Nancy E. Oriol

Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient.

The effectiveness of two epidural analgesic regimens on the ability to ambulate was compared in women in labor by a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. One group of patients received epidural fentanyl, a 75-micrograms bolus and an infusion of fentanyl 2.5 micrograms/mL at 15 mL/h (FENT, n = 53). A second group received ultra low-dose bupivacaine (0.04%), epinephrine (1.7 micrograms/mL), and fentanyl (1.7 micrograms/mL) (BEF, n = 77), a 15-mL bolus followed by an infusion at 15 mL/h. Adequate analgesia was rapidly obtained in 90.6% of patients in the FENT group and 92.2% of patients in the BEF group (P = 0.89). Seventy percent of patients in the FENT group ambulated versus 68% in the other group. The BEF mixture provided analgesia of longer duration (287 +/- 171 min versus 156 +/- 72 min, P = 0.0001). The number of patients delivering during administration of only their study drug (without needing higher doses of local anesthetics) was 52% for BEF and 21% for FENT (P = 0.0005). Hip flexion weakness precluding ambulation occurred in 17% (P = 0.002) of BEF patients and orthostatic hypotension in 9% (P = 0.08). Neither problem occurred in FENT patients. Neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. Approximately 70% of women receiving epidural analgesia with fentanyl or ultra low-dose bupivacaine, epinephrine, and fentanyl may ambulate safely during labor.

Bringing good teaching cases "to life": a simulator-based medical education service.

Realistic medical simulation has expanded worldwide over the last decade. Such technology is playing an increasing role in medical education not merely because simulator sessions are enjoyable, but because they can provide an enhanced environment for experiential learning and reflective thought. High-fidelity patient simulators allow students of all levels to “practice” medicine without risk, providing a natural framework for the integration of basic and clinical science in a safe environment. Often described as “flight simulation for doctors,” the rationale, utility, and range of medical simulations have been described elsewhere, yet the challenges of integrating this technology into the medical school curriculum have received little attention. The authors report how Harvard Medical School established an on-campus simulator program for students in 2001, building on the work of the Center for Medical Simulation in Boston. As an overarching structure for the process, faculty and residents developed a simulator-based “medical education service”—like any other medical teaching service, but designed exclusively to help students learn on the simulator alongside a clinician-mentor, on demand. Initial evaluations among both preclinical and clinical students suggest that simulation is highly accepted and increasingly demanded. For some learners, simulation may allow complex information to be understood and retained more efficiently than can occur with traditional methods. Moreover, the process outlined here suggests that simulation can be integrated into existing curricula of almost any medical school or teaching hospital in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

Factors Associated with Back Pain after Childbirth

BackgroundBack pain after childbirth is a frequent complaint. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of back pain 1–2 months post partum and to identify the factors, including epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery, that may predispose to it. MethodsWomen delivering a viable singleton infant were interviewed 12–48 h after delivery for a history of back pain that occurred before, during, or both before and during the recent pregnancy and for details of their delivery experience. Two months later, the women interviewed were sent a follow-up questionnaire regarding the occurrence of back pain 1–2 months post partum. ResultsFollow-up data were available for 1,042 (88%) of the 1,185 women originally interviewed. The Incidence of post partum back pain in women who received epidural anesthesia was equivalent to those who did not (44% vs. 45%). Through stepwise multiple logistic regression, post partum back pain was found to be associated with a history of back pain, younger age, and greater weight. However, new-onset post partum back pain was found to be associated with greater weight and shorter stature. No statistically significant association was found between post partum back pain and epidural anesthesia, number of attempts at epidural placement, duration of second stage of labor, mode of delivery, or birth weight. ConclusionsThe overall incidence of back pain 1–2 months post partum in this population was 44%. Predisposing factors were a history of back pain, younger age, and greater weight. Predisposing factors for new-onset post partum back pain were greater weight and shorter stature. Epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery did not appear to be associated with back pain 1–2 months post partum.

An association between severe labor pain and cesarean delivery.

The relationship between epidural analgesia and cesarean delivery remains controversial. Several studies have documented an association, although others have not. This inconsistency may result from an association between severe labor pain and dystocia. We hypothesized that dystocia causes severe labor pain, such that more epidural medication is required to maintain comfort. We examined the relationship between labor outcome and severe pain, defined by the number of supplemental epidural boluses. We retrospectively reviewed the anesthesia records of 4493 parturients who received small-dose labor epidural analgesia. An independent association was found between operative delivery and maternal age, body mass index, nulliparity, fetal weight, induction of labor, and the number of boluses required during labor. By using multivariate analysis, the odds ratio of cesarean delivery among women who required at least three boluses was 2.3 compared with those who required two boluses or less. No association was found between the concentration of bupivacaine in the epidural infusion and operative delivery. Because women with cesarean deliveries appeared to have more pain, degree of labor pain may be a confounding factor in studies examining epidural analgesia and outcome. Implications: This is a retrospective observational study demonstrating an association between labor pain and cesarean delivery. Our results provide an alternative explanation of why epidural analgesia is associated with cesarean delivery.

Application of linear and nonlinear time series modeling to heart rate dynamics analysis

The linear autoregressive (AR) model is often used to investigate the pathophysiologic mechanisms controlling heart rate (HR) dynamics. This study implemented parametric models new to this field to determine if a more appropriate HR dynamics modeling structure exists. The linear AR and autoregressive-moving average (ARMA) models, and the nonlinear polynomial autoregressive (PAR) and bilinear (BL) models were fit to instantaneous HR time series obtained from nine subjects in the supine position. Model orders were determined by the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). Model residual variance was used as the primary intermodel comparison criterion, with significance evaluated by a /spl lambda//sup 2/ distributed statistic. The BL model best represented the HR dynamics, as its residual variance was significantly (p<0.05) smaller than that of the corresponding AR model for nine out of nine data sets. In all cases, the BL model had a smaller residual variance than either the ARMA or PAR models. The bilinear model was ineffective at data forecasting, however, the authors show that this cannot reflect BL model validity because poor prediction is inherent to the BL model structure. The apparent superiority of the nonlinear bilinear model suggests that future heart rate dynamics studies should put greater emphasis on nonlinear analyses.<<ETX>>

Intravenous oxytocin in patients undergoing elective cesarean section.

The objective of this study was to compare four different doses of oxytocin to determine its minimal effective dose during elective cesarean section.A prospective, double-blind, randomized study was undertaken in 40 healthy term parturients presenting for elective cesarean section under regional anesthesia. Subjects were assigned to one of four groups. Group I received 5 IU, Group II 10 IU, Group III 15 IU, and Group IV 20 IU of oxytocin after clamping of the umbilical cord. Uterine tone was assessed by palpation on a linear analog scale (LAS) of 0 to 10 (0 = completely atonic, 10 = fully contracted) at 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after the start of oxytocin infusion. Estimated blood loss (EBL) and the difference in pre- and postoperative hematocrit (Delta Hct) were also recorded. At alpha = 0.05, the study design had a power of 95% to detect a 25% difference in the LAS between the four groups. There were no differences in the uterine tone in the four groups at any of the four intervals. EBL and Delta Hct were similar in all four groups. There appears to be no benefit in terms of degree of uterine contraction and amount of blood loss to administering more than 5 IU of intravenous oxytocin to term parturients undergoing elective cesarean section with a neuraxial block. (Anesth Analg 1997;84:753-6)

Calculating the return on investment of mobile healthcare.

BackgroundMobile health clinics provide an alternative portal into the healthcare system for the medically disenfranchised, that is, people who are underinsured, uninsured or who are otherwise outside of mainstream healthcare due to issues of trust, language, immigration status or simply location. Mobile health clinics as providers of last resort are an essential component of the healthcare safety net providing prevention, screening, and appropriate triage into mainstream services. Despite the face value of providing services to underserved populations, a focused analysis of the relative value of the mobile health clinic model has not been elucidated. The question that the return on investment algorithm has been designed to answer is: can the value of the services provided by mobile health programs be quantified in terms of quality adjusted life years saved and estimated emergency department expenditures avoided?MethodsUsing a sample mobile health clinic and published research that quantifies health outcomes, we developed and tested an algorithm to calculate the return on investment of a typical broad-service mobile health clinic: the relative value of mobile health clinic services = annual projected emergency department costs avoided + value of potential life years saved from the services provided. Return on investment ratio = the relative value of the mobile health clinic services/annual cost to run the mobile health clinic.ResultsBased on service data provided by The Family Van for 2008 we calculated the annual cost savings from preventing emergency room visits,

Early bedside care during preclinical medical education: can technology-enhanced patient simulation advance the Flexnerian ideal?

3,125,668 plus the relative value of providing 7 of the top 25 priority prevention services during the same period, US

Low dose intrathecal ropivacaine with or without sufentanil provides effective analgesia and does not impair motor strength during labour: a pilot study.

17,780,000 for a total annual value of

Mobile Clinic In Massachusetts Associated With Cost Savings From Lowering Blood Pressure And Emergency Department Use

20,339,968. Given that the annual cost to run the program was