Morena Fasano

Sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or with gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND Sorafenib is a small-molecule multitargeted kinase inhibitor that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), VEGFR-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor β. The aim of this multicenter, randomized phase II study was to evaluate clinical activity and safety of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or gemcitabine in unselected untreated elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS The trial was designed to select the most promising sorafenib-containing combination in previously untreated elderly (≥70 years) stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients, with performance status of zero to two. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following combinations: gemcitabine, 1200 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8, every 21 days, for a maximum of six cycles, plus sorafenib, 800 mg/day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm 1); or erlotinib, 150 mg/day, plus sorafenib, 800 mg/day, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm 2). A selection design was applied with 1-year survival rate as the primary end point of the study, requiring 58 patients. RESULTS Sixty patients were randomly allocated to the study (31 patients in arm 1 and 29 patients in arm 2). After a median follow-up of 15 months, 10 patients [32%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 49%] in arm 1 and 13 patients (45%, 95% CI 27% to 63%) in arm 2 were alive at 1 year. Median overall survival was 6.6 and 12.6 months in arm 1 and arm 2, respectively. Observed toxic effects were consistent with the expected drug profiles. CONCLUSIONS The combination of erlotinib and sorafenib was feasible in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and was associated with a higher 1-year survival rate than the other arm. According to the selection design, this combination warrants further investigation in phase III trials.

Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-targeted drugs: lung cancer

Despite the improvement in clinical outcomes derived by the introduction of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumours harbour EGFR-activating mutations, prognosis remains unfavourable because of the occurrence of either intrinsic or acquired resistance. We reviewed the published literature and abstracts of oral and poster presentations from international conferences addressing EGFR-TKIs resistance mechanisms discovered in preclinical models and in patients with NSCLC. The molecular heterogeneity of lung cancer has several implications in terms of possible mechanisms of either intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGFR-targeted inhibitors. Several mechanisms of resistance have been described to EGFR-TKIs, such as the occurrence of secondary mutation (T790M, C797S), the activation of alternative signalling (Met, HGF, AXL, Hh, IGF-1R), the aberrance of the downstream pathways (AKT mutations, loss of PTEN), the impairment of the EGFR-TKIs-mediated apoptosis pathway (BCL2-like 11/BIM deletion polymorphism) and histological transformation. Although some of the mechanisms of resistance have been identified, much additional information is needed to understand and overcome resistance to EGFR-TKI agents. The majority of resistance mechanisms described are the result of a selection of pre-existing clones; thus, studies on the mechanisms by which subclonal alterations have an impact on tumour biology and influence cancer progression are extremely important in order to define the best treatment strategy.

SMO Gene Amplification and Activation of the Hedgehog Pathway as Novel Mechanisms of Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Drugs in Human Lung Cancer

Purpose: Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) of EGF receptor (EGFR) is often related to activation of other signaling pathways and evolution through a mesenchymal phenotype. Experimental Design: Because the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway has emerged as an important mediator of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), we studied the activation of Hh signaling in models of EGFR-TKIs intrinsic or acquired resistance from both EGFR-mutated and wild-type (WT) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. Results: Activation of the Hh pathway was found in both models of EGFR-mutated and EGFR-WT NSCLC cell line resistant to EGFR-TKIs. In EGFR-mutated HCC827-GR cells, we found SMO (the Hh receptor) gene amplification, MET activation, and the functional interaction of these two signaling pathways. In HCC827-GR cells, inhibition of SMO or downregulation of GLI1 (the most important Hh-induced transcription factor) expression in combination with MET inhibition exerted significant antitumor activity. In EGFR-WT NSCLC cell lines resistant to EGFR inhibitors, the combined inhibition of SMO and EGFR exerted a strong antiproliferative activity with a complete inhibition of PI3K/Akt and MAPK phosphorylation. In addition, the inhibition of SMO by the use of LDE225 sensitizes EGFR-WT NSCLC cells to standard chemotherapy. Conclusions:This result supports the role of the Hh pathway in mediating resistance to anti-EGFR-TKIs through the induction of EMT and suggests new opportunities to design new treatment strategies in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 21(20); 4686–97. ©2015 AACR.

Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: From Epidemiology to Therapy

Lung neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous subtype of pulmonary cancers representing approximately 20% of all lung cancers, including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). The frequency appears to be approximately 3% for LCNEC. Diagnosis of LCNEC requires attention to neuroendocrine features by light microscopy and confirmation by immunohistochemical staining for neuroendocrine markers. Both SCLC and pulmonary LCNEC are high-grade and poor-prognosis tumors, with higher incidence in males and smokers and peripheral localization. LCNEC is very rare, and the precise diagnosis on small specimens is very difficult, so we have still too few data to define a standard of treatment for pulmonary LCNECs. Data of literature, most based on retrospective analysis, indicated a poor 5-year overall survival, with a high incidence of recurrence after surgery, even in stage I disease. Primary surgery should be the first option in all operable patients because there is no validate therapeutic approach for LCNEC due to lack of clinical trials in this setting. Neoadjuvant platinum-based regimens remain only an option for potentially resectable tumors. In advanced stages, SCLC-like chemotherapy seems the best option of treatment, with a good response rate but a poor overall survival (from 8 to 16 months in different case series). New agents are under clinical investigation to improve LCNEC patients’ outcome. We reviewed all data on treatment options feasible for pulmonary LCNEC, both for localized and extensive disease.

Metformin increases antitumor activity of MEK inhibitors through GLI1 downregulation in LKB1 positive human NSCLC cancer cells

Purpose Metformin, widely used as antidiabetic drug, showed antitumoral effects expecially in combination with chemotherapy. Our group recently has demonstrated that metformin and gefitinib are synergistic in LKB1-wild-type NSCLC cells. In these models, metformin as single agent induced an activation and phosphorylation of mitogen-activated-protein-kinase (MAPK) through an increased C-RAF/B-RAF heterodimerization. Experimental design Since single agent metformin enhances proliferating signals through the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway, and several MEK inhibitors (MEK-I) demonstrated clinical efficacy in combination with other agents in NSCLC, we tested the effects of metformin plus MEK-I (selumetinib or pimasertib) on proliferation, invasiveness, migration abilities in vitro and in vivo in LKB1 positive NSCLC models harboring KRAS wild type and mutated gene. Results The combination of metformin with MEK-I showed a strong anti-proliferative and proapoptotic effect in Calu-3, H1299, H358 and H1975 human NSCLC cell lines, independently from the KRAS mutational status. The combination reduced the metastatic behaviour of NSCLC cells, via a downregulation of GLI1 trascritional activity, thus affecting the transition from an epithelial to a mesenchymal phenotype. Metformin and MEK-Is combinations also decreased the production and activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 by reducing the NF-jB (p65) binding to MMP-2 and MMP-9 promoters. Conclusions Metformin potentiates the antitumor activity of MEK-Is in human LKB1-wild-type NSCLC cell lines, independently from the KRAS mutational status, through GLI1 downregulation and by reducing the NF-jB (p65)-mediated transcription of MMP-2 and MMP-9.

Quality of Life Analysis of TORCH, a Randomized Trial Testing First-Line Erlotinib Followed by Second-Line Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: The TORCH (Tarceva or Chemotherapy) trial randomized patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer to first-line erlotinib followed by second-line cisplatin/gemcitabine versus. standard inverse sequence. The trial, designed to test noninferiority in overall survival, was stopped at interim analysis because of inferior survival in the experimental arm. Quality of life (QoL), a secondary outcome, is reported here. Methods: QoL was assessed at baseline and every 3 weeks during first-line, using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 and QLQ–lung cancer specific module (LC13). Mean changes from baseline within arms were reported. QoL response and time-to-deterioration of QoL using a competing-risk approach were compared between treatment arms. Results: Six hundred and thirty patients (83%) completed baseline questionnaires. Compliance was affected by differential treatment efficacy, but was similar between arms for patients without progression or death. Significant differences in QoL responses were observed favoring chemotherapy for pain, sleeping, dyspnea, diarrhea, and favoring erlotinib for vomiting, constipation, sore mouth, and alopecia. In the small subset of patients with EGFR-mutated tumors, all selected items (global QoL, physical functioning, cough, dyspnea and pain) improved, whereas worsening or no change was observed in wild-type patients. Improvement was particularly evident in the first-line erlotinib arm as for global QoL and physical functioning. Conclusions: QoL was impacted by differential toxicity and efficacy between arms. Functional domains and global QoL did not differ, although some symptoms were better controlled with chemotherapy in unselected non–small-cell lung cancer patients.

Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Levels Correlate with Tumor VEGF and p53 Overexpression in Endocrine Positive Primary Breast Cancer

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent stimulator of angiogenesis, associated with unfavorable clinical characteristics in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate different angiogenic markers in endocrine-positive breast cancer patients. The authors analyzed serum and tumor samples from 71 patients with endocrine-positive operable primary breast cancer to determine the expression and the possible relationship between circulating serum VEGF levels, tumor VEGF expression, microvessel density (MVD), and other immunohistochemical parameters. Basal VEGF serum levels were significantly higher in breast cancer patients than in healthy controls. A significant correlation was observed between basal VEGF serum concentrations, microvessel density (p = 0.01) and p53 status (p = 0.004). Intratumoral VEGF expression was significantly associated with neoplastic embolization (p = 0.041) and circulating VEGF levels (p = 0.047). The results confirm that in primary endocrine-positive breast cancer serum VEGF levels are elevated and show a positive relationship with tumor VEGF and p53 overexpression.

The value of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 pathway in diagnosing indeterminate pleural effusion.

OBJECTIVES Our aim was to determine the diagnostic value of the matrix metalloproteinase-9/vascular endothelial grow factor receptor-1 pathway in differentiating pleural effusions (PE) of varying origin. METHODS In the last two years, 55 consecutive patients with exudative PE have been enrolled. In all patients, we measured PE levels of vascular endothelial grow factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1) in soluble form, through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (results expressed in pg/ml) and western blot, and of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), through ELISA (results expressed in ng/ml). The values recorded were then statistically compared with the etiologic diagnosis of the PEs. RESULTS Between the PEs analysed, 40 were found to be malignant and 15 to be benign. VEGFR-1 in soluble form (sVEGFR-1) was significantly higher in malignant than in benign effusions (P < 0.0001), using ELISA; the same was shown by the western blot analysis method. MMP-9 levels results also indicated significantly more malignant than benign effusions (P < 0.0001). VEGFR-1 in soluble form showed a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 93%, respectively, (cut-off value >852; AUC: 0.9) in predicting the malignant nature of a PE. Sensitivity and specificity of MMP-9 in predicting the malignant nature of a PE were, respectively, 95% and 73% (cut-off value >639; AUC: 0.8). In the pleural fluids, the values of the two markers were significantly related to each other (r = 0.5; P < 0.0001). Eighteen patients with malignancies, diagnosed by pleural biopsy, had negative cytological findings. Of these patients, sixteen (89%) presented elevated levels of both markers. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the VEGFR-1/MMP-9 pathway is significantly increased in malignant-rather than in benign-pleural effusions; thus, the measurement of their levels in the pleural effusion could be useful, throughout the diagnostic work-up, to select which cases would warrant a pleural biopsy.

Type III or allosteric kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: In recent times, there has been much interest in the development of pharmacological kinase inhibitors that treat NSCLC. Furthermore, treatment options have been guided by the development of a wide panel of synthetic small molecule kinase inhibitors. Most of the molecules developed belong to the type I class of inhibitors that target the ATP-binding site in its active conformation. The high sequence similarity in the ATP-binding site among members of the kinase families often results in low selectivity and additional toxicities. Also, second mutations in the ATP-binding site, such as threonine to methionine at position 790, have been described as a mechanism of resistance to ATP-competitive kinase inhibitors. For these reasons, alternative drug development approaches targeting sites other than the ATP cleft are being pursued. The class III or allosteric inhibitors, which bind outside the ATP-binding site, have been shown to negatively modulate kinase activity. Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the most well-characterised allosteric inhibitors that have reached clinical development in NSCLC. Expert opinion: Great progress has made in developing inhibitors with entirely new modes of action. That being said, it is important to highlight that despite their apparent simplicity, biochemical assays will remain at the core of drug discovery activities to better explore these new opportunities.

A Multicenter, Open-Label Phase II Study of Metformin With Erlotinib in Second-Line Therapy of Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Treatment Rationale and Protocol Dynamics of the METAL Trial

We present the rationale and study design of the METAL (METformin in Advanced Lung cancer) trial (EudraCT number: 2014-000349-59), a multicenter, open label phase II study, designed to evaluate the safety and activity of metformin combined with erlotinib as second-line therapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. This is a 2-part trial, consisting of a safety run-in part followed by a phase II part. The primary end point for the first part is the maximum tolerated dose and the identification of the recommended phase II dose of metformin in combination with erlotinib. Secondary end points are the study of pharmacokinetics and the antitumor activity evaluation of the experimental combination. The primary end point of part II is the time to disease progression with the combination, and antitumor activity as a secondary end point. Based on the statistical design, we plan to enroll approximately 60 patients.