Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Myrna E. Libby is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Myrna E. Libby.


Behavior analysis in practice | 2008

A Comparison of Most-to-Least and Least-to-Most Prompting on the Acquisition of Solitary Play Skills

Myrna E. Libby; Julie S. Weiss; Stacie L. Bancroft; William H. Ahearn

Two studies are presented in which common prompting procedures were evaluated while teaching children with autism to build Lego® play structures. In the first study, most-to-least (MTL) and least-to-most (LTM) prompting were compared. All participants learned to build the play structures when the teacher used MTL, which was associated with fewer errors than LTM. Nonetheless, three participants learned more quickly with LTM. This finding suggests that MTL may prevent errors, but it sometimes slows learning. The second study compared LTM to MTL without and with a delay (MTLD). MTLD provided an opportunity for the child to independently initiate responding but still minimized the likelihood of errors. Results showed that acquisition was nearly as rapid when the teacher used MTLD as LTM but it produced fewer errors than LTM. Best practice guidelines for choosing prompting procedures are proposed.


Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis | 2009

A Procedure for Identifying Precursors to Problem Behavior.

Brandon Herscovitch; Eileen M. Roscoe; Myrna E. Libby; Jason C. Bourret; William H. Ahearn

We describe a procedure for differentiating among potential precursor responses for use in a functional analysis. Conditional probability analysis of descriptive assessment data identified three potential precursors. Results from the indirect assessment corresponded with those obtained from the descriptive assessment. The top-ranked response identified as a precursor according to the indirect assessment had the strongest relation according to the probability analysis. When contingencies were arranged for the precursor in a functional analysis, the same function was identified as for target behavior, supporting the utility of indirect and descriptive methods to identify precursor behavior empirically.


Behavioral Interventions | 1998

THE EFFECTS OF REINFORCER CHOICE ON RATES OF CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR AND FREE OPERANT RESPONDING IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES

Richard B. Graff; Myrna E. Libby; Gina Green

A multielement design was used to evaluate the eAects of three reinforcement conditions on the free-operant and challenging responses of two individuals with severe disabilities. Preference assessments identified three stimuli that could function as reinforcers for each participant. Reinforcers were delivered on a variable ratio schedule for a free-operant response. In the participant-selected condition, each reinforcer delivery consisted of placing an array of three diAerent stimuli in front of the participant, who was allowed to select one. In the constant condition, each reinforcer delivery consisted of placing an array of three identical stimuli in front of the participant. Within each session the three stimuli were held constant, but varied across sessions. In the experimenter-selected condition, each reinforcer delivery consisted of an array of three identical stimuli being placed in front of the participant. Within each session, the three stimuli were presented in an order predetermined by the experimenter such that, on average, each stimulus was available every third reinforcer delivery. For both individuals, the participantselected condition resulted in lower average rates of challenging responses and slightly higher average free-operant response rates. No diAerences in responding were noted between the constant condition and the experimenter-selected condition. #1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Individuals with severe disabilities frequently require dense reinforcement for both skill acquisition and the reduction of challenging behaviors. Finding and maintaining eAective reinforcers are essential for eAective intervention. Most reinforcement procedures used in applied settings are derived from basic animal research in which establishing operations, such as deprivation, were manipulated (Michael, 1982). Although there is some evidence that manipulating establishing operations can aAect responding in individuals with developmental disabilities


Behavioral Interventions | 1999

Functional analysis and treatment of screaming in a young girl with severe disabilities

Richard B. Graff; Gregg T. Lineman; Myrna E. Libby; William H. Ahearn

Descriptive assessments suggested that the screaming of a 6-year-old girl with autism and severe mental retardation was maintained by automatic reinforcement. During two phases of a functional analysis, differentiation across experimental conditions was not achieved. Levels of screaming decreased across sessions in all experimental conditions. A time-out treatment procedure led to a rapid decrease in screaming. Copyright


Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis | 2011

A COMPARISON OF PROCEDURAL VARIATIONS IN TEACHING BEHAVIOR CHAINS: MANUAL GUIDANCE, TRAINER COMPLETION, AND NO COMPLETION OF UNTRAINED STEPS

Stacie L. Bancroft; Julie S. Weiss; Myrna E. Libby; William H. Ahearn

We compared variations for teaching a sequence of responses through forward chaining. Seven children who had been diagnosed with autism participated in a comparison of teacher completion (TC) of steps beyond the training step and manually guiding the student (SC) to complete steps beyond the training step. A no-completion (NC) condition, in which the steps beyond the training step were not completed, was added to the comparison with 4 of the participants. Results showed that learning occurred with all procedures, although 5 participants acquired the chains most efficiently in the SC condition and the other 2 learned most efficiently in the TC condition. Of the participants for whom an NC condition was included, the tasks were acquired with the shortest average session length and total training time. Despite the potential benefits of TC and SC procedures, NC is a viable option and may be preferable for some students.


Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis | 2000

THE EFFECTS OF ESTABLISHING OPERATIONS ON PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMES

Jennifer M. Gottschalk; Myrna E. Libby; Richard B. Graff


Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis | 1999

A comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice

Richard B. Graff; Myrna E. Libby


Behavioral Interventions | 2001

Extended analysis and treatment of self-injurious behavior

John J. Healey; William H. Ahearn; Richard B. Graff; Myrna E. Libby


Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis | 2000

Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.

Amy S. Geckeler; Myrna E. Libby; Richard B. Graff; William H. Ahearn


Behavioral Interventions | 1998

Effects of two levels of treatment intensity on a young child with severe disabilities

Richard B. Graff; Gina Green; Myrna E. Libby

Collaboration


Dive into the Myrna E. Libby's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gina Green

Northeastern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge