Miguel E. Lemmert
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Miguel E. Lemmert.
Journal of the American Heart Association | 2017
Miguel E. Lemmert; Rutger J. van Bommel; Roberto Diletti; Jeroen M. Wilschut; Peter de Jaegere; F. Zijlstra; Joost Daemen; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem
Background Coronary artery perforation (CAP) is a potentially lethal complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. We report on the incidence, clinical characteristics, and management of iatrogenic coronary perforations based on an 11‐year single‐center experience. Methods and Results From February 9, 2005, through November 20, 2016, 150 CAP cases were identified from our percutaneous coronary intervention database of 21 212 procedures (0.71%). Mean age of CAP patients was 66±11 years, and 62.7% were male. Treated lesion type was B2/C in 94.6%, and 31.3% were chronic total occlusions. Nonworkhorse guidewires were applied in 74.3%. CAP types were Ellis type I in 2.9%, Ellis type II in 40.4%, Ellis type III in 54.8%, and Ellis type III cavity spilling in 1.9%. CAP treatment was conservative (including prolonged balloon inflation) in 73.3%. Covered stents, coiling, and fat embolization were used in 24.0%, 0.7%, and 2.0%, respectively. Pericardiocentesis for tamponade was required for 72 patients (48.0%), of whom 28 were initially unrecognized. Twelve patients (12.7%) required emergency cardiac surgery to alleviate tamponade. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in 34.0%, and in‐hospital all‐cause mortality was 8.0%. All‐cause mortality accrued to 10.7% at 30 days and 17.8% at 1 year. Conclusions CAP is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary intervention, but morbidity and mortality are considerable. Early recognition and adequate management are of paramount importance.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2017
Miguel E. Lemmert; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Roberto Diletti; Rutger J. van Bommel; Ron T. van Domburg; Peter de Jaegere; Evelyn Regar; Felix Zijlstra; Eric Boersma; Joost Daemen
BACKGROUND A new-generation everolimus eluting platinum-chromium stent (EePCS), offering improved radial strength, radiopacity and conformability compared to everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium stents (EeCCS), was evaluated with regard to safety and efficacy in an all-comer cohort. METHODS A total of 1000 consecutive all-comer patients (including acute coronary syndrome, multivessel disease, calcified lesions) treated with an EePCS (Promus Premier™, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) from May 2013 to October 2014 were compared to 1000 consecutive patients treated with an EeCCS (Xience Prime™, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) from April 2012 to May 2013. Patients were clinically followed for 1year. RESULTS Mean age was 66±12years with diabetes in 20.7%, previous infarction in 22.7%, and ACS as the indication in 71.2% of patients. The mean number of stents per patient was 1.8±1.13. Total stented length was 35±25mm. Lesion classification was B2/C in 73.9% of patients. At 1year the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction [MI], ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was reached in 11.7% in the EePCS cohort and 10.9% in the EeCCS cohort (adjusted HR 1.01 [0.77-1.33]; p=0.95). No significant differences were noted in the individual clinical endpoints all-cause mortality (6.8% versus 6.4%), MI (2.2% versus 2.3%), and TVR (4.3% versus 3.7%) in the respective EePCS and EeCCS cohorts. Stent thrombosis occurred in 0.8% and 1.0% respectively. CONCLUSIONS In all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the use of EePCS was associated with similar 1-year clinical outcome as compared to EeCCS.
American Heart Journal | 2017
Miguel E. Lemmert; Keith G. Oldroyd; Paul Barragan; Maciej Lesiak; Robert A. Byrne; Evgeny Merkulov; Joost Daemen; Yoshinobu Onuma; Karen Witberg; Robert-Jan van Geuns
BACKGROUND Continuous improvements in stent technology make percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) a potential alternative to surgery in selected patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) disease. The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in these patients remains undetermined, and in addition, new stent designs using a bioabsorbable polymer might allow shorter duration of DAPT. STUDY DESIGN IDEAL-LM is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study that will enroll 818 patients undergoing uLMCA PCI. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to intravascular ultrasound-guided PCI with the novel everolimus-eluting platinum-chromium Synergy stent with a biodegradable polymer (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) followed by 4 months of DAPT or the everolimus-eluting cobalt-chromium Xience stent (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) followed by 12 months of DAPT. The total follow-up period will be 5 years. A subset of 100 patients will undergo optical coherence tomography at 3 months. END POINTS The primary end point will be major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) at 2 years. Secondary end points will consist of the individual components of the primary end point, procedural success, a device-oriented composite end point, stent thrombosis as per Academic Research Consortium criteria, and bleeding as per Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. SUMMARY IDEAL-LM is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the novel Synergy stent followed by 4 months of DAPT vs the Xience stent followed by 12 months of DAPT in patients undergoing uLMCA PCI. The study will provide novel insights regarding optimal treatment strategy for patients undergoing PCI of uLMCA disease (www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 02303717).
Journal of Cardiology | 2018
Kaneshka Masdjedi; Joost Daemen; Roberto Diletti; Jeroen Wilschut; Elisabeth M. W. J. Utens; Peter de Jaegere; Miguel E. Lemmert; Arie-Pieter Kappetein; Felix Zijlstra; Ron T. van Domburg; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Significant left main (LM) stem disease is potentially life-threatening and mandates revascularization. This study aimed to assess how patients rate the importance of particular features of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), how this determines their preference for a particular treatment strategy, and whether particular personality characteristics influence this preference. METHODS AND RESULTS In total, 1145 patients who visited the outpatient clinic of the Erasmus Medical Center for stable coronary artery disease were asked to complete a case vignette-questionnaire on a hypothetical significant LM stenosis amenable to PCI or CABG. To assess the individuals personality disposition and general distress level, each patient had to complete a set of 3 standardized, validated questionnaires with satisfactory psychometric properties. Overall 89% of patients preferred PCI to CABG. PCI was the preferred strategy despite a higher risk for repeat revascularization and need for more medication. Remarkably, the fact that a risk for repeat revascularization is more common in the PCI group is less important for the patients who opt for PCI. Risk for stroke and bleeding were the most important arguments to opt for PCI over CABG. Type D personality, depression, and anxiety were all associated with a relatively higher preference for CABG as revascularization strategy. CONCLUSION Overall, when given the choice patients seem to have a clear preference for PCI over CABG and consider stroke and bleeding important procedure-related complications. Patients with Type D personality, depression, or anxiety favor CABG.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2018
Rutger J. van Bommel; Miguel E. Lemmert; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Ron T. van Domburg; Joost Daemen
To compare the occurrence of acute stent recoil in two different stent types (platinum chromium and cobalt chromium) and identify the potential predictors of significant acute stent recoil.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2018
Laurens van Zandvoort; Maria Natalia Tovar Forero; Kaneshka Masdjedi; Miguel E. Lemmert; Roberto Diletti; Jeroen Wilschut; Peter de Jaegere; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem; Joost Daemen
Angiographic assessment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesions remains challenging and limited data is available on reference diameters and length of nonobstructive LMCA dimensions. Our aim was to provide insights in the dimensions of nonobstructive LMCA and to find a possible correlation with gender and patient habitus.
American Heart Journal | 2018
Lida Feyz; Nahid El Faquir; Miguel E. Lemmert; Karan Ramdat Misier; Laurens van Zandvoort; Ricardo P.J. Budde; Eric Boersma; Felix Zijlstra; Peter de Jaegere; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem; Joost Daemen
Background Dedicated data on the prevalence of incidental findings (IF) stratified according to overall clinical relevance and their subsequent correlation to outcome are lacking. The aim of the present study was to describe the prevalence and consequences of noncardiac IF on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in the workup for interventional cardiovascular procedures. Methods A total of 916 patients underwent preprocedural computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in the workup for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), renal sympathetic denervation (RDN), or MitraClip implantation. Results IF were found in 395 of 916 patients (43.1%), with an average of 1.8 IF per patient. Classifying the IF resulted in 155 patients with minor, 171 patients with moderate, and 69 patients with major IF. The intended procedure was delayed or canceled in only 15 of 916 (1.6%) of the patients because of the presence of potential malignant IF. In patients that did undergo the intended procedure (n = 774), the presence of a moderate or major IF (23.8%) did not impact 1‐year mortality compared to no or minor IF (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.56‐1.44, P value = .65). These findings were consistent among patients referred for TAVI, RDN, or MitraClip. Conclusions IF are frequent in patients referred for cardiovascular procedures. IF did not result in a delay or cancellation of the intended procedure in the vast majority of cases, irrespective of their clinical relevance. The presence of a major or moderate IF did not significantly impact 1‐year mortality.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2016
Miguel E. Lemmert; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Roberto Diletti; R. Vandomburg; Evelyn Regar; Felix Zijlstra; Eric Boersma; Joost Daemen
BACKGROUND A recent comprehensive network meta-analysis established that cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting (CoCr-EES) stents had significantly lower rate of stent thrombosis than bare metal or bioerodible polymer drug-eluting stents. To further explore the mechanism of this safety finding, Xience fluoropolymer-only stents without everolimus (XFP) were tested in an acute low-heparin extracorporeal shunt model.
Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions | 2018
Laurens van Zandvoort; Natalia Tovar Forero; Jurgen Ligthart; Karen Witberg; Miguel E. Lemmert; Roberto Diletti; Jeroen Wilschut; Peter de Jaegere; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem; Joost Daemen
Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions | 2018
Joost Daemen; Laurens van Zandvoort; Rutger J. van Bommel; Karen Witberg; Jurgen Ligthart; Kaneshka Masdjedi; Maria Natalia Tovar Forero; Miguel E. Lemmert; Jeroen Wilschut; Peter de Jaegere; Felix Zijlstra; Roberto Diletti; Nicolas M. Van Mieghem