Monica Standoli

Low-volume plus ascorbic acid vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy

AIM To investigate the effectiveness of low-volume plus ascorbic acid [polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc)] and high-volume plus simethicone [polyethylene glycol plus simethicone (PEG + Sim)] bowel preparations. METHODS A total of one hundred and forty-four outpatients (76 males), aged from 20 to 84 years (median age 59.5 years), who attended our Department, were divided into two groups, age and sex matched, and underwent colonoscopy. Two questionnaires, one for patients reporting acceptability and the other for endoscopists evaluating bowel cleansing effectiveness according to validated scales, were completed. Indications, timing of examination and endoscopical findings were recorded. Biopsy forceps were used as a measuring tool in order to determine polyp endoscopic size estimation. Difficulty in completing the preparation was rated in a 5-point Likert scale (1 = easy to 5 = unable). Adverse experiences (fullness, cramps, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, headache and insomnia), number of evacuations and types of activities performed during preparation (walking or resting in bed) were also investigated. RESULTS Seventy-two patients were selected for each group. The two groups were age and sex matched as well as being comparable in terms of medical history and drug therapies taken. Fourteen patients dropped out from the trial because they did not complete the preparation procedure. Ratings of global bowel cleansing examinations were considered to be adequate in 91% of PEG + Asc and 88% of PEG + Sim patients. Residual Stool Score indicated similar levels of amount and consistency of residual stool; there was a significant difference in the percentage of bowel wall visualization in favour of PEG + Sim patients. In the PEG + Sim group, 12 adenomas ≤ 10 mm diameter (5/left colon + 7/right colon) vs 9 (8/left colon + 1/right colon) in the PEG + Asc group were diagnosed. Visualization of small lesions seems to be one of the primary advantages of the PEG + Sim preparation. CONCLUSION PEG + Asc is a good alternative solution as a bowel preparation but more improvements are necessary in order to achieve the target of a perfect preparation.

Efficacy of H. pylori eradication with a sequential regimen followed by rescue therapy in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND Current Italian guidelines suggest sequential therapy as first-line therapy and a levofloxacin-based rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. We evaluated the efficacy of these therapies in clinical practice. METHODS 84 consecutive patients with dyspeptic symptoms and proven H. pylori infection by either UBT or upper endoscopy with biopsies were enrolled. Patients received a 10-day sequential therapy with lansoprazole 30mg plus amoxycillin 1g (all twice daily) for the first 5 days, followed by lansoprazole 30mg, clarithromycin 500mg, and metronidazole 500mg (all twice daily) for the remaining 5 days. Eradication failure patients received triple therapy with lansoprazole 30mg, levofloxacin 250mg, and amoxycillin 1g (all twice daily) for 10 days. RESULTS Following the sequential therapy H. pylori eradication was achieved in 70/84 (83.3%; 95% CI=75.4-91.3) patients, and in 70/77 (90.9%; 95% CI=84.5-97.3) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. The infection was cured in all 7 eradication failure patients by using second-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS A sequential regimen as first-line therapy and a 10-day levofloxacin-based triple regimen in those patients who failed to clear the infection, appear to be a valid therapeutic strategy for management of H. pylori infection in clinical practice.

Duodenal bulb in celiac adults: The "whether biopsying" dilemma

Background: Celiac disease (CD)-related lesions were described in duodenal bulb of celiac patients. Goal: Our aim was to evaluate the morphology of bulb mucosa in adult celiac patients and in controls to evaluate its usefulness for CD diagnosis. Study: We studied 43 celiac patients (10 male, median age: 35.2 y) at diagnosis and 43 gastroenterological controls (10 male, median age: 37.8 y), submitted to upper endoscopy for gastroenterological complaints. Histologic lesions were assayed by an experienced pathologist according to the Marsh modified classification. Antiendomysium antibodies and antitransglutaminase antibodies-tTGAb (ELISA and/or RIA) have been tested. In selected patients, DNA was typed for DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 genes by sequence-specific primer polymerase chain reaction. Results: In all celiac patients lesions were present in the bulb mucosa. One female with thyroiditis, who had a CD daughter, showed lesions only in the duodenal bulb. Patchy villous atrophy was found in another patient. All celiacs were antiendomysium and/or tTGAb positive. DQ2 heterodimer was present in 5 CD patients. The gastroenterological controls showed normal mucosa in the duodenum. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CD-related histologic lesions are present in duodenal bulb of adult patients. Moreover, the normal aspect of this mucosa in gastroenterological controls implies the high negative predictive value of this finding. Therefore, we suggest taking at least 1 biopsy on the bulb area and 1 from the distal duodenum for CD diagnosis, in all the patients submitted to upper endoscopy, to avoid missed or delayed diagnosis.

Endoscopic findings and psychometric abnormalities: What is the relationship in upper endoscopic outpatients?

BACKGROUND Psychological disorders are often associated with diseases of the upper digestive tract. Although emotions can influence gastrointestinal function in healthy individuals, psychological setting in upper gastrointestinal patients are unclear. We evaluate the psychological alterations prevalence in outpatients submitted to upper endoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 130 patients (50 males and 80 females; mean age 54±17 years) submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, were enrolled over the period May 2009 - September 2010. Subjects were asked to complete questionnaires before endoscopic examination. Alexithymia, anxiety, depression and coping style were assessed using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory and Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, respectively. RESULTS Coping impairment, Alexithymia, Anxiety and Depression were found respectively in 80.3%, 25.4%, 24.6% and 17.2%, often in association. Task-oriented, emotion-oriented and avoidance-oriented alterations were found in 41.8%, 40% and 30.6%, respectively. No correlations were demonstrated between diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal disease and psychometric results. CONCLUSIONS In our study, a high prevalence of psychometric alterations in gastrointestinal outpatients was unconnected with endoscopic findings, especially considering coping style alterations. This aspect should be taken into account in patients management and a long-term follow-up should clarify a possible role of these factors in patients prognosis and compliance.