Penny M. Heaton

Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of a Pentavalent Human-Bovine (WC3) Reassortant Rotavirus Vaccine at the End of Shelf Life

BACKGROUND. Rotavirus is the leading cause of dehydrating acute gastroenteritis in infants worldwide. Previous studies of a live pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine have shown it to be efficacious across a range of potencies. OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine at the end of shelf life in healthy infants. PATIENTS AND METHODS. During 2002–2004, 1312 healthy infants ∼6 to 12 weeks old from the United States (47%) and Finland (53%) were randomly assigned to receive 3 oral doses of vaccine (vaccine at ∼1.1 × 107 infectious U per dose) or placebo ∼4 to 10 weeks apart. Infants were to be followed for acute gastroenteritis through 1 rotavirus season after vaccination and for adverse events postvaccination. RESULTS. Three doses of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine at the end of shelf life demonstrated efficacy against rotavirus gastroenteritis caused by human G-serotypes included in the vaccine (G1–G4). Efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 100%, and efficacy against any rotavirus gastroenteritis regardless of severity was 72.5%. A threefold rise in G1 serum neutralizing was observed in 57% and in anti-rotavirus immunoglobulin A in 96% of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients. No statistically significant increase in vomiting, diarrhea, or irritability was observed among pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients compared with placebo recipients within the 7-day period from each dose. A statistically significant increase in fevers (≥100.5°F, rectal equivalent) was observed among pentavalent rotavirus vaccine recipients compared with placebo recipients after dose 1. CONCLUSIONS. This pentavalent human-bovine rotavirus vaccine was generally well tolerated, efficacious, and immunogenic at the end of shelf life.

Development of a Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine against Prevalent Serotypes of Rotavirus Gastroenteritis

The strategy of decreasing the morbidity and mortality associated with rotavirus gastroenteritis through vaccination is supported by studies demonstrating that wild-type rotavirus infection protects against subsequent rotavirus disease. Primary infection with wild-type rotavirus typically induces homotypic immunity. Vaccination of infants with a multivalent vaccine directed against prevalent rotavirus serotypes is the strategy most likely to provide the broadest degree of protection against rotavirus gastroenteritis. The pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (HBRV) is directed against each of the most prevalent rotavirus serotypes, including G1, G2, G3, G4, and P1. The safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of different reassortant compositions and formulations of the HBRV have been evaluated in clinical trials. An HBRV dose of > or =8 x 10(6) plaque-forming units has demonstrated 68.8%-76.6% efficacy against any rotavirus gastroenteritis, regardless of severity, and approximatel 100% efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis for the first rotavirus infection season after vaccination. The HBRV has been generally well tolerated, with no increase in the incidence of fever, vomiting, diarrhea, or behavioral changes among vaccine recipients, compared with placebo recipients, during the 14- and 42-day periods after administration of any dose. Shedding of vaccine strains in feces is uncommon. A large-scale trial is under way to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the manufacturing-scale formulation of pentavalent HBRV.

Safety and efficacy of the pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine in healthy premature infants.

Background: Premature infants seem to be at greater risk of hospitalization from rotavirus gastroenteritis than term infants. Safety and efficacy of the pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine were assessed in premature infants enrolled in the large-scale, blinded, placebo-controlled rotavirus efficacy and safety trial (REST). Methods: Healthy infants 6–12 weeks of chronologic age at study entry were randomized to receive 3 oral doses of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals. Infants born at ≤36 weeks of gestational age were eligible if thriving at the time of enrollment. Safety and efficacy were retrospectively assessed in these premature infants comparing vaccine with placebo recipients. Cases of rotavirus gastroenteritis were defined as forceful vomiting and/or ≥3 watery or looser-than-normal stools within a 24-hour period, accompanied by detection of rotavirus antigen in the stool. Results: A total of 2070 infants between 25 and 36 gestational weeks received at least 1 dose of vaccine or placebo; 1005 vaccine recipients and 1061 placebo recipients were evaluable for safety. Serious adverse events occurred in 55 vaccine recipients (5.5%) and 62 placebo recipients (5.8%). In a nested substudy of 308 premature infants evaluable for detailed safety (154 in each group), the frequencies of fever, diarrhea, vomiting, and irritability were comparable between vaccine and placebo recipients. Overall, 3 doses of the pentavalent vaccine reduced the rate of hospitalizations and emergency department visits in premature infants due to rotavirus gastroenteritis by 100% (95% CI: 82.2–100) compared with placebo. The vaccine also prevented 73.0% (95% CI: −2.2–95.2) of rotavirus gastroenteritis cases of any severity. Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis of healthy premature infants, the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine was generally well-tolerated and substantially reduced rotavirus-attributable hospitalizations and emergency department visits compared with placebo. Overall, vaccine safety and efficacy seemed to be generally comparable to the results in the REST study population as a whole. These results support vaccinating healthy premature infants on the same schedule as term infants.

RotaTeq, a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine: efficacy and safety among infants in Europe

A pentavalent human-bovine reassortant oral rotavirus vaccine, RotaTeq, was evaluated among nearly 70,000 infants in the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial (REST), of which 30,523 were from Europe. All infants were followed for serious adverse events as well as hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits. All adverse events, health care utilization, and RVGE regardless of severity were evaluated in the clinical efficacy cohort (N=2686) in Finland. RotaTeq was 98.3% (95% CI, 90.2-100%) and 68.0% (95% CI 60.3-74.4%) efficacious against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) and all RVGE due to any serotype for two rotavirus seasons post-vaccination. The combined rate of hospitalizations and ED visits due to RVGE of any serotype was reduced by 94.5% (95% CI, 91.3-96.8%) for up to 2 years after vaccination. There were no statistically significant differences between RotaTeq and placebo for any of the safety outcomes. In Europe, RotaTeq was highly efficacious and well tolerated.

The Pentavalent Rotavirus Vaccine: Discovery to Licensure and Beyond

Twenty-five years passed between the discovery of the parent strain (WC3) of the pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (PRV) in 1981 and the licensure of PRV in 2006. This orally administered liquid vaccine, which is given as a 3-dose series, is indicated for the prevention of rotavirus gastroenteritis, caused by the G serotypes contained in the vaccine, in infants and children. PRV is recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the American Academy of Pediatrics for administration to all infants in the United States. These recommendations are supported by the results of the phase III studies, which demonstrated that PRV is well tolerated and efficacious. PRV reduced rotavirus-related hospitalizations by 96% and was not associated with an increased incidence of serious adverse events, including intussusception. This report focuses on the safety and efficacy data from the late-phase studies of PRV and discusses plans for providing this vaccine to the developing world.

Concomitant use of the oral pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine and oral poliovirus vaccine.

Objectives: The live oral pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV) is well tolerated and highly efficacious against rotavirus gastroenteritis. This open-label, multicenter study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of coadministering oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) with PRV. Methods: From 2005 to 2006, healthy 6- to 12-week-old Latin American infants were randomized to PRV and OPV concomitantly or PRV 2–4 weeks before OPV. Three doses of each vaccine were administered 8–10 weeks apart. Subjects did not receive OPV at birth. Routine licensed pediatric vaccines were allowed. Antibody responses to PRV and OPV were evaluated 42 days after the last dose of each vaccine. Adverse events were recorded for 14 days after each study visit. Results: In the concomitant-use group (n = 372), more than 98% of subjects achieved serum-neutralizing antibody titer ≥1:8 against poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3. The poliovirus seroprotection rate in the concomitant-use group was statistically noninferior to the staggered-use group (n = 363). The immunoglobulin A (IgA) antirotavirus geometric mean titer was 46% lower in the concomitant-use group than in the staggered-use group. However, concomitant use elicited a ≥3-fold increase (from predose 1 to postdose 3) in serum antirotavirus IgA in 93% of subjects and achieved the definition of noninferiority. Both regimens were similarly well tolerated. Conclusions: PRV did not interfere with immune responses to OPV. Although coadministration with OPV reduced serum antirotavirus IgA geometric mean titer, seroresponse rates were high and consistent with those observed in previous studies showing high vaccine efficacy. These results support including PRV in vaccination schedules involving OPV.

The new pentavalent rotavirus vaccine composed of bovine (strain WC3) -human rotavirus reassortants.

Background: Infantile gastroenteritis caused by human rotaviruses is a prevalent disease throughout the world, causing dehydration and hospitalization in all countries. In developing countries, it is associated with a high mortality. A licensed vaccine against rotavirus was withdrawn because of a causal association with intussusception. A new vaccine has been developed and is a candidate for licensure. Methods: To recount the early development and recent demonstration of the safety and efficacy of the new vaccine. A bovine rotavirus attenuated for humans was isolated and reassorted with human rotaviruses of serotypes G1-4 and P1 to create a pentavalent vaccine. Multiple placebo-controlled clinical trials, including one involving approximately 70,000 infants, were conducted in multiple developed countries. Results: The pentavalent vaccine was well tolerated by infants less than 8 months of age, and the incidence of intussusception was similar among vaccine and placebo recipients. More than 90% of infants had a significant rise in serum antirotavirus IgA titer after 3 doses. Efficacy of 95% against severe disease causing hospitalization or emergency care was demonstrated, and pentavalent vaccine prevented 74% of all rotavirus disease. Conclusions: If widely used, pentavalent vaccine would control rotavirus disease in the United States and other developed countries and could also have a major effect in developing countries.

The integrated Phase III safety profile of the pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine

BACKGROUND Rotavirus gastroenteritis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE To perform an integrated safety analysis of data from the Phase III studies of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV). METHODS Healthy 6- to 12-week-old infants received 3 doses of PRV or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals in 3 Phase III, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Active surveillance for serious adverse events (AE), including intussusception, was performed at 7, 14, and 42 days after each dose. Other AEs occurring within 42 days after each dose were documented on Vaccination Report Cards. Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains was evaluated by plaque assay and electropherotyping. RESULTS Intussusception and other serious AEs were evaluated among 71,799 vaccinated subjects. Within 42 days after any dose, intussusception occurred among 6 PRV and 5 placebo recipients. All AEs were evaluated among 11 722 vaccinated subjects. Within the week following the first dose, the incidences of fever and irritability were similar among PRV and placebo recipients, although diarrhea and vomiting occurred more frequently among PRV recipients versus placebo recipients (10.4% vs. 9.1% and 6.7% vs. 5.4%, respectively). Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains occurred in 8.9% of 360 PRV recipients after the first dose. CONCLUSIONS Across the 3 Phase III clinical trials, PRV was well tolerated, with no increased clinical risk of intussusception. Fecal shedding of vaccine-virus strains occurred infrequently and in low amounts, suggesting the risk of transmission is unlikely.

EFFICACY OF PENTAVALENT HUMAN-BOVINE (WC3) REASSORTANT ROTAVIRUS VACCINE BASED ON BREASTFEEDING FREQUENCY

The efficacy of a live, oral, pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against G1-4 rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) was retrospectively assessed based on breastfeeding frequency among 5098 infants in a placebo-controlled trial. The efficacy against any RVGE severity for infants never breastfed, sometimes breastfed, or exclusively breastfed was 68.3%, 82.2%, and 68.0%, respectively. The efficacy against severe RVGE was 100%, 95.4%, and 100%, respectively. Breastfeeding did not seem to adversely impact the efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine.

Concomitant use of an oral live pentavalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine with licensed parenteral pediatric vaccines in the United States

Background: A live pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV) containing 5 human-bovine (WC3) reassortants expressing human serotypes G1, G2, G3, G4 and P1A[8] was evaluated in a blinded, placebo-controlled study. Possible interactions between PRV and concomitantly administered licensed pediatric vaccines were investigated in a United States-based nested substudy (Concomitant Use Study) of the Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial. Methods: From 2002 to 2003, healthy infants approximately 6 to 12 weeks of age at entry were randomized to receive either 3 oral doses of PRV or placebo at 4- to 10-week intervals. Subjects were also to receive combined Haemophilus influenzae type b and hepatitis B vaccine (2 doses), diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (3 doses), inactivated poliovirus vaccine (2 doses) and pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (3 doses) on the same day; oral poliovirus vaccine was not administered. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring antibody responses to PRV and antigens contained in the licensed vaccines. Cases of rotavirus gastroenteritis were defined by forceful vomiting and/or ≥3 watery or looser-than-normal stools within a 24-hour period, and detection of rotavirus antigen in the stool. Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse events using diary cards. Results: The Concomitant Use Study enrolled 662 subjects in the PRV group and 696 subjects in the placebo group. For the 17 antigens in the concomitantly administered vaccines, antibody responses were similar in PRV and placebo recipients, except for moderately diminished antibody responses to the pertactin component of pertussis vaccine. Efficacy of PRV against rotavirus gastroenteritis of any severity was 89.5% (95% CI = 26.5–99.8%). PRV was generally well tolerated when given concomitantly with the prespecified vaccines. Conclusions: In this study, antibody responses to the concomitantly administered vaccines were generally similar in PRV and placebo recipients. PRV was efficacious and well tolerated when given concomitantly with pediatric vaccines licensed in the United States.