Miseon Kim

Intermediate-risk grouping of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Background:In this study, we sought to identify a criterion for the intermediate-risk grouping of patients with cervical cancer who exhibit any intermediate-risk factor after radical hysterectomy.Methods:In total, 2158 patients with pathologically proven stage IB–IIA cervical cancer with any intermediate-risk factor after radical hysterectomy were randomly assigned to two groups, a development group and a validation group, at a ratio of 3 : 1 (1620 patients:538 patients). To predict recurrence, multivariate models were developed using the development group. The ability of the models to discriminate between groups was validated using the log-rank test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results:Four factors (histology, tumour size, deep stromal invasion (DSI), and lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI)) were significantly associated with disease recurrence and included in the models. Among the nine possible combinations of the four variables, models consisting of any two of the four intermediate-risk factors (tumour size ⩾3 cm, DSI of the outer third of the cervix, LVSI, and adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma histology) demonstrated the best performance for predicting recurrence.Conclusion:This study identified a ‘four-factor model’ in which the presence of any two factors may be useful for predicting recurrence in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy.

Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2016: 10-year special edition

In 2016, 13 topics were selected as major research advances in gynecologic oncology. For ovarian cancer, study results supporting previous ones regarding surgical preventive strategies were reported. There were several targeted agents that showed comparable responses in phase III trials, including niraparib, cediranib, and nintedanib. On the contrary to our expectations, dose-dense weekly chemotherapy regimen failed to prove superior survival outcomes compared with conventional triweekly regimen. Single-agent non-platinum treatment to prolong platinum-free-interval in patients with recurrent, partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer did not improve and even worsened overall survival (OS). For cervical cancer, we reviewed robust evidences of larger-scaled population-based study and cost-effectiveness of nonavalent vaccine for expanding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage. Standard of care treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) was briefly reviewed. For uterine corpus cancer, new findings about appropriate surgical wait time from diagnosis to surgery were reported. Advantages of minimally invasive surgery over conventional laparotomy were reconfirmed. There were 5 new gene regions that increase the risk of developing endometrial cancer. Regarding radiation therapy, Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Cancer (PORTEC)-3 quality of life (QOL) data were released and higher local control rate of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy was reported in LACC. In addition, 4 general oncology topics followed: chemotherapy at the end-of-life, immunotherapy with reengineering T-cells, actualization of precision medicine, and artificial intelligence (AI) to make personalized cancer therapy real. For breast cancer, adaptively randomized trials, extending aromatase inhibitor therapy, and ribociclib and palbociclib were introduced.

Elevated plasma fibrinogen levels and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a cohort study and meta-analysis

Objective To evaluate the effect of elevated plasma fibrinogen levels on the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods We reviewed the data of 217 patients with advanced-stage EOC between 2000 and 2012, and investigated the prognostic role of elevated plasma fibrinogen levels compared with serum CA-125 levels, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). For further evaluation, we performed a meta-analysis using 5 cohort studies published to July 2015, including our cohort study after a literature review. Results Among the four biomarkers, only plasma fibrinogen levels >485.2 mg/dL were correlated with impaired progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (median, 13.9 vs. 20.3 months and 42.2 vs. 55.4 months; p<0.010). Elevated plasma fibrinogen levels were an independent factor for poor PFS with marginal significance and OS (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs]=1.389 and 1.581; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]=0.979–1.972 and 1.032–2.423, respectively). Furthermore, crude and subgroup meta-analyses demonstrated that elevated plasma fibrinogen levels were associated with impaired PFS and OS in patients with all stage EOC. Conclusion Elevated plasma fibrinogen levels be more important for predicting survival than serum CA-125 levels, NLR and PLR in patients with EOC, in particular, advanced-stage disease. Moreover, it may be related to poor prognosis of EOC.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Valuable Tool for Predicting Parametrial Invasion in Stage IB1 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer.

Objectives The aims of study were to determine the predictive value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for parametrial invasion (PMI) and to develop a predictive model for PMI in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer (n = 215) who underwent radical hysterectomy between 2003 and 2014. The presence of PMI from postoperative pathological reports and its association with preoperative MRI findings were evaluated. We developed a predictive model for PMI using independent predictive factors identified by logistic regression and estimated its predictive performance. Results Thirty patients (14.0%) had PMI from postoperative pathological reports. Among the preoperative MRI findings, a greater tumor diameter (4.2 vs 2.0 cm; P < 0.001), a larger tumor volume (92.6 vs 12.7 cm3; P < 0.001), the presence of PMI (53.3% vs 8.6%; P < 0.001), and upper vaginal involvement (73.3% vs 22.7%; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with PMI. Multivariate analysis identified tumor volume (odds ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.63–18.53; P < 0.001) and PMI (odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.31–15.97; P < 0.001) from preoperative MRI findings as independent predictive factors for PMI. Our predictive model demonstrates that the presence of PMI or a tumor volume of greater than 18.0 cm3 has a higher sensitivity (86.7% vs 53.3%) and lower specificity (74.6% vs 91.4%) than the presence of PMI alone. Specifically, the models negative predictive value was superior to that of PMI only (97.2% vs 92.3%). In the low-risk group, defined as preoperative MRI findings suggesting no PMI and a tumor volume of 18.0 cm3 or less, the proportion of false negative cases was just 2.8%. Conclusions When tumor volume with findings suggesting that PMI is considered, preoperative MRI is useful in excluding PMI. A predictive model based on preoperative MRI findings seems to be valuable in identifying potential candidates for less radical surgery in stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer.OBJECTIVES The aims of study were to determine the predictive value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for parametrial invasion (PMI) and to develop a predictive model for PMI in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer (n = 215) who underwent radical hysterectomy between 2003 and 2014. The presence of PMI from postoperative pathological reports and its association with preoperative MRI findings were evaluated. We developed a predictive model for PMI using independent predictive factors identified by logistic regression and estimated its predictive performance. RESULTS Thirty patients (14.0%) had PMI from postoperative pathological reports. Among the preoperative MRI findings, a greater tumor diameter (4.2 vs 2.0 cm; P < 0.001), a larger tumor volume (92.6 vs 12.7 cm3; P < 0.001), the presence of PMI (53.3% vs 8.6%; P < 0.001), and upper vaginal involvement (73.3% vs 22.7%; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with PMI. Multivariate analysis identified tumor volume (odds ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.63-18.53; P < 0.001) and PMI (odds ratio, 6.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-15.97; P < 0.001) from preoperative MRI findings as independent predictive factors for PMI. Our predictive model demonstrates that the presence of PMI or a tumor volume of greater than 18.0 cm3 has a higher sensitivity (86.7% vs 53.3%) and lower specificity (74.6% vs 91.4%) than the presence of PMI alone. Specifically, the models negative predictive value was superior to that of PMI only (97.2% vs 92.3%). In the low-risk group, defined as preoperative MRI findings suggesting no PMI and a tumor volume of 18.0 cm3 or less, the proportion of false negative cases was just 2.8%. CONCLUSIONS When tumor volume with findings suggesting that PMI is considered, preoperative MRI is useful in excluding PMI. A predictive model based on preoperative MRI findings seems to be valuable in identifying potential candidates for less radical surgery in stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer.

Efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold coagulation for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A two center cohort study

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) combined with cold coagulation for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS We reviewed clinic-pathologic data of 498 patients treated with LEEP alone (n=354), and LEEP combined with cold coagulation (n=144) between January 2000 and December 2011. After LEEP, we followed up all patients by using Papanicolaou smear and human papillomavirus (HPV) test, and evaluated abnormal cervical cytology-free interval and high-risk HPV infection-free interval. Moreover, we investigated independent factors affecting abnormal cervical cytology or high-risk HPV infection after LEEP. RESULTS Abnormal cervical cytology-free interval was longer in patients treated with LEEP combined with cold coagulation than in those treated with LEEP alone (mean, 92.4 vs. 84.4 months; P=0.01), and patients treated with LEEP combined with cold coagulation also showed longer high-risk HPV infection-free interval than those treated with LEEP alone (mean, 87.6 vs. 59.1 months; P=0.01). Moreover, CIN 3 and cold coagulation were factors affecting abnormal cervical cytology after LEEP (adjusted hazard ratios, 1.90 and 0.61; 95% confidence intervals, 1.27 to 2.84 and 0.39 to 0.96), and CIN 3, positive deep cervical margin and cold coagulation were also factors affecting high-risk HPV infection after LEEP (adjusted hazard ratios, 2.07, 4.11, and 0.64; 95% confidence intervals, 1.38 to 3.08, 1.63 to 10.39, and 0.43 to 0.96). When we performed subgroup analyses for patients with CIN 2 or CIN 3, the result were similar. CONCLUSION LEEP combined with cold coagulation may be more effective for treating CIN than LEEP alone. Moreover, cold coagulation may decrease the risk of potential of recurrence after LEEP.

Identifying risk factors for occult lower extremity lymphedema using computed tomography in patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancers

OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors for lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) using computed tomographic (CT) scan in patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancers. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 511 consecutive gynecologic cancer patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. Mean difference (3.77±3.14mm) of subcutaneous layer thicknesses between preoperative and postoperative 1-year CT scans of 106 patients with clinical LEL was used as an objective criterion for regrouping all the patients into those with mean difference >3.77mm and ≤3.77mm. Risk factors for clinical LEL and significant increase of subcutaneous layer thickness on CT were evaluated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS A total of 106 (20.7%) patients were clinically diagnosed with LEL by a physician. Total number of lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved >30 (Odds ratio [OR] 3.2; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.94-5.32; p<0.001) and adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.75-5.52; p<0.001) were risk factors for clinical LEL. One hundred-nineteen (23.3%) had subcutaneous layer thickness increase of >3.77mm. In addition to number of LNs retrieved >30 (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.40-3.74; p=0.001) and adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.01-2.74; p=0.046), open surgery (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.01-3.11; p=0.045), long operation time (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.05-2.83; p=0.032), and no use of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.06-4.16; p=0.034) were risk factors for thick subcutaneous layer on postoperative CT. CONCLUSIONS In addition to high LN retrieval and adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, open surgery, long operation time, and no IPC use could be risk factors for occult LEL after lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers.

Ginsenoside Rh2 induces apoptosis and inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition in HEC1A and Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells

BACKGROUND Anticancer effect of ginsenoside Rh2 has been found in various cancer cells. However, the anticancer effect of Rh2 in endometrial cancer cells is still unclear. We aimed to determine the anticancer effect of Rh2 and elucidate its mechanism in endometrial cancer cells, using HEC1A and Ishikawa cell lines, in this study. METHODS Cell proliferation was assessed by MTT assay, and cell apoptosis was visualized by TdT mediated-dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) method. Western blot were performed to detect the expression of apoptosis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins. Further, cell invasion and migration assays were conducted to estimate cell migration and invasion abilities. RESULTS Rh2 treatment significantly suppressed cell proliferation in HEC1A and Ishikawa cells, in dose-dependent manner. Levels of cleaved poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) and cleaved caspase-3 increased in the both cell lines with Rh2 compared with control. In Western blotting analysis after Rh2 treatment, the expression of E-cadherin increased, while the expression of EMT-related proteins including vimentin, TGF-β, and Snail markedly decreased in both cell lines. The cell invasion and migration assays results indicated that Rh2 inhibited the cell invasion and migration in HEC1A cells. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggested that Rh2 exerts the anticancer effect in endometrial cancer cells through the apoptosis induction and EMT inhibition.

Bilateral salpingectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer in women at average risk: a position statement of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (KSOG)

Based on the current understanding of a preventive effect of bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancers, the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, and Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine support the following recommendations: • Women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease should be informed that bilateral salpingectomy reduces the risk of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer, and they should be counseled regarding this procedure at the time of hysterectomy. • Although salpingectomy is generally considered as a safe procedure in terms of preserving ovarian reserve, there is a lack of evidences representing its long-term outcomes. Therefore, patients should be informed about the minimal potential of this procedure for decreasing ovarian reserve. • Prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy is favorable in terms of prevention of ovarian/fallopian/peritoneal cancer, although operation-related complications minimally increase with this procedure, compared to the complications associated with vaginal hysterectomy alone. Conversion to open or laparoscopic approach from vaginal approach to perform prophylactic salpingectomy is not recommended. • Women who desire permanent sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery could be counseled for prophylactic salpingectomy before surgery on an individual basis.

Do fertile women have an inferior treatment for high‐grade precancerous lesions?

To investigate whether a concern for future pregnancy is reflected in the extent of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) and to assess the clinical outcome.

Survival impact of low anterior resection in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer grossly confined to the pelvic cavity: a Korean multicenter study

Objective To evaluate survival impact of low anterior resection (LAR) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) grossly confined to the pelvis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 397 patients who underwent primary staging surgery for treatment of 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II–IIIA EOC: 116 (29.2%) IIA, 212 (53.4%) IIB, and 69 (17.4%) IIIA. Patients with grossly enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes positive for metastatic carcinoma were excluded. Of 92 patients (23.2%) with gross tumors at the rectosigmoid colon, 68 (73.9%) underwent tumorectomy and 24 (26.1%), LAR for rectosigmoid lesions. Survival outcomes between patients who underwent tumorectomy and LAR were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results During the median follow-up of 55 months (range, 1–260), 141 (35.5%) recurrences and 81 (20.4%) deaths occurred. Age (52.8 vs. 54.5 years, p=0.552), optimal debulking (98.5% vs. 95.0%, p=0.405), histologic type (serous, 52.9% vs. 50.0%, p=0.804), FIGO stage (p=0.057), and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy ≥6 cycles (85.3% vs. 79.2%, p=0.485) were not different between groups. No significant difference in 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 57.9% vs. 62.5%, p=0.767) and overall survival (OS; 84.7% vs. 63.8%, p=0.087), respectively, was noted between groups. Postoperative ileus was more frequent in patients subjected to LAR than those who were not (4/24 [16.7%] vs. 11/373 [2.9%], p=0.001). The 5-year PFS (60.3% vs. 57.9%, p=0.523) and OS (81.8% vs. 87.7%, p=0.912) between patients who underwent tumorectomy and those who did not were also similar. Conclusion Survival benefit of LAR did not appear to be significant in EOC patients with grossly pelvis-confined tumors.