Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Nancy C. Dolan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Nancy C. Dolan.


Circulation | 2007

Calcium/Vitamin D Supplementation and Cardiovascular Events

Judith Hsia; Gerardo Heiss; Hong Ren; Matthew A. Allison; Nancy C. Dolan; Philip Greenland; Susan R. Heckbert; Karen C. Johnson; JoAnn E. Manson; Stephen Sidney; Maurizio Trevisan

Background— Individuals with vascular or valvular calcification are at increased risk for coronary events, but the relationship between calcium consumption and cardiovascular events is uncertain. We evaluated the risk of coronary and cerebrovascular events in the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial of calcium plus vitamin D supplementation. Methods and Results— We randomized 36 282 postmenopausal women 50 to 79 years of age at 40 clinical sites to calcium carbonate 500 mg with vitamin D 200 IU twice daily or to placebo. Cardiovascular disease was a prespecified secondary efficacy outcome. During 7 years of follow-up, myocardial infarction or coronary heart disease death was confirmed for 499 women assigned to calcium/vitamin D and 475 women assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.18). Stroke was confirmed among 362 women assigned to calcium/vitamin D and 377 assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.10). In subgroup analyses, women with higher total calcium intake (diet plus supplements) at baseline were not at higher risk for coronary events (P=0.91 for interaction) or stroke (P=0.14 for interaction) if assigned to active calcium/vitamin D. Conclusions— Calcium/vitamin D supplementation neither increased nor decreased coronary or cerebrovascular risk in generally healthy postmenopausal women over a 7-year use period.


Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2016

Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris

Andrea L. Zaenglein; Arun L. Pathy; Bethanee J. Schlosser; Ali Alikhan; Hilary E. Baldwin; Diane Berson; Whitney P. Bowe; Emmy M. Graber; Julie C. Harper; Sewon Kang; Jonette E. Keri; James J. Leyden; Rachel V. Reynolds; Nanette B. Silverberg; Linda Stein Gold; Megha M. Tollefson; Jonathan Weiss; Nancy C. Dolan; Andrew A. Sagan; Mackenzie Stern; Kevin Boyer; Reva Bhushan

Acne is one of the most common disorders treated by dermatologists and other health care providers. While it most often affects adolescents, it is not uncommon in adults and can also be seen in children. This evidence-based guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in its management. Issues from grading of acne to the topical and systemic management of the disease are reviewed. Suggestions on use are provided based on available evidence.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Health Care Provider-Directed Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Veterans: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

M. Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C. Dolan; Marian L. Fitzgibbon; Terry C. Davis; Nicolle Gorby; Lisa A. Ladewski; Dachao Liu; Alfred Rademaker; Franklin Medio; Brian P. Schmitt; Charles L. Bennett

PURPOSE Colorectal cancer screening is the most underused cancer screening tool in the United States. The purpose of this study was to test whether a health care provider-directed intervention increased colorectal cancer screening rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted at two clinic firms at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The records of 5,711 patients were reviewed; 1,978 patients were eligible. Eligible patients were men aged 50 years and older who had no personal or family history of colorectal cancer or polyps, had not received colorectal cancer screening, and had at least one visit to the clinic during the study period. Health care providers in the intervention firm attended a workshop on colorectal cancer screening. Every 4 to 6 months, they attended quality improvement workshops where they received group screening rates, individualized confidential feedback, and training on improving communication with patients with limited literacy skills. Medical records were reviewed for colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Literacy level was assessed in a subset of patients. RESULTS Colorectal cancer screening was recommended for 76.0% of patients in the intervention firm and for 69.4% of controls (P = .02). Screening tests were completed by 41.3% of patients in the intervention group versus 32.4% of controls (P = .003). Among patients with health literacy skills less than ninth grade, screening was completed by 55.7% of patients in the intervention group versus 30% of controls (P < .01). CONCLUSION A provider-directed intervention with feedback on individual and firm-specific screening rates significantly increased both recommendations and colorectal cancer screening completion rates among veterans.


Medical Care | 2011

Changes in Performance After Implementation of a Multifaceted Electronic-Health-Record-Based Quality Improvement System

Stephen D. Persell; Darren Kaiser; Nancy C. Dolan; Beth Andrews; Sue Levi; Janardan D. Khandekar; Thomas Gavagan; Jason A. Thompson; Elisha M. Friesema; David W. Baker

Background:Electronic health record (EHR) systems have the potential to revolutionize quality improvement (QI) methods by enhancing quality measurement and integrating multiple proven QI strategies. Objectives:To implement and evaluate a multifaceted QI intervention using EHR tools to improve quality measurement (including capture of contraindications and patient refusals), make point-of-care reminders more accurate, and provide more valid and responsive clinician feedback (including lists of patients not receiving essential medications) for 16 chronic disease and preventive service measures. Design:Time series analysis at a large internal medicine practice using a commercial EHR. Subjects:All adult patients eligible for each measure (range approximately 100–7500). Measures:The proportion of eligible patients who satisfied each measure after removing those with exceptions from the denominator. Results:During the year before the intervention, performance improved significantly for 8 measures. During the year after the intervention, performance improved significantly for 14 measures. For 9 measures, the primary outcome improved more rapidly during the intervention year than during the previous year (P < 0.001 for 8 measures, P = 0.02 for 1). Four other measures improved at rates that were not significantly different from the previous year. Improvements resulted from increases in patients receiving the service, documentation of exceptions, or a combination of both. For 5 drug-prescribing measures, more than half of physicians achieved 100% performance. Conclusions:Implementation of a multifaceted QI intervention using EHR tools to improve quality measurement and the accuracy and timeliness of clinician feedback improved performance and/or accelerated the rate of improvement for multiple measures simultaneously.


Annals of Family Medicine | 2007

Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians.

Vincenza Snow; Amir Qaseem; Patricia P. Barry; E. Rodney Hornbake; Jonathan E. Rodnick; Timothy Tobolic; Belinda Ireland; Jodi B. Segal; Eric B Bass; Kevin B. Weiss; Lee A. Green; Douglas K Owens; Mark D. Aronson; Donald E. Casey; J. Thomas Cross; Nancy C. Dolan; Nick Fitterman; Paul G. Shekelle; Katherine Sherif; Eric M. Wall; Kevin A. Peterson; James M. Gill; Robert C. Marshall; Kenneth G. Schellhase; Steven W. Strode; Kurtis S. Elward; James W. Mold; Jonathan L. Temte; Frederick M. Chen; Thomas F. Koinis

Venous thromboembolism is a common condition affecting 7.1 persons per 10,000 person-years among community residents. Incidence rates for venous thromboembolism are higher in men, African-Americans, and increase substantially with age. It is critical to treat deep venous thrombosis at an early stage to avoid development of further complications, such as pulmonary embolism or recurrent deep venous thrombosis. The target audience for this guideline is all clinicians caring for patients who have been given a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The target patient population is patients receiving a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism or lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 1995

Skin cancer control practices among physicians in a university general medicine practice

Nancy C. Dolan; Gary J. Martin; June K. Robinson; Alfred Rademaker

Physician counseling about sun protection and routine screening for skin cancer in high-risk individuals have been widely recommended. The purpose of this study was to assess the skin cancer control practices and knowledge among physicians in a university-based general medicine practice. Fifty-two physicians completed a survey on attitudes toward, behaviors in, and knowledge of skin cancer control. In addition, the ability of general medicine residents and attending physicians to correctly identify and make biopsy recommendations for ten photographed skin lesions was compared with that of third-year medical students and dermatology residents and attendings. The results of the survey illustrate a need for improving primary care physicians’ knowledge and identification of skin cancer risk factors, and increasing the frequency and consistency with which they perform skin cancer prevention counseling and complete skin examination in high-risk patient groups.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2001

Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting

Nancy C. Dolan; Joe Feinglass; Aparna Priyanath; Corrine Haviley; Asta V. Sorensen; Luz A. Venta

OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with patient satisfaction with communication of mammography results and their understanding and ability to recall these results.DESIGN: Cross-sectional telephone survey.SETTING: Academic breast imaging center.PATIENTS: Two hundred ninety-eight patients who had either a screening or diagnostic mammogram.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Survey items assessed waiting time for results, anxiety about results, satisfaction with several components of results reporting, and patients’ understanding of results and recommendations. Women undergoing screening exams were more likely to be dissatisfied with the way the results were communicated than those who underwent diagnostic exams and received immediate results (20% vs 11%, P=.05). For these screening patients, waiting for more than two weeks for notification of results, difficulty getting in touch with someone to answer questions, low ratings of how clearly results were explained, and considerable or extreme anxiety about the results were all independently associated with dissatisfaction with the way the results were reported, while age and actual exam result were not.CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing screening mammograms were more likely to be dissatisfied with the way the results were communicated than were those who underwent diagnostic mammograms. Interventions to reduce the wait time for results, reduce patients’ anxiety, and improve the clarity with which the results and recommendations are given may help improve overall satisfaction with mammography result reporting.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 1995

Adherence to screening mammography recommendations in a University general medicine clinic

Nancy C. Dolan; Douglas Reifler; Mary M. McDermott; William C. McGaghie

AbstractOBJECTIVE: To determine factors predicting adherence to a health care provider’s screening mammography recommendation in a general internal medicine practice. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: An urban academic general internal medicine practice. PATIENTS: Three hundred forty-nine asymptomatic women, aged 50 years and older, without prior history of breast cancer, who received a health care provider’s recommendation for screening mammography. MEASUREMENT: Independent variables were: patient age, race, insurance type, educational level, and duration of affiliation with the practice; visit type; and health care provider gender and level of training. Dependent variables were acceptance of the recommendation and adherence, defined as undergoing mammography within three months of the recommendation. RESULTS: Overall, 193 (55%) of the women underwent the recommended mammography. Two hundred ninety-eight (85%) initially agreed to the recommendation, and of these, 190 (64%) completed mammography within three months. By univariate analysis, acceptance of the recommendation decreased significantly with increasing age (p<0.01), and by race (African-Americans 89% vs whites 82%, p=0.05). Only age remained independently predictive of acceptance in a multiple variable analysis. Among women who accepted the recommendation, adherence varied significantly according to race (white 70% vs nonwhite 59%, p=0.05), insurance type [Medicare as only insurance 45%, Medicaid 66%, non-health maintenance organization (non-HMO) private 62%, HMO 73%, p=0.03], and health care provider training (attending physicians 73%, residents 58%, nurse practitioners 47%, p=0.02). In a logistic regression analysis, insurance type and health care provider training remained independently predictive of adherence. CONCLUSION: Acceptance of screening mammography recommendations decreases with age. Among the women who agreed to the recommendation for screening mammography, insurance type and health care provider level of training best predicted adherence.


Health Promotion Practice | 2007

Process Evaluation in an Intervention Designed to Improve Rates of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a VA Medical Center

Marian L. Fitzgibbon; M. Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C. Dolan; Terry C. Davis; Alfred Rademaker; Michael S. Wolf; Dachao Liu; Nicolle Gorby; Brian P. Schmitt; Charles L. Bennett

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United States. Although CRC screening is recommended for individuals 50 years and older, screening completion rates are low. This can be attributed to provider and patient barriers. We developed an intervention to improve provider recommendation and patient screening among noncompliant male veterans in a 2-year randomized controlled trial and examined the relationship between participation and study outcomes among patients and providers. Overall, providers who attended intervention sessions recommended CRC screening during 64% of patient visits and providers who did not attend any intervention sessions recommended screening during 54% of visits (p < .01). Patients of providers who attended intervention sessions also were more likely to be screened (42% versus 29%, p < .05). The patient intervention did not have the desired impact. The subgroup of patients in the patient intervention was not more likely to complete CRC screening.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 1996

Lump detection is enhanced in silicone breast models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue

Mary M. McDermott; Nancy C. Dolan; Josephine M Huang; Douglas Reifler; Alfred Rademaker

We varied the softness and nodularity of silicone breast models to assess the effects of age-related breast tissue characteristics on lump detection. In two sets of six silicone breast models manufactured to simulate premenopausal and postmenopausal breast tissue, respectively, 82 internal medicine attending and housestaff physicians more readily detected lumps among models simulating older breast tissue. The proportion of models with one or more false-positive findings was higher among models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue. We conclude that age-related changes in breast tissue most likely contribute to the higher sensitivity of clinical breast examination in older women.

Collaboration


Dive into the Nancy C. Dolan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles L. Bennett

University of South Carolina

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marian L. Fitzgibbon

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dachao Liu

Northwestern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amir Qaseem

American College of Physicians

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald E. Casey

American College of Physicians

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge