Mila Pontremoli Salcedo
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mila Pontremoli Salcedo.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics | 2010
Mirela Foresti Jiménez; Patrícia El Beitune; Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Alexandra Veleda Von Ameln; Fabiane Pinto Mastalir; Luciane Desimon Braun
To study the epidemiologic characteristics and underlying conditions that place pregnant women infected with H1N1 virus at increased risk for being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia | 2008
Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Gustavo Py Gomes da Silveira; Claudio G. Zettler
PURPOSE to demonstrate the expression of biomarkers, detected by immunohistochemical techniques in healthy tissues, as well as in preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the uterine cervix. METHODS in order to evaluate the immunohistochemical reactivity of tissues from the uterine cervix to p16 and to type 2 herpes simplex virus (HSV-2), 187 samples of low-grade intraepithelial lesions (LG-IEL) and high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HG-IEL), and of uterine cervix carcinoma were compared with a group of patients without uterine cervix lesions. Statistical analysis was done by the chi2 test for trends. The significance level was alpha=0.05. RESULTS the reactivity to p16 was assessed showing the following distribution: group without uterine cervix lesions: 56% (24/43), LG-IEL: 92% (43/47), HG-IEL: 94% (43/46), and cancer: 98% (46/47) (p<0.001, linear trend). Concerning the HSV-2: group without uterine cervix lesions: 27% (12/45), LG-IEL: 58% (22/38), HG-IEL: 78% (35/45), and cancer: 59 % (29/49) (p<0.001, linear trend). There was an increase in the reactivity ratio for the two markers in the pathological groups (LG-IEL, HG-IEL and uterine cervix cancer, at p<0.001) compared to controls. There was no significant difference between the LG-IEL and the HG-IEL groups. CONCLUSIONS a progressive increase of reactivity ratios of the studied immunohistochemical markers as a function of lesion severity was observed.
Gynecologic oncology reports | 2017
Cherry O. Onaiwu; Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Suzana Arenhart Pessini; Mark F. Munsell; Elizabeth E. Euscher; Kellie E. Reed; Kathleen M. Schmeler
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the clinical characteristics and outcomes of a series of women with Pagets disease of the vulva. A retrospective review was performed of 89 women with Pagets disease of the vulva evaluated at a single institution between 1966 and 2010. Medical records were reviewed for demographic information, clinical data, pathologic findings, treatment modalities and outcomes. We found that the primary treatment was surgery for 74 (83.1%) patients, with positive margins noted in 70.1% of cases. Five patients (5.6%) underwent topical treatment with imiquimod and/or 5-fluorouracil, one patient (1.1%) underwent laser ablation and treatment was unknown in 9 patients (10.1%). The majority of patients had multiple recurrences, with 18% having four or more recurrences. There were no significant differences in recurrence rates between patients who underwent surgery and those who did not. Furthermore, there was no association between positive margins following primary surgery and recurrence. Forty-one patients (46.1%) were diagnosed with 53 synchronous or metachronous cancers. Seven patients (7.9%) were found to have invasive vulvar cancer with 1 mm or more depth of invasion, but none of the patients died of Pagets disease or associated vulvar/vaginal cancer. Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with Pagets disease of the vulva develop multiple recurrences regardless of treatment modality or margin status. Alternatives to surgery are needed to better care for women with this disease.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | 2016
Jaqueline Villas-Boas; Luiz C. Vilodre; Helena Malerba; Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Mirela Foresti Jiménez; Patrícia El Beitune
OBJECTIVE To ascertain whether placement of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant induces significant changes in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, as reflected by metabolic parameters, in healthy women. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study of 213 healthy patients who received etonogestrel implants. Weight, BMI, blood pressure and a comprehensive metabolic profile were assessed at baseline, 1, 2 and 3 years. In 21 of the 213 participants, AUC for glucose levels, fasting insulin levels at baseline and year 3 (immediately before implant removal), HOMA-IR score, and the QUICK index were assessed. Parameters were expressed as median and interquartile range. The Wilcoxon test and ANOVA were used for comparison of measurements after implant placement (significance level p<0.05). RESULTS Median age was 26 years (range, 22-31.5). Results showed a trend toward increase of the variables weight (63.3-66.1) and BMI (24.7-25.7) and a decrease in TC (172-161.5), TG (75-69.5), and LDL (100.5-98.5) (p>0.05). Of the metabolic variables, FBG (85-88) and HDL (53-46) had significant differences (p<0.002). In the subgroup of 21 patients, there were reductions in insulin levels (9.65 vs. 8.4mU/dL, p=0.03), HOMA scores (2.06 vs. 1.75, p=0.02), QUICK index (0.34 vs. 0.35, p=0.03), TC (178 vs. 160mg/dL, p=0.001), HDL (51 vs. 46mg/dL, p=0.009), and LDL (110 vs. 100mg/dL, p=0.035). CONCLUSION These results provide evidence of the metabolic safety of the ENG implant in healthy women over a 3-year period. Indeed, implant placement induces changes consistent with a lower risk of insulin resistance and dyslipidemia.
Case Reports in Oncology | 2015
Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Andrea Milbourne; Anuja Jhingran; Patricia J. Eifel; Pedro T. Ramirez; Kathleen M. Schmeler
Introduction: The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is chemoradiation, with the majority of patients having a complete response to the therapy. The current surveillance recommendations from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology include annual cytology, with a small proportion of patients subsequently diagnosed with high-grade cervical dysplasia (CIN 2/3). To date, there is limited information regarding the optimal treatment and outcome for patients diagnosed with CIN 2/3. The current report describes the diagnosis, management and outcome of 4 patients diagnosed with CIN 2/3 following chemoradiation. Case Description: We describe 4 patients who developed CIN 2/3 seven months to 8 years following radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. All 4 patients were asymptomatic and the abnormalities were first detected by a Pap test. Three of the patients were managed conservatively with observation, and the CIN 2/3 resolved without intervention. One patient underwent 2 cervical conizations followed by a hysterectomy with no residual dysplasia noted on the hysterectomy specimen. Conclusion: The majority of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiation are symptomatic, and most cases are detected by a physical examination. The role of cytology, colposcopy and biopsies may be of limited value. Furthermore, the significance of the diagnosis of CIN 2/3 in patients previously treated with radiation therapy was not associated with recurrent disease in the 4 patients described. Our results suggest that cytology may be of limited value in detecting recurrence in patients following radiation therapy, even when CIN 2/3 is detected.
Revista brasileira de medicina | 2010
Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Patrícia El Beitune; Mauren Fronckowiak Salis; Mirela Foresti Jiménez; Antonio Celso Koehler Ayub
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2015
Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Andrea Pires Souto Damin; Grasiela Agnes; Suzana Arenhart Pessini; Patrícia El Beitune; Cláudio Osmar Pereira Alexandre; Kathleen M. Schmeler; Gustavo Py Gomes da Silveira
Femina | 2008
Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Patrícia El Beitune; Antonio Celso Koehler Ayub; Carla Maria De Martini Vanin; Jacqueline Mori Lazzari; Suzana Arenhart Pessini; Suzane Beirão de Almeida; Raquel Papandreus Dibi; Cesar Pereira Lima
Journal of Global Oncology | 2018
Melissa S. Lopez; Sonia Parra; Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Ellen Baker; Andrea Milbourne; Cesaltina Lorenzoni; Elvira Xavier Luis; Flora Mabota; Georgia Fontes-Cintra; Renato Moretti-Marques; Anthony Ogburn; Rose M. Gowen; Eduardo Robles; José Humberto Tavares; Kathleen M. Schmeler
Journal of Clinical Obstetrics, Gynecology & Infertility | 2016
Geraldo Gastal Gomes-Da-Silveira; Cristiane Cruz Nervo; Mila Pontremoli Salcedo; Patrícia El Beitune
Collaboration
Dive into the Mila Pontremoli Salcedo's collaboration.
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
View shared research outputsUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
View shared research outputsUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
View shared research outputsUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
View shared research outputsUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
View shared research outputsUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
View shared research outputsUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
View shared research outputs