Mike R. Goad
University of Leicester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mike R. Goad.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2009
P. A. Evans; A. P. Beardmore; Kim L. Page; J. P. Osborne; Paul T. O'Brien; R. Willingale; Rhaana L. C. Starling; D. N. Burrows; Olivier Godet; L. Vetere; Judith Lea Racusin; Mike R. Goad; K. Wiersema; L. Angelini; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; Neil Gehrels; J. A. Kennea; Raffaella Margutti; D. C. Morris; C. J. Mountford; C. Pagani; Matteo Perri; Patrizia Romano; Nial R. Tanvir
We present a homogeneous X-ray analysis of all 318 gamma-ray bursts detected by the X-ray telescope (XRT) on the Swift satellite up to 2008 July 23; this represents the largest sample of X-ray GRB data published to date. In Sections 2-3, we detail the methods which the Swift-XRT team has developed to produce the enhanced positions, light curves, hardness ratios and spectra presented in this paper. Software using these methods continues to create such products for all new GRBs observed by the Swift-XRT. We also detail web-based tools allowing users to create these products for any object observed by the XRT, not just GRBs. In Sections 4-6, we present the results of our analysis of GRBs, including probability distribution functions of the temporal and spectral properties of the sample. We demonstrate evidence for a consistent underlying behaviour which can produce a range of light-curve morphologies, and attempt to interpret this behaviour in the framework of external forward shock emission. We find several difficulties, in particular that reconciliation of our data with the forward shock model requires energy injection to continue for days to weeks.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2005
Ja Nousek; Vanessa Mangano; Paul T. O'Brien; P. Giommi; Olivier Godet; S. D. Barthelmy; Mike R. Goad; Sergio Campana; G. Cusumano; J. P. Osborne; A. P. Beardmore; A. Falcone; Jonathan Granot; G. Tagliaferri; Milvia Capalbi; David N. Burrows; Patrizia Romano; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Guido Chincarini; Dirk Grupe; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; Sandy Patel; Kim L. Page; Alan A. Wells; Chryssa Kouveliotou; A. Moretti; N. Gehrels
We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected with the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power law segments. These power law segments are separated by two corresponding break times. On top of this canonical behavior of the early X-ray light curve, many events have superimposed X-ray flares, which are most likely caused by internal shocks due to long lasting sporadx activity of the central engine, up to several hours after the GRB. We find that the initial steep decay is consistent with it being the tail of the prompt emission: from photons that are radiated at large angles relative to our line of sight. The first break in the light curve takes place when the forward shock emission becomes dominant, with the intermediate shallow flux decay likely caused by the continuous energy injection into the external shock. When this energy injection stops, a second break is then observed in the light curve. This energy injection increases the energy of the afterglow shock by at least a factor of f greater than or approx. equal to 4, and augments the already severe requirements for the efficiency of the prompt gamma-ray emission.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2006
John A. Nousek; C. Kouveliotou; Dirk Grupe; Kim L. Page; Jonathan Granot; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; Sandeep K. Patel; D. N. Burrows; Vanessa Mangano; S. D. Barthelmy; A. P. Beardmore; Sergio Campana; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; G. Cusumano; A. Falcone; N. Gehrels; P. Giommi; Mike R. Goad; Olivier Godet; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; A. Moretti; P. T. O’Brien; J. P. Osborne; Patrizia Romano; G. Tagliaferri; Alan A. Wells
We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) well observed by the Swift X-Ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power-law segments: (1) an initial very steep decay (/t � � with 3P � 1 P5), followed by (2) a very shallow decay (0:5P � 2 P1:0), and finally (3) a somewhat steeper decay (1P � 3 P1:5). These power-law segments are separated by two corresponding break times, tbreak;1 P500 s and 10 3 sPtbreak;2P 10 4 s. On top of this canonical behavior, many events have superimposed X-ray flares, which are most likely caused by internal shocks due to long-lasting sporadic activity of the central engine, up to several hours after the GRB. We find that the initial steep decay is consistent with it being the tail of the prompt emission, from photons that are radiated at large angles relative to our line of sight. The first break in the light curve (tbreak;1) takes place when the forward shock emission becomes dominant, with the intermediate shallow flux decay (� 2) likely caused by the continuous energy injection into the external shock. When this energy injection stops, a second break is then observed in the light curve (tbreak;2). This energy injection increases the energy of the afterglow shock by at least a factor of f k4 and augments the already severe requirements for the efficiency of the prompt gamma-ray emission. Subject headingg gamma rays: bursts — radiation mechanisms: nonthermal
The Astrophysical Journal | 2006
P. T. O’Brien; R. Willingale; Julian P. Osborne; Mike R. Goad; Kim L. Page; S. Vaughan; E. Rol; A. P. Beardmore; Olivier Godet; C. P. Hurkett; Alan A. Wells; Bing Zhang; Shiho Kobayashi; David N. Burrows; John A. Nousek; J. A. Kennea; A. Falcone; Dirk Grupe; Neil Gehrels; S. D. Barthelmy; John K. Cannizzo; J. R. Cummings; J. E. Hill; Hans A. Krimm; Guido Chincarini; Gianpiero Tagliaferri; Sergio Campana; A. Moretti; P. Giommi; Matteo Perri
We present observations of the early X-ray emission for a sample of 40 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) obtained using the Swift satellite, for which the narrow-field instruments were pointed at the burst within 10 minutes of the trigger. Using data from the Burst Alert Telescope and the X-Ray Telescope, we show that the X-ray light curve can be well described by an exponential that relaxes into a power law, often with flares superimposed. The transition time between the exponential and the power law provides a physically defined timescale for the burst duration. In most bursts, the power law breaks to a shallower decay within the first hour, and a late emission hump is observed, which can last for many hours. In other GRBs the hump is weak or absent. The observed variety in the shape of the early X-ray light curve can be explained as a combination of three components: prompt emission from the central engine, afterglow, and the late hump. In this scenario, afterglow emission begins during or soon after the burst, and the observed shape of the X-ray light curve depends on the relative strengths of the emission due to the central engine and that of the afterglow. There is a strong correlation such that those GRBs with stronger afterglow components have brighter early optical emission. The late emission hump can have a total fluence equivalent to that of the prompt phase. GRBs with the strongest late humps have weak or no X-ray flares.
Nature | 2005
S D Barthelmy; G Chincarini; D N Burrows; N Gehrels; S. Covino; A. Moretti; P Romano; Paul T. O'Brien; C L Sarazin; C Kouveliotou; Mike R. Goad; S Vaughan; G Tagliaferri; Bing Zhang; L. A. Antonelli; Sergio Campana; J R Cummings; P D'Avanzo; Melvyn B. Davies; P. Giommi; D Grupe; Y Kaneko; J A Kennea; A King; Shiho Kobayashi; A Melandri; P. Meszaros; J A Nousek; S Patel; T Sakamoto
Two short (< 2 s) γ-ray bursts (GRBs) have recently been localized and fading afterglow counterparts detected. The combination of these two results left unclear the nature of the host galaxies of the bursts, because one was a star-forming dwarf, while the other was probably an elliptical galaxy. Here we report the X-ray localization of a short burst (GRB 050724) with unusual γ-ray and X-ray properties. The X-ray afterglow lies off the centre of an elliptical galaxy at a redshift of z = 0.258 (ref. 5), coincident with the position determined by ground-based optical and radio observations. The low level of star formation typical for elliptical galaxies makes it unlikely that the burst originated in a supernova explosion. A supernova origin was also ruled out for GRB 050709 (refs 3, 31), even though that burst took place in a galaxy with current star formation. The isotropic energy for the short bursts is 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than that for the long bursts. Our results therefore suggest that an alternative source of bursts—the coalescence of binary systems of neutron stars or a neutron star-black hole pair—are the progenitors of short bursts.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2007
R. Willingale; P. T. O’Brien; J. P. Osborne; Olivier Godet; Kim L. Page; Mike R. Goad; D. N. Burrows; Bing Zhang; E. Rol; N. Gehrels; Guido Chincarini
We show that all X-ray decay curves of γ-ray bursts (GRBs) measured by Swift can be fitted using one or two components, both of which have exactly the same functional form comprised of an early falling exponential phase followed by a power-law decay. The first component contains the prompt γ-ray emission and the initial X-ray decay. The second component appears later, has a much longer duration, and is present for ≈80% of GRBs. It most likely arises from the external shock that eventually develops into the X-ray afterglow. In the remaining ≈20% of GRBs the initial X-ray decay of the first component fades more slowly than the second and dominates at late times to form an afterglow. The temporal decay parameters and γ/X-ray spectral indices derived for 107 GRBs are compared to the expectations of the standard fireball model including a search for possible jet breaks. For ~50% of GRBs the observed afterglow is in accord with the model, but for the rest the temporal and spectral indices do not conform to the expected closure relations and are suggestive of continued, late, energy injection. We identify a few possible jet breaks, but there are many examples where such breaks are predicted but are absent. The time Ta at which the exponential phase of the second component changes to a final power-law decay afterglow is correlated with the peak of the γ-ray spectrum, Epeak. This is analogous to the Ghirlanda relation, indicating that this time is in some way related to optically observed break times measured for pre-Swift bursts.
Nature | 2005
Gianpiero Tagliaferri; Mike R. Goad; Guido Chincarini; A. Moretti; Sergio Campana; David N. Burrows; Matteo Perri; S. D. Barthelmy; N. Gehrels; Hans A. Krimm; Takanori Sakamoto; Pawan Kumar; P. Meszaros; Shiho Kobayashi; Bing Zhang; L. Angelini; P. L. Banat; A. P. Beardmore; Milvia Capalbi; S. Covino; G. Cusumano; P. Giommi; Olivier Godet; J. E. Hill; J. A. Kennea; Vanessa Mangano; David C. Morris; John A. Nousek; Paul T. O'Brien; Julian P. Osborne
‘Long’ γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are commonly accepted to originate in the explosion of particularly massive stars, which give rise to highly relativistic jets. Inhomogeneities in the expanding flow result in internal shock waves that are believed to produce the γ-rays we see. As the jet travels further outward into the surrounding circumstellar medium, ‘external’ shocks create the afterglow emission seen in the X-ray, optical and radio bands. Here we report observations of the early phases of the X-ray emission of five GRBs. Their X-ray light curves are characterised by a surprisingly rapid fall-off for the first few hundred seconds, followed by a less rapid decline lasting several hours. This steep decline, together with detailed spectral properties of two particular bursts, shows that violent shock interactions take place in the early jet outflows.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2006
S. Vaughan; Mike R. Goad; A. P. Beardmore; P. T. O’Brien; Julian P. Osborne; Kim L. Page; S. D. Barthelmy; David N. Burrows; Sergio Campana; John K. Cannizzo; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; J. R. Cummings; G. Cusumano; P. Giommi; Olivier Godet; J. E. Hill; Shiho Kobayashi; Pawan Kumar; V. La Parola; Andrew J. Levan; Vanessa Mangano; P. Meszaros; A. Moretti; David C. Morris; John A. Nousek; Claudio Pagani; David M. Palmer; Judith Lea Racusin; Patrizia Romano
This paper discusses Swift observations of the � -ray burst GRB 050315 (z ¼ 1:949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t � 5 ) for � 200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/� -ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first � 300 s of X-ray emission (observed bytheXRT)canbeexplainedbyexponentialdecays,withsimilardecayconstants.ExtrapolatingtheBATlightcurve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading promptemission;thisstrongsimilaritybetweentheprompt � -rayandearlyX-rayemissionmayberelatedtothesimple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray–rich GRB. Theprompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to � 15keVand appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for � 1:2 ; 10 4 s, after which time it decayed with at emporal index of� � 0:7, followed by a second break at � 2:5 ; 10 5 s to a slope of � � 2. The apparent ‘‘plateau’’ in the X-raylight curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift. If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening
The Astrophysical Journal | 2006
A. Falcone; D. N. Burrows; Davide Lazzati; Sergio Campana; Shiho Kobayashi; Bing Zhang; P. Meszaros; Kim L. Page; J. A. Kennea; Patrizia Romano; Claudio Pagani; L. Angelini; A. P. Beardmore; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; G. Cusumano; P. Giommi; Mike R. Goad; Olivier Godet; Dirk Grupe; J. E. Hill; V. La Parola; Vanessa Mangano; A. Moretti; John A. Nousek; P. T. O’Brien; Julian P. Osborne; Matteo Perri; Gianpiero Tagliaferri; Alan A. Wells
Until recently, X-ray flares during the afterglow of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) were a rarely detected phenomenon; thus, their nature is unclear. During the afterglow of GRB 050502B, the largest X-ray flare ever recorded rose rapidly above the afterglow light curve detected by the Swift X-Ray Telescope. The peak flux of the flare was >500 times that of the underlying afterglow, and it occurred >12 minutes after the nominal prompt burst emission. The fluence of this X-ray flare, (1.0 ± 0.05) × 10-6 ergs cm-2 in the 0.2-10.0 keV energy band, exceeded the fluence of the nominal prompt burst. The spectra during the flare were significantly harder than those measured before and after the flare. Later in time, there were additional flux increases detected above the underlying afterglow, as well as a break in the afterglow light curve. All evidence presented below, including spectral and, particularly, timing information during and around the giant flare, suggests that this giant flare was the result of internal dissipation of energy due to late central engine activity, rather than an afterglow-related effect. We also find that the data are consistent with a second central engine activity episode, in which the ejecta is moving slower than that of the initial episode, causing the giant flare and then proceeding to overtake and refresh the afterglow shock, thus causing additional activity at even later times in the light curve.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 1997
Ignaz Wanders; Bradley M. Peterson; Danielle Alloin; Thomas R. Ayres; J. Clavel; D. M. Crenshaw; K. Horne; Gerard A. Kriss; Julian H. Krolik; M. Malkan; Hagai Netzer; Paul T. O'Brien; Pm RodriguezPascual; Willem Wamsteker; T. Alexander; Ksj Anderson; E. Benítez; N. G. Bochkarev; A. N. Burenkov; F.-Z. Cheng; Sj Collier; A. Comastri; M. Dietrich; D. Dultzin-Hacyan; Brian R. Espey; A. V. Filippenko; C. M. Gaskell; I. M. George; Mike R. Goad; Luis C. Ho
From 1996 June 10 to July 29, the International Ultraviolet Explorer monitored the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 7469 continuously in an attempt to measure time delays between the continuum and emission-line fluxes. From the time delays, one can estimate the size of the region dominating the production of the UV emission lines in this source. We find the strong UV emission lines to respond to continuum variations with time delays of about 23-31 for Lyα, 27 for C IV λ1549, 19-24 for N V λ1240, 17-18 for Si IV λ1400, and 07-10 for He II λ1640. The most remarkable result, however, is the detection of apparent time delays between the different UV continuum bands. With respect to the UV continuum flux at 1315 A, the flux at 1485 A, 1740 A, and 1825 A lags with time delays of 021, 035, and 028, respectively. Determination of the significance of this detection is somewhat problematic since it depends on accurate estimation of the uncertainties in the lag measurements, which are difficult to assess. We attempt to estimate the uncertainties in the time delays through Monte Carlo simulations, and these yield estimates of ~007 for the 1 σ uncertainties in the interband continuum time delays. Possible explanations for the delays include the existence of a continuum-flux reprocessing region close to the central source and/or a contamination of the continuum flux with a very broad time-delayed emission feature such as the Balmer continuum or merged Fe II multiplets.