Nadia Magdalinou

A panel of nine cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers may identify patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes

Background Patients presenting with parkinsonian syndromes share many clinical features, which can make diagnosis difficult. This is important as atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APSs) such as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) carry a poor prognosis, compared with patients with Parkinsons disease (PD). In addition, there is overlap between APS and dementia diseases, such as Alzheimers disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Objective To use a panel of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers to differentiate patients with APS from PD and dementia. Methods A prospective cohort of 160 patients and 30 control participants were recruited from a single specialist centre. Patients were clinically diagnosed according to current consensus criteria. CSF samples were obtained from patients with clinical diagnoses of PD (n=31), PSP (n=33), CBS (n=14), MSA (n=31), AD (n=26) and FTD (n=16). Healthy, elderly participants (n=30) were included as controls. Total τ (t-τ), phosphorylated τ (p-τ), β-amyloid 1–42 (Aβ42), neurofilament light chain (NFL), α-synuclein (α-syn), amyloid precursor protein soluble metabolites α and β (soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP)α, sAPPβ) and two neuroinflammatory markers (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and YKL-40) were measured in CSF. A reverse stepwise regression analysis and the false discovery rate procedure were used. Results CSF NFL (p<0.001), sAPPα (p<0.001) and a-syn (p=0.003) independently predicted diagnosis of PD versus APS. Together, these nine biomarkers could differentiate patients with PD from APS with an area under the curve of 0.95 and subtypes of APS from one another. There was good discriminatory power between parkinsonian groups, dementia disorders and healthy controls. Conclusions A panel of nine CSF biomarkers was able to differentiate APS from patients with PD and dementia. This may have important clinical utility in improving diagnostic accuracy, allowing better prognostication and earlier access to potential disease-modifying therapies.

Blood-based NfL : A biomarker for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorder

Objective: To determine if blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) protein can discriminate between Parkinson disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonian disorders (APD) with equally high diagnostic accuracy as CSF NfL, and can therefore improve the diagnostic workup of parkinsonian disorders. Methods: The study included 3 independent prospective cohorts: the Lund (n = 278) and London (n = 117) cohorts, comprising healthy controls and patients with PD, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS), and multiple system atrophy (MSA), as well as an early disease cohort (n = 109) of patients with PD, PSP, MSA, or CBS with disease duration ≤3 years. Blood NfL concentration was measured using an ultrasensitive single molecule array (Simoa) method, and the diagnostic accuracy to distinguish PD from APD was investigated. Results: We found strong correlations between blood and CSF concentrations of NfL (ρ ≥ 0.73–0.84, p ≤ 0.001). Blood NfL was increased in patients with MSA, PSP, and CBS (i.e., all APD groups) when compared to patients with PD as well as healthy controls in all cohorts (p < 0.001). Furthermore, in the Lund cohort, blood NfL could accurately distinguish PD from APD (area under the curve [AUC] 0.91) with similar results in both the London cohort (AUC 0.85) and the early disease cohort (AUC 0.81). Conclusions: Quantification of blood NfL concentration can be used to distinguish PD from APD. Blood-based NfL might consequently be included in the diagnostic workup of patients with parkinsonian symptoms in both primary care and specialized clinics. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that blood NfL levels discriminate between PD and APD.

Development and assessment of sensitive immuno-PCR assays for the quantification of cerebrospinal fluid three- and four-repeat tau isoforms in tauopathies.

Characteristic tau isoform composition of the insoluble fibrillar tau inclusions define tauopathies, including Alzheimers disease (AD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17/frontotemporal lobar degeneration‐tau (FTDP‐17/FTLD‐tau). Exon 10 splicing mutations in the tau gene, MAPT, in familial FTDP‐17 cause elevation of tau isoforms with four microtubule‐binding repeat domains (4R‐tau) compared to those with three repeats (3R‐tau). On the basis of two well‐characterised monoclonal antibodies against 3R‐ and 4R‐tau, we developed novel, sensitive immuno‐PCR assays for measuring the trace amounts of these isoforms in CSF. This was with the aim of assessing if CSF tau isoform changes reflect the pathological changes in tau isoform homeostasis in the degenerative brain and if these would be relevant for differential clinical diagnosis. Initial analysis of clinical CSF samples of PSP (n = 46), corticobasal syndrome (CBS; n = 22), AD (n = 11), Parkinsons disease with dementia (PDD; n = 16) and 35 controls revealed selective decreases of immunoreactive 4R‐tau in CSF of PSP and AD patients compared with controls, and lower 4R‐tau levels in AD compared with PDD. These decreases could be related to the disease‐specific conformational masking of the RD4‐binding epitope because of abnormal folding and/or aggregation of the 4R‐tau isoforms in tauopathies or increased sequestration of the 4R‐tau isoforms in brain tau pathology.

Increased CSF neurogranin concentration is specific to Alzheimer disease

Objective: To assess the specificity of the dendritic protein neurogranin (Ng) in CSF from patients with a broad range of neurodegenerative diseases including a variety of dementias, tauopathies, and synucleinopathies. Method: An optimized immunoassay was used to analyze CSF Ng in a retrospective cohort of 331 participants with different neurodegenerative diseases, including healthy controls (n = 19), biomarker-proven Alzheimer disease (AD) (n = 100), genetic AD (n = 2), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (n = 20), speech variant frontotemporal dementia (n = 21), Lewy body dementia (n = 13), Parkinson disease (n = 31), progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 46), multiple system atrophy (n = 29), as well as a heterogeneous group with non-neurodegenerative cognitive impairment (n = 50). CSF Ng concentrations and correlations of CSF Ng with total tau, phosphorylated tau, and β-amyloid 42 concentrations, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and disease duration in the different groups were investigated. Results: Median CSF Ng concentration was higher in patients with AD compared to both controls (p < 0.001) and all other disease groups (all p < 0.001) except speech variant frontotemporal dementia. There were no significant differences in CSF Ng concentrations between any other neurodegenerative groups and controls. In addition, we found strong correlations between Ng and total tau (p < 0.001) and phosphorylated tau (p < 0.001). Conclusions: These results confirm an increase in CSF Ng concentration in patients with AD as previously reported and show that this is specific to AD and not seen in a range of other neurodegenerative diseases.

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in parkinsonian conditions: an update and future directions

Parkinsonian diseases comprise a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders, which show significant clinical and pathological overlap. Accurate diagnosis still largely relies on clinical acumen; pathological diagnosis remains the gold standard. There is an urgent need for biomarkers to diagnose parkinsonian disorders, particularly in the early stages when diagnosis is most difficult. In this review, several of the most promising cerebrospinal fluid candidate markers will be discussed. Their strengths and limitations will be considered together with future developments in the field.

Normal pressure hydrocephalus or progressive supranuclear palsy? A clinicopathological case series

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a poorly understood condition, which typically presents with the triad of balance impairment, urinary incontinence and subacute cognitive decline, while brain imaging shows a marked enlargement of the cerebral ventricles. Few patients with iNPH have come to post-mortem. We identified four patients from the Queen Square Brain Bank archival collection, who had received a diagnosis of iNPH during life, and reviewed their clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics. At post mortem examination, one patient had Parkinson’s disease (PD) while the other three had progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). All four had presented with pure akinesia with gait freezing, accompanied by unsteadiness and falls. An awareness that PSP or PD can mimic the clinical symptoms of iNPH may help to avoid invasive and futile cerebrospinal fluid shunting procedures.

Single-Molecule Imaging of Individual Amyloid Protein Aggregates in Human Biofluids

The misfolding and aggregation of proteins into amyloid fibrils characterizes many neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. We report here a method, termed SAVE (single aggregate visualization by enhancement) imaging, for the ultrasensitive detection of individual amyloid fibrils and oligomers using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. We demonstrate that this method is able to detect the presence of amyloid aggregates of α-synuclein, tau, and amyloid-β. In addition, we show that aggregates can also be identified in human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Significantly, we see a twofold increase in the average aggregate concentration in CSF from Parkinson’s disease patients compared to age-matched controls. Taken together, we conclude that this method provides an opportunity to characterize the structural nature of amyloid aggregates in a key biofluid, and therefore has the potential to study disease progression in both animal models and humans to enhance our understanding of neurodegenerative disorders.

Cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein levels in Parkinson's disease--changed or unchanged?

Parkinsonian disorders represent a large group of agerelated neurodegenerative diseases. In addition to common Parkinson’s disease (PD), they include the rarer atypical parkinsonian disorders such as multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration and dementia with Lewy bodies [1]. The differential diagnosis may be challenging, especially in early disease stages. As an accurate initial diagnosis has profound implications for the management of these devastating disorders, there is an unmet need for better diagnostic tools. Predominantly expressed in the pre-synapse, a-synuclein, 140 amino acids long, has been found to be the major constituent of the intracellular aggregates in Lewy bodies, the pathological hallmark of PD and dementia with Lewy bodies, and in the glial cytoplasmic inclusions of multiple system atrophy [2,3]. These diseases have accordingly been grouped as synucleinopathies. Intracellular a-synuclein has been shown to be released into the extracellular space [4] and may be transmitted between neurons [5]. The exact roles of a-synuclein in biology and neurotoxicity remain unclear but genetic data, including duplications and triplications of the a-synuclein-encoding SNCA gene in PD, clearly suggest a primary involvement of the protein in neurodegeneration [6–8]. Full-length a-synuclein has been detected in biological fluids, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma, conditioned cell media and most recently saliva [4,9,10]. The quantification of a-synuclein in CSF, the fluid that surrounds the brain and communicates freely with the brain interstitial fluid, has been proposed as a potential biomarker for a-synuclein-related diseases [11]. There are discrepant findings, however, by a number of investigators using several different platforms and standard operating procedures, as well as a tremendous overlap of values across studies. Nevertheless, as more and more data accumulate a trend towards reduced CSF a-synuclein levels in PD and other synucleinopathies can be spotted in the literature. In this context, the new study by van Dijk et al. [12] in the current issue of European Journal of Neurology is important. van Dijk and colleagues employed a time-resolved F€ orster’s resonance energy transfer assay to measure CSF a-synuclein in 53 PD patients and 50 healthy controls and detected reduced levels in the former group. Moreover, they assessed CSF a-synuclein levels in relation to disease duration and severity, as well as imaging data of dopamine transporters, without finding any associations. The study was carefully conducted and the authors excluded CSF samples with blood contamination; a common reason for erroneously elevated CSF a-synuclein concentration is high amounts of the protein in red blood cells [13]. The data by van Dijk et al. corroborate the view that CSF a-synuclein is indeed reduced in PD, although with an overlap against controls making the diagnostic accuracy suboptimal. Including these latest data, we performed a metaanalysis of cross-sectional PD control studies on CSF a-synuclein. All studies reporting mean and standard deviations for CSF a-synuclein were included (for those reporting median and range, we contacted the authors) [12,14–28]. Fold change in the biomarker level between PD patients and controls was used as the effect metric to factor out method-related differences in absolute a-synuclein levels across studies. Studies on oligomeric a-synuclein were excluded. The meta-analysis clearly shows that CSF a-synuclein is reduced in PD (Fig. 1). The question now is whether this reduction correlates with Lewy body counts in the brain and whether it can be fine-tuned to better reflect pathology, e.g. by developing specific assays against N-terminally acetylated and C-terminally truncated a-synuclein forms that are found in brain tissue [29]. Perhaps CSF a-synuclein will develop into a biomarker that correlates with pathology in a manner similar to how the 42 amino acid isoform of amyloid b (Ab42) correlates with senile plaque pathology? It should be noted that CSF levels of total Ab did not associate with plaque pathology; it was not until specific assays for the aggregationprone Ab42 variant were developed that such correlations became evident [30]. In any case, van Dijk and colleagues’ assay holds real promise in large sample series, including other parkinsonian disorders and in longitudinal sample series with serial CSF examinations.

Using florbetapir positron emission tomography to explore cerebrospinal fluid cut points and gray zones in small sample sizes

We aimed to assess the feasibility of determining Alzheimers disease cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cut points in small samples through comparison with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET).

Cerebrospinal fluid in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: clinical utility of an extended panel of biomarkers in a specialist cognitive clinic

BackgroundCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are increasingly being used to support a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Their clinical utility for differentiating AD from non-AD neurodegenerative dementias, such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) or frontotemporal dementia (FTD), is less well established. We aimed to determine the diagnostic utility of an extended panel of CSF biomarkers to differentiate AD from a range of other neurodegenerative dementias.MethodsWe used immunoassays to measure conventional CSF markers of amyloid and tau pathology (amyloid beta (Aβ)1–42, total tau (T-tau), and phosphorylated tau (P-tau)) as well as amyloid processing (AβX-38, AβX-40, AβX-42, soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP)α, and sAPPβ), large fibre axonal degeneration (neurofilament light chain (NFL)), and neuroinflammation (YKL-40) in 245 patients with a variety of dementias and 30 controls. Patients fulfilled consensus criteria for AD (n = 156), DLB (n = 20), behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD; n = 45), progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA; n = 17), and semantic dementia (SD; n = 7); approximately 10% were pathology/genetically confirmed (n = 26). Global tests based on generalised least squares regression were used to determine differences between groups. Non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to quantify how well each biomarker discriminated AD from each of the other diagnostic groups (or combinations of groups). CSF cut-points for the major biomarkers found to have diagnostic utility were validated using an independent cohort which included causes of AD (n = 104), DLB (n = 5), bvFTD (n = 12), PNFA (n = 3), SD (n = 9), and controls (n = 10).ResultsThere were significant global differences in Aβ1–42, T-tau, T-tau/Aβ1–42 ratio, P-tau-181, NFL, AβX-42, AβX-42/X-40 ratio, APPα, and APPβ between groups. At a fixed sensitivity of 85%, AβX-42/X-40 could differentiate AD from controls, bvFTD, and SD with specificities of 93%, 85%, and 100%, respectively; for T-tau/Aβ1–42 these specificities were 83%, 70%, and 86%. AβX-42/X-40 had similar or higher specificity than Aβ1–42. No biomarker or ratio could differentiate AD from DLB or PNFA with specificity > 50%. Similar sensitivities and specificities were found in the independent validation cohort for differentiating AD and other dementias and in a pathology/genetically confirmed sub-cohort.ConclusionsCSF AβX-42/X-40 and T-tau/Aβ1–42 ratios have utility in distinguishing AD from controls, bvFTD, and SD. None of the biomarkers tested had good specificity at distinguishing AD from DLB or PNFA.