Monika Banach

Melatonin in experimental seizures and epilepsy

Although melatonin is approved only for the treatment of jet-lag syndrome and some types of insomnia, clinical data suggest that it is effective in the adjunctive therapy of osteoporosis, cataract, sepsis, neurodegenerative diseases, hypertension, and even cancer. Melatonin also modulates the electrical activity of neurons by reducing glutamatergic and enhancing GABA-ergic neurotransmission. The indoleamine may also be metabolized to kynurenic acid, an endogenous anticonvulsant. Finally, the hormone and its metabolites act as free radical scavengers and antioxidants. The vast majority of experimental data indicates anticonvulsant properties of the hormone. Melatonin inhibited audiogenic and electrical seizures, as well as reduced convulsions induced by pentetrazole, pilocarpine, L-cysteine and kainate. Only a few studies have shown direct or indirect proconvulsant effects of melatonin. For instance, melatonin enhanced low Mg2+-induced epileptiform activity in the hippocampus, whereas melatonin antagonists delayed the onset of pilocarpine-induced seizures. However, the relatively high doses of melatonin required to inhibit experimental seizures can induce some undesired effects (e.g., cognitive and motor impairment and decreased body temperature). In humans, melatonin may attenuate seizures, and it is most effective in the treatment of juvenile intractable epilepsy. Its additional benefits include improved physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functions. On the other hand, melatonin has been shown to induce electroencephalographic abnormalities in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and increase seizure activity in neurologically disabled children. The hormone showed very low toxicity in clinical practice. The reported adverse effects (nightmares, hypotension, and sleep disorders) were rare and mild. However, more placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the usefulness of melatonin in the adjunctive treatment of epilepsy.

Nitric oxide, epileptic seizures, and action of antiepileptic drugs.

Nitric oxide (NO) plays a variety of physiological and pathological roles in mammalian cells. In the central nervous system NO may behave as a second messenger, neuromodulator, and neurotransmitter, which may suggest an essential role of this gaseous molecule in epilepsy and epileptogenesis. The aim of this review is to survey the current literature in terms of experimental and clinical evidence of anti- or proconvulsive properties of NO and its implications in the anticonvulsive action of antiepileptic drugs. Up-to-date multiple NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors and donors of NO were used in a plethora of seizure models (e.g. electrically and pharmacologically-evoked convulsions, amygdala-kindled seizures). Reported results vary depending on the seizure model, kind and doses of pharmacological tools used in experiments, and route of drug administration. The most thoroughly tested NOS inhibitor was 7- nitroindazole (7-NI), which presented anticonvulsive properties in most known models of seizures. The clear-cut proconvulsant action of 7-NI was observed only in kainate-, nicotine-, and soman-induced convulsions in rodents. This NOS inhibitor enhanced the anticonvulsant action of almost all available classic and second-generation antiepileptic drugs except tiagabine, felbamate, and topiramate. The effect of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester was not so unambiguous. In pentylenetetrazole, pictotoxin, and N-methyl-Daspartate seizure models the inhibitor exhibited dose-dependent bidirectional action. NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester potentiated the efficacy of diazepam and clonazepam, diminished that of valproate and phenobarbital, but did not affect the anticonvulsant action of phenytoin and ethosuximide. On the other hand, NG-nitro-L-arginine, was anticonvulsant in nicotine-, glutamate-, and hyperbaric O2- evoked seizures, and proconvulsant in pilocarpine-, kainate-, bicuculline-, aminophylline-, and 4-aminopyridine-induced convulsions. NG-nitro-L-arginine remained without effect on the anticonvulsant action of both classic (valproate, phenobarbital, diazepam) and new generation (oxcarbazepine, felbamate, and ethosuximide) antiepileptic drugs. The action of ethosuximide was even impaired. Summing up, in the present state of knowledge the only reasonable conclusion is that NO behaves as a neuromodulator with dual - proconvulsive or anticonvulsive - action.

Neuroprotective Actions of Neurosteroids

Neurosteroids were initially defined as steroid hormones locally synthesized within the nervous tissue. Subsequently, they were described as steroid hormone derivatives that devoid hormonal action but still affect neuronal excitability through modulation of ionotropic receptors. Neurosteroids are further subdivided into natural (produced in the brain) and synthetic. Some authors distinguish between hormonal and regular neurosteroids in the group of natural ones. The latter group, including hormone metabolites like allopregnanolone or tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone, is devoid of hormonal activity. Both hormones and their derivatives share, however, most of the physiological functions. It is usually very difficult to distinguish the effects of hormones and their metabolites. All these substances may influence seizure phenomena and exhibit neuroprotective effects. Neuroprotection offered by steroid hormones may be realized in both genomic and non-genomic mechanisms and involve regulation of the pro- and anti-apoptotic factors expression, intracellular signaling pathways, neurotransmission, oxidative, and inflammatory processes. Since regular neurosteroids show no affinity for steroid receptors, they may act only in a non-genomic mode. Multiple studies have been conducted so far to show efficacy of neurosteroids in the treatment of the central and peripheral nervous system injury, ischemia, neurodegenerative diseases, or seizures. In this review we focused primarily on neurosteroid mechanisms of action and their role in the process of neurodegeneration. Most of the data refers to results obtained in experimental studies. However, it should be realized that knowledge about neuroactive steroids remains still incomplete and requires confirmation in clinical conditions.

Antiarrhythmic drugs and epilepsy

For a long time it has been suspected that epilepsy and cardiac arrhythmia may have common molecular background. Furthermore, seizures can affect function of the central autonomic control centers leading to short- and long-term alterations of cardiac rhythm. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) has most likely a cardiac mechanism. Common elements of pathogenesis create a basis for the assumption that antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) may affect seizure phenomena and interact with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Numerous studies have demonstrated anticonvulsant effects of AADs. Among class I AADs (sodium channel blockers), phenytoin is an established antiepileptic drug. Propafenone exerted low anti-electroshock activity in rats. Lidocaine and mexiletine showed the anticonvulsant activity not only in animal models, but also in patients with partial seizures. Among beta-blockers (class II AADs), propranolol was anticonvulsant in models for generalized tonic-clonic and complex partial seizures, but not for myoclonic convulsions. Metoprolol and pindolol antagonized tonic-clonic seizures in DBA/2 mice. Timolol reversed the epileptiform activity of pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) in the brain. Furthermore, amiodarone, the representative of class III AADs, inhibited PTZ- and caffeine-induced convulsions in mice. In the group of class IV AADs, verapamil protected mice against PTZ-induced seizures and inhibited epileptogenesis in amygdala-kindled rats. Verapamil and diltiazem showed moderate anticonvulsant activity in genetically epilepsy prone rats. Additionally, numerous AADs potentiated the anticonvulsant action of AEDs in both experimental and clinical conditions. It should be mentioned, however, that many AADs showed proconvulsant effects in overdose. Moreover, intravenous esmolol and intra-arterial verapamil induced seizures even at therapeutic dose ranges.

Statins – Are they anticonvulsant?

Statins are the most popular and effective lipid-lowering medications beneficial in hypercholesterolemias and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Growing evidence supports theory that statins exhibit neuroprotective action in acute stroke, Alzheimers disease, Parkinsons disease, multiple sclerosis or epilepsy. Hereby, we present available experimental data regarding action of this group of drugs on seizure activity and neuronal cell death. The most commonly examined statins, such as atorvastatin and simvastatin, display anticonvulsant action with only inconsiderable exceptions. However, the mechanism of this effect remains unexplained. Simvastatin, as a lipophilic statin, which can pass blood-brain barrier easily, was recommended as the best candidate for an anticonvulsant agent. Nevertheless, it is still indistinct, whether the protective activity of statins depends on cholesterol lowering properties or its pleiotropic characteristics. One of the most interesting of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A inhibitors actions involves influence on nitric oxide metabolism.

Effect of acute and chronic tianeptine on the action of classical antiepileptics in the mouse maximal electroshock model.

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of acute and chronic treatment with tianeptine, an antidepressant selectively accelerating presynaptic serotonin reuptake, on the protective activity of classical antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test in mice. METHODS Electroconvulsions were produced by means of an alternating current (50 Hz, 25 mA, 0.2 s) delivered via ear-clip electrodes. Motor impairment and long-term memory deficits in animals were quantified in the chimney test and in the passive-avoidance task, respectively. Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. RESULTS Acute and chronic treatment with tianeptine (25-50 mg/kg) did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Furthermore, tianeptine applied in both acute and chronic protocols enhanced the anticonvulsant action of valproate and carbamazepine, but not that of phenytoin. Neither acute nor chronic tianeptine changed the brain concentrations of valproate, carbamazepine or phenytoin. On the other hand, both single and chronic administration of tianeptine diminished the brain concentration of phenobarbital. In spite of this pharmacokinetic interaction, the antidepressant enhanced the antielectroshock action of phenobarbital. In terms of adverse effects, acute/chronic tianeptine (50 mg/kg) and its combinations with classic antiepileptic drugs did not impair motor performance or long-term memory in mice. CONCLUSION The obtained results justify the conclusion that tianeptine may be beneficial in the treatment of depressive disorders in the course of epilepsy.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of eslicarbazepine for the treatment of epilepsy.

Introduction: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a novel antiepileptic drug registered as the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. As a third-generation medication, ESL is believed to have favorable efficacy/safety profile and pharmacokinetic properties in comparison with related drugs (carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine). Areas covered: The aim of the paper was to evaluate pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of ESL with aspect to epilepsy treatment. The review of the scientific literature was based on the PubMed database, Clinical Trials, FDA and European Medicines Agency websites to elicit current information on drug metabolism, mechanism of action and efficacy/safety profile. Expert opinion: Results of clinical trials indicate that ESL possessed a favorable profile of anticonvulsant efficacy and tolerability as an add-on therapy in adult patients at daily doses of 800 and 1200 mg. Pediatric trials are in progress and their results will allow to characterize a role of ESL in the treatment of epilepsy in children.

Propafenone enhances the anticonvulsant action of classical antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock model

BACKGROUND Antiarrhythmic and antiepileptic drugs share some mechanisms of actions. Therefore, possibility of interactions between these in epileptic patients with cardiac arrhythmias is quite considerable. Herein, we attempted to assess interactions between propafenone and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital. METHODS Effects of propafenone on seizures were determined in the electroconvulsive threshold test in mice. Interactions between propafenone and antiepileptic drugs were estimated in the model of maximal electroshock. Motor coordination was evaluated in the chimney test, while long-term memory in the passive-avoidance task. Brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. RESULTS Propafenone up to 50mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold, significantly enhancing this parameter at doses of 60-90mg/kg. Applied at its subthreshold doses, propafenone potentiated the antielectroshock action of all four tested classical antiepileptics: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Propafenone alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory in mice. Propafenone did not change brain concentration of phenytoin and phenobarbital; however, it significantly decreased brain levels of carbamazepine and increased those of valproate. CONCLUSIONS Propafenone exhibits its own anticonvulsant effect and enhances the action of classical antiepileptic drugs against electrically induced convulsions in mice. Further investigations are required to determine the effect of propafenone on antiepileptic therapy in humans.

Sotalol enhances the anticonvulsant action of valproate and diphenylhydantoin in the mouse maximal electroshock model

BACKGROUND Sotalol as a drug blocking β-receptors and potassium KCNH2 channels may interact with different substances that affect seizures. Herein, we present interactions between sotalol and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital. METHODS Effects of sotalol and antiepileptics alone on seizures were determined in the electroconvulsive threshold test, while interactions between sotalol and antiepileptic drugs were estimated in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Motor coordination and long-term memory were evaluated, respectively, in the chimney test and passive-avoidance task. Brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. RESULTS Sotalol at doses up to 100mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Applied at doses 60-100mg/kg, sotalol potentiated the antielectroshock action of valproate, while at doses 80-100mg/kg that of phenytoin. Sotalol (up to 100mg/kg) did not affect the action of carbamazepine or phenobarbital in the maximal electroshock. Sotalol alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory in mice. Finally, sotalol did not change brain concentration of valproate and phenytoin, so pharmacokinetic interactions between the drugs are not probable. CONCLUSIONS As far as obtained data may be extrapolated into clinical conditions, sotalol may be considered as an arrhythmic drug that does not reduce the action of classical antiepileptic drugs and thereby can be used in epileptic patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic considerations for epilepsy – depression comorbidities

ABSTRACT Introduction: Epilepsy may be frequently associated with psychiatric disorders and its co-existence with depression usually results in the reduced quality of life of patients with epilepsy. Also, the efficacy of antiepileptic treatment in depressed patients with epilepsy may be significantly reduced. Areas covered: Results of experimental studies indicate that antidepressants co-administered with antiepileptic drugs may either increase their anticonvulsant activity, remain neutral or decrease the protective action of antiepileptic drugs in models of seizures. Apart from purely pharmacodynamic interactions, pharmacokinetic mechanisms have been proven to contribute to the final outcome. We report on clinical data regarding the pharmacokinetic interactions of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs with various antidepressants, whose plasma concentration may be significantly reduced. On the other hand, antidepressants (especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) may influence the metabolism of antiepileptics, in many cases resulting in the elevation of plasma concentration of antiepileptic drugs. Expert opinion: The preclinical data may provide valuable clues on how to combine these two groups of drugs – antidepressant drugs neutral or potentiating the anticonvulsant action of antiepileptics are recommended in this regard. Avoidance of antidepressants clearly decreasing the convulsive threshold or decreasing the anticonvulsant efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (f.e. bupropion or mianserin) in patients with epilepsy is recommended.