Rita Angelini

Low-volume plus ascorbic acid vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy

AIM To investigate the effectiveness of low-volume plus ascorbic acid [polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc)] and high-volume plus simethicone [polyethylene glycol plus simethicone (PEG + Sim)] bowel preparations. METHODS A total of one hundred and forty-four outpatients (76 males), aged from 20 to 84 years (median age 59.5 years), who attended our Department, were divided into two groups, age and sex matched, and underwent colonoscopy. Two questionnaires, one for patients reporting acceptability and the other for endoscopists evaluating bowel cleansing effectiveness according to validated scales, were completed. Indications, timing of examination and endoscopical findings were recorded. Biopsy forceps were used as a measuring tool in order to determine polyp endoscopic size estimation. Difficulty in completing the preparation was rated in a 5-point Likert scale (1 = easy to 5 = unable). Adverse experiences (fullness, cramps, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, headache and insomnia), number of evacuations and types of activities performed during preparation (walking or resting in bed) were also investigated. RESULTS Seventy-two patients were selected for each group. The two groups were age and sex matched as well as being comparable in terms of medical history and drug therapies taken. Fourteen patients dropped out from the trial because they did not complete the preparation procedure. Ratings of global bowel cleansing examinations were considered to be adequate in 91% of PEG + Asc and 88% of PEG + Sim patients. Residual Stool Score indicated similar levels of amount and consistency of residual stool; there was a significant difference in the percentage of bowel wall visualization in favour of PEG + Sim patients. In the PEG + Sim group, 12 adenomas ≤ 10 mm diameter (5/left colon + 7/right colon) vs 9 (8/left colon + 1/right colon) in the PEG + Asc group were diagnosed. Visualization of small lesions seems to be one of the primary advantages of the PEG + Sim preparation. CONCLUSION PEG + Asc is a good alternative solution as a bowel preparation but more improvements are necessary in order to achieve the target of a perfect preparation.

Efficacy of H. pylori eradication with a sequential regimen followed by rescue therapy in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND Current Italian guidelines suggest sequential therapy as first-line therapy and a levofloxacin-based rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. We evaluated the efficacy of these therapies in clinical practice. METHODS 84 consecutive patients with dyspeptic symptoms and proven H. pylori infection by either UBT or upper endoscopy with biopsies were enrolled. Patients received a 10-day sequential therapy with lansoprazole 30mg plus amoxycillin 1g (all twice daily) for the first 5 days, followed by lansoprazole 30mg, clarithromycin 500mg, and metronidazole 500mg (all twice daily) for the remaining 5 days. Eradication failure patients received triple therapy with lansoprazole 30mg, levofloxacin 250mg, and amoxycillin 1g (all twice daily) for 10 days. RESULTS Following the sequential therapy H. pylori eradication was achieved in 70/84 (83.3%; 95% CI=75.4-91.3) patients, and in 70/77 (90.9%; 95% CI=84.5-97.3) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. The infection was cured in all 7 eradication failure patients by using second-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS A sequential regimen as first-line therapy and a 10-day levofloxacin-based triple regimen in those patients who failed to clear the infection, appear to be a valid therapeutic strategy for management of H. pylori infection in clinical practice.

A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection

Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value = 0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value = ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring.

Multiple, zonal and multi-zone adenoma detection rates according to quality of cleansing during colonoscopy

Background The safety and diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy depend on the quality of colon cleansing. The adenoma detection rate is usually used as a quality measurement score. Objective We aimed to introduce and evaluate three new parameters to determine polyps and adenomas segmental localization and their distribution in association with different bowel preparation levels during colonoscopy. We introduce the multiple adenoma detection rate (the percentage of patients with >2 adenomas diagnosed during colonoscopy), the zonal adenoma detection rate (the percentage of patients with >2 adenomas diagnosed during colonoscopy in different colon areas (rectum, sigmoid, descending, transverse, ascending and cecum colon)), and multi-zone adenoma detection rate (the percentage of patients with >2 adenomas diagnosed during colonoscopy in different colon areas with at least a segment between them with or without lesions (i.e. rectum and descending colon with or without lesions in the sigmoid)). Methods We prospectively enrolled outpatients who underwent colonoscopy from January 2013 to October 2014. The bowel preparation quality, according to the Aronchick modified scale, number and location of lesions, Paris classification and histology, were recorded. The multiple adenoma/polyp detection rate, zonal adenoma/polyp detection rate, and multi-zone adenoma/polyp detection rate were determined. Results In total, 519 consecutive patients (266/253 M/F; mean age 55.3 ± 12.8 years) were enrolled. The adenoma and polyp detection rates were 21% and 35%, respectively. Multiple adenomas were detected in 28 patients. Adenoma and polyp detection rate and new parameters were statistically significantly higher in the optimal as compared with the adequate bowel preparation. Conclusions An optimal level of bowel preparation was strongly associated not only with a higher adenoma detection rate, but also with a higher chance of detecting multiple clinically relevant lesions in adjacent or discrete segments of the colon.

Endoscopic findings and psychometric abnormalities: What is the relationship in upper endoscopic outpatients?

BACKGROUND Psychological disorders are often associated with diseases of the upper digestive tract. Although emotions can influence gastrointestinal function in healthy individuals, psychological setting in upper gastrointestinal patients are unclear. We evaluate the psychological alterations prevalence in outpatients submitted to upper endoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 130 patients (50 males and 80 females; mean age 54±17 years) submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, were enrolled over the period May 2009 - September 2010. Subjects were asked to complete questionnaires before endoscopic examination. Alexithymia, anxiety, depression and coping style were assessed using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory and Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, respectively. RESULTS Coping impairment, Alexithymia, Anxiety and Depression were found respectively in 80.3%, 25.4%, 24.6% and 17.2%, often in association. Task-oriented, emotion-oriented and avoidance-oriented alterations were found in 41.8%, 40% and 30.6%, respectively. No correlations were demonstrated between diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal disease and psychometric results. CONCLUSIONS In our study, a high prevalence of psychometric alterations in gastrointestinal outpatients was unconnected with endoscopic findings, especially considering coping style alterations. This aspect should be taken into account in patients management and a long-term follow-up should clarify a possible role of these factors in patients prognosis and compliance.

Polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation before colonoscopy for selected inpatients: A pilot study: 1-L PEG bowel preparation in inpatients

To evaluate the impact of a new same‐day, low‐dose 1‐L polyethylene glycol‐based (1‐L PEG) bowel preparation on the diagnostic rating of selected hospitalized patients and its tolerability, with risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation.