Nancy Smith

Associations of patient outcomes with level of asthma control.

BACKGROUND Despite effective medications, asthma remains a significant burden to the US health care system. OBJECTIVE To determine whether partly and uncontrolled asthma in respondents to the Asthma Insights and Management (AIM) survey was associated with adverse outcomes (such as visits to health care professionals and medication use) compared with well-controlled asthma. METHODS The AIM survey, conducted in 2009, included 2,500 patients with asthma who were 12 years or older. We classified patients into levels of control and compared use of health care services and limitations of activities in patients whose asthma was well controlled vs those with partly and uncontrolled asthma. RESULTS Patients who reported lower income and educational status and lacked health insurance were less likely to have had well-controlled asthma. Respondents with uncontrolled asthma were more likely to report ever use of oral steroids (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-3.2) and over-the-counter medicine (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.0-3.7) compared with patients whose asthma was well controlled. Respondents with partly and uncontrolled asthma were also significantly more likely to report ever visiting physicians, specialists, or the emergency department or being hospitalized for asthma compared with those whose asthma was well controlled (ORs ranging from 2.1 to 5.6). Finally, respondents whose asthma was uncontrolled had increased odds (ORs ranging from 14 to 34) of reporting that asthma limited their activities compared with respondents whose asthma was well controlled. CONCLUSION Patients with partly and uncontrolled asthma defined by international guidelines reported use of significantly more health care resources and greater limitations of their daily activities compared with patients whose asthma was well controlled.

Diagnosis and treatment of nasal and ocular allergies: the Allergies, Immunotherapy, and RhinoconjunctivitiS (AIRS) surveys

BACKGROUND Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) is managed by a number of health care professional specialties, whose practice styles may vary. OBJECTIVE To survey patients and health care professionals about the diagnosis and treatment of ARC. METHODS The Allergies, Immunotherapy, and RhinoconjunctivitiS (AIRS) surveys were telephone surveys of randomly selected patients and health care professionals in the United States in 2012. Participants were 2,765 people ever diagnosed as having nasal and/or ocular allergies and 500 practitioners in 7 specialties who were treating ARC. RESULTS Adult respondents to the patient survey reported that their allergies had been diagnosed most often by physicians in family practice (46%) rather than by allergists/immunologists (17%) or otolaryngologists (11%). Childrens allergies had been diagnosed most often by pediatricians (41%) and family practitioners (22%). Most respondents with conditions diagnosed by an allergist/immunologist (94.9%) or otolaryngologist (62.7%) had been given an allergy test, but the test was not given to most patients with conditions diagnosed by family practitioners (61.3%) or pediatricians (64.9%). Most patients (75.8%) were treating their allergies with over-the-counter medications, and 53.5% were taking prescription medications. Allergen immunotherapy was being used by 33% (adult) or 28% (child) patients of allergist/immunologists, 25% (adult) or 24% (child) patients of otolaryngologists, and 8% and 10% of patients of family practitioners and pediatricians, respectively. CONCLUSION Most patients took nonprescription medications for their allergy symptoms or were treated by general practitioners, who did not use allergy testing when diagnosing ARC. Most patients seen by allergist/immunologists and otolaryngologists were evaluated with allergy tests, and most allergen immunotherapy was provided by allergy specialists.

Asthma control, cost and race: results from a national survey

Abstract Objective: Although interventions have been shown to alleviate symptoms in most patients suffering from asthma, only one-third of asthma patients have disease that is well-controlled. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether partly and uncontrolled asthmas are associated with increased costs for asthma-related healthcare utilization compared to well-controlled asthma and to determine whether these associations differed across racial groups. Methods: We classified respondents from the Asthma Insights and Management survey into those with well-, partly and uncontrolled asthma and compared utilization of healthcare services and costs among these groups, as well as between whites and non-whites. Results: Respondents categorized as having asthma that was not well-controlled reported lower income levels, higher rates of unemployment and more trouble paying for healthcare; similar results were found in analyses stratified by race. Patients whose asthma was partly or uncontrolled had greater use of asthma-related medications and medical services compared to patients whose asthma was well-controlled. Total unadjusted and adjusted costs were greater in patients whose asthma was classified as partly and uncontrolled. Similar results were found in analyses stratified on race. Across all levels of asthma control, non-whites had higher rates of utilization of emergency rooms and urgent care facilities and had greater rates of hospitalizations compared to whites. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that patients with asthma that is not well-controlled utilized more healthcare resources and had greater medical costs, despite lacking of health insurance which may suggest less access to care.

Level of asthma control and healthcare utilization in Latin America

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether uncontrolled asthma was associated with healthcare outcomes among Latin American patients with asthma. We used data from 2168 patients with asthma who participated in the 2011 Latin America Asthma Insights and Management (AIM) survey. Using Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, patients were categorized as having asthma that was well‐controlled, partly controlled, or uncontrolled. Overall, 7% of the patients surveyed had asthma that was classified as well‐controlled. Patients whose asthma was not well‐controlled were significantly more likely to report use of asthma medications (ORs ranging from 1.6–41) and to have had emergency healthcare visits or hospitalizations for their asthma in the previous year (ORs ranging from 2.1 to 5.9). They also reported decreases in their productivity compared to patients with well‐controlled asthma. These associations suggest that emphasis on improving asthma control could have substantial effects on patient productivity and utilization of healthcare resources.

Effects of mean depth and grammaticality on children's imitations of sentences

This study investigated whether childrens tendency to delete function words and inflections of nouns and verbs (telegraphic speech) in an imitation task can be attributed solely to such factors as relative lack of stress and low-information value. The results indicated that the telegraphic nature of childrens (mean age, 4 years, 4 months) imitations is a result not of their inability to perceive and process articles and inflections, but rather of their tendency to delete these at the time of sentence production. In addition, an application of Yngves sentence mean-depth measure failed to account for relative difficulty of sentence imitations.

The Allergies, Immunotherapy, and RhinoconjunctivitiS (AIRS) survey: provider practices and beliefs about allergen immunotherapy

The practices and beliefs of the provider specialties that treat allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) with allergen immunotherapy (AIT) may vary.

Association Between Weight Change, Clinical Outcomes, and Health Care Costs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND Previous research suggests that weight loss is associated with decreases in health care costs among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and that weight change can affect clinical measures, including hemoglobin A1c (A1c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), and blood pressure. Previous research has also demonstrated more pronounced impact of weight change among patients with T2DM who are obese and have no evidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). OBJECTIVES To (a) examine the association between weight change and all-cause and diabetes-related health care costs among patients with T2DM; (b) examine the association between weight change and select clinical measures among patients with T2DM; and (c) analyze a subgroup of obese patients with no previous CVD. METHODS This retrospective, observational cohort study used U.S. insurance claims linked to laboratory and electronic medical records. This study included patients with T2DM aged 18 years or older who added or switched to a nonmetformin antidiabetes medication after metformin monotherapy between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2012 (date of add/switch was the index date). The primary predictor was percentage weight change (PWC) between a weight measurement at index and a follow-up measurement 6 months later; PWC ranged from negative (weight loss) to positive (weight gain). Outcomes, measured in the 12-month period beginning at the time of follow-up weight measurement, included all-cause and diabetes-related health care costs and achievement of thresholds for A1c, blood pressure, and LDL-C. Multivariable models quantified the association between PWC (linear effect) and study outcomes. RESULTS A total of 1,520 patients (mean age 55 years; 47% female) were included, with 780 patients (mean age 53 years; 51% female) in the subgroup sample. Mean (SD) index weight and PWC were 224.6 (52.8) lbs and +0.2% (4.7%) in the primary analysis, and 241.3 (47.3) lbs and -0.2% (4.6%) in the subgroup sample. In adjusted analyses, decreasing PWC was associated with decreasing diabetes-specific pharmacy costs (P < 0.001) in the primary analysis sample and with decreasing all-cause pharmacy costs (P = 0.018), diabetes-specific total costs (P = 0.039), diabetes-specific medical costs (P = 0.002), and diabetes-specific pharmacy costs (P < 0.001) in the subgroup sample. PWC was not associated with all-cause total health care costs or all-cause medical costs in either sample. In adjusted analyses, decreasing PWC was also associated with increasing odds of attaining the A1c goals of < 6.5% (P < 0.001) and < 7.0% (P < 0.001) in the primary analysis sample and increasing odds of attaining the A1c goals of < 6.5% (P < 0.001), < 7.0% (P < 0.001), and < 8.0% (P = 0.010) in the subgroup sample. PWC was not associated with any of the other clinical measures in either of the study samples. CONCLUSIONS This real-world study suggests that among patients with T2DM, weight loss over a short-term (6-month) period is associated with positive impact on attainment of A1c goals and decreased diabetes-specific pharmacy costs over the subsequent 12 months. In the subset of patients who were obese and had no previus CVD, weight loss over the 6-month period was also associated with decreased all-cause pharmacy costs, diabetes-specific medical costs, and diabetes-specific total health care costs. Future research is warranted to examine whether these associations change over longer-term periods of follow-up. DISCLOSURES This study was sponsored by AstraZeneca and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Truven Health Analytics received funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca to conduct this study. Mukherjee is an employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Bell and Sternhufvud are employees of AstraZeneca. Johnston, Stott-Miller, and McMorrow are employees of Truven Health Analytics. Nancy Smith is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb and is employed by GreenKey Resources. Study concept was created by Mukherjee, Sternhufvud, Bell, and Johnston. Stott-Miller and McMorrow took the lead in data collection, along with Johnston, with data interpretation performed by Mukherjee, Sternhufvud, Smith, Stott-Miller, and Johnston. The manuscript was written by Mukherjee, Johnston, and Stott-Miller, along with Sternhufvud and Smith, and revised by Mukherjee, Smith, and Johnston, along with Sternhufvud and Stott-Miller.

Diagnosis of nasal and eye allergies: the Allergies, Immunotherapy, and RhinoconjunctivitiS (AIRS) patient survey

Methods A national sample of 34,030 households using a dual frame approach of random digit dialing and cell phone sample were targeted. Patients aged =5 years with a health care professional diagnosis of hay fever, allergic rhinitis, rhino-conjunctivitis, nasal or eye allergies and symptoms or medication for condition in past 12 months were surveyed. Data on specific diagnosis and allergy testing were collected.