Nalini Ranjan Kumar
Central Institute of Fisheries Education
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Nalini Ranjan Kumar.
Current World Environment | 2016
Pankajkumar Hanmantrao Mugaonkar; Nalini Ranjan Kumar; Gauri Shelar; R. S Biradar; Kvn Mallikarjuna Rao
The paper delineates the distribution, communication and price transmission along the supply chain. Pangasius was mainly produced and supplied from state of Andhra Pradesh to several states in India. The major share of Pangasius traded to West Bengal (73.29%) and Maharashtra (16.4%) and hence the study was restricted to these two states. The three marketing channels were identified (A, B and C) and the major volume was transacted through the channel (B). The stakeholders identified in marketing were farmers, broker, transporters, packers, ice providers, wholesalers, secondary wholesalers and retailers. Exchange of information among actors, was mainly focused on quality, quantity, prices, time of delivery and arrangements with supporting intermediaries. The every intermediary added a cost and moved it further to respective stakeholder after earning some returns. In channel (B), the profit of wholesalers and retailers was Rs. 3.08 and Rs. 6.85 per Kg, respectively whereas in channel (C), primary wholesaler, secondary wholesaler and retailer realised profit in rupees per kg of Rs. 2.31, Rs. 4.5 and Rs. 8.15, respectively. Channel (A) had shown direct sell to consumers. Price spread reflects Channel (B) (Rs. 31.2/Kg) was efficient than (C) (Rs. 34.95/ Kg). Farmers opined that negligible local demand compelled farmers to sell Pangasius in distant market. Promotion of Pangasius consumption in home state and nearby states will go a long way in improving local demand and to ensure better prices. This may realise sustainable development of Pangasius in India. keywords: Pangasius, Andhra Pradesh, Supply Chain, Schematic Diagram.
Agricultural Economics Research Review | 2015
N.W. Quershi; L. Achoth; M. Krishnan; S. Prakash; P.S. Ananthan; Nalini Ranjan Kumar; S.K. Pandey
This paper captures the performance of the agriculture, livestock and fisheries sub-sectors in terms of capital formation, incremental capital output ratio and relative contribution of these sub-sectors to gross domestic product during the period 2004-05 to 2010-11. The Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) in fisheries took off at around 6 per cent in 1990, peaked at around 16 per cent in 1999 and has been hovering around 10 per cent for the past 5-6 years. But, the GFCF in agriculture turned positive after 1999, and reached a maximum of 5 per cent, while GFCF in livestock, turned positive only in the Xth Plan period and still remains below the 5 per cent mark. The investment elasticity of growth (IEG) in agriculture has been found fluctuating during 1981-2011, while that of the livestock and fisheries sub-sectors has been found improving. In all the three sub-sectors, when the investment elasticity is higher, the Incremental Capital Output Ratio (ICOR) is lower and vice-a-versa. The investment efficiency ratio (IER) has been found increasing in agriculture and fisheries, and reducing in the livestock sub-sector. Despite the fact that agriculture is the largest private investment sector in India, the investment elasticity is low and the ICOR is high, indicating the need for a relook at the composition and direction of investment in agriculture and livestock sub-sectors. The estimates of IEG in the fisheries have been found positive but, the ICOR is declining, indicating an increased output resulting from the increasing capital formation. The cointegration analysis has revealed a long-run equilibrium of time series with a common ground in the values of agriculture, livestock and fisheries GDP and GFCF. The ICOR in livestock has been found declining, indicating an excess capacity of capital in this sub-sector despite the fact that the IER has been marginally positive. The excess capacity could also arise because of misdirected investments in areas within the livestock sub-sector. Some broad leads have been derived from the results.
Agricultural Economics Research Review | 2014
Apu Das; Nalini Ranjan Kumar
The launch of aqua-model village scheme by the Government of Tripura was an ambitious effort for the development of fisheries in the state. The study has assessed the employment generation and income distribution pattern across fish farmers on implementation of aqua-model village scheme by the Department of Fisheries of Govt. of Tripura during 2004–05 to 2010–11 based on the responses of 80 sample farmers selected from both the adopted and non-adopted villages under the scheme. The study has revealed that the aqua-model village scheme has helped in generating employment and income and improving equitable distribution of income across the fish farmers of the state. The study has suggested implementation of this scheme in other areas of the state also.
International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies | 2014
Prathvi Rani; Sheela Immanuel; Nalini Ranjan Kumar
Fishery technology | 2013
Apu Das; Nalini Ranjan Kumar; Biswajit Debnath; Debtanu Barman; Manik Datta
International Journal of Agriculture Sciences | 2012
Apu Das; Nalini Ranjan Kumar; Biswajit Debnath; Sagar C. Mandal
Indian Journal of Fisheries | 2013
Apu Das; Nalini Ranjan Kumar; M. Krishnan; Vinod Kumar Yadav
Indian Journal of Fisheries | 2013
Prathvi Rani; Sheela Immanuel; P.S. Ananthan; S. N. Ojha; Nalini Ranjan Kumar; Mohan Krishnan
Journal of Applied and Natural Science | 2017
Stanzin Gawa; Nalini Ranjan Kumar; Swadesh Prakash; Vinod Kumar Yadav; Vinay Maruti Hatte; Navghan Mahida
Indian Journal of Fisheries | 2016
Apu Das; Nalini Ranjan Kumar; Prathvi Rani
Collaboration
Dive into the Nalini Ranjan Kumar's collaboration.
Pankajkumar Hanmantrao Mugaonkar
Central Institute of Fisheries Education
View shared research outputs