N. Satou

Orthotopic liver transplantation for congenital biliary atresia. An 11-year, single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE The authors analyze a single centers 11-year experience with 190 orthotopic liver transplants for congenital biliary atresia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Hepatic portoenterostomy generally is the initial treatment for children with congenital biliary atresia. Despite multiple modifications of the hepatic portoenterostomy, two thirds of treated patients still develop recurrent cholestasis, portal hypertension, cholangitis, and cirrhosis. Therefore, the only hope of long-term survival in the majority of children with congenital biliary atresia is definitive correction with orthotopic liver transplantation. METHODS The medical records of 190 consecutive patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation for congenital biliary atresia from July 1, 1984 to February 29, 1996 were reviewed. Results were analyzed via Cox multivariate regression analysis to determine the statistical strength of independent associations between pretransplant covariates and patient and graft survival. Actuarial patient and graft survival was determined at 1, 2, and 5 years. The type and incidence of post-transplant complications were determined, as was the quality of long-term graft function. The median follow-up period was 3.21 years. RESULTS The liver grafts were comprised on 155 whole-organ, 24 reduced-size, and 11 living donor organs. Median pretransplant values for recipient age, weight, and total bilirubin were 1.4 years, 12.3 kg, and 13.8 mg/dL, respectively. One hundred sixty-four patients (86%) had undergone prior hepatic portoenterostomy. Eighty-seven patients (46%) were United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status 1 or 2 at the time of liver transplantation. The majority (15/24, 62%) of reduced-size graft recipients were UNOS status I at the time of transplantation. One hundred fifty-nine patients (84%) received a single graft, whereas 31 patients required 37 retransplants. The 1, 2, and 5 year actuarial patient survival rates were 83%, 80% and 78% respectively, whereas graft survival rates were 81%, 77%, and 76%, respectively. Cox multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that pretransplant total bilirubin, UNOS status, and graft type significantly predicted patient survival, whereas recipient age, weight, and previous hepatic portoenterostomy did not. Current median follow-up values for total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase levels in the 154 surviving patients were 0.5 mg/dL and 34 international units/L, respectively. CONCLUSION Long-term patient survival after orthotopic liver transplantation for congenital biliary atresia is excellent and is independent of recipient age, weight, or previous hepatic portoenterostomy. Optimal results are obtained in this patient population when liver transplantation is performed before marked hyperbilirubinemia, and when possible, using a living-donor graft.

Improved costs and outcomes with conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in TAVR patients: Time to wake up?

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a commonplace procedure for the treatment of aortic stenosis in higher risk surgical patients. With the high cost and steadily increasing number of patients receiving TAVR, emphasis has been placed on optimizing outcomes as well as resource utilization. Recently, studies have demonstrated the feasibility of conscious sedation in lieu of general anesthesia for TAVR. This study aimed to investigate the clinical as well as cost outcomes associated with conscious sedation in comparison to general anesthesia in TAVR. Methods Records for all adult patients undergoing TAVR at our institution between August 2012 and June 2016 were included using our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) registries. Cost data was gathered using the BIOME database. Patients were stratified into two groups according to whether they received general anesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation (CS) during the procedure. No-replacement propensity score matching was done using the validated STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) as a propensity score. Primary outcome measure with survival to discharge and several secondary outcome measures were also included in analysis. According to our institutions data reporting guidelines, all cost data is presented as a percentage of the general anesthesia control group cost. Results Of the 231 patients initially identified, 225 (157 GA, 68 CS) were included for analysis. After no-replacement propensity score matching, 196 patients (147 GA, 49 CS) remained. Overall mortality was 1.5% in the matched population with a trend towards lower mortality in the CS group. Conscious sedation was associated with significantly fewer ICU hours (30 vs 96 hours, p = <0.001) and total hospital days (4.9 vs 10.4, p<0.001). Additionally, there was a 28% decrease in direct cost (p<0.001) as well as significant decreases in all individual all cost categories associated with the use of conscious sedation. There was no difference in composite major adverse events between groups. These trends remained on all subsequent subgroup analyses. Conclusion Conscious sedation is emerging as a safe and viable option for anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The use of conscious sedation was not only associated with similar rates of adverse events, but also shortened ICU and overall hospital stays. Finally, there were significant decreases in all cost categories when compared to a propensity matched cohort receiving general anesthesia.

Addition of Statins to Treatment With β-Blockers to Improve Outcomes for Cardiac Surgery Patients: Beyond the Surgical Care Improvement Project.

Addition of Statins to Treatment With β-Blockers to Improve Outcomes for Cardiac Surgery Patients: Beyond the Surgical Care Improvement Project For nearly 2 decades, β-blockers have been thought to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events during the perioperative period. Beginning with the Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography trial1 in 1999, a series of studies have provided compelling evidence that patients undergoing high-risk operations should receive β-blockers before surgery.2 Given these findings, the Surgical Care Improvement Project required that all patients previously receiving β-blockers should receive their medication in the 24 hours before surgery. More recently, however, several large-scale studies have failed to reproduce these beneficial effects,3,4 and the Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation trial4 found increased mortality with the use of β-blockers before surgery. A similar controversy exists with regard to the perioperative administration of statins, agents that may reduce