Mushegh A. Sahakyan
Oslo University Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mushegh A. Sahakyan.
Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Sciences | 2017
Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Bjørn Edwin; Airazat M. Kazaryan; Leonid Barkhatov; Trond Buanes; Dejan Ignjatovic; Knut Jørgen Labori; Bård I. Røsok
The outcomes following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in elderly patients have not been widely reported to date. This study aimed to analyze perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients aged ≥70 years (elderly group) and compare with those <70 years (non‐elderly group).
British Journal of Surgery | 2017
Dyre Kleive; Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Audun Elnaes Berstad; Caroline S. Verbeke; Ivar P. Gladhaug; Bjørn Edwin; Pål-Dag Line; Knut Jørgen Labori
Pancreatoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric–portal vein resection has become a common procedure in pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy plus venous resection at a high‐volume centre, and to examine trends in management and outcome over a decade for the latter procedure.
Surgery | 2017
Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Song Cheol Kim; Dyre Kleive; Airazat M. Kazaryan; Ki Byung Song; Dejan Ignjatovic; Trond Buanes; Bård I. Røsok; Knut Jørgen Labori; Bjørn Edwin
Background. Surgical resection is the only curative option in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Little is known about the oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. This bi‐institutional study aimed to examine the long‐term oncologic results of standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a large cohort of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods. From January 2002 to March 2016, 207 patients underwent standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at Oslo University Hospital‐Rikshospitalet (Oslo, Norway) and Asan Medical Centre (Seoul, Republic of Korea). After the exclusion criteria were applied (distant metastases at operation, conversion to an open operation, loss to follow‐up), 186 patients were eligible for the analysis. Perioperative and oncologic variables were analyzed for association with recurrence and survival. Results. Median overall and recurrence‐free survivals were 32 and 16 months, while 5‐year overall and recurrence‐free survival rates were estimated to be 38.2% and 35.9%, respectively. Ninety‐six (52%) patients developed recurrence: 56 (30%) extrapancreatic, 27 (15%) locoregional, and 13 (7%) combined locoregional and extrapancreatic. Thirty‐seven (19.9%) patients had early recurrence (within 6 months of operation). In the multivariable analysis, tumor size >3 cm and no adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with early recurrence (P = .017 and P = .015, respectively). The Cox regression model showed that tumor size >3 cm and lymphovascular invasion were independent predictors of decreased recurrence‐free and overall survival. Conclusion. Standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with satisfactory long‐term oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Several risk factors, such as tumor size >3 cm, no adjuvant chemotherapy, and lymphovascular invasion, are linked to poor prognosis after standard laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2016
Leonid Barkhatov; Åsmund A. Fretland; Airazat M. Kazaryan; Bård I. Røsok; Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Anne Waage; Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth; Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Bjørn Edwin
The aim of this study was to validate clinical risk scores in patients underwent laparoscopic resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) with 5 years follow‐up or more, and assess 5‐ and 10‐year actual survival in this group.
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer | 2016
Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Sheraz Yaqub; Airazat M. Kazaryan; Olaug Villanger; Audun Elnaes Berstad; Knut Jørgen Labori; Bjørn Edwin; Bård I. Røsok
Completion pancreatectomy (CP) is a surgical procedure, in which the aim is to remove the remnant pancreatic tissue after initial pancreatic resection. This technique is used as a salvage procedure after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients, experiencing severe complications of pancreatic leakage. Although some authors have proposed not to consider CP in patients with a pancreatic fistula [1], Gueroult et al. assumed that CP may represent the only means to achieve adequate control of an ongoing infection [2]. Other reports also concluded that despite of significant morbidity and mortality CP has a role in the management of post-pancreatic surgical complications and may increase survival [3, 4]. Other clinical indication for this procedure is isolated local recurrence (ILR) of malignancy in the pancreatic remnant. However, given the low rate of resectable cases, the indications for surgery have not yet been clarified. Previously, limited experience with CP has been reported in the literature and generally by conventional, open surgery [5–13]. A review of the relevant literature revealed that no cases of laparoscopic completion pancreatectomy (LCP) after initial open PD have been reported to date. In this article, we describe two cases of LCP in our institution for ILR of malignant tumors in the pancreatic remnant after initial PD.
Radiology and Oncology | 2017
Davit L. Aghayan; Egidijus Pelanis; Åsmund A. Fretland; Airazat M. Kazaryan; Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Bård I. Røsok; Leonid Barkhatov; Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth; Ole Jakob Elle; Bjørn Edwin
Abstract Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is increasingly performed in specialized centers. While there is a trend towards a parenchyma-sparing strategy in multimodal treatment for CLM, its role is yet unclear. In this study we present short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing liver resection (LPSLR) at a single center. Patients and methods LLR were performed in 951 procedures between August 1998 and March 2017 at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Patients who primarily underwent LPSLR for CLM were included in the study. LPSLR was defined as non-anatomic hence the patients who underwent hemihepatectomy and sectionectomy were excluded. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. The Accordion classification was used to grade postoperative complications. The median follow-up was 40 months. Results 296 patients underwent primary LPSLR for CLM. A single specimen was resected in 204 cases, multiple resections were performed in 92 cases. 5 laparoscopic operations were converted to open. The median operative time was 134 minutes, blood loss was 200 ml and hospital stay was 3 days. There was no 90-day mortality in this study. The postoperative complication rate was 14.5%. 189 patients developed disease recurrence. Recurrence in the liver occurred in 146 patients (49%), of whom 85 patients underwent repeated surgical treatment (liver resection [n = 69], ablation [n = 14] and liver transplantation [n = 2]). Five-year overall survival was 48%, median overall survival was 56 months. Conclusions LPSLR of CLM can be performed safely with the good surgical and oncological results. The technique facilitates repeated surgical treatment, which may improve survival for patients with CLM.
Case reports in oncological medicine | 2016
Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Airazat M. Kazaryan; Ewa Pomianowska; Andreas Abildgaard; Pål-Dag Line; Bjørn Atle Bjørnbeth; Bjørn Edwin; Bård I. Røsok
Background. Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) indicates a poor prognosis. Surgery is considered the only curative option for selected patients with HCC recurrence following LT. Traditionally, the preference is given to the open approach. Methods. In this report, we present two cases of laparoscopic resections (LR) for recurrent HCC after LT, performed at Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet. Results. Both procedures were executed without intraoperative and postoperative adverse events. Whereas one of the patients had a recurrence one year after LR, the other patient did not have any sign of disease during 3-year follow-up. Conclusions. We argue that, in selected cases, patients with HCC recurrence following LT may benefit from LR due to its limited tissue trauma and timely start of subsequent treatment if curative resection cannot be obtained. In patients with relatively favorable prognosis, LR facilitates postoperative recovery course and avoids unnecessary laparotomy.
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2016
Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Airazat M. Kazaryan; Majd Rawashdeh; David Fuks; Mark Shmavonyan; Sven-Petter Haugvik; Knut Jørgen Labori; Trond Buanes; Bård I. Røsok; Dejan Ignjatovic; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Brice Gayet; Song Cheol Kim; Bjørn Edwin
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2017
Bjørn Edwin; Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Marc G. Besselink; Marco Braga; Jean-Michel Fabre; Laureano Fernández-Cruz; Brice Gayet; Song Cheol Kim; Igor Khatkov
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2017
Mushegh A. Sahakyan; Bård I. Røsok; Airazat M. Kazaryan; Leonid Barkhatov; Sven-Petter Haugvik; Åsmund A. Fretland; Dejan Ignjatovic; Knut Jørgen Labori; Bjørn Edwin