Mustafa Citak

Clinical outcome and complications using a polyaxial locking plate in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures. A reliable system

INTRODUCTION The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures (ORIF) is a perpetual challenge to the surgeon. For this reason, the principle of polyaxiality was developed to provide an improved primary stability of the fracture through better anchorage of the screws, especially in osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to present clinical results with the polyaxial locking plate in the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in order to determine whether the technique of polyaxiality leads to better functional outcome and lower complication rates in comparison to monoaxial plates in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-three patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically with the polyaxial locking Suture Plate™ (Arthrex(®)) between 03/2007 and 06/2009. Fifty-two of the patients (mean age, 69.9 ± 12.1) were included in a radiographical and clinical examination using the Constant score (CS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH). RESULTS The follow-up examinations were on average 13.9 ± 4.5 months (10-27 months) after surgical treatment. The mean CS of the patients was 66.0 ± 13.7 points, the age- and gender-related CS was 90.9% ± 20.0% and the mean DASH score was 23.8 ± 19.8 points for the injured side. The patients with a nearly anatomical reduction of their fracture (n = 13) reached a significantly higher CS (75.1 ± 8.5; p = 0.004) and DASH-score (13.6 ± 11.6; p = 0.043) and none of these patients had a complication. The complications were identified in 12 (23.1%) cases, 5 of which involved loss of reduction. All of these 5 cases were lacking of initial medial column support and 4 of which were type C2.3 AO-Classification. CONCLUSION The data show that the combination of angular stability with the possibility of variable polyaxial screw direction is a good concept for reduction and fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures, but anatomical reduction and medial support remain important preconditions for a good outcome. However, a significantly lower rate of complications or better clinical outcome than that reported in the literature could not be found.

[Spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: an analysis of 129 fractures after surgical treatment].

INTRODUCTION The ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a systemic rheumatic disease, which affects the skeleton, joints and internal organs. Attributed to the augmented rigidity of the spine and the concomitant impairment of compensatory mechanism minor force might cause spine fractures. Multilevel stabilization and dorsoventral instrumentation is a well - established procedure. This study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of 119 patients with AS associated spine fractures. METHODS From 07/96 to 01/10, 119 patients with 129 spine fractures due to AS were treated in our department. Data were collected retrospectively. In all patients the operative treatment of the fracture was either performed by ventral and/or dorsal spondylodesis. RESULTS The median age was 67 years (37-95). There were 51 cervical, 55 thoracic and 23 lumbar spine fractures. On initial presentation no fractures in 18 patients (15%) and stable fractures in 15 patients (13%) were detected, which further secondarily dislocated. Thus, in 28% of the patients the injury was assessed falsely. 47% of the fractures were preceded by a trivial trauma in domestic surrounding. 61 patients (51%) developed either an incomplete or a complete paraplegia. In 32 patients ventral instrumentation, in 82 patients dorsal and in 15 patients dorsoventral instrumentation were performed. 14% developed postoperative wound infection an in 15% revision surgery due to implant loosening or insufficient stabilization was required. CONCLUSION Early diagnostic of AS associated spine fractures using conventional radiographs and computed tomography scans is important for the detection and adequate treatment. A great amount of spine fractures are obviously either under diagnosed or underestimated, initially. A secondary dislocation of the fracture might result in severe neurological complications up to paraplegia.

Wirbelsäulenfraktur bei ankylosierender Spondylitis

INTRODUCTION The ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a systemic rheumatic disease, which affects the skeleton, joints and internal organs. Attributed to the augmented rigidity of the spine and the concomitant impairment of compensatory mechanism minor force might cause spine fractures. Multilevel stabilization and dorsoventral instrumentation is a well - established procedure. This study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of 119 patients with AS associated spine fractures. METHODS From 07/96 to 01/10, 119 patients with 129 spine fractures due to AS were treated in our department. Data were collected retrospectively. In all patients the operative treatment of the fracture was either performed by ventral and/or dorsal spondylodesis. RESULTS The median age was 67 years (37-95). There were 51 cervical, 55 thoracic and 23 lumbar spine fractures. On initial presentation no fractures in 18 patients (15%) and stable fractures in 15 patients (13%) were detected, which further secondarily dislocated. Thus, in 28% of the patients the injury was assessed falsely. 47% of the fractures were preceded by a trivial trauma in domestic surrounding. 61 patients (51%) developed either an incomplete or a complete paraplegia. In 32 patients ventral instrumentation, in 82 patients dorsal and in 15 patients dorsoventral instrumentation were performed. 14% developed postoperative wound infection an in 15% revision surgery due to implant loosening or insufficient stabilization was required. CONCLUSION Early diagnostic of AS associated spine fractures using conventional radiographs and computed tomography scans is important for the detection and adequate treatment. A great amount of spine fractures are obviously either under diagnosed or underestimated, initially. A secondary dislocation of the fracture might result in severe neurological complications up to paraplegia.

The influence of a weight-bearing platform on the mechanical behavior of two Ilizarov ring fixators: tensioned wires vs. half-pins

BackgroundA weight-bearing platform applied at the distal end of an Ilizarov external frame allows patients with hindfoot transfixations, foot deformities or plantar skin lesions to bear weight. This leads to an indirect loading of the fracture or osteotomy site. However, the effect on the fracture/osteotomy sites motion or compressive loads is unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the mechanical effects of a weight-bearing platform on the traditional all-wire, four-ring frame in comparison to a two-ring frame consisting of half-pins.MethodsTwo frame configurations, with either anatomically positioned wires or half-pins, were analyzed with and without a weight-bearing platform applied underneath the distal ring. Composite tibiae with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy of 3.5 mm were used in all the experiments. An axial load was applied with the use of a universal test machine (UTS®). Interfragmentary movements, the relative movements of bone fragments and movements between rings were recorded using displacement transducers. Compressive loads at the osteotomy site were recorded with loading cells.ResultsIndirect loading with a weight-bearing platform altered the force transmission through the osteotomy. Indirect loading of the tibiae decreased the extent of the axial micro-motion by 50% under the applied weight load when compared to direct weight loading (p < 0.05). The half pin frame was 25% stiffer than the wire frame under both direct and indirect loading of the tibiae (p < 0.05). Compressive loads under indirect loading were reduced by 67% in the wire frame and by 57% in the half-pin frames compared to direct loading of the bones (p < 0.05). While axial loading in the wire frames resulted in plain axial movements at the site of the osteotomy, it was coupled with translational movements and angular displacements in the half pin mountings. This effect was more apparent in the case of indirect loading.ConclusionsA weight-bearing platform has substantial influence on the biomechanical performance of an Ilizarov external fixator. Half-pins induce greater stiffness to the Ilizarov external fixator and allow the usage of only one ring per bone segment, but shear stresses at the osteotomy under axial loading should be considered. The results allow an estimation of the size and direction of interfragmentary movements based on the extent of weight bearing.

Salvage procedures of the elbow. Alternatives to elbow arthroplasty

Destructive changes of the elbow joint represent a challenge for both patient and surgeon. Resection arthroplasty is associated with postoperative instability and loss of power and is a rarely performed procedure. Interpositional arthroplasty remains a useful option for healthy active patients with severe post-traumatic elbow arthrosis and is one of the oldest methods used to reconstruct the elbow. The principle of interpositional arthroplasty is based on a sparing resection of the destroyed joint surface and on creating a congruent elbow joint with human tissue. Nowadays, autogenous dermis, fascia lata or Achilles allograft are used. A preoperatively stable elbow is required to prevent instability following interpositional arthroplasty. The use of total elbow arthroplasty is limited due to the contraindications and in such cases the only remaining options are salvage procedures of the elbow. In general, arthrodesis should be performed in patients with painful osteoarthritis of the elbow with high demands on the upper extremities. Historically, tuberculosis was the most common indication for elbow arthrodesis and various methods of elbow arthrodesis have been described. However, most attention has been given to the position in which the elbow joint should be fixed and should be decided depending on the individual characteristics of the patient. Sufficient bone stock is crucial for a successful elbow arthrodesis and in cases with massive bone loss reconstruction of the elbow using an allograft can be performed to restore bone quality. However, the high complication rate of this procedure limits the scope of its use. Nevertheless, allograft procedures can restore pain-free joint function for several years.

Exoskeletons for rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries. Options and limitations

BACKGROUND Mobile exoskeletons are increasingly being applied in the course of rehabilitation and provision of medical aids to patients with spinal cord injuries. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS This article gives a description of the currently available exoskeletal systems and the clinical application including scientific and medical evidence, to derive recommendations regarding clinical practice of the various exoskeletons in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries. RESULTS The different systems represent a useful adjunct to the therapeutic regimen depending on the medical objectives. Posture-controlled exoskeletons in particular enable mobilization of patients with neurological gait disorders via direct motion support. In addition the neurologically controlled exoskeleton HAL® leads to functional improvements in patients with residual muscular functions in the chronic phase of spinal cord injury in terms of improved walking abilities subsequent to training. However, beneficial effects on bone density, bladder function and perfusion are conceivable but not yet adequately supported by evidence. Positive effects on spasticity and neuropathic pain are currently based only on case series or small clinical trials. CONCLUSION Although exoskeletons are not yet an established tool in the treatment of spinal cord injuries, the systems will play a more important role in rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries in the future. Neurologically controlled exoskeletons show beneficial effects in the treatment of acute and chronic spinal cord injuries and might therefore evolve to be a useful alternative to conventional locomotion training.ZusammenfassungHintergrundIm Rahmen des Lokomotiontrainings bei der Behandlung querschnittgelähmter Patienten kommen zunehmend mobile Exoskelette in der Rehabilitation und Hilfsmittelversorgung zum Einsatz.Fragestellung und MethodikDie derzeit auf dem Markt verfügbaren exoskelettalen Systeme werden beschrieben, ihre Möglichkeiten in der klinischen Anwendung und die dafür zurzeit vorhandene Evidenz dargestellt. Daraus werden Empfehlungen zur klinischen Anwendung der verschiedenen Exoskelette in der Rehabilitation querschnittgelähmter Patienten abgeleitet.ErgebnisseDie Anwendbarkeit unterschiedlicher Exoskelette als Therapiegerät ist mit jeweils unterschiedlicher Zielsetzung möglich. Elektromechanisch kontrollierte Exoskelette zeigen ihre Einsetzbarkeit insbesondere in der Mobilisation bei neurogenen Gangstörungen durch direkte Gangunterstützung. Der Einsatz des neuronal gesteuerten HAL®-Exoskeletts verspricht zusätzlich funktionelle Verbesserungen auch in der chronischen Phase einer Querschnittlähmung bei Patienten mit motorischen Restfunktionen, wenn sie nach dem Training ohne Exoskelett gehen. Ergebnisse, die positive Einflüsse auf Knochendichte, Blasen-Mastdarm-Funktion und Durchblutung zeigen, sind denkbar, aber noch nicht hinreichend belegt. Effekte hinsichtlich Spastikreduktion und Linderung neuropathischer Schmerzen sind bisher lediglich in Fallserien oder im Rahmen kleiner Studien berichtet worden.SchlussfolgerungExoskelette werden zunehmend bei querschnittgelähmten Patienten als „High-tech-Hilfsmittel“ zum Einsatz kommen, sind aber zurzeit im routinemäßigen Einsatz nicht etabliert. Neurologisch-kontrollierte Exoskelette versprechen einen positiven Einfluss auf die Behandlung akuter und chronischer Querschnittlähmungen und können damit eine zukünftige Alternative zum etablierten Lokomotiontraining darstellen.AbstractBackgroundMobile exoskeletons are increasingly being applied in the course of rehabilitation and provision of medical aids to patients with spinal cord injuries.Objectives and methodsThis article gives a description of the currently available exoskeletal systems and the clinical application including scientific and medical evidence, to derive recommendations regarding clinical practice of the various exoskeletons in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries.ResultsThe different systems represent a useful adjunct to the therapeutic regimen depending on the medical objectives. Posture-controlled exoskeletons in particular enable mobilization of patients with neurological gait disorders via direct motion support. In addition the neurologically controlled exoskeleton HAL® leads to functional improvements in patients with residual muscular functions in the chronic phase of spinal cord injury in terms of improved walking abilities subsequent to training. However, beneficial effects on bone density, bladder function and perfusion are conceivable but not yet adequately supported by evidence. Positive effects on spasticity and neuropathic pain are currently based only on case series or small clinical trials.ConclusionAlthough exoskeletons are not yet an established tool in the treatment of spinal cord injuries, the systems will play a more important role in rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries in the future. Neurologically controlled exoskeletons show beneficial effects in the treatment of acute and chronic spinal cord injuries and might therefore evolve to be a useful alternative to conventional locomotion training.

Salvage Procedures am Ellenbogen

Destructive changes of the elbow joint represent a challenge for both patient and surgeon. Resection arthroplasty is associated with postoperative instability and loss of power and is a rarely performed procedure. Interpositional arthroplasty remains a useful option for healthy active patients with severe post-traumatic elbow arthrosis and is one of the oldest methods used to reconstruct the elbow. The principle of interpositional arthroplasty is based on a sparing resection of the destroyed joint surface and on creating a congruent elbow joint with human tissue. Nowadays, autogenous dermis, fascia lata or Achilles allograft are used. A preoperatively stable elbow is required to prevent instability following interpositional arthroplasty. The use of total elbow arthroplasty is limited due to the contraindications and in such cases the only remaining options are salvage procedures of the elbow. In general, arthrodesis should be performed in patients with painful osteoarthritis of the elbow with high demands on the upper extremities. Historically, tuberculosis was the most common indication for elbow arthrodesis and various methods of elbow arthrodesis have been described. However, most attention has been given to the position in which the elbow joint should be fixed and should be decided depending on the individual characteristics of the patient. Sufficient bone stock is crucial for a successful elbow arthrodesis and in cases with massive bone loss reconstruction of the elbow using an allograft can be performed to restore bone quality. However, the high complication rate of this procedure limits the scope of its use. Nevertheless, allograft procedures can restore pain-free joint function for several years.

Exoskelette in der Rehabilitation Querschnittgelähmter

BACKGROUND Mobile exoskeletons are increasingly being applied in the course of rehabilitation and provision of medical aids to patients with spinal cord injuries. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS This article gives a description of the currently available exoskeletal systems and the clinical application including scientific and medical evidence, to derive recommendations regarding clinical practice of the various exoskeletons in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries. RESULTS The different systems represent a useful adjunct to the therapeutic regimen depending on the medical objectives. Posture-controlled exoskeletons in particular enable mobilization of patients with neurological gait disorders via direct motion support. In addition the neurologically controlled exoskeleton HAL® leads to functional improvements in patients with residual muscular functions in the chronic phase of spinal cord injury in terms of improved walking abilities subsequent to training. However, beneficial effects on bone density, bladder function and perfusion are conceivable but not yet adequately supported by evidence. Positive effects on spasticity and neuropathic pain are currently based only on case series or small clinical trials. CONCLUSION Although exoskeletons are not yet an established tool in the treatment of spinal cord injuries, the systems will play a more important role in rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries in the future. Neurologically controlled exoskeletons show beneficial effects in the treatment of acute and chronic spinal cord injuries and might therefore evolve to be a useful alternative to conventional locomotion training.ZusammenfassungHintergrundIm Rahmen des Lokomotiontrainings bei der Behandlung querschnittgelähmter Patienten kommen zunehmend mobile Exoskelette in der Rehabilitation und Hilfsmittelversorgung zum Einsatz.Fragestellung und MethodikDie derzeit auf dem Markt verfügbaren exoskelettalen Systeme werden beschrieben, ihre Möglichkeiten in der klinischen Anwendung und die dafür zurzeit vorhandene Evidenz dargestellt. Daraus werden Empfehlungen zur klinischen Anwendung der verschiedenen Exoskelette in der Rehabilitation querschnittgelähmter Patienten abgeleitet.ErgebnisseDie Anwendbarkeit unterschiedlicher Exoskelette als Therapiegerät ist mit jeweils unterschiedlicher Zielsetzung möglich. Elektromechanisch kontrollierte Exoskelette zeigen ihre Einsetzbarkeit insbesondere in der Mobilisation bei neurogenen Gangstörungen durch direkte Gangunterstützung. Der Einsatz des neuronal gesteuerten HAL®-Exoskeletts verspricht zusätzlich funktionelle Verbesserungen auch in der chronischen Phase einer Querschnittlähmung bei Patienten mit motorischen Restfunktionen, wenn sie nach dem Training ohne Exoskelett gehen. Ergebnisse, die positive Einflüsse auf Knochendichte, Blasen-Mastdarm-Funktion und Durchblutung zeigen, sind denkbar, aber noch nicht hinreichend belegt. Effekte hinsichtlich Spastikreduktion und Linderung neuropathischer Schmerzen sind bisher lediglich in Fallserien oder im Rahmen kleiner Studien berichtet worden.SchlussfolgerungExoskelette werden zunehmend bei querschnittgelähmten Patienten als „High-tech-Hilfsmittel“ zum Einsatz kommen, sind aber zurzeit im routinemäßigen Einsatz nicht etabliert. Neurologisch-kontrollierte Exoskelette versprechen einen positiven Einfluss auf die Behandlung akuter und chronischer Querschnittlähmungen und können damit eine zukünftige Alternative zum etablierten Lokomotiontraining darstellen.AbstractBackgroundMobile exoskeletons are increasingly being applied in the course of rehabilitation and provision of medical aids to patients with spinal cord injuries.Objectives and methodsThis article gives a description of the currently available exoskeletal systems and the clinical application including scientific and medical evidence, to derive recommendations regarding clinical practice of the various exoskeletons in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries.ResultsThe different systems represent a useful adjunct to the therapeutic regimen depending on the medical objectives. Posture-controlled exoskeletons in particular enable mobilization of patients with neurological gait disorders via direct motion support. In addition the neurologically controlled exoskeleton HAL® leads to functional improvements in patients with residual muscular functions in the chronic phase of spinal cord injury in terms of improved walking abilities subsequent to training. However, beneficial effects on bone density, bladder function and perfusion are conceivable but not yet adequately supported by evidence. Positive effects on spasticity and neuropathic pain are currently based only on case series or small clinical trials.ConclusionAlthough exoskeletons are not yet an established tool in the treatment of spinal cord injuries, the systems will play a more important role in rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries in the future. Neurologically controlled exoskeletons show beneficial effects in the treatment of acute and chronic spinal cord injuries and might therefore evolve to be a useful alternative to conventional locomotion training.

Ilizarov External Frame Technique for Pirogoff Amputations With Ankle Disarticulation and Tibiocalcaneal Fusion

Background: The high rates of wound failure, persisting infection, and nonunion of the tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis are the main reasons why the Pirogoff ankle disarticulation is rarely used for limb salvage. Use of the Ilizarov external frame has increased our fusion rate. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with the use of the Ilizarov external frame as a technique for Pirogoff amputations with ankle disarticulation and tibiocalcaneal fusion. Methods: Twenty-four patients (median age, 57.4 years; range, 29-76 years) underwent a Pirogoff amputation with Ilizarov external frame use between January 2004 and June 2011. The most common indications were gangrene with uncontrollable infection due to Charcot arthropathy or chronic osteomyelitis. Four patients had sustained crush injuries of the foot. All patients were clinically and radiographically followed for a minimum of 12 months. Additionally, 15 patients were evaluated using the Taniguchi rating scale for Pirogoff amputations after a mean follow-up of 44.9 months (range, 12-86 months). Results: In 21 patients (87.5%), a well-healed Pirogoff stump was achieved after a mean external fixation time of 18.1 weeks (range, 12.7-26.6 weeks). Impaired vascular perfusion was found to be the limiting factor for successful wound healing and an overall successful Pirogoff amputation. According to the Taniguchi scale, 67% of the patients achieved good or excellent functional results. Fair (27%) and poor (6%) results were observed only in the diabetic patients. Conclusion: Using the Ilizarov external frame allowed safe fixation and a high success rate, even in neuropathic feet. The frame allowed for immediate weight-bearing and soft tissue control; however, frame-associated complications were common and could result in revision surgery. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Two-stage revision of infected total knee arthroplasty using a distraction spacer

BACKGROUND The infection of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has remained as one of the most devastating potential complications. In this context we developed a new technique that keeps the spacer in distraction during the cementation process to achieve better weight-bearing stability. METHODS We present a case of a 75-year-old male patient, who was treated in our hospital with an infected total knee replacement (TKR) using the distraction spacer. The operative technique includes the removal of the infected prosthesis after radical debridement. Then two carbon rods were inserted overlapping 2-3 cm in the medulla of the tibia and femur. Afterwards an external fixateur with distraction module is attached with two Schanz screws into the distal femur and the proximal tibia. The cementation process was performed under distraction. After hardening of the cement the external fixateur and the Schanz screws are then removed. RESULTS Postoperatively the patient was mobilized with full weight-bearing using an extension splint. The antibiotic therapy was continued for five weeks. After sterile puncture, the reimplantation was performed using a Zimmer-Rotating-Hinge-Knee without any complications. CONCLUSIONS This method allows cement hardening without micromovements and early mobilization with partial full weight bearing and prevents the contraction of the capsule and the ligaments during the prosthesis-free period, preparing the knee for a secondary TKA or an intramedullary arthrodesis with a titanium stem.