Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Miqdad Asaria is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Miqdad Asaria.


Allergy | 2017

Allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Sangeeta Dhami; Ulugbek Nurmatov; Stefania Arasi; T. Khan; Miqdad Asaria; Hadar Zaman; Arnav Agarwal; G. Netuveli; Graham Roberts; Oliver Pfaar; Antonella Muraro; Ignacio J. Ansotegui; Moises A. Calderon; Cemal Cingi; Stephen R. Durham; R. Gerth van Wijk; Susanne Halken; Eckard Hamelmann; Peter Hellings; Lars Jacobsen; Edward F. Knol; Désirée Larenas-Linnemann; Sandra Y. Lin; Paraskevi Maggina; R. Mösges; H. Oude Elberink; Giovanni B. Pajno; Ruby Panwankar; E. A. Pastorello; Martin Penagos

The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is in the process of developing Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis. To inform the development of clinical recommendations, we undertook a systematic review to assess the effectiveness, cost‐effectiveness, and safety of AIT in the management of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.


Allergy | 2017

Allergen immunotherapy for allergic asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sangeeta Dhami; Artemisia Kakourou; Felix Asamoah; Ioana Agache; S. Lau; Marek Jutel; Antonella Muraro; Graham Roberts; Cezmi A. Akdis; Matteo Bonini; Ozlem Cavkaytar; Breda Flood; P. Gajdanowicz; Kenji Izuhara; O. Kalayci; Ralph Mösges; Oscar Palomares; Oliver Pfaar; Sylwia Smolinska; Milena Sokolowska; Miqdad Asaria; G. Netuveli; Hadar Zaman; Ather Akhlaq; Aziz Sheikh

To inform the development of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunologys (EAACI) Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) for allergic asthma, we assessed the evidence on the effectiveness, cost‐effectiveness and safety of AIT.


Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2016

How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England

Miqdad Asaria; Shehzad Ali; Tim Doran; Brian Ferguson; Robert Fleetcroft; Maria Goddard; Peter Goldblatt; Mauro Laudicella; Rosalind Raine; Richard Cookson

Background Provision of universal coverage is essential for achieving equity in healthcare, but inequalities still exist in universal healthcare systems. Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, the National Health Service (NHS) in England, which has provided universal coverage since 1948, made sustained efforts to reduce health inequalities by strengthening primary care. We provide the first comprehensive assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities of primary care access, quality and outcomes during this period. Methods Whole-population small area longitudinal study based on 32 482 neighbourhoods of approximately 1500 people in England from 2004/2005 to 2011/2012. We measured slope indices of inequality in four indicators: (1) patients per family doctor, (2) primary care quality, (3) preventable emergency hospital admissions and (4) mortality from conditions considered amenable to healthcare. Results Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, there were larger absolute improvements on all indicators in more-deprived neighbourhoods. The modelled gap between the most-deprived and least-deprived neighbourhoods in England decreased by: 193 patients per family doctor (95% CI 173 to 213), 3.29 percentage points of primary care quality (3.13 to 3.45), 0.42 preventable hospitalisations per 1000 people (0.29 to 0.55) and 0.23 amenable deaths per 1000 people (0.15 to 0.31). By 2011/2012, inequalities in primary care supply and quality were almost eliminated, but socioeconomic inequality was still associated with 158 396 preventable hospitalisations and 37 983 deaths amenable to healthcare. Conclusions Between 2004/2005 and 2011/2012, the NHS succeeded in substantially reducing socioeconomic inequalities in primary care access and quality, but made only modest reductions in healthcare outcome inequalities.


Medical Decision Making | 2016

Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis A Tutorial

Miqdad Asaria; Susan Griffin; Richard Cookson

Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) is a framework for incorporating health inequality concerns into the economic evaluation of health sector interventions. In this tutorial, we describe the technical details of how to conduct DCEA, using an illustrative example comparing alternative ways of implementing the National Health Service (NHS) Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP). The 2 key stages in DCEA are 1) modeling social distributions of health associated with different interventions, and 2) evaluating social distributions of health with respect to the dual objectives of improving total population health and reducing unfair health inequality. As well as describing the technical methods used, we also identify the data requirements and the social value judgments that have to be made. Finally, we demonstrate the use of sensitivity analyses to explore the impacts of alternative modeling assumptions and social value judgments.


Allergy | 2017

Allergen immunotherapy for insect venom allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sangeeta Dhami; Hadar Zaman; Eva-Maria Varga; Gunter J. Sturm; Antonella Muraro; Cezmi A. Akdis; Dario Antolin-Amerigo; Maria Beatrice Bilò; Danijela Bokanovic; Moises A. Calderon; E. Cichocka-Jarosz; J. N. G. Oude Elberink; Radoslaw Gawlik; Thilo Jakob; Joanna Lange; Ervin Mingomataj; Dimitris I. Mitsias; H. Mosbech; Markus Ollert; O. Pfaar; Constantinos Pitsios; V. Pravettoni; Graham Roberts; Franziska Ruëff; Betül Ayşe Sin; Miqdad Asaria; G. Netuveli; Aziz Sheikh

The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is in the process of developing the EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) for the management of insect venom allergy. To inform this process, we sought to assess the effectiveness, cost‐effectiveness and safety of AIT in the management of insect venom allergy.


European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes | 2016

Long-term healthcare use and costs in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a population-based cohort using linked health records (CALIBER).

Simon Walker; Miqdad Asaria; Andrea Manca; Stephen Palmer; Chris P Gale; Anoop Dinesh Shah; Keith R. Abrams; Michael J. Crowther; Adam Timmis; Harry Hemingway; Mark Sculpher

Abstract Aims To examine long-term healthcare utilization and costs of patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD). Methods and results Linked cohort study of 94 966 patients with SCAD in England, 1 January 2001 to 31 March 2010, identified from primary care, secondary care, disease, and death registries. Resource use and costs, and cost predictors by time and 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile were estimated using generalized linear models. Coronary heart disease hospitalizations were 20.5% in the first year and 66% in the year following a non-fatal (myocardial infarction, ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke) event. Mean healthcare costs were £3133 per patient in the first year and £10 377 in the year following a non-fatal event. First-year predictors of cost included sex (mean cost £549 lower in females), SCAD diagnosis (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction cost £656 more than stable angina), and co-morbidities (heart failure cost £657 more per patient). Compared with lower risk patients (5-year CVD risk 3.5%), those of higher risk (5-year CVD risk 44.2%) had higher 5-year costs (£23 393 vs. £9335) and lower lifetime costs (£43 020 vs. £116 888). Conclusion Patients with SCAD incur substantial healthcare utilization and costs, which varies and may be predicted by 5-year CVD risk profile. Higher risk patients have higher initial but lower lifetime costs than lower risk patients as a result of shorter life expectancy. Improved cardiovascular survivorship among an ageing CVD population is likely to require stratified care in anticipation of the burgeoning demand.


Heart | 2016

Using electronic health records to predict costs and outcomes in stable coronary artery disease

Miqdad Asaria; Simon Walker; Stephen Palmer; Chris P Gale; Anoop Dinesh Shah; Keith R. Abrams; Michael J. Crowther; Andrea Manca; Adam Timmis; Harry Hemingway; Mark Sculpher

Objectives To use electronic health records (EHR) to predict lifetime costs and health outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease (stable-CAD) stratified by their risk of future cardiovascular events, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treatments targeted at these populations. Methods The analysis was based on 94 966 patients with stable-CAD in England between 2001 and 2010, identified in four prospectively collected, linked EHR sources. Markov modelling was used to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) stratified by baseline cardiovascular risk. Results For the lowest risk tenth of patients with stable-CAD, predicted discounted remaining lifetime healthcare costs and QALYs were £62 210 (95% CI £33 724 to £90 043) and 12.0 (95% CI 11.5 to 12.5) years, respectively. For the highest risk tenth of the population, the equivalent costs and QALYs were £35 549 (95% CI £31 679 to £39 615) and 2.9 (95% CI 2.6 to 3.1) years, respectively. A new treatment with a hazard reduction of 20% for myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular disease death and no side-effects would be cost-effective if priced below £72 per year for the lowest risk patients and £646 per year for the highest risk patients. Conclusions Existing EHRs may be used to estimate lifetime healthcare costs and outcomes of patients with stable-CAD. The stable-CAD model developed in this study lends itself to informing decisions about commissioning, pricing and reimbursement. At current prices, to be cost-effective some established as well as future stable-CAD treatments may require stratification by patient risk.


Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2016

The costs of inequality: whole-population modelling study of lifetime inpatient hospital costs in the English National Health Service by level of neighbourhood deprivation

Miqdad Asaria; Tim Doran; Richard Cookson

Background There are substantial socioeconomic inequalities in both life expectancy and healthcare use in England. In this study, we describe how these two sets of inequalities interact by estimating the social gradient in hospital costs across the life course. Methods Hospital episode statistics, population and index of multiple deprivation data were combined at lower-layer super output area level to estimate inpatient hospital costs for 2011/2012 by age, sex and deprivation quintile. Survival curves were estimated for each of the deprivation groups and used to estimate expected annual costs and cumulative lifetime costs. Results A steep social gradient was observed in overall inpatient hospital admissions, with rates ranging from 31 298/100 000 population in the most affluent fifth of areas to 43 385 in the most deprived fifth. This gradient was steeper for emergency than for elective admissions. The total cost associated with this inequality in 2011/2012 was £4.8 billion. A social gradient was also observed in the modelled lifetime costs where the lower life expectancy was not sufficient to outweigh the higher average costs in the more deprived populations. Lifetime costs for women were 14% greater than for men, due to higher costs in the reproductive years and greater life expectancy. Conclusions Socioeconomic inequalities result in increased morbidity and decreased life expectancy. Interventions to reduce inequality and improve health in more deprived neighbourhoods have the potential to save money for health systems not only within years but across peoples’ entire lifetimes, despite increased costs due to longer life expectancies.


BMJ Open | 2016

Unequal socioeconomic distribution of the primary care workforce: whole-population small area longitudinal study.

Miqdad Asaria; Richard Cookson; Robert Fleetcroft; Shehzad Ali

Objective To measure changes in socioeconomic inequality in the distribution of family physicians (general practitioners (GPs)) relative to need in England from 2004/2005 to 2013/2014. Design Whole-population small area longitudinal data linkage study. Setting England from 2004/2005 to 2013/2014. Participants 32 482 lower layer super output areas (neighbourhoods of 1500 people on average). Main outcome measures Slope index of inequality (SII) between the most and least deprived small areas in annual full-time equivalent GPs (FTE GPs) per 100 000 need adjusted population. Results In 2004/2005, inequality in primary care supply as measured by the SII in FTE GPs was 4.2 (95% CI 3.1 to 5.3) GPs per 100 000. By 2013/2014, this SII had fallen to −0.7 (95% CI −2.5 to 1.1) GPs per 100 000. The number of FTE GPs per 100 000 serving the most deprived fifth of small areas increased over this period from 54.0 to 60.5, while increasing from 57.2 to 59.9 in the least deprived fifth, so that by the end of the study period there were more GPs per 100 000 need adjusted population in the most deprived areas than in the least deprived. The increase in GP supply in the most deprived fifth of neighbourhoods was larger in areas that received targeted investment for establishing new practices under the ‘Equitable Access to Primary Medical Care’. Conclusions There was a substantial reduction in socioeconomic inequality in family physician supply associated with national policy. This policy may not have completely eliminated socioeconomic inequality in family physician supply since existing need adjustment formulae do not fully capture the additional burden of multimorbidity in deprived neighbourhoods. The small area approach introduced in this study can be used routinely to monitor socioeconomic inequality of access to primary care and to indicate workforce shortages in particular neighbourhoods. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0


PharmacoEconomics | 2016

Using Linked Electronic Health Records to Estimate Healthcare Costs: Key Challenges and Opportunities

Miqdad Asaria; Katja Grasic; Simon Walker

This paper discusses key challenges and opportunities that arise when using linked electronic health records (EHR) in health economics and outcomes research (HEOR), with a particular focus on estimating healthcare costs. These challenges and opportunities are framed in the context of a case study modelling the costs of stable coronary artery disease in England. The challenges and opportunities discussed fall broadly into the categories of (1) handling and organising data of this size and sensitivity; (2) extracting clinical endpoints from datasets that have not been designed and collected with such endpoints in mind; and (3) the principles and practice of costing resource use from routinely collected data. We find that there are a number of new challenges and opportunities that arise when working with EHR compared with more traditional sources of data for HEOR. These call for greater clinician involvement and intelligent use of sensitivity analysis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Miqdad Asaria's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rosalind Raine

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Goldblatt

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge