Mohammed Asmal
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mohammed Asmal.
Science Translational Medicine | 2011
Norman L. Letvin; Srinivas S. Rao; David C. Montefiori; Michael S. Seaman; Yue Sun; So-Yon Lim; Wendy W. Yeh; Mohammed Asmal; Rebecca Gelman; Ling Shen; James B. Whitney; Cathal Seoighe; Miguel Lacerda; Sheila M. Keating; Philip J. Norris; Michael G. Hudgens; Peter B. Gilbert; Adam P. Buzby; Linh Mach; Jinrong Zhang; Harikrishnan Balachandran; George M. Shaw; Stephen D. Schmidt; John Paul Todd; Alan Dodson; John R. Mascola; Gary J. Nabel
A vaccine protecting monkeys against mucosal infection by simian immunodeficiency virus sheds light on immune and genetic correlates of protection. Unraveling Immune Correlates of Vaccine Protection Developing an effective vaccine against HIV-1, the virus that causes AIDS, has been a huge challenge that has stymied AIDS researchers for several decades. A key problem for HIV vaccine trials has been the lack of immune correlates that indicate which antibody and T cell responses in the vaccinees correlate directly with a protective effect. The only HIV vaccine trial to date that has shown a protective effect is the RV144 trial carried out in Thailand between 2003 and 2006, with the final results reported in 2009. In this trial of 16,400 Thai volunteers, those vaccinated with a prime-boost HIV vaccine showed a reduction in the rate of infection by HIV-1 of 31% compared to volunteers given a placebo. The protective effect was seen for up to 3 years after the initial vaccination, but the immune correlates of protection by this vaccine are still not known. In an effort to learn more about possible immune correlates of HIV vaccine protection, Letvin and colleagues used a prime/boost vaccine regimen in monkeys that was similar to that used in the RV144 trial. Monkeys were vaccinated with a plasmid DNA prime/recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 (rAd5) boost vaccine regimen and then were challenged with intrarectal doses of one of two isolates of the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) every week for 12 weeks. Although the vaccine had no impact on acquisition of the SIVmac251 isolate (which is tough for the monkey immune system to neutralize), the vaccine provided a 50% reduction in infection with the SIVsmE660 isolate (which more readily undergoes neutralization). The authors then examined a variety of immune responses in the protected vaccinated monkeys including cellular, antibody, and innate immune responses; they also examined whether protective host alleles were present in the protected animals. They found that low levels of neutralizing antibodies and a CD4+ T cell response against the HIV envelope (Env) protein correlated with the protective effect. In addition, monkeys that expressed two TRIM5 alleles that help to restrict SIV replication in host cells were protected by the vaccine, whereas monkeys expressing one TRIM5 allele that is permissive for SIV replication were not. This study begins to unravel the immune and genetic correlates of protection in nonhuman primates and highlights the need to scrutinize these types of correlates in future trials of HIV vaccines in human volunteers. The RV144 vaccine trial in Thailand demonstrated that an HIV vaccine could prevent infection in humans and highlights the importance of understanding protective immunity against HIV. We used a nonhuman primate model to define immune and genetic mechanisms of protection against mucosal infection by the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). A plasmid DNA prime/recombinant adenovirus serotype 5 (rAd5) boost vaccine regimen was evaluated for its ability to protect monkeys from infection by SIVmac251 or SIVsmE660 isolates after repeat intrarectal challenges. Although this prime-boost vaccine regimen failed to protect against SIVmac251 infection, 50% of vaccinated monkeys were protected from infection with SIVsmE660. Among SIVsmE660-infected animals, there was about a one-log reduction in peak plasma virus RNA in monkeys expressing the major histocompatibility complex class I allele Mamu-A*01, implicating cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the control of SIV replication once infection is established. Among Mamu-A*01–negative monkeys challenged with SIVsmE660, no CD8+ T cell response or innate immune response was associated with protection against virus acquisition. However, low levels of neutralizing antibodies and an envelope-specific CD4+ T cell response were associated with vaccine protection in these monkeys. Moreover, monkeys that expressed two TRIM5 alleles that restrict SIV replication were more likely to be protected from infection than monkeys that expressed at least one permissive TRIM5 allele. This study begins to elucidate the mechanisms of vaccine protection against immunodeficiency viruses and highlights the need to analyze these immune and genetic correlates of protection in future trials of HIV vaccine strategies.
PLOS Pathogens | 2011
S. Gnanakaran; Tanmoy Bhattacharya; Marcus Daniels; Brandon F. Keele; Peter Hraber; Alan S. Lapedes; Tongye Shen; Brian Gaschen; Mohan Krishnamoorthy; Hui-Hui Li; Julie M. Decker; Jesus F. Salazar-Gonzalez; Shuyi Wang; Chunlai Jiang; Feng Gao; Ronald Swanstrom; Jeffrey A. Anderson; Li-Hua Ping; Myron S. Cohen; Martin Markowitz; Paul A. Goepfert; Michael S. Saag; Joseph J. Eron; Charles B. Hicks; William A. Blattner; Georgia D. Tomaras; Mohammed Asmal; Norman L. Letvin; Peter B. Gilbert; Allan C. deCamp
Here we have identified HIV-1 B clade Envelope (Env) amino acid signatures from early in infection that may be favored at transmission, as well as patterns of recurrent mutation in chronic infection that may reflect common pathways of immune evasion. To accomplish this, we compared thousands of sequences derived by single genome amplification from several hundred individuals that were sampled either early in infection or were chronically infected. Samples were divided at the outset into hypothesis-forming and validation sets, and we used phylogenetically corrected statistical strategies to identify signatures, systematically scanning all of Env. Signatures included single amino acids, glycosylation motifs, and multi-site patterns based on functional or structural groupings of amino acids. We identified signatures near the CCR5 co-receptor-binding region, near the CD4 binding site, and in the signal peptide and cytoplasmic domain, which may influence Env expression and processing. Two signatures patterns associated with transmission were particularly interesting. The first was the most statistically robust signature, located in position 12 in the signal peptide. The second was the loss of an N-linked glycosylation site at positions 413–415; the presence of this site has been recently found to be associated with escape from potent and broad neutralizing antibodies, consistent with enabling a common pathway for immune escape during chronic infection. Its recurrent loss in early infection suggests it may impact fitness at the time of transmission or during early viral expansion. The signature patterns we identified implicate Env expression levels in selection at viral transmission or in early expansion, and suggest that immune evasion patterns that recur in many individuals during chronic infection when antibodies are present can be selected against when the infection is being established prior to the adaptive immune response.
Journal of Immunology | 2005
John Colgan; Mohammed Asmal; Bin Yu; Jeremy Luban
Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive drug that is widely used to prevent organ transplant rejection. Known intracellular ligands for cyclosporine include the cyclophilins, a large family of phylogenetically conserved proteins that potentially regulate protein folding in cells. Immunosuppression by cyclosporine is thought to result from the formation of a drug-cyclophilin complex that binds to and inhibits calcineurin, a serine/threonine phosphatase that is activated by TCR engagement. Amino acids within the cyclophilins that are critical for binding to cyclosporine have been identified. Most of these residues are highly conserved within the 15 mammalian cyclophilins, suggesting that many are potential targets for the drug. We examined the effects of cyclosporine on immune cells and mice lacking Ppia, the gene encoding the prototypical cyclophilin protein cyclophilin A. TCR-induced proliferation and signal transduction by Ppia−/− CD4+ T cells were resistant to cyclosporine, an effect that was attributable to diminished calcineurin inhibition. Immunosuppressive doses of cyclosporine failed to block the responses of Ppia−/− mice to allogeneic challenge. Rag2−/− mice reconstituted with Ppia−/− splenocytes were also cyclosporine resistant, indicating that this property is intrinsic to Ppia−/− immune cells. Thus, among multiple potential ligands, CypA is the primary mediator of immunosuppression by cyclosporine.
Journal of Virology | 2011
Yue Sun; Mohammed Asmal; Sophie Lane; Sallie R. Permar; Stephen D. Schmidt; John R. Mascola; Norman L. Letvin
ABSTRACT With the recent demonstration in the RV144 Thai trial that a vaccine regimen that does not elicit neutralizing antibodies or cytotoxic T lymphocytes may confer protection against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, attention has turned to nonneutralizing antibodies as a possible mechanism of vaccine protection. In the current study, we evaluated the kinetics of the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) response during acute and chronic SIVmac251 infection of rhesus monkeys. We first adapted a flow cytometry-based ADCC assay, evaluating the use of different target cells as well as different strategies for quantitation of activated natural killer (NK) cells. We found that the use of SIVmac251 Env gp130-coated target cells facilitates analyses of ADCC activity with a higher degree of sensitivity than the use of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected target cells; however, the kinetics of the measured responses were the same using these different target cells. By comparing NK cell expression of CD107a with NK cell expression of other cytokines or chemokine molecules, we found that measuring CD107a expression is sufficient for evaluating the anti-SIV function of NK cells. We also showed that ADCC responses can be detected as early as 3 weeks after SIVmac251 infection and that the magnitude of this antibody response is inversely associated with plasma viral RNA levels in animals with moderate to high levels of viral replication. However, we also demonstrated an association between NK cell-mediated ADCC responses and the amount of SIVmac251 gp140 binding antibody that developed after viral infection. This final observation raises the possibility that the antibodies that mediate ADCC are a subset of the antibodies detected in a binding assay and arise within weeks of infection.
Journal of Virology | 2011
Mohammed Asmal; Yue Sun; Sophie Lane; Wendy W. Yeh; Stephen D. Schmidt; John R. Mascola; Norman L. Letvin
ABSTRACT Antibody-dependent cell-mediated viral inhibition (ADCVI) is an attractive target for vaccination because it takes advantage of both the anamnestic properties of an adaptive immune response and the rapid early response characteristics of an innate immune response. Effective utilization of ADCVI in vaccine strategies will depend on an understanding of the natural history of ADCVI during acute and chronic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. We used the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected rhesus monkey as a model to study the kinetics of ADCVI in early infection, the durability of ADCVI through the course of infection, and the effectiveness of ADCVI against viruses with envelope mutations that are known to confer escape from antibody neutralization. We demonstrate the development of ADCVI, capable of inhibiting viral replication 100-fold, within 3 weeks of infection, preceding the development of a comparable-titer neutralizing antibody response by weeks to months. The emergence of ADCVI was temporally associated with the emergence of gp140-binding antibodies, and in most animals, ADCVI persisted through the course of infection. Highly evolved viral envelopes from viruses isolated at late time points following infection that were resistant to plasma neutralization remained susceptible to ADCVI, suggesting that the epitope determinants of neutralization escape are not shared by antibodies that mediate ADCVI. These findings suggest that despite the ability of SIV to mutate and adapt to multiple immunologic pressures during the course of infection, SIV envelope may not escape the binding of autologous antibodies that mediate ADCVI.
Journal of Virology | 2009
Wendy W. Yeh; Pimkwan Jaru-ampornpan; Daiva Nevidomskyte; Mohammed Asmal; Srinivas S. Rao; Adam P. Buzby; David C. Montefiori; Bette Korber; Norman L. Letvin
ABSTRACT Although there is increasing evidence that individuals already infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can be infected with a heterologous strain of the virus, the extent of protection against superinfection conferred by the first infection and the biologic consequences of superinfection are not well understood. We explored these questions in the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)/rhesus monkey model of HIV-1/AIDS. We infected cohorts of rhesus monkeys with either SIVmac251 or SIVsmE660 and then exposed animals to the reciprocal virus through intrarectal inoculations. Employing a quantitative real-time PCR assay, we determined the replication kinetics of the two strains of virus for 20 weeks. We found that primary infection with a replication-competent virus did not protect against acquisition of infection by a heterologous virus but did confer relative control of the superinfecting virus. In animals that became superinfected, there was a reduction in peak replication and rapid control of the second virus. The relative susceptibility to superinfection was not correlated with CD4+ T-cell count, CD4+ memory T-cell subsets, cytokine production by virus-specific CD8+ or CD4+ cells, or neutralizing antibodies at the time of exposure to the second virus. Although there were transient increases in viral loads of the primary virus and a modest decline in CD4+ T-cell counts after superinfection, there was no evidence of disease acceleration. These findings indicate that an immunodeficiency virus infection confers partial protection against a second immunodeficiency virus infection, but this protection may be mediated by mechanisms other than classical adaptive immune responses.
PLOS ONE | 2011
Mohammed Asmal; Ina Hellmann; Weimin Liu; Brandon F. Keele; Alan S. Perelson; Tanmoy Bhattacharya; S. Gnanakaran; Marcus Daniels; Barton F. Haynes; Bette T. Korber; Beatrice H. Hahn; George M. Shaw; Norman L. Letvin
Mucosal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) results in a bottleneck in viral genetic diversity. Gnanakaran and colleagues used a computational strategy to identify signature amino acids at particular positions in Envelope that were associated either with transmitted sequences sampled very early in infection, or sequences sampled during chronic infection. Among the strongest signatures observed was an enrichment for the stable presence of histidine at position 12 at transmission and in early infection, and a recurrent loss of histidine at position 12 in chronic infection. This amino acid lies within the leader peptide of Envelope, a region of the protein that has been shown to influence envelope glycoprotein expression and virion infectivity. We show a strong association between a positively charged amino acid like histidine at position 12 in transmitted/founder viruses with more efficient trafficking of the nascent envelope polypeptide to the endoplasmic reticulum and higher steady-state glycoprotein expression compared to viruses that have a non-basic position 12 residue, a substitution that was enriched among viruses sampled from chronically infected individuals. When expressed in the context of other viral proteins, transmitted envelopes with a basic amino acid position 12 were incorporated at higher density into the virus and exhibited higher infectious titers than did non-signature envelopes. These results support the potential utility of using a computational approach to examine large viral sequence data sets for functional signatures and indicate the importance of Envelope expression levels for efficient HIV transmission.
Journal of Virology | 2010
Wendy W. Yeh; Ishita Rahman; Peter Hraber; Rory T. Coffey; Daiva Nevidomskyte; Ayush Giri; Mohammed Asmal; Svetlana Miljkovic; Marcus Daniels; James B. Whitney; Brandon F. Keele; Beatrice H. Hahn; Bette Korber; George M. Shaw; Michael S. Seaman; Norman L. Letvin
ABSTRACT While the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected rhesus monkey is an important animal model for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection of humans, much remains to be learned about the evolution of the humoral immune response in this model. In HIV-1 infection, autologous neutralizing antibodies emerge 2 to 3 months after infection. However, the ontogeny of the SIV-specific neutralizing antibody response in mucosally infected animals has not been defined. We characterized the kinetics of the autologous neutralizing antibody response to the transmitted/founder SIVmac251 using a pseudovirion-based TZM-bl cell assay and monitored env sequence evolution using single-genome amplification in four rhesus animals that were infected via intrarectal inoculations. We show that the SIVmac251 founder viruses induced neutralizing antibodies at 5 to 8 months after infection. Despite their slow emergence and low titers, these neutralizing antibodies selected for escape mutants that harbored substitutions and deletions in variable region 1 (V1), V2, and V4 of Env. The neutralizing antibody response was initially focused on V4 at 5 to 8 months after infection and then targeted V1/V2 and V4 by 16 months. These findings reveal a striking delay in the development of neutralizing antibodies in SIVmac-infected animals, thus raising questions concerning the suitability of SIVmac251 as a challenge strain to screen AIDS vaccines that elicit neutralizing antibodies as a means to prevent virus acquisition. They also illustrate the capacity of the SIVmac quasispecies to modify antigenic determinants in response to very modest titers of neutralizing antibodies.
Journal of Virology | 2013
Dror Kolodkin-Gal; Sandrine L. Hulot; Birgit Korioth-Schmitz; Randi B. Gombos; Yi Zheng; Joshua Owuor; Michelle A. Lifton; Christian Ayeni; Wendy W. Yeh; Mohammed Asmal; Gideon Zamir; Norman L. Letvin
ABSTRACT Effective strategies are needed to block mucosal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Here, we address a crucial question in HIV-1 pathogenesis: whether infected donor mononuclear cells or cell-free virus plays the more important role in initiating mucosal infection by HIV-1. This distinction is critical, as effective strategies for blocking cell-free and cell-associated virus transmission may be different. We describe a novel ex vivo model system that utilizes sealed human colonic mucosa explants and demonstrate in both the ex vivo model and in vivo using the rectal challenge model in rhesus monkeys that HIV-1-infected lymphocytes can transmit infection across the mucosa more efficiently than cell-free virus. These findings may have significant implications for our understanding of the pathogenesis of mucosal transmission of HIV-1 and for the development of strategies to prevent HIV-1 transmission.
Journal of Virology | 2012
Lukas Flatz; Cheng Cheng; Lingshu Wang; Kathryn E. Foulds; Sung Youl Ko; Wing Pui Kong; Rahul Roychoudhuri; Wei Shi; Saran Bao; John Paul Todd; Mohammed Asmal; Ling Shen; Mitzi Donaldson; Stephen D. Schmidt; Jason G. D. Gall; Daniel D. Pinschewer; Norman L. Letvin; Srinivas S. Rao; John R. Mascola; Mario Roederer; Gary J. Nabel
ABSTRACT The RV144 trial demonstrated that an experimental AIDS vaccine can prevent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in humans. Because of its limited efficacy, further understanding of the mechanisms of preventive AIDS vaccines remains a priority, and nonhuman primate (NHP) models of lentiviral infection provide an opportunity to define immunogens, vectors, and correlates of immunity. In this study, we show that prime-boost vaccination with a mismatched SIV envelope (Env) gene, derived from simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac239, prevents infection by SIVsmE660 intrarectally. Analysis of different gene-based prime-boost immunization regimens revealed that recombinant adenovirus type 5 (rAd5) prime followed by replication-defective lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (rLCMV) boost elicited robust CD4 and CD8 T-cell and humoral immune responses. This vaccine protected against infection after repetitive mucosal challenge with efficacies of 82% per exposure and 62% cumulatively. No effect was seen on viremia in infected vaccinated monkeys compared to controls. Protection correlated with the presence of neutralizing antibodies to the challenge viruses tested in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. These data indicate that a vaccine expressing a mismatched Env gene alone can prevent SIV infection in NHPs and identifies an immune correlate that may guide immunogen selection and immune monitoring for clinical efficacy trials.