeks after the first and second doses to receipt of the subsequent dose (Analysis A) and events occurring from 2 weeks after the first and second doses to 2 weeks after the subsequent dose (Analysis B) were analyzed. In Analysis A, RV5 reduced the rates of combined hospitalizations and ED visits for G1–G4 RVGE or RVGE regardless of serotype between doses 1 and 2 by 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72–100%) or 82% (95% CI: 39–97%), respectively, and between doses 2 and 3, RV5 reduced the rates of combined hospitalizations and ED visits for G1–G4 RVGE or RVGE regardless of serotype by 91% (95% CI: 63–99%) or 84% (95% CI: 54–96%), respectively. Similar rate reductions were observed in Analysis B. These data suggest that RV5 provides a high level of protection between doses against hospitalizations and ED visits for RVGE starting as early as 14 days after the first dose.

Development, clinical evaluation, and post-licensure impact of RotaTeq, a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine

Rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) is the leading cause of severe diarrhea in children worldwide. This paper provides an overview of the development, clinical evaluation, and postlicensure impact of RotaTeq™(Rotavirus Vaccine, Live, Oral, Pentavalent, Merck & Co., Inc.). RotaTeq, an oral vaccine, is uniquely designed to contain five human‐bovine reassortant rotavirus strains expressing the human serotypes G1, G2, G3, G4, and P1A[8], which represent the most common human rotavirus serotypes responsible for ∼85% of RVGE worldwide. The development required novel solutions for manufacturing, testing, and formulation for each of the reassortants. In one of the largest vaccine clinical trials conducted, the vaccine was shown to be well tolerated and highly efficacious against severe RVGE. Efficacy has also been demonstrated in lower‐income countries. In large U.S. postlicensure studies, there have been no safety signals identified, and RotaTeq has had a significant impact on reducing RVGE and its associated medical costs since licensure in 2006.