Mikhail A. Semenov
Rothamsted Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mikhail A. Semenov.
Nature plants | 2017
Enli Wang; Pierre Martre; Zhigan Zhao; Frank Ewert; Andrea Maiorano; Reimund P. Rötter; Bruce A. Kimball; Michael J. Ottman; Gerard W. Wall; Jeffrey W. White; Matthew P. Reynolds; Phillip D. Alderman; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Jakarat Anothai; Bruno Basso; Christian Biernath; Davide Cammarano; Andrew J. Challinor; Giacomo De Sanctis; Jordi Doltra; E. Fereres; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Sebastian Gayler; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Leslie A. Hunt; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Mohamed Jabloun; Curtis D. Jones; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Ann-Kristin Koehler
Increasing the accuracy of crop productivity estimates is a key element in planning adaptation strategies to ensure global food security under climate change. Process-based crop models are effective means to project climate impact on crop yield, but have large uncertainty in yield simulations. Here, we show that variations in the mathematical functions currently used to simulate temperature responses of physiological processes in 29 wheat models account for >50% of uncertainty in simulated grain yields for mean growing season temperatures from 14 °C to 33 °C. We derived a set of new temperature response functions that when substituted in four wheat models reduced the error in grain yield simulations across seven global sites with different temperature regimes by 19% to 50% (42% average). We anticipate the improved temperature responses to be a key step to improve modelling of crops under rising temperature and climate change, leading to higher skill of crop yield projections.
Environmental Health Perspectives | 2016
Iain R. Lake; Natalia R. Jones; Maureen D. Agnew; C. M. Goodess; Filippo Giorgi; Lynda Hamaoui-Laguel; Mikhail A. Semenov; Fabien Solomon; Jonathan Storkey; Robert Vautard; Michelle M. Epstein
Background: Globally, pollen allergy is a major public health problem, but a fundamental unknown is the likely impact of climate change. To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify the consequences of climate change upon pollen allergy in humans. Objectives: We produced quantitative estimates of the potential impact of climate change upon pollen allergy in humans, focusing upon common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) in Europe. Methods: A process-based model estimated the change in ragweed’s range under climate change. A second model simulated current and future ragweed pollen levels. These findings were translated into health burdens using a dose–response curve generated from a systematic review and from current and future population data. Models considered two different suites of regional climate/pollen models, two greenhouse gas emissions scenarios [Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5], and three different plant invasion scenarios. Results: Our primary estimates indicated that sensitization to ragweed will more than double in Europe, from 33 to 77 million people, by 2041–2060. According to our projections, sensitization will increase in countries with an existing ragweed problem (e.g., Hungary, the Balkans), but the greatest proportional increases will occur where sensitization is uncommon (e.g., Germany, Poland, France). Higher pollen concentrations and a longer pollen season may also increase the severity of symptoms. Our model projections were driven predominantly by changes in climate (66%) but were also influenced by current trends in the spread of this invasive plant species. Assumptions about the rate at which ragweed spreads throughout Europe had a large influence upon the results. Conclusions: Our quantitative estimates indicate that ragweed pollen allergy will become a common health problem across Europe, expanding into areas where it is currently uncommon. Control of ragweed spread may be an important adaptation strategy in response to climate change. Citation: Lake IR, Jones NR, Agnew M, Goodess CM, Giorgi F, Hamaoui-Laguel L, Semenov MA, Solomon F, Storkey J, Vautard R, Epstein MM. 2017. Climate change and future pollen allergy in Europe. Environ Health Perspect 125:385–391; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP173
Global Change Biology | 2018
Fulu Tao; Reimund P. Rötter; Taru Palosuo; Carlos Gregorio Hernández Díaz-Ambrona; M. Ines Minguez; Mikhail A. Semenov; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Claas Nendel; Xenia Specka; Holger Hoffmann; Frank Ewert; Anaëlle Dambreville; Pierre Martre; Lucía Rodríguez; M. Ruiz-Ramos; Thomas Gaiser; J. G. Höhn; Tapio Salo; Roberto Ferrise; Marco Bindi; Davide Cammarano; Alan H. Schulman
Climate change impact assessments are plagued with uncertainties from many sources, such as climate projections or the inadequacies in structure and parameters of the impact model. Previous studies tried to account for the uncertainty from one or two of these. Here, we developed a triple-ensemble probabilistic assessment using seven crop models, multiple sets of model parameters and eight contrasting climate projections together to comprehensively account for uncertainties from these three important sources. We demonstrated the approach in assessing climate change impact on barley growth and yield at Jokioinen, Finland in the Boreal climatic zone and Lleida, Spain in the Mediterranean climatic zone, for the 2050s. We further quantified and compared the contribution of crop model structure, crop model parameters and climate projections to the total variance of ensemble output using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Based on the triple-ensemble probabilistic assessment, the median of simulated yield change was -4% and +16%, and the probability of decreasing yield was 63% and 31% in the 2050s, at Jokioinen and Lleida, respectively, relative to 1981-2010. The contribution of crop model structure to the total variance of ensemble output was larger than that from downscaled climate projections and model parameters. The relative contribution of crop model parameters and downscaled climate projections to the total variance of ensemble output varied greatly among the seven crop models and between the two sites. The contribution of downscaled climate projections was on average larger than that of crop model parameters. This information on the uncertainty from different sources can be quite useful for model users to decide where to put the most effort when preparing or choosing models or parameters for impact analyses. We concluded that the triple-ensemble probabilistic approach that accounts for the uncertainties from multiple important sources provide more comprehensive information for quantifying uncertainties in climate change impact assessments as compared to the conventional approaches that are deterministic or only account for the uncertainties from one or two of the uncertainty sources.
Pest Management Science | 2017
Russell Slater; Pierre Stratonovitch; Jan Elias; Mikhail A. Semenov; Ian Denholm
BACKGROUND Tools with the potential to predict risks of insecticide resistance and aid the evaluation and design of resistance management tactics are of value to all sectors of the pest management community. Here we describe use of a versatile individual-based model of resistance evolution to simulate how strategies employing single and multiple insecticides influence resistance development in the pollen beetle, Meligethes aeneus. RESULTS Under repeated exposure to a single insecticide, resistance evolved faster to a pyrethroid (lambda-cyhalothrin) than to a pyridine azomethane (pymetrozine), due to difference in initial efficacy. A mixture of these compounds delayed resistance compared to use of single products. The effectiveness of rotations depended on the sequence in which compounds were applied in response to pest density thresholds. Effectiveness of a mixture strategy declined with reductions in grower compliance. At least 50% compliance was needed to cause some delay in resistance development. CONCLUSION No single strategy meets all requirements for managing resistance. It is important to evaluate factors that prevail under particular pest management scenarios. The model used here provides operators with a valuable means for evaluating and extending sound resistance management advice, as well as understanding needs and opportunities offered by new control techniques.
Frontiers in Plant Science | 2017
Henry M. Barber; Martin Lukac; James Simmonds; Mikhail A. Semenov; Michael Gooding
Successive single day transfers of pot-grown wheat to high temperature (35/30°C day/night) replicated controlled environments, from the second node detectable to the milky-ripe growth stages, provides the strongest available evidence that the fertility of wheat can be highly vulnerable to heat stress during two discrete peak periods of susceptibility: early booting [decimal growth stage (GS) 41–45] and early anthesis (GS 61–65). A double Gaussian fitted simultaneously to grain number and weight data from two contrasting elite lines (Renesansa, listed in Serbia, Ppd-D1a, Rht8; Savannah, listed in UK, Ppd-D1b, Rht-D1b) identified peak periods of main stem susceptibility centered on 3 (s.e. = 0.82) and 18 (s.e. = 0.55) days (mean daily temperature = 14.3°C) pre-GS 65 for both cultivars. Severity of effect depended on genotype, growth stage and their interaction: grain set relative to that achieved at 20/15°C dropped below 80% for Savannah at booting and Renesansa at anthesis. Savannah was relatively tolerant to heat stress at anthesis. A further experiment including 62 lines of the mapping, doubled-haploid progeny of Renesansa × Savannah found tolerance at anthesis to be associated with Ppd-D1b, Rht-D1b, and a QTL from Renesansa on chromosome 2A. None of the relevant markers were associated with tolerance during booting. Rht8 was never associated with heat stress tolerance, a lack of effect confirmed in a further experiment where Rht8 was included in a comparison of near isogenic lines in a cv. Paragon background. Some compensatory increases in mean grain weight were observed, but only when stress was applied during booting and only where Ppd-D1a was absent.
Nature Climate Change | 2016
Bing Liu; Senthold Asseng; Christoph Müller; Frank Ewert; Joshua Elliott; David B. Lobell; Pierre Martre; Alex C. Ruane; Daniel Wallach; James W. Jones; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Phillip D. Alderman; Jakarat Anothai; Bruno Basso; Christian Biernath; Davide Cammarano; Andrew J. Challinor; Delphine Deryng; Giacomo De Sanctis; Jordi Doltra; E. Fereres; Christian Folberth; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Sebastian Gayler; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Leslie A. Hunt; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Mohamed Jabloun; Curtis D. Jones
Field Crops Research | 2017
Heidi Webber; Pierre Martre; Senthold Asseng; Bruce A. Kimball; Jeffrey W. White; Michael J. Ottman; Gerard W. Wall; Giacomo De Sanctis; Jordi Doltra; R. F. Grant; Belay T. Kassie; Andrea Maiorano; Jørgen E. Olesen; Dominique Ripoche; Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei; Mikhail A. Semenov; Pierre Stratonovitch; Frank Ewert
Field Crops Research | 2017
Andrea Maiorano; Pierre Martre; Senthold Asseng; Frank Ewert; Christoph Müller; Reimund P. Rötter; Alex C. Ruane; Mikhail A. Semenov; Daniel Wallach; Enli Wang; Phillip D. Alderman; Belay T. Kassie; Christian Biernath; Bruno Basso; Davide Cammarano; Andrew J. Challinor; Jordi Doltra; Benjamin Dumont; Ehsan Eyshi Rezaei; Sebastian Gayler; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Bruce A. Kimball; Ann-Kristin Koehler; Bing Liu; Garry J. O’Leary; Jørgen E. Olesen; Michael J. Ottman; Eckart Priesack; Matthew P. Reynolds; Pierre Stratonovitch
Field Crops Research | 2016
Davide Cammarano; Reimund P. Rötter; Senthold Asseng; Frank Ewert; Daniel Wallach; Pierre Martre; Jerry L. Hatfield; James W. Jones; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Alex C. Ruane; Kenneth J. Boote; Peter J. Thorburn; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Carlos Angulo; Bruno Basso; Patrick Bertuzzi; Christian Biernath; Nadine Brisson; Andrew J. Challinor; Jordi Doltra; Sebastian Gayler; Richie Goldberg; Lee Heng; Josh Hooker; Leslie A. Hunt; Joachim Ingwersen; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Christoph Müller; Soora Naresh Kumar
European Journal of Agronomy | 2017
Fulu Tao; Reimund P. Rötter; Taru Palosuo; Carlos Gregorio Hernández Díaz-Ambrona; M. Ines Minguez; Mikhail A. Semenov; Kurt Christian Kersebaum; Claas Nendel; Davide Cammarano; Holger Hoffmann; Frank Ewert; Anaëlle Dambreville; Pierre Martre; Lucía Rodríguez; M. Ruiz-Ramos; Thomas Gaiser; J. G. Höhn; Tapio Salo; Roberto Ferrise; Marco Bindi; Alan H. Schulman