Ming-Jun Lai
University of Georgia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ming-Jun Lai.
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis | 2013
Ming-Jun Lai; Yangyang Xu; Wotao Yin
In this paper, we first study
Advances in Computational Mathematics | 1998
Ming-Jun Lai; Larry L. Schumaker
\ell_q
Siam Journal on Imaging Sciences | 2013
Ming-Jun Lai; Wotao Yin
minimization and its associated iterative reweighted algorithm for recovering sparse vectors. Unlike most existing work, we focus on unconstrained
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing | 2000
Wenjie He; Ming-Jun Lai
\ell_q
Mathematics of Computation | 2003
Ming-Jun Lai; Larry L. Schumaker
minimization, for which we show a few advantages on noisy measurements and/or approximately sparse vectors. Inspired by the results in [Daubechies et al., Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 63 (2010), pp. 1--38] for constrained
Computer Aided Geometric Design | 1996
Ming-Jun Lai
\ell_q
Numerische Mathematik | 2001
Ming-Jun Lai; Larry L. Schumaker
minimization, we start with a preliminary yet novel analysis for unconstrained
Journal of Approximation Theory | 1990
Charles K. Chui; Ming-Jun Lai
\ell_q
Numerical Algorithms | 1992
Ming-Jun Lai
minimization, which includes convergence, error bound, and local convergence behavior. Then, the algorithm and analysis are extended to the recovery of low-rank matrices. The algorithms for both vector and matrix recovery have been compared to some state-of-the-art algorithms and show superior performance on recovering sparse vectors and low-rank matrices.
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis | 1998
Ming-Jun Lai; Larry L. Schumaker
We show how to construct stable quasi-interpolation schemes in the bivariate spline spaces Sdr(Δ) with d⩾ 3r + 2 which achieve optimal approximation order. In addition to treating the usual max norm, we also give results in the Lp norms, and show that the methods also approximate derivatives to optimal order. We pay special attention to the approximation constants, and show that they depend only on the smallest angle in the underlying triangulation and the nature of the boundary of the domain.