Barbara Piskorska

Nitric oxide, epileptic seizures, and action of antiepileptic drugs.

Nitric oxide (NO) plays a variety of physiological and pathological roles in mammalian cells. In the central nervous system NO may behave as a second messenger, neuromodulator, and neurotransmitter, which may suggest an essential role of this gaseous molecule in epilepsy and epileptogenesis. The aim of this review is to survey the current literature in terms of experimental and clinical evidence of anti- or proconvulsive properties of NO and its implications in the anticonvulsive action of antiepileptic drugs. Up-to-date multiple NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors and donors of NO were used in a plethora of seizure models (e.g. electrically and pharmacologically-evoked convulsions, amygdala-kindled seizures). Reported results vary depending on the seizure model, kind and doses of pharmacological tools used in experiments, and route of drug administration. The most thoroughly tested NOS inhibitor was 7- nitroindazole (7-NI), which presented anticonvulsive properties in most known models of seizures. The clear-cut proconvulsant action of 7-NI was observed only in kainate-, nicotine-, and soman-induced convulsions in rodents. This NOS inhibitor enhanced the anticonvulsant action of almost all available classic and second-generation antiepileptic drugs except tiagabine, felbamate, and topiramate. The effect of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester was not so unambiguous. In pentylenetetrazole, pictotoxin, and N-methyl-Daspartate seizure models the inhibitor exhibited dose-dependent bidirectional action. NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester potentiated the efficacy of diazepam and clonazepam, diminished that of valproate and phenobarbital, but did not affect the anticonvulsant action of phenytoin and ethosuximide. On the other hand, NG-nitro-L-arginine, was anticonvulsant in nicotine-, glutamate-, and hyperbaric O2- evoked seizures, and proconvulsant in pilocarpine-, kainate-, bicuculline-, aminophylline-, and 4-aminopyridine-induced convulsions. NG-nitro-L-arginine remained without effect on the anticonvulsant action of both classic (valproate, phenobarbital, diazepam) and new generation (oxcarbazepine, felbamate, and ethosuximide) antiepileptic drugs. The action of ethosuximide was even impaired. Summing up, in the present state of knowledge the only reasonable conclusion is that NO behaves as a neuromodulator with dual - proconvulsive or anticonvulsive - action.

Neuroprotective Actions of Neurosteroids

Neurosteroids were initially defined as steroid hormones locally synthesized within the nervous tissue. Subsequently, they were described as steroid hormone derivatives that devoid hormonal action but still affect neuronal excitability through modulation of ionotropic receptors. Neurosteroids are further subdivided into natural (produced in the brain) and synthetic. Some authors distinguish between hormonal and regular neurosteroids in the group of natural ones. The latter group, including hormone metabolites like allopregnanolone or tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone, is devoid of hormonal activity. Both hormones and their derivatives share, however, most of the physiological functions. It is usually very difficult to distinguish the effects of hormones and their metabolites. All these substances may influence seizure phenomena and exhibit neuroprotective effects. Neuroprotection offered by steroid hormones may be realized in both genomic and non-genomic mechanisms and involve regulation of the pro- and anti-apoptotic factors expression, intracellular signaling pathways, neurotransmission, oxidative, and inflammatory processes. Since regular neurosteroids show no affinity for steroid receptors, they may act only in a non-genomic mode. Multiple studies have been conducted so far to show efficacy of neurosteroids in the treatment of the central and peripheral nervous system injury, ischemia, neurodegenerative diseases, or seizures. In this review we focused primarily on neurosteroid mechanisms of action and their role in the process of neurodegeneration. Most of the data refers to results obtained in experimental studies. However, it should be realized that knowledge about neuroactive steroids remains still incomplete and requires confirmation in clinical conditions.

Effect of acute and chronic tianeptine on the action of classical antiepileptics in the mouse maximal electroshock model.

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to analyze the influence of acute and chronic treatment with tianeptine, an antidepressant selectively accelerating presynaptic serotonin reuptake, on the protective activity of classical antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test in mice. METHODS Electroconvulsions were produced by means of an alternating current (50 Hz, 25 mA, 0.2 s) delivered via ear-clip electrodes. Motor impairment and long-term memory deficits in animals were quantified in the chimney test and in the passive-avoidance task, respectively. Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. RESULTS Acute and chronic treatment with tianeptine (25-50 mg/kg) did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Furthermore, tianeptine applied in both acute and chronic protocols enhanced the anticonvulsant action of valproate and carbamazepine, but not that of phenytoin. Neither acute nor chronic tianeptine changed the brain concentrations of valproate, carbamazepine or phenytoin. On the other hand, both single and chronic administration of tianeptine diminished the brain concentration of phenobarbital. In spite of this pharmacokinetic interaction, the antidepressant enhanced the antielectroshock action of phenobarbital. In terms of adverse effects, acute/chronic tianeptine (50 mg/kg) and its combinations with classic antiepileptic drugs did not impair motor performance or long-term memory in mice. CONCLUSION The obtained results justify the conclusion that tianeptine may be beneficial in the treatment of depressive disorders in the course of epilepsy.

Safety issues around misuse of antiepileptics

Introduction: Drug misuse is a deliberate or accidental (by omission) nonadherence to medical recommendations, which may range from inappropriate use (missed, increased, or lowered doses or even complete discontinuation of therapy) to compulsive overdosing. Currently, this phenomenon affects as many as 20 – 80% of epileptic patients. Areas covered: Long-standing research has enabled the identification and understanding of factors behind the phenomenon of nonadherence to medical recommendations. An inappropriate use of antiepileptic drugs usually has serious health implications for both children and adults. These involve increased frequency of seizures in patients who lower their doses or discontinue therapy, which may often lead to pathologies. On the other hand, patients who increase or take extra doses expose themselves to toxic effects of antiepileptic drugs. In both cases, there is an increased need for hospitalization, which further implies extra healthcare costs. The most misused antiepileptic drug is gabapentin (53%), whereas the least misused are lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and phenytoin (all drugs at 32%). Expert opinion: The prevalence of misuse of antiepileptic drugs among epileptic patients is comparable to that observed in other chronically ill individuals. Preventive strategies have to be based on the reasons leading to nonadherence.

Propafenone enhances the anticonvulsant action of classical antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock model

BACKGROUND Antiarrhythmic and antiepileptic drugs share some mechanisms of actions. Therefore, possibility of interactions between these in epileptic patients with cardiac arrhythmias is quite considerable. Herein, we attempted to assess interactions between propafenone and four conventional antiepileptic drugs: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin and phenobarbital. METHODS Effects of propafenone on seizures were determined in the electroconvulsive threshold test in mice. Interactions between propafenone and antiepileptic drugs were estimated in the model of maximal electroshock. Motor coordination was evaluated in the chimney test, while long-term memory in the passive-avoidance task. Brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. RESULTS Propafenone up to 50mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold, significantly enhancing this parameter at doses of 60-90mg/kg. Applied at its subthreshold doses, propafenone potentiated the antielectroshock action of all four tested classical antiepileptics: carbamazepine, valproate, phenytoin, and phenobarbital. Propafenone alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory in mice. Propafenone did not change brain concentration of phenytoin and phenobarbital; however, it significantly decreased brain levels of carbamazepine and increased those of valproate. CONCLUSIONS Propafenone exhibits its own anticonvulsant effect and enhances the action of classical antiepileptic drugs against electrically induced convulsions in mice. Further investigations are required to determine the effect of propafenone on antiepileptic therapy in humans.