Miranda R. Andrus
Auburn University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Miranda R. Andrus.
Pharmacotherapy | 2002
Miranda R. Andrus; Mary T. Roth
Illiteracy has become an increasingly important problem, especially as it relates to health care. A national survey found that almost half of the adult population has deficiencies in reading or computation skills. Literacy is defined as the basic ability to read and speak English, whereas functional health literacy is the ability to read, understand, and act on health information. Up to 48% of English‐speaking patients do not have adequate functional health literacy. The consequences of inadequate health literacy include poorer health status, lack of knowledge about medical care and medical conditions, decreased comprehension of medical information, lack of understanding and use of preventive services, poorer self‐reported health, poorer compliance rates, increased hospitalizations, and increased health care costs. The medical community must acknowledge this issue and develop strategies to ensure that patients receive assistance in overcoming the barriers that limit their ability to function adequately in the health care environment.
Pharmacotherapy | 2006
Deidre B. Clark; Miranda R. Andrus; Debbie C. Byrd
A 47‐year‐old woman developed confusion, incoordination, and hypertension after she was given linezolid in addition to sertraline for 5 days. Her symptoms resolved within 4 days of discontinuing linezolid. One and a half months later, she received a second course of linezolid; sertraline was discontinued on day 1 of linezolid therapy. On day 9 of therapy, the patient developed confusion, myoclonus, and incoordination, and cardiopulmonary arrest occurred, leaving the patient in a coma. Diarrhea, hypertension, and tachycardia developed after cardiopulmonary arrest. Linezolid was discontinued on day 10, and cyproheptadine was given. Linezolid is a weak monoamine oxidase inhibitor and has been reported to interact with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Several cases of serotonin syndrome in patients taking linezolid and SSRIs have been reported, including two reports with sertraline, one with paroxetine, four with citalopram, and two with fluoxetine. One abstract of a retrospective analysis reported that serotonin syndrome did not occur in patients who received linezolid and fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline. Because of several limitations, however, no conclusions can be drawn from that retrospective analysis. A drug interaction involving escitalopram and linezolid has not been documented. Caution should be used when linezolid is used in patients receiving an SSRI. Other antibiotic options should be considered first, and linezolid should be reserved as the last resort if possible. If the infection requires linezolid, the SSRI should be discontinued, and the patient should be monitored closely for serotonin syndrome.
Pharmacotherapy | 2005
Mary T. Roth; Miranda R. Andrus; Eric C. Westman
Study Objectives. To determine the success of an outpatient smoking‐cessation clinic by assessing smoking abstinence rates and factors associated with lower abstinence rates. We also sought to determine whether smoking abstinence rates differed among various smoking‐cessation products.
Drugs & Aging | 2008
Miranda R. Andrus; Joyce V. Loyed
The incidence of and mortality from both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) increase with age. In addition, the average age of patients with COPD and CVD is also increasing as a result of improvements in both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Coronary artery disease is a compelling indication for β-adrenoceptor antagonist use in a population in whom β-adrenoceptor antagonism is often viewed as contraindicated. β-Adrenoceptor antagonists have been proven to improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but have been under-utilized in patients with COPD with concomitant CVD because of a fear of bronchoconstriction and adverse effects, particularly in the elderly. The advanced age of patients with COPD and CVD, along with the sheer number of patients with these diseases, necessitates that clinicians understand the treatment of these co-morbidities using seemingly conflicting therapy in the form of β-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists.We review changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of β-adrenoceptor antagonists in the elderly, the role of β-adrenoceptor antagonists in CVD and the literature regarding the safety and mortality benefits of β-adrenoceptor antagonists in elderly patients with COPD and concomitant CVD. We conclude that cardioselective β-adrenoceptor antagonists appear to be safe to use in elderly male patients with mild-to-moderate COPD who have a compelling indication for β-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy. Data in female patients are very limited. Nonselective β-adrenoceptor antagonists should be avoided in general, except in patients with heart failure who might benefit significantly from the use of carvedilol. β-Adrenoceptor antagonists have been shown to improve mortality in older patients with coexisting CVD and COPD.
The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education | 2011
T. Lynn Stevenson; Brent I. Fox; Miranda R. Andrus; Dana G. Carroll
Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness and impact of a customized Web-based software program implemented in 2006 for school-wide documentation of clinical interventions by pharmacy practice faculty members, pharmacy residents, and student pharmacists. Methods. The implementation process, directed by a committee of faculty members and school administrators, included preparation and refinement of the software, user training, development of forms and reports, and integration of the documentation process within the curriculum. Results. Use of the documentation tool consistently increased from May 2007 to December 2010. Over 187,000 interventions were documented with over
Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2010
Miranda R. Andrus; Elizabeth Gilbert
6.2 million in associated cost avoidance. Conclusions. Successful implementation of a school-wide documentation tool required considerable time from the oversight committee and a comprehensive training program for all users, with ongoing monitoring of data collection practices. Data collected proved to be useful to show the impact of faculty members, residents, and student pharmacists at affiliated training sites.
Pharmacy Practice (internet) | 2012
Miranda R. Andrus
Objective: To evaluate the use of topiramate for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to June week 4, 2010), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to May 2010), ISI Web of Science (1945 to July 3, 2010), and Iowa Drug Information Service (searched July 6, 2010) were searched using the terms posttraumatic stress disorder and topiramate. Guidelines and other sources were identified from bibliography searches. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All English-language human studies and case reports that evaluated the use of topiramate for treatment of PTSD were evaluated. Data Synthesis: One case report, 1 case series, 2 open-label trials, and 1 placebo-controlled trial that used topiramate (monotherapy or adjunct) to treat civilian PTSD were identified and evaluated. The case report and case series reported subjective reduction of symptoms, and the open-label trials reported a significant reduction in PTSD Checklist–Civilian score. The placebo-controlled trial found no significant difference in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score. One open-label trial and 2 placebo-controlled trials that used topiramate in combat-related PTSD were identified and evaluated. The open-label trial reported a significant reduction in CAPS score, and 1 placebo-controlled trial reported a statistically significant difference in CAPS score. However, the other placebo-controlled trial found no significant differences. In some of the trials evaluated, the clinical significance of outcomes reported is difficult to determine. Adverse effects were reported throughout the trials but generally were not considered serious. Conclusions: Based on the limited evidence available, topiramate is a possible alternative or adjunct option for patients with PTSD that is refractory to standard treatments.
The Journal of pharmacy technology | 2016
Haley M. Phillippe; Bradley M. Wright; Kathryn E. Bowerman; Miranda R. Andrus
The Joint Commission continues to emphasize the importance of medication reconciliation in all practice settings. Pharmacists and student pharmacists are uniquely trained in this aspect of patient care, and can assist with keeping accurate and complete medication records through patient interview in the outpatient setting. Objective The objective of this study was to quantify and describe medication reconciliation efforts by student pharmacists in an outpatient family medicine center. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all standard medication reconciliation forms completed by student pharmacists during patient interviews from April 2010 to July 2010. The number of reviews conducted was recorded, along with the frequency of each type of discrepancy. A discrepancy was defined as any lack of agreement between the medication list in the electronic health record (EHR) and the patient-reported regimen and included any differences in dose or frequency of a medication, duplication of the same medication, medication no longer taken or omission of any medication. Results A total of 213 standard medication forms from the 4 month period were reviewed. A total of 555 discrepancies were found, including medications no longer taken, prescription medications that needed to be added to the EHR, over-the-counter(OTC) and herbal medications that needed to be added to the EHR, medications taken differently than recorded in the EHR, and medication allergies which needed to be updated. An average of 2.6 discrepancies was found per patient interviewed. Conclusions Student pharmacist-initiated medication reconciliation in an outpatient family medicine center resulted in the resolution of numerous discrepancies in the medication lists of individual patients. Pharmacists and student pharmacists are uniquely trained in medication history taking and play a vital role in medication reconciliation in the outpatient setting.
The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education | 2018
Miranda R. Andrus; Sharon McDonough; Kristi W. Kelley; Pamela L. Stamm; Emily K. McCoy; Katelin M. Lisenby; Heather P. Whitley; Nicole Slater; Dana G. Carroll; E. Kelly Hester; Allison Meyer Helmer; Cherry W. Jackson; Debbie C. Byrd
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become available recently as an alternative to warfarin in appropriate patients. Few studies have been conducted that evaluate pharmacist-managed services for the management of the DOACs. Objective: To review the appropriateness of DOAC therapy and warfarin therapy in adult patients in a university-affiliated outpatient clinic and the need for further monitoring of these agents. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients receiving a DOAC or warfarin therapy. Indication, dose, duration, age, weight, adherence, drug interactions, bleeding risk/history, renal function, and hepatic function were evaluated for DOACs and warfarin. If prescribed warfarin, international normalized ratio readings were also obtained. The pharmacists made verbal recommendations to primary care prescribers regarding findings, and changes to therapy were reviewed and documented. Results: A total of 175 patient charts were reviewed (49% DOACs, 51% warfarin). Twenty-five percent of prescribed DOACs should have been avoided due to inappropriate indication or renal function. The majority of these were switched to warfarin after discussion with the primary care provider. Of patients prescribed DOACs, 22% had a history of poor adherence to therapy and half of these were switched to warfarin. An additional 24% of prescribed DOACs were inappropriate due to incorrect dosing, major drug interactions, and/or renal dosing; however, these medications could be appropriate if adjustments are made. Nineteen percent of patients on warfarin therapy would be a candidate for DOAC therapy. Conclusion: Although there were limitations to this analysis, the results demonstrate that additional intervention is needed to improve appropriate prescribing and monitoring of the DOACs. Pharmacists can meet this need by providing medication reviews of novel anticoagulants and educating physicians.
Pharmacotherapy | 2011
Stuart T. Haines; Miranda R. Andrus; Melissa Badowski; Mary M. Bradbury; Ann E. Canales; Jeffrey M. Cavanaugh; Peter Koval; Mary W. Lee; Joel C. Marrs; James Michael Nash; Carol Ott; Amy Robbins Williams; Danielle L. Wham
Objective. To develop and establish validity for a grading rubric to evaluate diabetes subjective, objective, assessment, plan (SOAP) note writing on primary care (PC) advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs), and to assess reliability and student perceptions of the rubric. Methods. Ten PC APPE faculty members collaborated to develop a rubric to provide formative and summative feedback on three written SOAP notes per APPE student over a 10-month period. Correlation analyses were conducted between rubric scores and three criterion variables to assess criterion-related validity: APPE grades, Pharmaceutical Care Ability Profile Scores, and Global Impression Scores. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability testing were completed using Cohen’s kappa and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Student perceptions were assessed through an anonymous student survey. Results. Fifty-one students and 167 SOAP notes were evaluated using the final rubric. The mean score significantly increased from the first to second SOAP note and from the first to third SOAP note. Statistically significant positive correlations were found between final rubric scores and criterion variables. The ICC for inter-rater reliability was fair (.59) for final rubric scores and excellent for intra-rater reliability (.98 to1.00). Students responded that the rubric improved their ability (84.9%) and confidence (92.4%) to write SOAP notes. Conclusion. The rubric may be used to make valid decisions about students’ SOAP note writing ability and may increase their confidence in this area. The use of the rubric allows for greater reliability among multiple graders, supporting grading consistency.