N. Bellios

Überschwellige periphere Stimulation bei präperimetrischen Glaukomen

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Early glaucomatous visual field defects can occur outside the central 30 degrees , which is usually examined in perimetric tests used for glaucoma diagnosis and screening. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of peripheral suprathreshold stimulation in open angle glaucoma before the development of reproducible visual field damage in standard 30 degrees automatic white-on-white perimetry. METHODS A total of 352 eyes of 352 patients (ages 35-69 years; visual acuity 0.8 or better) from the Erlanger Glaucoma Registry were included in this study. They were divided into two groups: normal eyes and preperimetric glaucoma. All patients underwent a standardized glaucoma examination including Octopus 500EZ static perimetry (G1 program, all three phases); 95 eyes of 95 patients also received a 135-point suprathreshold test pattern of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (model 750i) for detecting peripheral visual field defects. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for any single test point in phase 3 of the G1 test pattern and the Humphrey 135-point pattern. A score was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed. RESULTS In 33 of 176 (18.8%) eyes with preperimetric glaucoma, the score was 3 or higher in phase 3 of the G1 program (normal eyes: 19 of 196; 9.7%). For both examination modalities, the highest sensitivity was found in test locations in the superior nasal midperiphery, corresponding to neuroretinal rim loss predominantly in the inferotemporal sector in early glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. CONCLUSION Positive test results using suprathreshold stimulation in the midperiphery can be found in patients with preperimetric glaucoma at a significantly higher frequency than in normal subjects. Longitudinal studies will show whether such tests can be useful for predicting perimetric manifestation of the disease.

Peripheral suprathreshold stimulation in preperimetric glaucoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Early glaucomatous visual field defects can occur outside the central 30 degrees , which is usually examined in perimetric tests used for glaucoma diagnosis and screening. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of peripheral suprathreshold stimulation in open angle glaucoma before the development of reproducible visual field damage in standard 30 degrees automatic white-on-white perimetry. METHODS A total of 352 eyes of 352 patients (ages 35-69 years; visual acuity 0.8 or better) from the Erlanger Glaucoma Registry were included in this study. They were divided into two groups: normal eyes and preperimetric glaucoma. All patients underwent a standardized glaucoma examination including Octopus 500EZ static perimetry (G1 program, all three phases); 95 eyes of 95 patients also received a 135-point suprathreshold test pattern of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (model 750i) for detecting peripheral visual field defects. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for any single test point in phase 3 of the G1 test pattern and the Humphrey 135-point pattern. A score was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed. RESULTS In 33 of 176 (18.8%) eyes with preperimetric glaucoma, the score was 3 or higher in phase 3 of the G1 program (normal eyes: 19 of 196; 9.7%). For both examination modalities, the highest sensitivity was found in test locations in the superior nasal midperiphery, corresponding to neuroretinal rim loss predominantly in the inferotemporal sector in early glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. CONCLUSION Positive test results using suprathreshold stimulation in the midperiphery can be found in patients with preperimetric glaucoma at a significantly higher frequency than in normal subjects. Longitudinal studies will show whether such tests can be useful for predicting perimetric manifestation of the disease.

Überschwellige periphere Stimulation bei präperimetrischen Glaukomen@@@Peripheral suprathreshold stimulation in preperimetric glaucoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Early glaucomatous visual field defects can occur outside the central 30 degrees , which is usually examined in perimetric tests used for glaucoma diagnosis and screening. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of peripheral suprathreshold stimulation in open angle glaucoma before the development of reproducible visual field damage in standard 30 degrees automatic white-on-white perimetry. METHODS A total of 352 eyes of 352 patients (ages 35-69 years; visual acuity 0.8 or better) from the Erlanger Glaucoma Registry were included in this study. They were divided into two groups: normal eyes and preperimetric glaucoma. All patients underwent a standardized glaucoma examination including Octopus 500EZ static perimetry (G1 program, all three phases); 95 eyes of 95 patients also received a 135-point suprathreshold test pattern of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (model 750i) for detecting peripheral visual field defects. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for any single test point in phase 3 of the G1 test pattern and the Humphrey 135-point pattern. A score was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed. RESULTS In 33 of 176 (18.8%) eyes with preperimetric glaucoma, the score was 3 or higher in phase 3 of the G1 program (normal eyes: 19 of 196; 9.7%). For both examination modalities, the highest sensitivity was found in test locations in the superior nasal midperiphery, corresponding to neuroretinal rim loss predominantly in the inferotemporal sector in early glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. CONCLUSION Positive test results using suprathreshold stimulation in the midperiphery can be found in patients with preperimetric glaucoma at a significantly higher frequency than in normal subjects. Longitudinal studies will show whether such tests can be useful for predicting perimetric manifestation of the disease.