Muhammad Ghias

The Role of Ganglionated Plexi in Apnea-Related Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to simulate sleep apnea-induced atrial fibrillation (AF) in an experimental model and to determine whether neural ablation will prevent AF. BACKGROUND An increasing number of clinical reports have associated sleep apnea and AF, and many possible mechanisms responsible for this relationship have been proposed. METHODS Thirty dogs anesthetized with Na-pentobarbital were ventilated by a positive pressure respirator. Protocol 1 (n = 14): After a right thoracotomy, atrial and pulmonary vein programmed pacing at 2x and 4x threshold determined the shortest atrial refractory period. Obstructive apnea was induced by turning off the respirator during end expiration for 2 min. During apnea, programmed pacing was performed with S1-S2 = 5 to 10 ms earlier than the atrial refractory period. Neural activity was monitored from the ganglionated plexi (GP) adjacent to the right pulmonary veins. Protocol 2 (n = 16): Electrical stimulation identified the GP at the right pulmonary artery (RPA). Programmed pacing was again instituted, below atrial refractory period, during 2 min of apnea. After radiofrequency ablation of the RPA GP, continuous programmed pacing was again repeated during 2 min of apnea. In 5 dogs, blood gases were determined at baseline and at 2 min of apnea. RESULTS Protocol 1: During apnea, S1-S2 induced AF within 85 +/- 38 s (9 of 10). In 1 case, AF occurred spontaneously at 1 min 36 s of apnea. Recorded GP neural activity progressively increased before AF onset. Systolic but not diastolic blood pressure rose significantly before AF (149 +/- 26 mm Hg to 193 +/- 38 mm Hg, p < 0.05). In 4 dogs, autonomic blockade prevented apnea-induced AF. Protocol 2: AF induced by pacing occurred in 8 of 11 dogs within the 2-min period of apnea, before neural ablation. After ablation, 0 of 6 showed AF during 2 min of apnea (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS This experimental model of apnea shows a reproducible incidence of AF. After neural ablation of the RPA GP or autonomic blockade, AF inducibility was significantly inhibited.

Low Level Vagosympathetic Stimulation: A Paradox and Potential New Modality for the Treatment of Focal Atrial Fibrillation

Background—We used high-frequency stimulation delivered during the refractory period of the atrium and pulmonary veins (PVs) to induce focal firing and atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to demonstrate that bilateral low-level vagosympathetic nerve stimulation (LL-VNS) could suppress high-frequency stimulation–induced focal AF at atrial and PV sites. Methods and Results—In 23 dogs anesthetized with Na-pentobarbital, electrodes in the vagosympathetic trunks allowed LL-VNS at 1 V below that which slowed the sinus rate or atrioventricular conduction. Multielectrode catheters were fixed at the right and left superior and inferior PVs and both atrial appendages. LL-VNS continued for 3 hours. At the end of each hour, the high-frequency stimulation algorithm consisting of a 40-ms train of stimuli (200 Hz; stimulus duration, 0.1 to 1.0 ms) was delivered 2 ms after the atrial pacing stimulus during the refractory period at each PV and atrial appendages site. The lowest voltage of high-frequency stimulation that induced AF was defined as the AF threshold. Five dogs without LL-VNS served as sham controls. Six dogs underwent LL-VNS after transection of bilateral vagosympathetic trunks. LL-VNS induced a progressive increase in AF threshold at all PV and atrial appendages sites, particularly significant (P<0.05) at the right superior PV, right inferior PV, left superior PV, and right atrial appendage. Bilateral vagosympathetic transection did not significantly alter the previous findings, and the 5 sham control dogs did not show changes in AF threshold at any site over a period of 3 hours. Conclusions—LL-VNS may prevent episodic AF caused by rapid PV and non-PV firing.Background— We used high-frequency stimulation delivered during the refractory period of the atrium and pulmonary veins (PVs) to induce focal firing and atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to demonstrate that bilateral low-level vagosympathetic nerve stimulation (LL-VNS) could suppress high-frequency stimulation-induced focal AF at atrial and PV sites. Methods and Results— In 23 dogs anesthetized with Na-pentobarbital, electrodes in the vagosympathetic trunks allowed LL-VNS at 1 V below that which slowed the sinus rate or atrioventricular conduction. Multielectrode catheters were fixed at the right and left superior and inferior PVs and both atrial appendages. LL-VNS continued for 3 hours. At the end of each hour, the high-frequency stimulation algorithm consisting of a 40-ms train of stimuli (200 Hz; stimulus duration, 0.1 to 1.0 ms) was delivered 2 ms after the atrial pacing stimulus during the refractory period at each PV and atrial appendages site. The lowest voltage of high-frequency stimulation that induced AF was defined as the AF threshold. Five dogs without LL-VNS served as sham controls. Six dogs underwent LL-VNS after transection of bilateral vagosympathetic trunks. LL-VNS induced a progressive increase in AF threshold at all PV and atrial appendages sites, particularly significant ( P <0.05) at the right superior PV, right inferior PV, left superior PV, and right atrial appendage. Bilateral vagosympathetic transection did not significantly alter the previous findings, and the 5 sham control dogs did not show changes in AF threshold at any site over a period of 3 hours. Conclusions— LL-VNS may prevent episodic AF caused by rapid PV and non-PV firing. Received April 7, 2009; accepted September 21, 2009.

Autonomic Mechanism for Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms: Evidence by Fast Fourier Transform Analysis

Introduction: The mechanism(s) underlying complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) is not well understood. We hypothesized that CFAE may be caused by enhanced activity of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system.

An Acute Model for Atrial Fibrillation Arising from a Peripheral Atrial Site: Evidence for Primary and Secondary Triggers

Background: We previously demonstrated that acetylcholine (Ach) injected into cardiac ganglionated plexi (GP) causes pulmonary vein (PV) ectopy initiating atrial fibrillation (AF).

Pharmacological prevention and termination of focal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS Patients undergo ablation for focal atrial fibrillation (AF) as a result of failure of anti-arrhythmic drugs. Our basic studies have implicated cholinergic and adrenergic neurotransmitter release as the underlying mechanism for focal AF. Therefore, we tested the efficacy of a combination of sodium channel-blocking agents with additional vagolytic properties and a β-blocker to terminate and prevent focal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS In 18 Na-pentobarbital-anaesthetized dogs, after a right or left thoracotomy, acetylcholine (Ach, 0.5 cc, 100 mM) was injected into a fat pad containing ganglionated plexi (GP) or applied on an atrial appendage (AA) to induce focal firing at the pulmonary veins (PVs) or AA, respectively. Disopyramide (2-4 mg/kg, n= 6) or quinidine (3-6 mg/kg, n= 12) combined with esmolol or propranolol (1 mg/kg, n= 13 and 5, respectively) were slowly injected to terminate (Group I, n= 12) or prevent (Group II, n= 6) Ach-induced sustained focal AF. In another four dogs, only the sodium channel-blocking agents with additional vagolytic properties or only the β-blocker was injected prior to or after the initiation of focal AF. At baseline, the mean duration of AF induced by Ach was 26 ± 4 min. Group I: After drugs, Ach-induced AF duration was 3 ± 1 min (P< 0.001). Group II: Prior to drugs, Ach-induced AF lasted for 19 ± 3 min. With the drug combination the duration of Ach-induced AF, decreased to 6 ± 1/min, P< 0.001. Either quinidine or propranolol alone did not change the duration of Ach-induced AF, mean 25 ± 10 min compared with Ach alone, 28 ± 16 min, P= 0.2. CONCLUSIONS Type IA (cholinergic antagonist) plus Type II (β-adrenergic antagonist) provides significant prevention and suppression of focal AF arising at PV and non-PV sites.

Low-Level Vagosympathetic StimulationCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE: A Paradox and Potential New Modality for the Treatment of Focal Atrial Fibrillation

Background—We used high-frequency stimulation delivered during the refractory period of the atrium and pulmonary veins (PVs) to induce focal firing and atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to demonstrate that bilateral low-level vagosympathetic nerve stimulation (LL-VNS) could suppress high-frequency stimulation–induced focal AF at atrial and PV sites. Methods and Results—In 23 dogs anesthetized with Na-pentobarbital, electrodes in the vagosympathetic trunks allowed LL-VNS at 1 V below that which slowed the sinus rate or atrioventricular conduction. Multielectrode catheters were fixed at the right and left superior and inferior PVs and both atrial appendages. LL-VNS continued for 3 hours. At the end of each hour, the high-frequency stimulation algorithm consisting of a 40-ms train of stimuli (200 Hz; stimulus duration, 0.1 to 1.0 ms) was delivered 2 ms after the atrial pacing stimulus during the refractory period at each PV and atrial appendages site. The lowest voltage of high-frequency stimulation that induced AF was defined as the AF threshold. Five dogs without LL-VNS served as sham controls. Six dogs underwent LL-VNS after transection of bilateral vagosympathetic trunks. LL-VNS induced a progressive increase in AF threshold at all PV and atrial appendages sites, particularly significant (P<0.05) at the right superior PV, right inferior PV, left superior PV, and right atrial appendage. Bilateral vagosympathetic transection did not significantly alter the previous findings, and the 5 sham control dogs did not show changes in AF threshold at any site over a period of 3 hours. Conclusions—LL-VNS may prevent episodic AF caused by rapid PV and non-PV firing.Background— We used high-frequency stimulation delivered during the refractory period of the atrium and pulmonary veins (PVs) to induce focal firing and atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to demonstrate that bilateral low-level vagosympathetic nerve stimulation (LL-VNS) could suppress high-frequency stimulation-induced focal AF at atrial and PV sites. Methods and Results— In 23 dogs anesthetized with Na-pentobarbital, electrodes in the vagosympathetic trunks allowed LL-VNS at 1 V below that which slowed the sinus rate or atrioventricular conduction. Multielectrode catheters were fixed at the right and left superior and inferior PVs and both atrial appendages. LL-VNS continued for 3 hours. At the end of each hour, the high-frequency stimulation algorithm consisting of a 40-ms train of stimuli (200 Hz; stimulus duration, 0.1 to 1.0 ms) was delivered 2 ms after the atrial pacing stimulus during the refractory period at each PV and atrial appendages site. The lowest voltage of high-frequency stimulation that induced AF was defined as the AF threshold. Five dogs without LL-VNS served as sham controls. Six dogs underwent LL-VNS after transection of bilateral vagosympathetic trunks. LL-VNS induced a progressive increase in AF threshold at all PV and atrial appendages sites, particularly significant ( P <0.05) at the right superior PV, right inferior PV, left superior PV, and right atrial appendage. Bilateral vagosympathetic transection did not significantly alter the previous findings, and the 5 sham control dogs did not show changes in AF threshold at any site over a period of 3 hours. Conclusions— LL-VNS may prevent episodic AF caused by rapid PV and non-PV firing. Received April 7, 2009; accepted September 21, 2009.

Low-Level Vagosympathetic StimulationCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Background—We used high-frequency stimulation delivered during the refractory period of the atrium and pulmonary veins (PVs) to induce focal firing and atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to demonstrate that bilateral low-level vagosympathetic nerve stimulation (LL-VNS) could suppress high-frequency stimulation–induced focal AF at atrial and PV sites. Methods and Results—In 23 dogs anesthetized with Na-pentobarbital, electrodes in the vagosympathetic trunks allowed LL-VNS at 1 V below that which slowed the sinus rate or atrioventricular conduction. Multielectrode catheters were fixed at the right and left superior and inferior PVs and both atrial appendages. LL-VNS continued for 3 hours. At the end of each hour, the high-frequency stimulation algorithm consisting of a 40-ms train of stimuli (200 Hz; stimulus duration, 0.1 to 1.0 ms) was delivered 2 ms after the atrial pacing stimulus during the refractory period at each PV and atrial appendages site. The lowest voltage of high-frequency stimulation that induced AF was defined as the AF threshold. Five dogs without LL-VNS served as sham controls. Six dogs underwent LL-VNS after transection of bilateral vagosympathetic trunks. LL-VNS induced a progressive increase in AF threshold at all PV and atrial appendages sites, particularly significant (P<0.05) at the right superior PV, right inferior PV, left superior PV, and right atrial appendage. Bilateral vagosympathetic transection did not significantly alter the previous findings, and the 5 sham control dogs did not show changes in AF threshold at any site over a period of 3 hours. Conclusions—LL-VNS may prevent episodic AF caused by rapid PV and non-PV firing.Background— We used high-frequency stimulation delivered during the refractory period of the atrium and pulmonary veins (PVs) to induce focal firing and atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to demonstrate that bilateral low-level vagosympathetic nerve stimulation (LL-VNS) could suppress high-frequency stimulation-induced focal AF at atrial and PV sites. Methods and Results— In 23 dogs anesthetized with Na-pentobarbital, electrodes in the vagosympathetic trunks allowed LL-VNS at 1 V below that which slowed the sinus rate or atrioventricular conduction. Multielectrode catheters were fixed at the right and left superior and inferior PVs and both atrial appendages. LL-VNS continued for 3 hours. At the end of each hour, the high-frequency stimulation algorithm consisting of a 40-ms train of stimuli (200 Hz; stimulus duration, 0.1 to 1.0 ms) was delivered 2 ms after the atrial pacing stimulus during the refractory period at each PV and atrial appendages site. The lowest voltage of high-frequency stimulation that induced AF was defined as the AF threshold. Five dogs without LL-VNS served as sham controls. Six dogs underwent LL-VNS after transection of bilateral vagosympathetic trunks. LL-VNS induced a progressive increase in AF threshold at all PV and atrial appendages sites, particularly significant ( P <0.05) at the right superior PV, right inferior PV, left superior PV, and right atrial appendage. Bilateral vagosympathetic transection did not significantly alter the previous findings, and the 5 sham control dogs did not show changes in AF threshold at any site over a period of 3 hours. Conclusions— LL-VNS may prevent episodic AF caused by rapid PV and non-PV firing. Received April 7, 2009; accepted September 21, 2009.

Atrial Fibrillation Begets Atrial FibrillationCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE: Autonomic Mechanism for Atrial Electrical Remodeling Induced by Short-Term Rapid Atrial Pacing

Background— The mechanism(s) for acute changes in electrophysiological properties of the atria during rapid pacing induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is not completely understood. We sought to evaluate the contribution of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system in acute atrial electrical remodeling and AF induced by 6-hour rapid atrial pacing. Methods and Results— Continuous rapid pacing (1200 bpm, 2× threshold [TH]) was performed at the left atrial appendage. Group 1 (n=7) underwent 6-hour pacing immediately followed by ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation; group 2 (n=7) underwent GP ablation immediately followed by 6-hour pacing; and group 3 (n=4) underwent administration of autonomic blockers, atropine (1 mg/kg), and propranolol (0.6 mg/kg) immediately followed by 6-hour pacing. The effective refractory period (ERP) and window of vulnerability (WOV, in milliseconds), ie, the difference between the longest and the shortest coupling interval of the premature stimulus that induced AF, were measured at 2×TH and 10×TH at the left atrium, right atrium, and pulmonary veins every hour before and after GP ablation or autonomic blockade. In group 1, ERP was markedly shortened in the first 2 hours and then stabilized both at 2×TH and 10×TH; however, WOV was progressively widened throughout the 6-hour period. After GP ablation, ERP was significantly longer than before ablation and AF could not be induced (WOV=0) at either 2×TH or 10×TH. In groups 2 and 3, rapid atrial pacing failed to shorten the ERP. AF could not be induced in 6 of 7 dogs in group 2 and all 4 dogs in group 3 during the 6-hour pacing period. Conclusion— The intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in the acute stages of atrial electrical remodeling induced by rapid atrial pacing.Background— The mechanism(s) for acute changes in electrophysiological properties of the atria during rapid pacing induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is not completely understood. We sought to evaluate the contribution of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system in acute atrial electrical remodeling and AF induced by 6-hour rapid atrial pacing. Methods and Results— Continuous rapid pacing (1200 bpm, 2× threshold [TH]) was performed at the left atrial appendage. Group 1 (n=7) underwent 6-hour pacing immediately followed by ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation; group 2 (n=7) underwent GP ablation immediately followed by 6-hour pacing; and group 3 (n=4) underwent administration of autonomic blockers, atropine (1 mg/kg), and propranolol (0.6 mg/kg) immediately followed by 6-hour pacing. The effective refractory period (ERP) and window of vulnerability (WOV, in milliseconds), ie, the difference between the longest and the shortest coupling interval of the premature stimulus that induced AF, were measured at 2×TH and 10×TH at the left atrium, right atrium, and pulmonary veins every hour before and after GP ablation or autonomic blockade. In group 1, ERP was markedly shortened in the first 2 hours and then stabilized both at 2×TH and 10×TH; however, WOV was progressively widened throughout the 6-hour period. After GP ablation, ERP was significantly longer than before ablation and AF could not be induced (WOV=0) at either 2×TH or 10×TH. In groups 2 and 3, rapid atrial pacing failed to shorten the ERP. AF could not be induced in 6 of 7 dogs in group 2 and all 4 dogs in group 3 during the 6-hour pacing period. Conclusion— The intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in the acute stages of atrial electrical remodeling induced by rapid atrial pacing. Received April 3, 2008; accepted June 16, 2008.

Atrial Fibrillation Begets Atrial FibrillationCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Background— The mechanism(s) for acute changes in electrophysiological properties of the atria during rapid pacing induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is not completely understood. We sought to evaluate the contribution of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system in acute atrial electrical remodeling and AF induced by 6-hour rapid atrial pacing. Methods and Results— Continuous rapid pacing (1200 bpm, 2× threshold [TH]) was performed at the left atrial appendage. Group 1 (n=7) underwent 6-hour pacing immediately followed by ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation; group 2 (n=7) underwent GP ablation immediately followed by 6-hour pacing; and group 3 (n=4) underwent administration of autonomic blockers, atropine (1 mg/kg), and propranolol (0.6 mg/kg) immediately followed by 6-hour pacing. The effective refractory period (ERP) and window of vulnerability (WOV, in milliseconds), ie, the difference between the longest and the shortest coupling interval of the premature stimulus that induced AF, were measured at 2×TH and 10×TH at the left atrium, right atrium, and pulmonary veins every hour before and after GP ablation or autonomic blockade. In group 1, ERP was markedly shortened in the first 2 hours and then stabilized both at 2×TH and 10×TH; however, WOV was progressively widened throughout the 6-hour period. After GP ablation, ERP was significantly longer than before ablation and AF could not be induced (WOV=0) at either 2×TH or 10×TH. In groups 2 and 3, rapid atrial pacing failed to shorten the ERP. AF could not be induced in 6 of 7 dogs in group 2 and all 4 dogs in group 3 during the 6-hour pacing period. Conclusion— The intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in the acute stages of atrial electrical remodeling induced by rapid atrial pacing.Background— The mechanism(s) for acute changes in electrophysiological properties of the atria during rapid pacing induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is not completely understood. We sought to evaluate the contribution of the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system in acute atrial electrical remodeling and AF induced by 6-hour rapid atrial pacing. Methods and Results— Continuous rapid pacing (1200 bpm, 2× threshold [TH]) was performed at the left atrial appendage. Group 1 (n=7) underwent 6-hour pacing immediately followed by ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation; group 2 (n=7) underwent GP ablation immediately followed by 6-hour pacing; and group 3 (n=4) underwent administration of autonomic blockers, atropine (1 mg/kg), and propranolol (0.6 mg/kg) immediately followed by 6-hour pacing. The effective refractory period (ERP) and window of vulnerability (WOV, in milliseconds), ie, the difference between the longest and the shortest coupling interval of the premature stimulus that induced AF, were measured at 2×TH and 10×TH at the left atrium, right atrium, and pulmonary veins every hour before and after GP ablation or autonomic blockade. In group 1, ERP was markedly shortened in the first 2 hours and then stabilized both at 2×TH and 10×TH; however, WOV was progressively widened throughout the 6-hour period. After GP ablation, ERP was significantly longer than before ablation and AF could not be induced (WOV=0) at either 2×TH or 10×TH. In groups 2 and 3, rapid atrial pacing failed to shorten the ERP. AF could not be induced in 6 of 7 dogs in group 2 and all 4 dogs in group 3 during the 6-hour pacing period. Conclusion— The intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in the acute stages of atrial electrical remodeling induced by rapid atrial pacing. Received April 3, 2008; accepted June 16, 2008.